< Back to front page
Text size
–
+
Massachusetts among least religious states
Massachusetts is tied with Maine for the position of the third-least religious state in the nation, according to a new analysis by Gallup.
The analysis, based on 350,000 interviews, concludes that Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine, and Massachusetts are the only states in the nation where fewer than half of the residents say that religion is an important part of their daily lives. Here's the data:
![]() ![]() |
And here's Gallup's map of the nation by importance of religion to its residents:






Good.
Massachusetts has one of the highest average IQs of these United States
Massachusetts has one of the highest rates of education (with advanced degrees)
Massachusetts is one of the leading states in inventions and patents
Massachusetts is tied for the third least religious states. Go figure
What a shock..!
Good to know. I'll stay away from the dark green states full of ignorant inbreds who wish for jesus ponies to return with their rapture.
And I thought it was just me...
Hmmmm. High IQ, high rate of education, not very religious. Makes perfect sense to me.
Hmm. The "least religious" list includes all six New England state and the two Pacific Northwest states .... but also Alaska and Nevada. Not much cultural similarity there!
When you go back and look at the election map: 'dark green' = red states.
I am surprised at the Alaska result. I thought that all Alaskians were like Ms. Palin.
To the ones who are shocked:
Well, you can be a liberal and decent at the same time. :-) Actually, both go hand in hand.
Look at Utah that has a high rate of wife battering and death as a result of it. Women there live like women with 'rights' from the Ancient Ages - and this in the country that holds freedom so high. - Maybe someone would like to write about this.
Yeah.. GOOD. This is one of the best reasons to live here. The graph is great. It could also be a graph of productivity, crime, IQ, test scores, etc etc etc. It would look exactly the same. The worse the place the more religion..
And I thought being "religious" meant that there were standards of conduct... morality.. and all that.
How do those religious states account for their high divorce rates? Massachusetts has one of the lowest in the nation. Several of the dark green states can't seem to get their marriage act together.
How do these religious states explain their lack of charity? (Massachusetts gets less that $1 back from the feds for each dollar sent. The bulk of states in dark green suck from the federal troth - getting more than their dollar ).
So far, I see no clear advantage to being "religious".
Not all religious people are ignorant inbreds, nor are all atheists / agnostics intelligent. I say this as an atheist.
Well, look at all the bigots who think religious people are stupid. You guys are out in force today. I like living in New England, but being surrounded by self-obsessed, intolerant, prejudiced, stereotyping left-wing ignorami is far from my favorite part.
we are also the 2nd smartest, interesting
http://www.statestats.com/edrank06.htm
One of the reasons I am glad I was born here, and continue to live here. I honestly could never live in the so called bible belt and listen to them.
Mark R.'s post is right on the mark. Perhaps the Gallup Poll wasn't specific in regards to the differences between religious and spiritual. the difference in my mind is religion makes much ado about external rituals, the spiritual focuses on the inner. Or that the external practitioner is always talking to God, while the spiritual practitioner is actually listening.
Just found out that the four states with the highest murder rates are same four states that are most religious: Miss., AL., TN. and LA.. Go figure...
This is why the rest of the country calls us M*ssholes. Gofigure and everyone who commented likewise are part of the elitist, snobbish, i know better than thee pompous attitude that smells to high, well, i was going to say high heavens. Galileo, Newton, and Copernicus were religious-do all you commenters think you know more than they?''
MA doesn't lead the league in being smart, it leads in being the
pseudo-intelligentian, the self congratulators, the wow, ain't i special kids, the ones who think of and call themselves the best and the brightest, and mean it--no humility.
The fact of the matter is that there is no reason that religious faith and educated intelligence can't co-exist. I think the main reason MA is like it is now is that Puritanism, and then pre-Vatican II Catholicism, were so smothering, that a good part of the state wanted none of it. Besides, more than half in MA still said religion is an important part of their daily life.
wow anne smith. you wonder why the rest of the country believes there is Eastern elitism?? where's the liberal tolerance in that intolerant statement??
As an Alaskan, I can say we aren't surprised by the Alaska result. We'd previously been pegged as the "least churchgoing" GOP state. Alaskans are independent-minded, not necessarily prone to joining things like churches and also very often very far from relatives and close family who can keep one going to church. And nobody wants to give up a good summer weekend for church when outdoor activities beckon. Sarah Palin's Wasilla happens to be a hotbed of churchgoing in Alaska. In Anchorage, Fairbanks and Juneau, it isn't such a big deal.
When you see the word "intolerance" what usually preceeds it?
Nice to be a New Englander. But what about the other 48%?
I'm originally from California but have lived in Mass for a decade now. Calif is also not very religious, but never there did I feel the disdain and disgust toward Christianity that I do here. I'd like to think that highly educated, intelligent people wouldn't stereotype or assume that everyone of a certain religion is a fundamentalist wacko, but they seem to here.
Also, it doesn't help that it's extremely difficult to find churches here that are interesting, inspirational, educational, or up with the times.
It's hard to believe in God with this much snow!
I think the survey in part is due to old-fashioned Yankee traints of not being overly religious and feeling the need to wear it on our sleeves. I suspect there are many religous people in new england, but they tend to be very private about it compared to our neighbors down south.
Gaudete, yes there is a reason that religious faith and educated intelligence don't coexist and correlate negatively. It's because religious faith is you taking what you are told at face value and believing it, and educated intelligence is you questioning everything you are told by anyone and everyone.
Not surprising that friendly Southerners have the deepest faith. It is also not surprising that the so-called "tolerant" New Englanders can call people from other parts of the country "ignorant". Ever been to Southie, folks?
Thanks for confirming my stereotype of Massachusetts people as intolerent, ignorant, anti-religious elitists. I just moved here from "flyover" country as you people call it and it's unfortunate but strangely comforting to have my anecdotal impressions confirmed.
I am not necessarily embarrassed about living in a "least religious" state. Whether you worship is your business, not mine.
I am, however, embarrassed by the intolerance displayed by some of the people commenting here. Tolerance works both ways, folks.
I spent a good deal of time in those bible belt states for work and while I was there many of my friends from up here told me continue to tell me, various forms of the "Oh I could never live amongst those people." kind of statements. Most were not quite so pleasant as that. Interestingly while I was there, I did not hear word one about any kind of southern animosity toward "those yankees", as it were. Now.. I'm not so naive as to think it doesn't exist, but at the very least they didn't express it in such a hostile manner as some of the postings on this board. No, in fact my experience was nothing but pleasant. I've learned one thing. How you are treated depends greatly on how you treat others. Do unto others.. golden rule etc... hmmm.... sounds vaguely religous.
In response to #17...
"Liberal" and "hypocrite" are one in the same.
As for the inverse relationship between intelligence and religiousness being commented on, the majority of the Ivy League universities maintained religious affiliations early in their histories - Harvard was founded by Puritans and first used the motto "Veritas Christo et Ecclesiae " meaning "Truth for Christ and the Church."
Before liberals start making judgments, it might be prudent to learn some history first...
Hey Gaudette, you are calling out the intelligence of others and then say "Besides, more than half in MA still said religion is an important part of their daily life.", when the poll above clearly shows it is only 48%, which obviously is less than 50%
Also, Newton was religious, to an extent, he was also certifiably insane, though a genius all the same. And using scientists who have been dead since long before Darwin was alive is a little misleading. Of course they were religious as there was no proof of anything else.
Next I am sure you are going to throw out some right wing absurdity and try to claim that Hitler was an atheist as well.
You still don't address the fact that MA is among the best educated, healthiest and weathiest states in the country, along with having the lowest divorce rate and one of the lowest teen pregnancy rates and Boston's murder/violent crime rate is extremely low for a large city. None of which any of the most religious states can say.
That is interesting, but why? What happened to the Pilgrims? Blue Laws? And all the beautiful churches?
Gaudette, I am surprised that the moderator of this discussion allowed your spewing of hate and name calling to be posted.
We would prefer that you focus on the facts and attempt to explain the data if you disagree with the observations of those who responded. Can you explain the map that interestingly appears to match the level of education, intelligence results, etc? When the data is there for all to see, it is not pseudo, or elite thinking, it is fact.
Why not try to refute the observations that people are making?
I would rather that you would have observed that maybe the people of these states are more reserved about professing their religion or something like that, rather than spewing right wing hate and name calling.
I noticed that you didn't even come up with your own insults. You repeated the same old tired talk show garbage. At least you could try to be creative. If you carry on like this all of the time, I am sure those around you would wish you would simply shut up and keep your ignorance to yourself. We love our state and wouldn't want to live anywhere else.
It's scary that only a small part of the country is thinking straight.
If you want to read and outstanding analysis of the high correlation between religiousness and intolerance, ignorance, even racism in modern America, look for “Letter to a Christian nation” by Sam Harris. The most socially advanced countries like Sweden, Finland, and Japan are the less religious.
It’s a shame the largest industrialized country is still highly influenced by religion. Northeast is a haven for tolerant, conscious, self-aware people.
That's why I love New England. There is nothing wrong with being religious, but there should be a separation of church and state and in New England you tend to have that. That is why New England tends to be socially liberal because religion doesn't play a big role in state laws. Some people on this blog say New Englanders are intolerant. If you want to witness intolerance go live in the southern region of the country which, not surprisingly, is the most religious area of the US. I have lived there and religion plays such a big role influencing state laws, that intolerance tends to win out. If you're not part of the white, religious, straight society, you lose.
The least educated are most dependent on the balm of religion to give them hope, for there is no greater poverty than ignorance. It is not that educated individuals do not appreciate the solace religion affords them, it is just that they understand god most helps those that are most able to help themselves. As for Alaskans, they live in one of the most glorious areas of gods' creation why cut oneself off from gods' glory listening to the ranting or droning of a mere mortal on a pulpit reading what persons can read for themselves if they use the brain god provided them.
"A religion is a set of stories, symbols, beliefs and practices, often with a supernatural quality, that give meaning to the practitioner's experiences of life through reference to an ultimate power or reality." -Wikipedia
Who cares if your neighbor is religious? Religious expressions, such as going to church, can foster a sense of community, solidarity, and spirituality, which one may or may not be able to find elsewhere.
So long as one group is not trying to force their religion or lack thereof upon anybody else, who really cares about this cultural anomoly?
Atheist Alaskan: I am glad you mentioned that. I have met many people from Alaska and liked most of them.....enter Sarah Palin. Just not sure how she got elected there ?
Hahhahaaaaa... religious wackos are so defensive.
The truth hurts, plain and simple. Religion can definitely co-exist peacefully with intellectualism and liberalism and all the rest.
It's just that most of the time... it doesn't.
And if you can't see that or admit it to yourself chances are really, really high that you are one of the many religious nutballs that cannot reconcile those two things.
I think MA is full of people who live life by their religious beliefs. Most. They just think of being religious as going to church or church events. So they say they are not religious - but religious beliefs are a very important part of the way they make decisions every day. To their advantage most of the time.
I think the question means a different thing to people in the North than it means to people in the South.
Massachusetts is one of the more diverse areas of the country. This part of the country is also where large numbers of Europeans have, and still immigrate to. The US & Europe is becoming more atheist/agnostic as generations pass on. Very similar to the US, the southern parts tend to be more religious (Italy/Spain/Portugal); while the further North you go (Scandinavian countries, The Netherlands) the less predominant religion becomes. These figures don't represent anything good or bad, it's showing our evolution as more and more people are becoming free thinkers. Additionally, religion is neither good nor bad - it's like anything else that is taken in excess; it becomes dangerous.
I don't see why people here are bashing religion. It may not be for you, but is it really fair to judge somebody because they are religious?
It sounds like those that are ignorant of religion seem to be afraid of it.
It's also funny how people think that Massachusetts is "educated". Sure, people here might be educated, but from my experience, they certainly aren't that intelligent. Just look at how the people here whine about Deval Patrick raising taxes.
Thank you to all the self asorbed, conceited, agnostics/athiests who have enlightened me here. I'm not especially religious myself, but I have friends and family who are. If I didn't read these comments I would never know that they are all ignorant, intolerant, racist murderers.
Man-made global warming is a religion. So adding those numbers into the mix, Massachusetts has 48% worshiping God and the other 52% worshiping Al Gore.
Yeah, let's talk about history. When people from other parts of the country call us elitist, anti-religious snobs, they should be reminded: we did the fundamentalist thing already and it sucked. Yup, the Bay State already did the intolerant theocracy crap back in the days when most of the country was forest or swamp, and let's see what we got out of letting the Puritans run things: massacred Indians, phony witch trials and executions, and the British finally sending over the troops to straighten us out (at our expense) for a hundred years.
No thanks, Bible Belt.
Anyone who has ever been in the South understands that those crackers don't have very much to cling to, except God and guns. You'd be praying and attending those whacked-out mega churches throughout the Bible Belt too if you were married to your brother, sister, first cousin and had to endure all the y'alls and tobacco chewing and toothless neighbors that seem to come with territory south of the Mason Dixon line. The movie "Deliverance" was non-fiction!
cdunlea and NewEnglander... let me guess... public education?
To all of you arrogent Massholes...Enstein was deeply spiritual and felt that there was a direct connection between a divine creator and the creation of the universe. And the last time I checked, he was smarter than any of you pseudo intellectuals in Massachusetts who feel like because you live down the road from MIT that somehow makes you smart. The country was founded on Christian principles by our founding fathers who were also spiritual. Most of this country's problems have resulted from the fact that we have lost our spiritual and moral mooring, not just the lay people but many in the clergy as well.
Like it or not, we are all part of each other and of God. Many of you who refuse to acknowedge such display ignorance of the nature of your own being.
I am thrilled to live someplace where religion does not dominate people's thoughts. Sadly, though, Massachusetts still practices a severe strain of puritanism mixed with punitive Catholicism in its medieval divorce laws that force lifetime alimony on almost every man in the state who makes over $50 or $60K. Divorced men who pay alimony have no legal right to retire and have their payments lowered. These laws put men in jail (regularly) who do not have money to pay exorbitant sums of alimony; that force 80 year old men with cancer and heart problems to continue paying alimony to women who have been working for the 30 years since the marriage ended (the husband having sent her to graduate school); that treat the children of second marriages as lessor than the children of first marriages; that treat second wives as lessor beings than first wives; that reward lawyers for making divorce more acrimonious and far more costly than it needs to be.
The state's divorce laws are a national disgrace and should encourage people to leave, to tell their sons NEVER to settle here and marry. To read about the laws of this otherwise extremely enlightened place, please go here www.massalimonyreform.org and then write or call your legislator and ask him or her to support true alimony reform.
We are irreligious heathens 'round these parts. But our marriages work - with an extremely low divorce rate - our people are healthy - we have a great education system, one of the best in the world - a comparatively low unemployment rate - an extremely low unintended pregnancy and abortion rate - and a comparatively healthy economy.
Contrary to what conservatives seem to believe, it seems that the lesson of this study is that morality inversely correlates with overt religiosity. It could perhaps be inferred that those who constantly talk about morality have far less actual morality than those who shut up about it and let other people alone to pursue their happiness.
The largest part of the problem for all New England's lost soles who feel spiritual knowledge is associated with ignorance, is that you get disenchanted with organized religions "superstructure", and its associated transgressions either past or present, and proceed to throw out the baby with the bath... negating knowledge of the physical, mental and spiritual nature of your being. The difference between Religion and spirituality is the formal presents a structure for you to believe in, the latter presents a path for you to experience your connection with the divine yourself
Your ignorance of your relationship with the divine is your loss. Its the only thing that is eternal. And the people in the South will have that over the arrogent northeast all day long.
At least New Englanders are not hypocrites like the "religious faithful" of the Bible Belt.
Someone mentioned Einstein. Didn't Einstein once say that "God doesn't roll dice."
I also think that many of our highbrow universities and colleges in the area have operating churches, chapels and spiritual spaces. Did 4 billion years of randomness and chance get us to where we are today? I'm not so sure, and I'm one of those scientist types most of you are criticizing here.
Many of the people commenting here are being close-minded. Just to let some of you know, the map only tells you part of the story and was not created to correlate religion and quality of life. Some of you need to realize that this country was founded on religious freedom and, admittedly, so do many religious Americans. Many of you are trying to look at the downside of religion as opposed to looking at it more objectively. I'm not particularly religious myself, but it definitely makes me sick when people refuse to see things through another's perspective. If you ask me, religious people and atheists use religion as a scapegoat for the problems of humanity. I believe all the problems of the world would still exist in some form or another with or without religion.
A-yup, that's a mighty impressive display of intelligent discourse, insight and open-minded discourse there, NewEnglander. And all this time when people said Massachusetts is known for its chowder I thought they were referring to the soup.
While I am not particularly religious, the abuse of religion in general by the overwhelming number of previous posts is embarrassing for our state. For a state that prides itself on being progressive, it just shows that people are people and that anywhere you go, foolish intolerance reigns supreme no matter which side of the fence you choose sit.
Jim K:
"It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it." (Albert Einstein, 1954, The Human Side, edited by Helen Dukas and Banesh Hoffman, Princeton University Press)
"I cannot conceive of a God who rewards and punishes his creatures, or has a will of the kind that we experience in ourselves. Neither can I nor would I want to conceive of an individual that survives his physical death; let feeble souls, from fear or absurd egoism, cherish such thoughts. I am satisfied with the mystery of the eternity of life and with the awareness and a glimpse of the marvelous structure of the existing world, together with the devoted striving to comprehend a portion, be it ever so tiny, of the Reason that manifests itself in nature. "(Albert Einstein, The World as I See It)
"The idea of a personal God is an anthropological concept which I am unable to take seriously." (Albert Einstein, Letter to Hoffman and Dukas, 1946)
"I do not believe in immortality of the individual, and I consider ethics to be an exclusively human concern with no superhuman authority behind it." (Albert Einstein, The Human Side)
At best, Einstein, like most of our founding fathers was a deist. He in no way beleived in a personal god who required worship or eternal salvataion or any of that crap. He was spiritual in that he was awed by the wonders of the Universe but never accepted a divine creator
To be fair, though, he wasn't a big fan of Atheist either:
"I have repeatedly said that in my opinion the idea of a personal God is a childlike one, but I do not share the crusading spirit of the professional atheist whose fervor is mostly due to a painful act of liberation from the fetters of religious indoctrination received in youth. I prefer an attitude of humility corresponding to the weakness of our intellectual understanding of nature and of our own being." (Albert Einstein)
Thank god, but especially jesus..
It would seem the folks from Mass. have spoken and made their views quite clear in this comments section. And if I had to chose between 'bible thumpers' and the so called tolerant 'Liberals', I would chose the religious types every time.
13. WROTE:
we are also the 2nd smartest, interesting
http://www.statestats.com/edrank06.htm
-----------------------
Yeah, clearly. that why the oh so smart people of the Commondearth of Hackachusetts keep voting these same criminals into orifice year after year after year....
This Board sort of reminds me of the story of the fall of Satan, who arrogantly challenged God's intellect and substance, and sucked Eve into being seduced by the "tree of knowledge". Some things never change. Not much humility on this thread.
I'm leading the way, baby!
rlynden, can you please tell me a state that isn't chock full of corrupt politicians? MA is certainly not alone, or even exceptional in that aspect
I think we need to remember that many of the people who moved up to Alaska did so to escape the establishment, to live as they please. It would stand to reason they aren't much for organized religions either.
If you want to embrace 'god's how do you know which set to embrace? Every culture in history had a set of gods. We have one dominant set of gods today (the judeo-christian God), but what makes that the right god? I don't embrace religion. I'll say that up front, but even if you do, how do you know that your's is right? Can you really say that everyone else is wrong? If you say you embrace spirituality, I won't argue with that, but once you embrace one facet of religion, when there are so many others... I can't see how you can accept all the people throughout time who have been good people trying to do what they think is right., will burn in hell.
And if they won't burn in hell, how can those of us who don't embrace a set of gods, but still live by a strong ethical code do worse? I guess my point is that if you are religious, that is fine, but do you have the room in your hearts for all of us who aren't? If we live well and care for each other, is there a need to evangelize? I don't see much day to day religious cramming down one another's throats until a discussion like this comes up. I'd prefer this sort of thing stop.
OK, so Massachusetts is a great state and all, but what about Nevada? Reno and Vegas are not exactly what I'd call low crime areas.
Pride comes before the fall.
It's really amazing that for such a "forward looking" state, we are overwhelmingly intolerant of religion and hence those who believe in any organized religion. While I'm not religious, I envy those that are as numerous studies have shown that people who attend church or synagogue, etc. at least once a month are happier and feel more connected to a broader community than those who don't care about religion. Whether there ultimately is a God or you disappear into the dust when you die, you will probably live 80 +/- years, so why not find some peace and happiness along the way. For all of our sophistication, it's evident in day to day life around here that most of us could use a little more happiness. Simple as that!
Its a shame that people take this conversation and turn it into such an elitist argument. The fact is that religion and education are not mutually exclusive, as is evidenced by the Jesuit tradition at Boston College and Holy Cross. Tolerance and religion are not different concepts; the most religious people in my life, my grandmother and my great aunt, were also among the most tolerant. There is a difference between fundamentalism and religious, and those that take away the true meaning from organized religion can be made a lot better off by it. Please don't espouse the learned nature of Massachusetts because we as a state choose not to attend church, it is just as judgmental as the fundamentalism that exists elsewhere in the country, only it seemingly creates millions of gods instead of one.
Whatever gets you through the day, I say. Have faith in God, a goddess, the Universe, a star...whatever. Doesn't matter to me. As long as everybody understands that religious freedom means ALL religion...or none at all.
I do believe there is a correlation between higher IQ/more education and religious beliefs, but I'm not convinced it's all about how intelligent a person is. Nothing is ever that simple.
And about that "masshole" thing...it's old. It's tired. We've heard it a million times. Please spare us your lack of creativity.
Reading the comments here....
Tribalism at its best.
Well, I was born, raised and educated in MA, but I really enjoy living in east TN now...how much do you want to bet that Anne Smith is a Rosie O'Donnell look alike?
The survey does speak volumes and it is interesting to analyze. I wonder if it can be surmised that the key to accepting Gay marriage requires a state to be Godless.
Or are these results misleading?
With grace & respect for all self-proclaimed intellectuals, the lifelong pursuit of truth and knowledge ultimately leads to the discovery of God's infinity, so try not to settle for what you know today as absolute; keep on seeking truth and looking for answers until your last breath!
Davdev:
In developing the theory of relativity, Einstein realized that the equations led to the conclusion that the universe had a beginning. He didn't like the idea of a beginning, because he thought one would have to conclude that the universe was created by God. So, he added a cosmological constant to the equation to attempt to get rid of the beginning. He said this was one of the worst mistakes of his life. Of course, the results of Edwin Hubble confirmed that the universe was expanding and had a beginning at some point in the past. So, Einstein became a deist - a believer in an impersonal creator God:
"I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with fates and actions of human beings."
However, it would also seem that Einstein was not an atheist, since he also complained about being put into that camp:
"In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me for the support of such views."
He believed in God.
Case Closed
Some people seem to forget that there can be a hug gap between "tolerance" and "taking seriously". I can tolerate LaRouchians, UFO cultists, Bigfoot believers, and the religious. Doesn't mean I have to take them seriously.
Of course every one of us is entitled to our opinion here. Maybe the real question is what God thinks of this.
"There is nothing wrong with being religious, but there should be a separation of church and state and in New England you tend to have that"
You do realize this is a Christian principle?
Some of my favorite bible verses...
Ephesians 6:5
1 Corinthians 14:34-35
1 Timothy 2:9
Deuteronomy 23:1
What a useless relic of a bygone era. I wonder if any of the bible thumping people have actually read their bible?
About two-thirds of scientists believe in God, according to a new survey that uncovered stark differences based on the type of research they do.
The study, along with another one released in June, would appear to debunk the oft-held notion that science is incompatible with religion.
Those in the social sciences are more likely to believe in God and attend religious services than researchers in the natural sciences, the study found.
The opposite had been expected.
Nearly 38 percent of natural scientists -- people in disciplines like physics, chemistry and biology -- said they do not believe in God. Only 31 percent of the social scientists do not believe.
In the new study, Rice University sociologist Elaine Howard Ecklund surveyed 1,646 faculty members at elite research universities, asking 36 questions about belief and spiritual practices.
"Based on previous research, we thought that social scientists would be less likely to practice religion than natural scientists are, but our data showed just the opposite," Ecklund said.
Some stand-out stats: 41 percent of the biologists don't believe, while that figure is just 27 percent among political scientists.
In separate work at the University of Chicago, released in June, 76 percent of doctors said they believed in God and 59 percent believe in some sort of afterlife.
"Now we must examine the nature of these differences," Ecklund said today. "Many scientists see themselves as having a spirituality not attached to a particular religious tradition. Some scientists who don't believe in God see themselves as very spiritual people. They have a way outside of themselves that they use to understand the meaning of life."
HI Jim, I believe I said that Einstein was a deist, and didn't like to be grouped with Athiests, but your case is certainly not closed.
Spinoza's God is certainly not a god that most traditional religions would recognize. Spinoza's God is not in fact a being at all. It is his ideas that Nature is in itself the ultimate power. There is a begining and Nature is it's own creator. In a sense you could say Spinoza's God is Mother Nature, though obviously he wouldn't put it that way.
What dumb *ss study would think the Social Scientists would be less religious than Natural Scientists. So they went into the study thinking they would find more Athiest Economists than Biologists? That is absurd in and of itself. I would also love a link to the study as I highly doubt only 41% of biologists don't believe.
Oh, and and as much as they like to think so, Political Scientists and Economists are not scientists, as much as they like to think they are. There opinions on God and actual Science are no more valid than the average person on the street
This might explain why Massachusetts is in the bottom fifth when it comes to charitable giving despite having the third highest per-capita income.
I just noticed that with the exception of Nevada, which is a state built on artificiality and godlessness, everywhere with low religion results is far north and cold, where as everywhere with heavy religious concentration is warm year-round. Perhaps its just easier to believe in a God when it's nice and toasty where you live.
What the analysis (or, more accurately, the summary above), and many of the comments that have followed, do not do is distinguish amongst different religions and their accompanying practices. The distinctions are critical to the issue.
The "most religious" states embrace certain religions or sects that are often labeled evangelical or fundamentalist. The current practice of these religions discourages liberal education and pits religion as the adversary of science, liberal thought and the like.
Other religions do not force such a stark choice upon their adherents, and in many cases believe religion and secular education can be joined for a greater understanding of the wonders of both. Judaism, Catholicism and the more subdued strains of Protestantism meet this standard...and those happen to be the religions that are more prevelant in the "liberal" and "smarter" states.
The salient issue is less the presence of religion versus a complete lack of it; rather, it's the intensity and ubiquity of religion in all aspects of daily operating life that seems to correlate negatively with educational achievement, tolerance for differing views, lifestyles and the "other." Look to the world of Islam -- the countries that are of most concern to the US generally seem to be Islamofacist theocracies; practicioners of moderate Islam are more stable and less a threat.
One thing to remember. No one gets out of earth alive. We will all die. I am not terribly religious myself but I am smart enough to know I was created by the one who came here and died for me, Jesus Christ. He wasn't very religious either.
He happens to God. He came unto His own and was rejected. But to as many as received Him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God. Even to those who believe on His name. Sorry to hear about Massachusetts.
The article says relilgion so why single out christianity in the comment section. Read your history books the founding of this nation start when the pilgrims came to the new england because of religious persectution in there native country. Since then many other religious groups have come here for the same reason.
Perhaps in Massachusetts and other "less religious" states we simply allow ourselves to doubt and question, and take it for granted that others will do the same. I attend a Saturday-morning study session at a large suburban synagogue and most of the participants are highly educated (many in science), religiously knowledgeable, socially liberal, and attend one or more worship services every week. During one session recently, the topic of religious doubt was raised, and at least one-third of the group acknowledged they did not have a traditional belief in God. Clearly, religion is "important" in their lives, but, as they say, "God is in the details."
i feel sorry for people who don't believe in God.
What empty and meaningless lives they must lead.
Perhaps this is why none of our politicians feels guilt for their crimes and failures?
This article is silly. What's the point ?
Thank God!!! Hallelujah! Praise the Lord! but Jesus H. Christ Massachusetts, you gone an embarrassed us again. First it was Dukakis, then the Pedarists, the Bulgers, John Kerry and now this! Yikes, next thing you know we'll be damned for having the least number of tacky lights on our houses during those religious holidays that come in December each year..
How about the fact that Massachusetts (and most of New England states) is leading the country in negative population growth and that corporations continue to leave en mass?
People arent leaving just b/c the weather stinks. The intolerance displayed in this blog by all the so called "smartest" has everything to do w/ how screwed up Massachusetts is and will continue to be - keep telling yourselves that your the "Hub" ......
The largest part of the problem for all New England's lost soles who feel spiritual knowledge is associated with ignorance, is that you get disenchanted with organized religions "superstructure", and its associated transgressions either past or present, and proceed to throw out the baby with the bath... negating knowledge of the physical, mental and spiritual nature of your being. Most of this country's problems have resulted from the fact that we have lost our spiritual and moral mooring, not just the lay people but some in the clergy as well.
The difference between Religion and spirituality is the formal presents a structure for you to believe in, the latter presents a path for you to experience your connection with the divine yourself
Their ignorance of your relationship with the divine is their loss. Its the only thing that is eternal. And the people in the South will have that over the arrogent northeast all day long.
Like it or not, we are all part of each other and of God. Many of you who refuse to acknowedge such display ignorance of the nature of your own being.
I have enjoyed reading all the comments, even those I disagree with because most have given me a good laugh.
However, there are sadly those bigots like Anne Smith (post # 4) who harbor obvious ill will towards those who have a belief in Jesus and tend to think that if you live in the South and have religion part of your daily life that you are an inbred.
Just because you may consider yourself more intelligent, more attractive (except maybe in Ms. Smith's case), and have a fatter bank account than your southern neighbors makes no excuse to show the elitist and humanist attitude towards those who do not.
As a matter of fact, I applaud the poster who reminded us that the highest per capita contributors to charitable causes in the United States are from the South and if I'm not mistaken, we here in Massachusetts are near, if not at, the bottom of the list.
Like someone once said, we are on this earth for a very short time, let's hope that when it comes time to meet our Maker that we have earned the right to enjoy the eternal life following our mortal one.
The chosen One # 79. Boy are you lost (or should I say "girl".) Bible thumpers as you quote them are very well read thank you, enough to know and differentiate passgaes meant to reflect the social norms of he times (all the passages you quoted" from spiritual trithrs meant to transend time. May I recommend that search for your direct connection with a loving God by focusing on the four gospels instead of cherry picking passages that were meant for their time to negate the entire bible.
Just because you are lost in the fog of your own misinterpretation, pls dont drag other innocents down with you.
Davdev #81. I summit, your interpretation of Einsteins beliefs were more accurate than mine.
Thank you for the clarification.
Jim
Thank God
Amen. And let all the zealots judge and label us. Sadly for them, good is good does not talks, judges and goes to Church each Sunday.
Enough of the religious right and their anti-Science anti-intellectual nonsense that got us into this mess.
Live and let live.
I am a dyed-in-the-wool New Englander living in Georgia. For one thing, being the second "smartest" state means nothing. . .look at the concentration of population in Georgia and other large, mostly rural states vs. MA. I think these state comparisons should be made between metro areas. . .I'd love to compare you Northeast snobs with the brains at Georgia Tech, Emory and the CDC.
With regard to religion, I would have like to see the numbers before the Catholic Church scandal. Not that Catholicism is the only religion, but there are plenty of Irish and Italians there who I'll bet left the flock after that.
I miss New England every day, but I do not miss the northeast snobs and generalizations they make about other groups.
Correlation or causation?
http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/Graphic-shows-overall-grade-keeping-good-teachers-and-getting-rid/photo//090129/480/ed5fdded25a7457ea94531e2b065628b//s:/ap/20090129/ap_on_re_us/teacher_quality
Compare the maps.
This is sad. Hopefully more people will find the way before it's too late.
Pretty funny.....substitute the words "gay" or "black" for "Christian" or "religious" on this board and see how very hateful and intolerant some of these "elitist" and "enlightened" posters really are. The only group in which discrimination and hatred is out and out endorsed and apparently accepted by some of the geniuses on this board is against those who are religious. How very sad they feel compelled to knock 48 percent of their fellow citizens for their beliefs.
And, the reason why contributions to charities in Mass pales in comparison to most of the rest of the country is because many liberals in this state demand that the government pony up to support their "social service program" du jour. I mean, why support something out of your own pocket when you can demand that others cover for you.
#79 I hate it when people do that. That's like if I picked up a random book, read a few lines out of it and if I think it sounds dumb, then I put it back down and decide not to read it. What if I'm missing out on a great book? Stop trying to prove that Christians are ignorant when you haven't even done your research.
And @pragmatist, I know that it's unfair for all the good doing people to go to hell. But you know, the difference between Christianity and other religions is that Christianity isn't a religion that can be made up. Some crazy dude can't just come up with it. (And I KNOW there's going to be some nut out there that will be like, "How do you know that someone didn't make this up yada yada yada" but that's a whole 'nother spiel that I won't start). So because some guy didn't come up with it, Christianity IS the way it is. (If you catch my drift..). You're making it sound like we can change what we believe and it'll happen but we can't. The Bible says that Jesus is the ONLY way and that God is the ONLY God. It's unfair, I know but if you think about it, NO ONE deserves to go to heaven which means that no matter how many good deeds we do, we can never earn our way there. It's God's grace that even allows us to go to heaven in the first place. SO yeah, it's sad, but it's the truth and if we believe it to be absolute, than yeah, we CAN expect others to believe the same.
"The US & Europe is becoming more atheist/agnostic as generations pass on. " I don't quite remember who said this, (it was way up there), but every time I read this, my heart breaks. This is sad. Because I'm a New Englander.
Some of the religious who have posted comments here abhor the intolerance imbued in some of the comments here (NewEnglander, you're the champ!). But my problem with people who profess strong religious views is that they codify their intolerance at the NATIONAL LEVEL, as evidenced by their support for constitutional bans on gay marriage, for example.
People here have to acknowledge, most of the religious have supported the Republican Party, owing to their platform on abortion, homosexuality, stem-cell research, and the teaching of religion (Christianity, but not Islam) in schools. But they support the same party that has displayed indifference to people who are suffering daily, those millions who are uninsured, the poor, and immigrants (legal and otherwise).
And yes, belief in an amoral Deist is different than a belief in the Judeo-Christian-Islam (JCI) God. Most of the founding fathers were deists, as with most of the scientists in Newton's era. You cannot lump them together with those who believe in the JCI God.
looking at the map, it looks like all the loose marbles roll to the corners
I just have an issue with those who claim that a document written by men and translated by men is the infallible word of God, and use the Bible as a club to beat down upon others. As a choir-singing churchgoer, I consider religion to be my personal belief, not one I inflict on others. In that sense, I am a liberal churchgoer. And yes, the hypocrisy of the religious, be it Jimmy Swaggert or the peodphile priests sickens me. I left the Catholic Church because I could not accept the Church's teachings, and refused to be a hypocrite.
Churches, as part of our "villages" along with families, schools, and organizations (Boy and Girl scouts, etc. ) are one way we communicate our values to our children. As a member of a tolerant church, the chuch reinforces my family's values. Sadly, some churches reflect their community's intolerances as well.
Ted Kaczynski has a high IQ and lots of education too
To "Proud":
"This is sad. Hopefully more people will find the way before it's too late." Wow. You truly are a brainwashed lemming. Too late for what? Is that a threat to non-believers? Maybe you need to concern yourself with life here on earth and spend less time cowering like a scared puppy at the things we don't understand. And if there is a god, and he/she is going to punish me for not believing in him/her, then that makes him/her an intolerant arrogant bully. Do you really think an omnipotent creator of everything would act that way? I would doubt that.
Jim K., will you sell me some of the LSD you're eating? Thanks.
All you so-called 'believers'........enjoy your fairy-tales and comic book heroes.
I would also note that for our friends who have posted and moved up here recently from those southern states and the "fly-over" middle of the country, it should be noted that a lot has changed here in the last two decades. There is a lot of animosity against religion here, and against the RCC, specifically. I think much of it has to do with this being a major concentration focus of priests molesting children and it being covered up going back at least three Cardinals.
I know many who changed their beliefs and feelings about faith and religion dramatically due to the information that came out. I would say that those poll numbers somewhat reflect changes in demographics from that scandal, but also reflect a change in attitude. While faith has not been the focus up here that it is for other areas, I think the animosity is of more recent and understandable origin.
seems to me that both sides are are stereotyping the other, the stereotyping of religionists by a few non-religionists is being used by a few religionists to stereotype the non-religionists.
i have found it is not so much the religion or the congregants but the leaders, the pastors, the preachers, the priests that lend themselves to such simplistic stereotyping....i still remember the first time i saw the sunday morning tv preacher after moving to nc in 1980, i thought it was a joke like a saturday night live skit but no, it was the reverend ernest aynsley a'preachin' and a' beggin' in the name of jesus. it is the robertsons, falwells, grahams, kennedys, wildmons etc that are the problem.
regular joe goingto service once o9r twice a week
you are so right, proud, with god's help we will turn those green regions to the light. thank you
funny how the the similarities between the devoutly religious and the extreme liberal are obvious, but the liberals as usual don't see it. they praise Obama as a Messiah for no apparent reason, but look down their noses at those who praise God. they blindly follow the words of fools like Al Gore, like religious folks follow the words of ancient documents. they worship the views of the Hollywood types, like religious folks flock to hear the Pope. liberals profess tolerance, but in realtiy are the most intolerant group of Americans if you don't share their viewpoints, identical in every way to religious folks. and finally, both are the most illogical people on the planet...maybe they should get together and discuss their similarities rather tha nhate each other so much.
to @48, JimK
Our country was not founded on Christian principles. It was founded based on the philosophies of the ancient Greeks, Locke, Hobbes, Smith, etc. Go through the Constitution and find me Christian principles. Look at the Declaration of Independence. with the same goal.
I would also note that you don't find Christianity in the Bill of Rights. Most of the Founding Fathers identified themselves as Deists. They believed in a spirituality but would not necessarily consider themselves Christian. There are tons of letters and quotes from the likes of Jefferson, Adams, Madison, Franklin and others to back this up, if you look a little.
Now, the country was largely populated with Christians, but, remember that many that came here did so to escape religious intolerance in Europe. Hence, there was a bright focus put on the need to separate government and religion and keep government from advocating or advancing any religion.
I think they asked the wrong question, what would have happened if they'd asked:
do you ask for meaning in life? or is spirituality important to you? the way they asked the question it was all about church, synagogue, mosque etc.
... anyone sees a resemblance between this map and the map of the confederate and union states of 1864? Funny this 35th parallel...
Least religous = most liberal. Equals highest taxes and most corruption.
How's that 'change' you (dupes) all bought into, coming along?
Coupe raising more Taxes.
Let me hit submit before this socialist raises taxes on clicks.
I love it when the self-professed tolerant liberals come out and spew their hatred and intolerance of people who are religious - apparently the irony is completely lost on them. Apparently they think that being tolerant means that it's OK to hate certain people but not others.
#95, I think you’re on the correct track.
But who has the right to judge anyone else. If your Atheist, Catholic, Christian, Muslim, whatever. USA is built on a HUGE melting pot from different races, religion etc. The fact is religious clashes’ cause more pain, death, and suffering than anything else.
If we take any of that away from the equation we as a whole (USA) would not be the same. Someone said earlier, those “Ignorant Massholes” (or whatever they said) or the “Bible Lovers” (whatever), why insult someone who has a different believe than you?? Do any of you know for a FACT!!! That the other is wrong? If you do lets start hearing them?
If you do not believe in god, GREAT, if you do GREAT! This is a huge debate, just as evolution has been for centuries. Even the Pope finally admitted that there are too many facts that prove evolution exists. You can go to any legit museum and see hard facts in front of you.
I am atheist and I’m from NH, so what? I believe in Science, I do not believe in Santa Clause, or the Tooth Fairy, or God for that matter. I accept that fact that there is nothing after life. Some of you are too frightened to think that this is it, so you look for a faith in religion which is GREAT!!!! I am friends with many men of cloth and we have debates about this but they are still my friends. I do not insult them, nor do they insult me for my beliefs.
For those of you proud about Massachusetts ranking in this survey, remember that Massachusetts might be one of the most corrupt states in America. Look at the current political situation in Mass and the fact that Barney Frank keeps going back to Congress should be good enough evidence. For all the intellect the state does possess, it certainly lacks a bit of moral balance when elected officials are concerned.
Yes, Eloise, and there isn't a tooth fairy either. Sad that we all must grow up, but I'd prefer it to living with fantasies buzzing in my head all day that some preacher or spirit was floating around me ready to meddle with everything. What's so bad about nothingness? Anyone who has ever been put under for an operation knows what nothingness is like. Time becomes irrelevant and like before you were born, you aren't aware of anything. There's no fear involved. I'd fear Life (with a capital L) much more.