< Back to front page Text size +

Obama refers to abortion, not Notre Dame

Posted by Michael Paulson April 30, 2009 08:00 AM

Obamapresser.jpg

President Obama last night was sort of asked about the controversy over his scheduled commencement address and honorary degree at the University of Notre Dame, and he sort of answered. The exchange:


QUESTION: Thank you, Mr. President. In a couple of weeks, you're going to be giving the commencement at Notre Dame. And, as you know, this has caused a lot of controversy among Catholics who are opposed to your position on abortion.

As a candidate, you vowed that one of the very things you wanted to do was sign the Freedom of Choice Act, which, as you know, would eliminate federal, state and local restrictions on abortion. And at one point in the campaign when asked about abortion and life, you said that it was above -- quote, "above my pay grade."

Now that you've been president for 100 days, obviously, your pay grade is a little higher than when you were a senator.

Do you still hope that Congress quickly sends you the Freedom of Choice Act so you can sign it?

OBAMA: You know, the -- my view on -- on abortion, I think, has been very consistent. I think abortion is a moral issue and an ethical issue.

I think that those who are pro-choice make a mistake when they -- if they suggest -- and I don't want to create straw men here, but I think there are some who suggest that this is simply an issue about women's freedom and that there's no other considerations. I think, look, this is an issue that people have to wrestle with and families and individual women have to wrestle with.

The reason I'm pro-choice is because I don't think women take that -- that position casually. I think that they struggle with these decisions each and every day. And I think they are in a better position to make these decisions ultimately than members of Congress or a president of the United States, in consultation with their families, with their doctors, with their doctors, with their clergy.

So -- so that has been my consistent position. The other thing that I said consistently during the campaign is I would like to reduce the number of unwanted presidencies that result in women feeling compelled to get an abortion, or at least considering getting an abortion, particularly if we can reduce the number of teen pregnancies, which has started to spike up again.

And so I've got a task force within the Domestic Policy Council in the West Wing of the White House that is working with groups both in the pro-choice camp and in the pro-life camp, to see if we can arrive at some consensus on that.

Now, the Freedom of Choice Act is not highest legislative priority. I believe that women should have the right to choose. But I think that the most important thing we can do to tamp down some of the anger surrounding this issue is to focus on those areas that we can agree on. And that's -- that's where I'm going to focus.

(Photo, by Charles Dharapak/AP, shows President Obama walking down the Cross Hall before the start of a news conference in the East Room of the White House in Washington on 4/29/09. )

  • CommentComment
  • Email E-mail

Email this article

Invalid email address
Invalid email address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

20 comments so far...
  1. Typo: would like to reduce the number of unwanted presidencies

    Posted by amanda April 30, 09 08:45 AM
  1. Obama's statement makes too much sense so the media will pick it apart until they can find points for people to get all worked over again.

    kind of like they did when they picked the title of the story.

    i for one will be happy to see the globe go out of business

    Posted by cbreeze April 30, 09 09:10 AM
  1. You may want to check the transcript of President Obama's response--I'm pretty sure he was talking about "unwanted pregnancies" and not "unwanted presidencies." Of course, there have been many unwanted presidencies--the last 8 years is a good example. I can think of no greater argument in favor of abortion.

    Posted by Anne April 30, 09 09:15 AM
  1. Nobody favors abortion, but making it illegal does not stop them. They've been going on in one form or another since not long after man and woman-kind climbed out of the trees.

    It is perfectly reasonable to strive for a society where there are fewer unwanted pregnancies, and fewer abortions are needed or wanted.

    I always wonder what demons drive those who are most vocal about the issue.

    Posted by Harrybosch April 30, 09 10:00 AM
  1. Don't legislate anything as serious and grave as abortion at the Federal level. If the Federal "makes a mistake" legislatively it is virtually impossible to reverse the error. Abortion rights should not be legislated nor should they be sanctioned - especially by the Federal government. Smart politics/government need to be applied, however such methodology has never been applied in the realm of American (or any other country's that I can know off) politics/legislature nor has any such methodology been even identified for such difficult situations.

    Posted by RugBurn April 30, 09 10:33 AM
  1. I have always been pretty neutral on the issue, but can someone give me a compelling reason why someone would abort a healthy fetus in the 6th, 7th or 8th month of pregnancy?

    Posted by jim64 April 30, 09 10:40 AM
  1. Maybe Obama does not know any of these women, but I know some women who do casually have abortions. I think it devaluates human life.

    Posted by Neil April 30, 09 10:45 AM
  1. In these tough economic times, people are having a tough time raising kids who are already born. Maybe we should expand the freedom of choice to include parents choosing whether or not to terminate any child up to three years old.

    Posted by Danaed April 30, 09 10:56 AM
  1. So Anne,

    If I am reading your comment correctly, somebody should have "killed"
    Bush.

    Moreover you are also, by your own admission, equating abortion with killing. Thank you. At least you are being honest.

    Harrybosch, you wonder about "what demons drive those most vocal about this issue?" Start by re-reading what your friend Anne just wrote.

    By the way I did not climb out of a tree, which implies that I am an animal without a conscience. But there are humans who do ignore their conscience. Like those who call for the death of a president and those who abort babies.

    Posted by tumbleweed April 30, 09 11:35 AM
  1. Jim64
    I don't believe that many "healthy fetus" are aborted in the 6,7 and 8 month.

    Neil,
    How do you know so many women having abortions?

    Tumbleweed,
    I don't believe Anne used the word "killed".

    Posted by kozynferg April 30, 09 12:19 PM
  1. "By the way I did not climb out of a tree, which implies that I am an animal without a conscience. But there are humans who do ignore their conscience. "

    It sounds as if you are opposed to abortion, and I respect that. I assume you have taken steps in your own personal life to ensure that you and your significant other are not burdened with an unwanted pregnancy, and have perhaps also counseled your family and loved ones how to avoid the situation.

    Maybe you are also active in or contribute money to organizations who work to minimize and eliminate unwanted pregnancies. Good on ya!

    More and more folks do what I assume you are doing, we'll have one less thing to talk about.

    Posted by Harrybosch April 30, 09 12:45 PM
  1. Jim64,

    Abortion is not legal in the 6th, 7th, or 8th month of pregnancy. The only reason I could think of to have one then would be some completely extreme case to save the life of the mother. Even then, I would think that in 99.9% of cases the medical providers would try to deliver early . . .

    Posted by MLyons April 30, 09 01:15 PM
  1. Harry,

    Maybe if you didn't look at child as a "burden" you wouldn't worry so much about what I do in my own life or any one elses for that matter.

    Posted by tumbleweed April 30, 09 02:05 PM
  1. I guess not having sex with someone you aren't ready to have a child with is an outrageous answer to the problem? Perhaps instead of accepting casual sex as part of life, why not hold people to a moral standard. No one is perfect and people will misstep, it's what you do once you've made the misstep. Adoption is a viable alternative to abortion. You don't want to raise the child that's fine, but there are plenty of people in this world who would love that child. Selfishness is the only reason. You created the child, give up 9 months out of a long life for said child.

    Posted by katym April 30, 09 02:38 PM
  1. tumbleweed,

    I never said that a child is a burden. And of the two of us, only one of us is concerned with what others are doing in their own personal lives.

    Posted by Harrybosch April 30, 09 03:00 PM
  1. "I guess not having sex with someone you aren't ready to have a child with is an outrageous answer to the problem?"

    100,000 years of human history says no.

    "Perhaps instead of accepting casual sex as part of life, why not hold people to a moral standard."

    Because your moral standard may be different from mine.

    Posted by Harrybosch April 30, 09 03:12 PM
  1. HArrybosch-

    "Because your moral standard may be different from mine".
    Actions have consequence, and part of accepting the responsability of sex is the consequence of producing a child- but you are obviously a member of the "do what feels good, spread STD's and AIDS, then whine until someone else steps up to take care of the hefty medical bills" group. Grow up. Get some self control.

    Posted by Katym April 30, 09 04:33 PM
  1. Harry are you saying people can't use self control. I know a man with seven grandhcildren bewteen the ages of 15 and 27. Five are virgins the other two wiated until marriage. Believe it or not they are all fine productive members of society, even the 27 year old virgin. I know this may not be typical but as long as sex is accepted as a lesisure activity and not a beautiful and wonderful act between a Wife and her husband we will continue to have abortion used by selfish people as birth control, children raised by one parent, high divorce rate, and an increase in number of those effected and number of types of STD's. Whether you use God as your moral standard or even if you don't believe in God it is VERY clear that casual sex is a dangerous lifestyle brith control or not.

    Posted by Henway April 30, 09 04:37 PM
  1. Mr. Obama saddens me with his stated goal of tamping down the anger over abortion. I am sick of all the genocide that he is intent to promote, i.e., the unleashing of deadly violence against nearly 50 million of our defenseless brothers and sisters who are just younger and less developed than we are. Mr. Obama's utilitarian ethic of killing the "unwanted" if one wants to do so rivals the Hegelian utilitarianism of Henrich Himmler . His program of increased contraception will only exacerbate the problem--increased contraception has lead to more abortion historically throughout the world. Why shouldn't we be upset that as the most pro-murder-in-the-womb president ever wants to take away any defense that we might muster to save even a few children? His support of FOCA, which he did not deny, will take away our constitutional right of conscience. I pray that this president will examine the evil he is doing and change for the good.

    Posted by veritasgood May 15, 09 01:10 PM
  1. ==================================
    Obama continues to present his "faith" as being man-centered instead of God-centered.
    ==================================
    Obama states "perhaps because I witnessed all the good works their [the church's] faith inspired them to perform, I found myself drawn not just to work with the church I was drawn to be in the church. It was through this service that I was brought to Christ."

    Ray Comfort teaches the core of being a Christian is being "saved," knowing what we are "saved" from and that Jesus is the only way to our salvation:

    http://www.wayofthemaster.com/mp3/tape01.m3u

    Obama believes his salvation is based on himself, according to this interview:

    http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/386118.aspx

    * Obama defines how he will enter into heaven as "if I live my life as well as I can, that I will be rewarded"

    * Obama defines sin as "Being out of alignment with my values"

    * And, for Obama, sinning is "if I’m true to myself and my faith that that is its own reward, when I’m not true to it, it’s its own punishment."

    Posted by N Waff May 17, 09 11:40 PM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

Blogger

Michael Paulson covers religion for The Boston Globe. He shared in the Pulitzer Prize in 2003, won the Mike Berger, Templeton and Supple awards in 2008, and is a four-time winner of the Wilbur Award.
E-mail mpaulson@globe.com.

views

Harvey_Cox_cow.JPGHarvey Cox, the Hollis professor of divinity at Harvard University, marks his retirement by asserting a little-used right of his professorship -- to graze a cow in Harvard Yard. Photo, by Barry Chin of the Globe staff, taken on Sept. 10, 2009 in Cambridge, Mass.

archives