< Back to front page Text size +

Marshfield miracle helps sainthood cause

Posted by Michael Paulson April 28, 2009 06:30 PM

Sullivan2.jpg

Globe reporter Jenna Russell spent some time this afternoon with Jack Sullivan, the longtime Plymouth District Court clerk magistrate who says that he experienced a miraculous healing after praying for the help of the late Cardinal John Henry Newman. Here's her dispatch:

"MARSHFIELD _ Lying in a hospital bed after surgery on his spine, unable to walk and in agonizing pain, Jack Sullivan propped himself up on elbows and prayed.

Not to some vast, unknowable God, but to a specific figure in the Catholic church, vastly respected, yet mortal: Cardinal John Henry Newman, an Englishman who died in 1890.

The healing, as Sullivan tells it, was almost immediate. He felt a tingling all over, was flooded with warmth, and, as easy as that, he could walk.

Now, the recovery that Sullivan, 70, has been describing for almost a decade, a drama that unfolded in August 2001, is on the verge of being deemed a miracle by the Catholic church, and the unassuming Marshfield man, a church deacon and father of three, is at the center of an accelerating campaign to make the late British cardinal a saint.

A panel of theologians, convened by the branch of the Vatican that investigates possible miracles, has concluded that Sullivan's recovery resulted from his prayer, the London Telegraph newspaper reported. A panel of doctors previously researched his claim and found no medical explanation for what happened, Sullivan said. The final decision to bestow miracle status rests with Pope Benedict XVI. If that status is given, as expected, it would lead to beatification for Newman, the last step before canonization, or sainthood.

For Sullivan, who has remained pain-free since his prayers were answered, and who has lately been busy fertilizing his rose garden and celebrating his 40th wedding anniversary, the Vatican finding confirms what he has long believed.

He said his most striking memory of that summer day eight years ago is the wave of well-being that swept over him as he prayed in his hospital bed.

'The most important thing was the sense of exuberance I felt, exuberance and confidence that all would be well, all would be rosy, and a tremendous happiness,' Sullivan said yesterday. 'I got up and walked all over the place, twisting my cane like Charlie Chaplin.'"

The Globe's Charlie Radin took a look at Sullivan's role in the sainthood tribunal in a 2005 story.

The Catholic blogosphere has been fascinated by the Newman sainthood cause, and this latest development is attracting considerable attention.

Here's the Rev. James Martin, blogging at America magazine:

"Newman would make a fascinating and somewhat controversial modern saint: On the one hand, he is beloved by traditional Catholics (among them Pope Benedict XVI) for the moving story of his conversion from Anglicanism, his "theology of conscience," as well as his elegant apologias for the Catholic faith. But he is also loved by progressive Catholics for his ideas on the "development of doctrine." And, ironically, many Catholics suspicious of clericalism often quote this prince of the church who quipped, "Who are the laity? I answered that the church would look foolish without them.")

And not long ago, in preparation for his beatification, church officials attempted to unearth his remains in order to "transfer" them to a place more appropriate for public veneration but found little left. (Something quite the opposite of the tradition of the "incorruptible" saint.) The exhumation proved controversial since Newman had explicitly asked to be buried next to his lifelong friend, Ambrose St. John. "As far as this world was concerned, I was his first and last...he was my earthly light," Newman wrote. As a result, he is somewhat beloved among the gay community as well, who claim him as one of their own.

Newman: favorite of traditionalists, progressives, anti-clericalists and gays? It's a bit like the quest for the historical Jesus. Which Jesus you're looking for depends a great deal on what you're looking for. Stay tuned for the controversy over the historical Newman."

Sullivan1.jpg

(Photos, by Debee Tlumacki for the Globe, show Sullivan at his Marshfield home. In the photo at top, he is holding a photo of Cardinal Newman.)

  • CommentComment
  • Email E-mail

Email this article

Invalid email address
Invalid email address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

47 comments so far...
  1. catholicism is monotheistic yet saints can answer prayers as easily as God

    Posted by jeff dahmer April 28, 09 07:12 PM
  1. It makes a nice story...I'd be interested to know what the doctors had found, as why this reported recovery was seemingly so rapid.

    Posted by Cyberman12 April 28, 09 07:22 PM
  1. Sullivan actively and vocally supported Newman's canonization BEFORE the so-called "miracle" ever happened. The power of modern science healed this man, and he chooses to use this as a way to advance his agenda and improve his standing in the church and the image of the mythica....err...religion that he believes so strongly in. Regardless of the motives, the entire process is a joke. The only positive is that the harder these whackos try to win converts in an ever-evolving and increasingly educated world the more foolish they look.

    Posted by tony April 28, 09 07:29 PM
  1. false signs and wonders Christ warned about. Since Newman was a heretic the healing is from the devil and not God.

    Posted by rob April 28, 09 07:34 PM
  1. This is silly. Miracles are essentially currently unexplainable by science. Unenlightened or ignorant people are quick to cite magical explanations for things before consideration of more logical explanations. The fact that doctors could not necessarily explain his improvement does not mean that some god or saint cured him! It simply means that science cannot currently explain what occurred. To think otherwise is quite frankly, intellectual laziness.

    Posted by Rich101 April 28, 09 07:34 PM
  1. You pray for the Saint to intervene on your behalf.

    Posted by Catholic April 28, 09 07:36 PM
  1. A small, but important, note of correction. Catholics do not pray to the the Saints, they pray with them. Prayers are made only to God. Catholics ask the Saints to help pray with and for them under the premise that they are close to God. Think of it like a juiced up prayer chain. Catholicism 101.

    Posted by JG April 28, 09 07:38 PM
  1. Tony,

    You make some great points.

    Posted by avi cohen April 28, 09 07:42 PM
  1. So let's see........the guys back gets better right after surgery, and THAT's a miracle? Get me that surgeon's name! How much narcotic was he on during this feeling of wellbeing that rushed over him?
    Just wondering........anyone ever see someone regrow a lost limb? Or are some miracles too tough?

    Posted by showmeproof April 28, 09 07:43 PM
  1. When I was 7 I prayed to god that I would be an NBA player, that didn't happen so I guess that cancels out this "miracle"?

    Posted by Flexbo April 28, 09 07:44 PM
  1. Jeff, the author of this article, Jenna, has it slightly wrong, which is why you are confused. Jack prayed for the intercession of Cardinal Newman, he did not pray TO him. When Catholics "pray" to saints they ask the saint (or anyone who has died) to intercede on their behalf, and if anything comes from it the answered prayer is Gods work alone. It's like with the wedding feast of Cana where Mary intercedes on behalf of those who had run out of wine and asks Jesus to help.

    Posted by jp April 28, 09 07:44 PM
  1. Do all the prayers that don't get answered prove that there isn't a god?

    Posted by TimberJim-2 April 28, 09 07:51 PM
  1. how's about we all pray for priests not to molest boys? perhaps magically it will stop overnight. somehow i doubt this will happen.

    Posted by rox April 28, 09 08:04 PM
  1. I'm glad the man recovered, but no one should believe in superstition.

    Posted by Brian April 28, 09 08:14 PM
  1. to those naysayers, remember your posts after your death.

    Posted by jaxon April 28, 09 08:19 PM
  1. Ah, ye of little faith...

    Skeptics should consider Pascal's famous wager, expounded in his Pensees:

    God is, or He is not. But to which side shall we incline? Reason can decide nothing here. There is an infinite chaos which separated us. A game is being played at the extremity of this infinite distance where heads or tails will turn up... Which will you choose then? Let us weigh the gain and the loss in wagering that God is... If you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing. Wager, then, without hesitation that He is.

    Posted by RJ April 28, 09 08:26 PM
  1. Ahh the children of this generation seem to know all life's secret. They too will grow older and learn what Shakespeare learned about heaven and earth. And some will even find God.

    Posted by James April 28, 09 08:30 PM
  1. I find it utterly absurd that people are debating this medieval mularkey in the 21st century.

    Posted by Fred April 28, 09 08:46 PM
  1. Saints are like Jack Abramoff Heaven. They got connections, but you gotta wonder what they did for it.

    Posted by CTRon April 28, 09 08:55 PM
  1. Quite honestly it's probably as simple as the fact the man propped himself on his elbows. This allows for expansion and stretching of the back vertebra and releases tension on the nerves causing the pain. I know because I've dealt with a slipped disc in the lower back for years, and stretching the back almost always causes a tingling sensation and relief form the aches as the pressure is relieved from the disc pressing on the nerves. Since the man had surgery, most of the healing work had been done, and I have to believe there were some nerves under stress that were repositioned as the muscles were stretched when he propped himself up on his elbows. i wish it was a miracle, but I think it's as simple as relieving stress on the nerves.

    Posted by RL April 28, 09 09:08 PM
  1. I asked Spiderman to fix my back and He did! And I have just as much evidence as this dude.

    Posted by Hunter Jones April 28, 09 09:18 PM
  1. I pray to the Placebo Divinity!

    Posted by Jack Certer April 28, 09 09:22 PM
  1. everyone should leave the catholic faith. the roman catholic church is the great scarlet harlot of rome spoke about in the book of revelation.

    get into a non-denominational bible cell group and learn about the 'creator of all' once and for all!

    Posted by pause and think about it April 28, 09 09:28 PM
  1. timber jim,

    No, a prayer may not be answered because He has a different plan for us. I may have desperately wanted to date Karen in high school, but He had a different plan. I didn't date Karen, met my soon to be fiance, and I'm a lot happier!

    Posted by Mainiac April 28, 09 09:33 PM
  1. btw...no man can make a person a saint. the word of god says the saints are all believers in him. not who the gods of the catholic church say they are. learn what's in the bible and you'll run as fast as you can from the roman catholic church. don't look back either!

    Posted by pause and think about it April 28, 09 09:37 PM
  1. Some people believe in God, some do not. Why is it such a joke for people to believe? If you are a Republican in this state, you are also a joke. So the only way to survive and be taken seriously is to be a Godless democrat. Lisen up people....everyone is entitled to their opinion and they shouldn't be criticized for it.

    Posted by Peacefulocean April 28, 09 09:45 PM
  1. Why the need to pray to a saint to intercede on someones behalf instead of just praying to god him/herself? It's also extreme to think that god would answer one prayer over that of someone elses. Tell that to all the people with terminal illness and extreme strife in their lives who pray everyday and get no answer or so called miracle from god. This seems like an attempt of the catholic church to win over more people in the light of there demise...

    Posted by marcb April 28, 09 09:52 PM
  1. It is strange that the church is even considering Newman considering the questions over his sexuality. For instance this quote from Newman after the death of his longtime roommate Ambrose St. John in 1875, “I have ever thought no bereavement was equal to that of a husband's or a wife's, but I feel it difficult to believe that any can be greater, or any one's sorrow greater, than mine."
    It should also be noted that Newman at his own request was buried in the same grave as Ambrose St. John, "I wish, with all my heart, to be buried in Fr Ambrose St John's grave - and I give this as my last, my imperative will", he wrote, later adding: "This I confirm and insist on."
    This past year the church decided to separate the two from the same grave, going against Newman’s own wishes. Fortunately Newman had the last laugh, the remains of both Newman and St. John had deteriorated to the point that nothing could be found.

    mike

    Posted by mikegilbo April 28, 09 10:03 PM
  1. Jesus said, "Whatsoever ye shall ask the Father in my name, he will give it you" (John 16:23). Why would a believer bypass the Savior's instructions and appeal to a deceased person, rather than Jesus Himself, to be his advocate before the Father? What is the scriptural justification for that practice? After all, Jesus "ever liveth to make intercession for them" (Hebrews 7:25).

    Posted by Jim Nagle April 28, 09 10:06 PM
  1. Thanks for the point, JG, that we pray TO God, and WITH Saints. Important difference!

    Posted by Laurie Waterman April 28, 09 10:11 PM
  1. If the God of Christianity is all powerful, why does God need people to pray to saints for their healing? From a Christian perspective, Isn't that idolatry?

    Posted by PKC April 28, 09 10:41 PM
  1. This prayer and intercession stuff reminds me all too much of cloud-gathering Zeus and the whimsical ways he decided to intervene in human affairs. And just as is the case with the Catholic Church and priests, Zeus and the other gods had an especially keen interest in sex.

    Posted by Phineas T. Bluster April 28, 09 10:50 PM
  1. I'm trying to reconcile the logic of Mainiac (no. 25) with other posts ... if God has a plan for us regardless, then why do we need to pray? And if we are praying for something that is counter to God's plan for us, then is it just to stroke His ego?

    Posted by Samantha April 28, 09 11:04 PM
  1. Why persecute ALL catholics for their beliefs? In this country, in this day and age, aren't we supposed to be accepting of all people no matter what their beliefs may be? I am catholic and proud of it, I pray to God and ask the saints for help and sometimes I receive it. So yes, I believe miracles are possible and that God is out there. I guess that I am just a wacko nut job though

    Posted by Dan April 28, 09 11:04 PM
  1. What a concept. These saints sit idle until someone prays for them to heal them and then they swing into action. However, to do this, they must be all powerful, meaning they could surely intervene in other human affairs. So they overlook all the horrible things that happen to innocent people in this world and fix only those that come calling. Yeah, now I remember why I dropped out of the Catholic Church.

    Posted by Hocus Pocus April 28, 09 11:21 PM
  1. RJ - Is that what religion is to you? A bet??? Well, there's some deep conviction for you. Ridiculous!!

    Pascal and all of those people who dispense reason to understand the world around us are sick and delusional at best. More likely they were creating arguments to keep ignorant people oppressed. That is, after all, the goal of organized religion. The fact that there are unexplained phenomena in the world does not mean that we have to abandon the reason we have and accept preposterous events or beings to clarify them. The main thing that sets humans apart from other animals (as far as we currently know) is that we are rational creatures. To abandon this is to lower ourselves and deny what is in order to blindly accept what isn't. Any being or church that even remotely suggests this should be suspect!

    This sainthood malarchy and intervention with a personal god stuff is pathetic! It's as if these people still believe in Santa Claus. Or as J.D. Salinger said, most people's understanding of god is a cross between St. Francis of Assissi and Heidi's grandfather. We must use our reason and brains to understand the world around us. The world that exists, not one that was imagined 2000 years ago! Accept that there are things we do not know yet. Believe me, you will still be able to sleep at night. Whether there is an unmoved mover or un-caused cause, who cares!!? It doesn't necessarily follow that this inital cause is what these relgions understand as god.

    The guy had a morphine drip. Period.

    Posted by Rozzwell April 28, 09 11:27 PM
  1. Rozzwell- And we humans evolved from slime, too, right? Now there's some real, down-to-earth rationality. I'm a lot more comfortable with the "fairy tale" of the Genesis account of creation, thank you. It requires a lot less mindless credulity.

    Posted by Jim Nagle April 28, 09 11:36 PM
  1. This is stupid... It's like a couple nights ago I said Jason Bay would hit a home run against the Yankees then low and behold he did! If you pray and it happens some how its some sort of miracle, but what about the millions of other times you pray and it doesn't happen? Religion=Fiction... What do Jesus and Pinnochio have in common? They were both "real boys"

    Posted by DK April 29, 09 12:22 AM
  1. I don't understand the compelling need to criticize someone else's faith. If you don't believe good for you -go for it. Why not be happy that Mr. Sullivan found the strength he needed in an hour of need. I happen to know that he is a very kind and generous man. Many of you posters could learn a lesson about generosity of spirit from Jack.

    Posted by Steve April 29, 09 12:35 AM
  1. "Skeptics should consider Pascal's famous wager, expounded in his Pensees"

    That's why I worship the Egyptian cat goddess Bast. Just in case.

    Meanwhile, thank heavens God was curing back pain in 2001 instead of answering the prayers of people dying screaming in the 9/11 attacks.

    Posted by jk April 29, 09 12:38 AM
  1. No, Jim, it just requires a lot less mind. Sad, very sad.

    Posted by Rozzwell April 29, 09 01:04 AM
  1. Rozzwell, all of the overwrought punctuation marks and ad hominem attacks suggest that you have some serious emotional issues around the subject. So why don't you take your own advice and employ dispassionate reason in your arguments? I offered Pascal's wager for the consideration of skeptics like you, and if you had read more accurately, offered nothing about my own convictions. It's pretty funny to see Pascal designated as one of "those people" who dispensed [with] reason to understand the world around us. Do you have the slightest idea who Pascal was? As we can safely assume an answer in the negative, I will tell you that he was probably the greatest mathemetician and physicist of the 17th century. So maybe you should take a time out and put your head down while the rest of us try to have a sensible discussion.

    Posted by RJ April 29, 09 01:18 AM
  1. Religion was started when the first charlatan met the first fool. And if the pain didn't go away it was because god had other plans, or it was punishment for gays getting married.

    Posted by Dale Carselli April 29, 09 07:21 AM
  1. Mike Gilbo @10:03 pm, your quotes do not prove that Newman was a homosexual, and especially not that he was engaged in any unchastity. Sad that you and others apparently define yourself only by what your genitalia crave, and that you think it impossible for people to be loving friends without rolling in the hay with each other.

    My favorite quote from Newman, May 12, 1879: "For thirty, forty, fifty years I have resisted to the best of my powers the spirit of liberalism in religion. Never did Holy Church need champions against it more sorely than now, when, alas! it is an error overspreading, as a snare, the whole earth; and on this great occasion, when it is natural for one who is in my place to look out upon the world, and upon Holy Church as in it, and upon her future, it will not, I hope, be considered out of place, if I renew the protest against it which I have made so often.

    Liberalism in religion is the doctrine that there is no positive truth in religion, but that one creed is as good as another, and this is the teaching which is gaining substance and force daily. It is inconsistent with any recognition of any religion, as true. It teaches that all are to be tolerated, for all are matters of opinion. Revealed religion is not a truth, but a sentiment and a taste; not an objective fact, not miraculous; and it is the right of each individual to make it say just what strikes his fancy"

    Posted by gaudete April 29, 09 08:37 AM
  1. Opinions and thoughts are your own. For those of us that believe in our "faith," important word "faith." Than it is what it is. I personally have a strong faith; Do I believe in everything the Catholic church preaches, no. But I have a strong belief in God, that's my personal choice. Everyone has a personal choice. I also believe in miracles, I believe in St. Theresa, she followed her faith. There are many examples out there. Two important words choice and faith. My faith is my belief that gets me through some extremely tough times.

    Posted by Donna DiFabio April 29, 09 08:38 AM
  1. Jesus himself performed miracles in front of scores of people who ultimately rejected him. Why is it any surprise that the secularists on this Board would doubt modern day miracles which are evidenced solely by the person (and remain unexplained by attending physicians) who received the miracle?

    Posted by KJR April 29, 09 10:29 AM
  1. I 've known Jack Sullivan for years and he is a very religious man. Though I am an atheist and do not believe any of this stuff I do believe that the brain is a superpower and can cure the body with its own strength. I'm sure if he was "cured" it was his own power and legitimate belief in a higher power that that did it for him. Unfortuately, the Catholic Church and the people like Cardinal Law (who should be in jail) who call the shots will grab all the mileage they can out of this story and try another way to "cash in" on the deal. They are on the run now and will be happy to find a "glory story". I'm pleased for Jack and wish him the best.

    Posted by Mary McGillivray Hayes April 29, 09 04:04 PM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

Blogger

Michael Paulson covers religion for The Boston Globe. He shared in the Pulitzer Prize in 2003, won the Mike Berger, Templeton and Supple awards in 2008, and is a four-time winner of the Wilbur Award.
E-mail mpaulson@globe.com.

views

Harvey_Cox_cow.JPGHarvey Cox, the Hollis professor of divinity at Harvard University, marks his retirement by asserting a little-used right of his professorship -- to graze a cow in Harvard Yard. Photo, by Barry Chin of the Globe staff, taken on Sept. 10, 2009 in Cambridge, Mass.

archives