< Back to Front Page Text size +

Pondering the afterlife in Harry Potter

Posted by Michael Paulson November 2, 2008 07:43 PM

voldemort.jpg

The program for the annual meeting of the American Academy of Religion, taking place this weekend in Chicago, includes some pretty arcane stuff -- "Music in Confucian Moral Cultivation" and "Heterogeneous Tantras in Practice" -- so this afternoon I stopped by a session on Harry Potter titled "The Potterian Way of Death: J. K. Rowling's Conception of Mortality.''

In the mainstream media, Potter's world most commonly intersects with the religion beat in the form of a perennial debate in some corners of Christendom over whether the Potter series is anti-Christian, in that it glorifies magic and witchcraft, or pro-Christian, in that it celebrates good over evil. But the 50 or so professors who gathered this afternoon blew right past that question, and moved on to deeper matter -- what exactly is Rowling's take on the value of life after death?

First up was Paul Corey, a religious studies lecturer at McMaster University in Canada, who was fairly critical of what he views as Rowling's excessively simplistic and black-and-white take on good vs. evil. "Why isn't there an evil Hufflepuff?" he asked. Corey managed to compare Voldemort to suicide bombers, saying "they, like Voldemort, kill so they can transcend death,'' and to Michael Jackson, saying that in his pursuit of immortality, Voldemort "lost his nose, his skin turned white, and he looked like a reptile.'' But then Corey began to explore how Voldemort's quest to conquer death might differ from, or resemble, the desire of Christians for eternal life in heaven. "What is the difference between a Christian and a death eater?'' Corey asked. He said both want to banish the impure and to receive immortality. Corey noted that the epitaph on the gravestone of Harry's parents, "The last enemy that shall be destroyed is Death," is actually a quote from the apostle Paul (First Corinthians 15:26), and said that the quotation triggered a dispute between Harry and Hermione over what exactly destroying death means -- does it mean actually defeating death, or living beyond death? And is there life after death in Rowling's world? Corey suggests the jury is still out, saying, "the series never answers the question definitively.''

Oona Eisenstadt, an assistant professor of religious studies at Pomona College, took a different approach, exploring ways in which the Potter series functions as a Christian allegory. She suggested that, in the series, Rowling has effectively split each of the major New Testament roles in two, saying, "Rowling has made the split in order to facilitate a differentiated theological understanding.'' For example, Eisenstadt said, Dumbledore and Harry Potter represent Jesus, with Potter as Jesus's human incarnation, who dies and is reborn to defeat Voldemort, and with Dumbledore as Jesus in heaven, as a divine intercessor. She described Snape and Draco Malfoy as two aspects of Judas, and the horcruxes and the hallows as two facets of the afterlife. Most provocatively, Eisenstadt, who teaches Jewish studies, suggested that the goblins and the Ministry of Magic both stand in for the Jewish community as seen by anti-Semites. "Rowling takes the rapacious and unscrupulous characteristics of the Jews (as seen by anti-Semites) and assigns these to a non-human species,'' she said. She noted that the goblins are "small, hunched and wizened,'' love money and precious metals, work as goldsmiths, are hoarders, run the bank, and cheat when they can. "Clearly the goblins are the anti-Semites' Jews,'' she said. "The other side of the anti-Semitic conception of Jews is legalism,'' she said, "and legalism is the quality of the Ministry of Magic." Eisenstadt said the ministry "is unquestionably the Pharisees,'' and said that as the ministry's role evolves during the Potter series, "the reader can not help but understand it as a commentary on politics at large.''

(One observation by Eisenstadt that caught my attention was her critique of the Hogwarts administration for allowing a Sorting Hat to assign children to houses with others of the same personality type. "An enlightened school board would break up Slytherin,'' she said. "But there is no enlightened school board in the wizarding world.")

Finally, Lois Shepherd, an expert on bioethics at the University of Virginia Law School, explored the connection between the body and the mind in the Potter series.

A postscript: the hotel where the religion professors are meeting is across the street from Grant Park, where Barack Obama is scheduled to have his election night rally, and there are lots of folks walking by wearing Obama gear. But in the lobby of the Hilton this evening, I saw an academic wearing campaign button for a ticket only Potter fans can appreciate: Fudge/Umbridge.

(Photo above shows Ralph Fiennes as Voldemort in the 2007 film "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix.")

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
7 comments so far...
  1. Snape is Judas!? If Snape betrayed anyone, it was Voldermort. His memories enabled Harry to kill Voldermort and Snape only killed Dumbledore because Dumbledore demanded it. Snape's 'mercy killing' saved Dumbledore from a very long, painful death. Judas just straight up betrayed Jesus. I can't really see the similarities, unless this critique was written before the final book came out.

    Posted by Caitlin November 3, 08 03:28 PM
  1. Thanks for the spoiler Caitlin!

    Posted by V November 3, 08 04:36 PM
  1. Ok, WTF people, we are talking about works of FICTION. Harry Potter, the magic, the spells, the world, DO NOT EXIST!!!!! Why on earth are people trying to compare characters, plots lines, etc to religion?

    Oh, wait a minute, the bible is a work of fiction, so I guess they are comparing two works of fiction...then everything is all-right.

    Posted by Go_Sox_Go_Obama November 3, 08 04:43 PM
  1. Snape is the character who is saddled with the responsibility to carry out a heinous, horrible act in order to help bring about the greater good that results because of it. Without Dumbledore's death, the rest cannot happen. Sounds like a Judas scenario, to me - with the added element that Snape, like Judas, was one of the master's inner circle, entrusted with hidden knowledge and expected to pass on the teachings of the master.

    Posted by cliona November 3, 08 06:35 PM
  1. Interestingly, while Rowling does deal in some very explicit terms with the Afterlife, what with ghosts, the recalling of Harry's loved ones from Death to help him find the strength to sacrifice himself for those he loves, a wonderful conversation with his dead mentor in a way-station between life and afterlife, none of this fairly interesting stuff seems to have been mentioned in the symposium you mention.

    A shame, I think.

    Posted by Jonathan Andrew Sheen November 3, 08 07:58 PM
  1. It wasnt written before the 7th book came out. Ignorance.

    Posted by Carmen November 3, 08 08:27 PM
  1. I like this series, and this is an interesting topic. I'm surprised nobody in the article addressed the literal treatment of the afterlife in The Deathly Hallows. Rowling portrays a train-station-like near-death experience that Harry and Voldemort oddly share, cleverly leaving ambiguous whether it's "real." Harry is given the choice of whether to return to the world or to go, as Dumbledore describes it, "on." I'd be interested to know what people think of that.

    I don't think Rowling's treatment of morality is particularly simplistic. Snape's a great example of how Rowling sees good and evil as anything but a black-and-white divide. She recognizes through Snape that sometimes people are actually evil -- there is such a thing and she gives us many different takes and variations on the various evil characteristics of people -- but sometimes they appear to be nasty but are merely complicated and good at heart.

    Posted by Jeremy Sher November 3, 08 08:51 PM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

Blogger

Michael Paulson covers religion for The Boston Globe. He shared in the Pulitzer Prize in 2003, won the Mike Berger, Templeton and Supple awards in 2008, and is a four-time winner of the Wilbur Award.
E-mail mpaulson@globe.com.

views

Harriet_Severino.JPG

Photo, by Yoon S. Byun of the Globe staff, shows Harriet Severino, 45, practicing Zen meditation on May 19, 2009 at a weekly gathering called Ralph Waldo Emerson Zen Sangha at the First Church in Boston (Unitarian Universalist).


archives