< Back to front page Text size +

Notre Dame's Jenkins on Obama, abortion

Posted by Michael Paulson May 17, 2009 06:05 PM

Obama_at_Notre_Dame2.JPG

Here is the text of the speech by Notre Dame's president, the Rev. John I. Jenkins, introducing President Obama at today's commencement, and reflecting on the associated controversy:

"President Obama, Fr. Hesburgh, Judge Noonan, Members of the Board of Trustees, Members of the faculty, staff, alumni, friends, parents, and most of all – the Notre Dame Class of 2009:

Several autumns ago, you came to Notre Dame from home….now Notre Dame has become home. And it always will be. For home is not where you live. Home is where you belong. You will always belong – and I pray you will always feel you belong – here at Notre Dame.

You are … ND.

In my four years as President of your University – I have found that even among those who did not go to Notre Dame, even among those who do not share the Catholic faith, there is a special expectation, a special hope, for what Notre Dame can accomplish in the world. They hope that Notre Dame will be one of the great universities in the nation, but they also hope that it will send forth graduates who -- grounded in deep moral values -- can help solve the world’s toughest problems.

Their hope is in you, the graduates of 2009.

That is a good place for hope to be. I have great confidence in what your talent and energy can accomplish in the world. But I have a special optimism for what you can do inspired by faith.

It is your faith that will focus your talents and help you build the world you long to live in and leave to your children.

The world you enter today is torn by division – and is fixed on its differences.

Differences must be acknowledged, and in some cases cherished. But too often differences lead to pride in self and contempt for others, until two sides – taking opposing views of the same difference -- demonize each other. Whether the difference is political, religious, racial, or national -- trust falls, anger rises, and cooperation ends … even for the sake of causes all sides care about.

More than any problem in the arts or sciences - engineering or medicine – easing the hateful divisions between human beings is the supreme challenge of this age. If we can solve this problem, we have a chance to come together and solve all the others.

A Catholic university – and its graduates – are specially called, and I believe specially equipped, to help meet this challenge.

As a Catholic university, we are part of the Church – members of the “mystical body of Christ” animated by our faith in the Gospel. Yet we are also – most of us – citizens of the United States – this extraordinary evolving expression of human freedom. We are called to serve each community of which we’re a part, and this call is captured in the motto over the door of the east nave of the Basilica: “God, Country, Notre Dame.”

As we serve the Church, we can persuade believers by appeals to both faith and reason. As we serve our country, we will be motivated by faith, but we cannot appeal only to faith. We must also engage in a dialogue that appeals to reason that all can accept.

When we face differences with fellow citizens, we will be tested: do we keep trying, with love and a generous spirit, to appeal to ethical principles that might be persuasive to others – or do we condemn those who differ with us for not seeing the truth that we see?

The first approach can lead to healing, the second to hostility. We know which approach we are called to as disciples of Christ.

Pope Benedict said last year from the South Lawn of the White House: “I am confident that the American people will find in their religious beliefs a precious source of insight and an inspiration to pursue reasoned, responsible and respectful dialogue in the effort to build a more humane and free society.”

Genuine faith does not inhibit the use of reason; it purifies it of pride and distorting self-interest. As it does so, Pope Benedict has said, “human reason is emboldened to pursue its noble purpose of serving mankind, giving expression to our deepest common aspirations and extending … public debate.”

Tapping the full potential of human reason to seek God and serve humanity is a central mission of the Catholic Church. The natural place for the Church to pursue this mission is at a Catholic university. The University of Notre Dame belongs to an academic tradition of nearly a thousand years – born of the Church’s teaching that human reason, tempered by faith, is a gift of God, a path to religious truth, and a means for seeking the common good in secular life.

It is out of this duty to serve the common good that we seek to foster dialogue with all people of good will, regardless of faith, background or perspective. We will listen to all views, and always bear witness for what we believe. Insofar as we play this role, we can be what Pope John Paul II said a Catholic university is meant to be – "a primary and privileged place for a fruitful dialogue between the Gospel and culture" [Ex corde ecclesiae, 3.34].

Of course, dialogue is never instantaneous; it doesn’t begin and end in an afternoon. It is an ongoing process made possible by many acts of courtesy and gestures of respect, by listening carefully and speaking honestly. Paradoxically, support for these actions often falls as the need for them rises – so they are most controversial precisely when they can be most helpful.

As we all know, a great deal of attention has surrounded President Obama’s visit to Notre Dame. We honor all people of good will who have come to this discussion respectfully and out of deeply held conviction.

Most of the debate has centered on Notre Dame’s decision to invite and honor the President. Less attention has been focused on the President’s decision to accept.

President Obama has come to Notre Dame, though he knows well that we are fully supportive of Church teaching on the sanctity of human life, and we oppose his policies on abortion and embryonic stem cell research.

Others might have avoided this venue for that reason. But President Obama is not someone who stops talking to those who differ with him.

Mr. President: This is a principle we share.

As the Fathers of the Second Vatican Council wrote in their pastoral constitution Gaudium et Spes: “Respect and love ought to be extended also to those who think or act differently than we do in social, political and even religious matters. In fact, the more deeply we come to understand their ways of thinking through such courtesy and love, the more easily will we be able to enter into dialogue with them.”

If we want to extend courtesy, respect and love – and enter into dialogue – then surely we can start by acknowledging what is honorable in others.

We welcome President Obama to Notre Dame, and we honor him for the qualities and accomplishments the American people admired in him when they elected him. He is a man who grew up without a father, whose family was fed for a time with the help of food stamps -- yet who mastered the most rigorous academic challenges, who turned his back on wealth to serve the poor, who sought the Presidency at a young age against long odds, and who – on the threshold of his goal -- left the campaign to go to the bedside of his dying grandmother who helped raise him.

He is a leader who has great respect for the role of faith and religious institutions in public life. He has said: “Secularists are wrong when they ask believers to leave their religion at the door before entering into the public square.”

He is the first African American to be elected President, yet his appeal powerfully transcends race. In a country that has been deeply wounded by racial hatred – he has been a healer.

He has set ambitious goals across a sweeping agenda -- extending health care coverage to millions who don’t have it, improving education especially for those who most need it, promoting renewable energy for the sake of our economy, our security, and our climate.

He has declared the goal of a world without nuclear weapons and has begun arms reduction talks with the Russians.

He has pledged to accelerate America’s fight against poverty, to reform immigration to make it more humane, and to advance America’s merciful work in fighting disease in the poorest places on earth.

As commander-in-chief and as chief executive, he embraces with confidence both the burdens of leadership and the hopes of his country.

Ladies and Gentlemen: The President of the United States."

(Photo, by Jeff Haynes/Getty Images, shows Notre Dame President Rev. John I. Jenkins and President Obama at the Notre Dame commencement today, May 17, 2009.)

  • CommentComment
  • Email E-mail

Email this article

Invalid email address
Invalid email address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

169 comments so far...
  1. Jenkins should be fired !!

    Posted by John Adkins May 17, 09 06:54 PM
  1. WHY !!!!!!!!

    Posted by Frank Harshman May 17, 09 06:56 PM
  1. It is one thing to invite President Obama to speak yet another to give him an honorary degree. Of course, the President is going to accept Notre Dame's offer to speak at a Catholic Institution. He will take all of these types of opportunities
    because the more controversy it produces it will work to divide Catholics on the views of stem-cell research and abortion. The President is a smart man and he will use that division to his benefit.I am not sure that there is a common ground to the taking of a human life as the President suggests.

    Posted by Joyce Lyman May 17, 09 06:57 PM
  1. Wow! What a wonderful introduction!

    I believe I am a better advocate for the unborn when I listen to those who disagree with me than I am when I'm overcome with the need to prove that I'm right. After all, I still have a great deal to learn.

    Fr. Jenkins did more to win justice for the very young than the protesters who marched around campus with T-shirts of babies being tossed into the garbage. Pro-Lifers would do well to give those we disagree with the idea that we are a joyous, rational group of people.

    Paul Bradford, Pro-Life Catholics for Choice

    Posted by Paul Bradford May 17, 09 06:57 PM
  1. So long as the difference between the intrinsic evil of abortion is "thrown in" with other important, but not necessarily intrinsically evil acts, there will be a problem. Abortion is different that war, death penalty, immigration, health care, etc. Honorable people can disagree on approach, but as to abortion, IT IS ALWAYS EVIL. This has been lost on Fr. Jenkins and Notre Dame, and they have caused great scandal. The issues isn't so much as inviting Obama to speak, I really don't care about that - but it is about honoring a man who enables evil

    Lord have mercy on us.

    Posted by KJR May 17, 09 07:01 PM
  1. Paul - what the heck is a "Pro-Life Catholic for Choice". THAT is the ultimate OXYMORON, and THAT is the deception of the pro-abortion crowd.

    Posted by KJR May 17, 09 07:03 PM
  1. Look at all the reich wing hypocrites who hate the President. They never had a problem before when Condoleeza Rice spoke at Notre Dame. She just happens to be pro choice. And where's the outrage for GW Bush's executions when he was the Governor of Texas? President Obama tried to reach out his hand to all the reich wing thugs who hate him. Its clear they were just using this wedge issue as a reason to protest against him.

    Posted by Chris May 17, 09 07:10 PM
  1. Burn him at the stake.

    Posted by CR May 17, 09 07:11 PM
  1. The whole ND administration should be fired over this. A complete disgrace! Even ND has sold out its Catholic ideals.

    If they want to bring in speakers like this who represent ideals other than what a Catholic University is supposed to represent remove the university from the Archdiocese.

    Now it is on the Archdiocese to take appropriate action. That won't happen either.

    Posted by WK May 17, 09 07:12 PM
  1. I agree we must be able to talk to people of different faiths and beliefs.
    But we don't have to invite them into our house and tell the world how great they are.
    Jenkins compromised the principles of the church, he needs to be offered the oppritunity to find a different job.
    If we violate our principles we have become weaker, not stronger or smarter.

    Posted by Frank May 17, 09 07:13 PM
  1. Why is it so difficult for people to understand that someone can be pro-life, i.e., opposed to abortion, but pro freedom and support a woman's right to make her own decisions? It is neither oxymoronic, nor deception. It you're opposed to abortion, don't have one.

    Posted by Allen Sherpa May 17, 09 07:16 PM
  1. as Bob Dylan once sang " Be it the Devil or be it the Lord, we all got to SERVE somebody" . Who is the ND Prez serving? Obama is serving MoveOn, DailyKos, George Sors, Planned Parenthood, NARAL, NOW etc etc etc. SUBSTANCE OVER ORATORY!!!!!

    Posted by bobster May 17, 09 07:18 PM
  1. Hmm.. Pro-Life Catholics for Choice. Sorry to tell you that you cannot be a practicing Catholic and pro choice. Read the Catechism of the Catholic Church, along with reading the views expressed on the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops website regarding Abortion. You are only fooling yourself. If you want to be pro choice, then you are not a practicing catholic. End of story.

    Posted by Warren May 17, 09 07:19 PM
  1. KJR, as you state in your last sentence...'Lord have mercy on us'...I pray the Lord does have mercy on you. You are not hearing what Rev. Jenkins was saying. It is only in OPEN dialogue that differences can be addressed, and your attitude does not enable open dialogue.

    Posted by jc May 17, 09 07:21 PM
  1. Nice to see the Catholic Agenda pushers sch as KJR out today, always a pleasure to share the board with those who have no interest in intelligent discourse.

    As usual, the Anti-Choice groups and their mouthpieces here fail to realize many things, but most important among them are these.
    First, no one is pro-abortion, rather we are pro-choice, pro-freedom. Abortion is not a good thing, but neither is it intrinsically evil as the so-called pro-lifers insist it is. Should a woman have to bear the burden of being pregnant from someone who raped her? Only an inhuman monster would suggest they should, yet these pro-lifers claim to be the side of he just, protecting the innocent. Poppycock. The church has always stood opposite the rights and liberties of women.

    Second, we are not all Catholics (thankfully). We do not share your beliefs, your obsessions and your restrictions. We do not believe that the Pope has a mystical connection with God who has told him that abortion is wrong or when life begins. Anyone with a knowledge of ecclesiastical history could tell you that the Pope, and apparently by extension, God, can't even make up his mind about when life begins and what should happen to those who have abortions. We don't share in your beliefs, please don't try to force them upon us.

    Try doing some good in the world for a change, instead of spouting off about the very hard choices some women have had to make in regards to their own bodies.

    Posted by Brendan May 17, 09 07:23 PM
  1. There is no american political party that embraces all aspects of the Catholic faith. As such, Notre Dame either has to extend an invitation to all sitting presidents or to none. It has chosen to extend an invitation to all and I respect that and I am proud of the ND students who have engaged the discussions of the past couple weeks with a respectful and thoughtful mind.

    Unfortunately, abortion is not going away. The pro-life movement needs to spend more time, effort and money combatting unwanted pregnancy as well as providing for all women that choose life. The pro-life movement must also embrace those who made a regretful choice. We must minister to all.

    As a Boston transplant and Notre Dame graduate living in South Bend, I was disgusted by the costly displays in the weeks before Mr. Obama's visit. I can only imagine how many $130 cribs could have been purchased for needy mothers at the local woman's care center with the money spent. Grotesque photographs of fetuses do nothing more than alienate. They do not provide healing and they do not help anyone.

    Posted by bhawks81 May 17, 09 07:25 PM
  1. If his appeal powerfully transcends race, why give an honorary degree to an advocate of abortion which appears to result in 37% of abortions being African -American when only comprising 13% of the population? Is there a Margaret Sanger policy being implemented here?

    Posted by Peter Michael May 17, 09 07:27 PM
  1. I am deeply moved by the introductory remarks in announcing President Obama to the Notre Dame graduates. Whether you agree or disagree with his stand on choice or stem cell research, in this country, people are supposed to be able to say what is in their hearts without fear of reprisals. I am embarrassed that there were demonstrations against the President. As a Hoosier, I can only hope people will learn to respect the office of President, even though they are free to disagree with the person who holds that office.

    Posted by grammy May 17, 09 07:30 PM
  1. There is no such thing as a "pro life Catholic for choice".
    If you are pro abortion you cannot call yourself a Catholic. If you are against a basic tenant of the Catholic church you are not a Catholic! That has been made very clear by the American Bishops.

    Posted by Manuel Abella MD May 17, 09 07:32 PM
  1. His speech was one of many great speeches that he's given and he had it all going on this speech...Substance check...Oratory skills check...He has it all!!!! Get on board and stop hatin...Republicans neo-con whackos are the thing of the past...Hey elephants, we spent 8 yrs listening to garbage and lies and deceit...So deal with it!!!!!!!!!!!! Is the elephant an endangered species???

    Posted by Neoconsrwhackos May 17, 09 07:38 PM
  1. try reading the Bible once in a while. The first order of God is love. Women have rid them selves of unwanted pregnancies since the being of time. Why don't all the pro life people start a petition to receive unwanted children. There are still foster group homes all over the Country. Let them know that you want them and take them in. Give them a good life, as God would intended. Try not to be a hypocritical. God is watching. And if the real issue is race, we are given a charge by God to love everybody. God is not mocked.

    Posted by Aduni May 17, 09 07:38 PM
  1. And God formed man from the dust of the earth and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life and the man became a living soul. Genesis 2:7
    The debate isn't when life begins, we know that. From a biological standpoint, no doubt life begins at conception. The question is when does God inject a soul into that biological life form. Since as many as 60-80% of all conceptions fail to implant into the uterine wall (in normal, healthy humans) and are subsequently flushed down the toilet, if those embryos have a soul then surely heaven is full of embryos.
    Maybe St. Thomas Aquinas, Pope Innocent III, St. Augustine and Pope Gregory XIV knew something we humans have forgotten. Hmmmm...

    Posted by Dr. T J Hammond May 17, 09 07:38 PM
  1. #s 1, 5, 6, 8, 9 and 13 remind me of why I am no longer Catholic.

    #15 makes me wince at being a liberal. While I agree with much of what he says, the way he has put his opinions reinforces the shortsightedness "liberals suck" mentality of the aforementioned posters with whom I vehemently disagree.

    If you require one side to listen to the other, then be prepared to respectfully disagree with those you have chastised.

    Posted by Christine May 17, 09 07:39 PM
  1. Did you know that President Obama lifted a ban on federal funding for international groups that perform abortions? Fr. Jenkins said "When we face differences with fellow citizens... do we keep trying... to appeal to ethical principles that might be persuasive to others. " Yes, we need to keep trying. But we don't need to invite evil into our homes.

    Posted by RWR May 17, 09 07:40 PM
  1. I was totally against Obama speaking at Notre Dame for the very reason of what he advocates and what the university stands against. I believe if I let a homosexual preach from our church pulpit , it would be the same thing. I do not believe in abortion and I do not believe the homosexual life style is accepted by God. If you believe in the word of God then stand up for it.

    Posted by Sherry Thacker May 17, 09 07:41 PM
  1. Seems to me it would be more aptly said "Pro-my-life lapsed Catholic for the choice to kill small children" but that would be argumentative. I am ready and able to extend respect and love to any human being, even BO, but we have to stop killing the electorate.

    Posted by Kenneth Jones May 17, 09 07:42 PM
  1. "If you don't stand for something... You will fall for anything." I am certain Fr. Jenkins would like to re-write the Bible, such that God the Father does not destroy Sodom & Gomorrah (Genesis 19:24) and Jesus does not "Cleanse the Temple" (Matthew 21: 10-17; Mark 11:11; & Luke 19: 45-46). On this day, we should quote what Jesus repeated when he cleansed the temple; i.e., ""My house shall be called a house of prayer', but you have made it a den of robbers." Certainly Fr. Jenkins exhibits the weak Catholic leadership in the United States which has led to empty churches and 60% of pseudo-Catholics approving of Obama.

    Posted by Michael R. Zeihen May 17, 09 07:43 PM
  1. We live in an age of great deception. I would recommend the film the Silent Scream to those who think abortion is not that serious. What a disgrace and what deception that an abortionist should be invited to a catholic institution. Congratulations to those arrested and especially Mr Keyes.

    Posted by Jerry Fleming May 17, 09 07:51 PM
  1. To bhawks81:
    From an agnostic and pro-choice advocate, it remedies what irritation I have when I read these comments slightly to see that, even though we might not have the same viewpoints on abortion and we might differ on religion, there are still Catholics that can see that the majority of you are fools, spending money that should be spent on helping those women who are abruptly mothers, energy that should be counseling instead of dividing, and so forth. Thank you for being the eye in the maelstrom of stupidity.

    Posted by Awry May 17, 09 07:52 PM
  1. There are so many of you ... starting with the first moronic call for Jenkins to be fired ... who just don't get it. You never will because you are so strongly stuck on your one and only very personal point of view ... not a religious belief but an extremely narrow view of life, the cosmos and our purpose here on this tiny little spec we call earth. If you were really content with your position on such matters as the definition of life vs. freedom of choice, you would not be so hatefully terrified of those who cross these self-imposed, artificially created borders of morality.

    Posted by Zee! May 17, 09 07:53 PM
  1. Also, it's amazing how the Pope preaches love and acceptance and such and then all of you run around here saying others are evil, should be burnt, fired, etcetera. Congratulations on direct hypocrisy of the supposed mouth of God.

    Finally, a last note on those posters that pro-lifers love to use - what a terrible argument, to photograph the visceral side of an issue and try to emotionally sway people from logic. Same as vegetarians who try to use slaughterhouse footage to get people to go vegan, even though our entire history as human beings goes against it. Intellect is short out in Notre Dame supporters, apparently.

    Posted by Awry May 17, 09 07:56 PM
  1. Jenkins should be defrocked, go to the sacrament of penance, and apologize to his superiors in which he took a vow of obedience.

    Posted by Steve Douglas May 17, 09 07:56 PM
  1. I come from a 90%+ Catholic country where abortion is generally a crime, with a few exceptions, but that does NOT prevent many women from trying to terminate unwanted pregnancies by any possible means. Some will pay large amounts of money to get some doctor to risk his career by performing a safe abortion, while many will just go to cheaper and unlicensed practitioners and risk their lives in unhealthy conditions. Other women give birth and abandon the newborns, etc. And in most cases, they end up deeply regretting everything for life, simply because it's unnatural to get rid of our offspring.

    I'm Catholic, pro-file and pray for an end to abortions. However, I think making abortion illegal does not solve the problem, but just cloaks and hides it. I think there cannot be a real pro-file society without effective sexual education and very strong social support for both women and unwanted children. So, that's the starting point of true pro-life policies, not just making abortion illegal or a social stigma.

    Posted by Juan May 17, 09 08:01 PM
  1. Is Jenkins Possessed?

    The repugnance felt by faithful and obedient Catholics is due to the honoring by a Catholic institution of Obama because of his extreme acceptance of abortion, not whether or not he has accomplished something or will do so, or whether or not there should be dialogue with opposing actors on one subject or another, or what color he is or what he did to his grandmother. Would Jenkins contend that Catholics should have honored Hitler because of his incredible accomplishments of revitalizing Germany in the thirties?

    The logic is clear. You can honor an act when it conforms to your sense of what is honorably right. But you can not honor a person who acts so, if that person also acts in a way contrary to what you yourself advocate as honorably right. Example: The act of X giving some money to a homeless man is honorable, but not the person X, if X is also guilty of murdering another man. A more apt example might be the following: The act of a doctor doing free general practice work at a free health clinic is honorable, but pray, should Catholics honor that actual doctor if the doctor also does abortions there?

    Posted by JoeE May 17, 09 08:03 PM
  1. Father Jenkins should resign in disgrace. No wonder young Catholic men are not joining the priesthood - it is filled with moral cowards like Father Jenkins who advance their doctrines of moral relativism because they lack the courage to stand for truth.

    Posted by Joel May 17, 09 08:06 PM
  1. As a Notre Dame grad, I am proud of Fr. /jenkins, good job!

    Posted by Dave May 17, 09 08:06 PM
  1. The gospel of Jesus Christ is not about reason nor choice, it's about holiness and obedience to our God. Scripture does not evade the truth. President Obama has blasphemed God because of his unholy disobedience to the Word of God. Do not be fooled by his smile, speech or cunning words. God will not be mocked by one who supports late term abortion, supports homosexuality and would allow embryos to be used for research. He calls for no more junk science; but supports evolution as if it is real! God will judge him, we can't. One day he will have to face an angry God who will demand justice on the other side of life

    Posted by Ivan Truman May 17, 09 08:07 PM
  1. @19 -

    You are precisely the reason why the Catholic Church is shrinking in the United States. Actually, you can be a Catholic who struggles with this issue. You actually can be a practicing Catholic who both worries about her daughter and the life she carries in her. You can be angry at the young man who got her pregnant and will face NONE of these questions and concerns. You can hate torture, condemn it, and yet wonder about its efficacy in a ticking-time-bomb situation. You can hate the death penalty, but wish it - in all its contradictions - on people like Tim McVeigh, all the while knowing that it's wrong, and that you shouldn't, but you feel it anyway. To be a Catholic is not to follow the Church's litmus test; it is to follow in the path of the great thinkers, intellectuals, and yes, even the community organizers who comprise the great history of the Church. To be a Catholic is not to be a sheep. It is to ask the shepherd questions.

    Posted by Andrea May 17, 09 08:07 PM
  1. and of course to extend the foolishness ... the Pope and all good Catholics are opposed to contraception of any form. That stand really says it all when discussing what is so absolutely right ... and wrong about the actions of unwanted pregnancies.

    Posted by Dave May 17, 09 08:10 PM
  1. Pray for Jenkins! I would not want to go before God and explain why I invited an abortionist to speak at a Catholic college. Just shameful.

    If Paul says he needs to work out his salvation with "fear and trembling," I would not want to be Jenkins. There is just no sound reasoning for having Obama speak.

    Posted by Steve May 17, 09 08:12 PM
  1. Notre Dame is not a Catholic institution and Father Jenkins does not represent the teachings and doctrines of the Catholic Church by inviting a person who not only believes that innocent and helpless unborns can be slaughtered, but one, who by his power and authority, actively seeks to enact laws to that will result in the murder of miilions more! If Notre Dame were really a Catholic institution, it would be encouraging its students to pray and protest at abortion clinics rather than honor the man who is financing, supporting, and advancing the greatest holocaust in the history of mankind..

    Posted by Stan Truskie May 17, 09 08:16 PM
  1. If only Catholics would be this passionate about pedofile priest and doing something about that, but no, they just love their pedopriest isn't that right. Please, get your hypocritical protest right.

    Posted by The Incredible Hulk May 17, 09 08:19 PM
  1. Dear "Pro-lifer" for Choice and f ellow "believers": Please utilize your intelligence to study the SCIENCE about the basic biology of the fertilized egg - it is biologically unique, unique DNA. Study when does life really begin - not necessarily when it is human but when does its biological life begin. You are proud to be rational and scientific, tryly study the science without your preconceived political position. Outside of the biological facts but supported by them, the unborn child is not a meaningless blob of protoplasm without its own value. FYI I too am a beliver in FREEDOM, as in the freedom of each child to have an environment to reach its full potential. We all need to spend energy supporting all of our children. However, I do not believe in the "freedom" for the life of an unborn child to be terminated, sometimes while stil viable outside the womb. We all want a better world for all children to grow up in. What kind of world have we created when terminating the life of unwanted, innocent children is not only acceptable, but a positive good to be promoted and encouraged?

    Posted by Stephen the sad May 17, 09 08:21 PM
  1. Too bad you self rightous ignoramouses don't have the same vigor against priest that molest little boys and ruin their lives.Not to mention the church higher ups that cover for them.I don't believe in smoking or drinking,so I do neighter.If you don't believe in abortion,don't have one.Better yet keep your legs shut and it would be a mute point.Get a life will you?

    Posted by Ty May 17, 09 08:27 PM
  1. Thank God, Notre Dame, the students and others who are following the teachings of Jesus.

    It is difficult for me to believe some of the hatefulness in the name of religion. My best wishes to you that you may find the love in your heart that appears to be lacking re the protests, etc.

    Wish all graduates success in helping others.

    Posted by Judy Smith May 17, 09 08:31 PM
  1. The liberal Jesuits of this university are the type that will ultimately destroy the Church. Obama's speech was loaded with double talk and stupidly, the crowd lapped it up! The doctor story was a good example. He said he didn't change his views but changed the wording in his website so that it seemed like he "listens" to opposing views. How can anybody take this man seriously? He's a LIAR! And, the Catholics who ADORE Obama have been suckered into his lie!

    Posted by Conservative Catholic May 17, 09 08:33 PM
  1. I left the Catholic Church in high school after bearing so much Catholic hypocrisy I could stand no more. My dad is a ND fan and I always just thought it was because of our Irish Heritage. I am a pro-choice liberal who voted for Obama and today I am truly inspired by both ND and the President.

    This is what I wanted to experience in Catholic school- faith, reason and openness. Instead I got what you see in the comments below this fantastic and Truly Catholic speech; demand for retribution against those who are better than themselves, petty judgements, infatuation with labels and how you can't be this label and another label at the same time... uggh, Once again it is proven to me that there a few real Catholics out there.

    You almost had an ex-Catholic thinking about coming home. Instead my advice to those of you who feel these leaders at Notre Dame should be fired: study their speeches and Obama's speech again and again. Make a study of Father Hesburgh's life as well. Make it your spiritual study; you have much to learn. Cath-holos means all-embracing.

    Posted by K. Flanigan May 17, 09 08:33 PM
  1. Sorry, but I do not believe that it is self evident that human life begins at conception. It seems reasonable that there are at least degradations of the unborn. A blastocyst cannot be a human person as a grown person or even a fetus is a human person, as blastocysts can split off and become multiple persons. I am unaware of this phenomenon among persons I have ever known or read about--though this does happen with my dear plant friends. There is something about a ball of cells and a human person, even an underdeveloped human fetus, that make them qualitatively distinct. I cannot see how anyone can have moral outrage over emergency contraception for women who have been raped. I further cannot see how extreme prolifers can demonize someone who th inks it is not immoral, but even just, that a woman who has been raped can have access to emergency contraception despite the elimination of a blastocyst. Unless you have feelings for blastocysts, but why have such strong feelings for blastocysts when that compassion could be directed to living children and mothers?

    Posted by Prajna Sword May 17, 09 08:38 PM
  1. We must not expect this event, or any of the arguments, to persuade anyone to change their minds on such a polarized question. Rather it is predictable that more attack creates defensiveness and further entrenches existing opinions. However the notion that the opposition needs to be demonized or ostracized is just not practical; the logical extension of shunning others because they disagree with us is for us all to be bitter permanent enemies to the death.

    The slim hope left for humanity and especially democracy depends on our striving to work with others even though they disagree with us. Both atheists and fundamentalists can agree that this is not Heaven; we should not expect every other person here to come around to everything we believe.

    Posted by Ralph Ellis May 17, 09 08:38 PM
  1. God, am I glad I finally escaped the unholy clutches of the Catholic Curuch in the 12th Grade. I have never read such vapid garbage in my life. I am a lifelong Republican who voted for President Obama for a badly needed change away from small mindedness. I was frankly very impressed by Fr. Jenkins introduction. He represesents what little there is left to love and respect in the Catholic Church. I was impressed with the President's speach as well. There were times when I thought that his were some of the same words I would expect from a religious leader who really loved people instead of simply thought of them as tools to maintain the power of their Church. Words that might well have come from their Christ, but certainly not their Pope.

    Posted by Charles Ingram May 17, 09 08:39 PM
  1. I find it ironic the subject of abortion was raised at a Catholic University named for history's and Christianity's most famous unwed mother. Perhaps Father Jenkins should have asked himself what Our Lady (Notre Dame) would have thought of the abortion debate. She, who willingly took on what was arguably the most important unplanned pregnancy in history. She, who faced censure; ostracism and conceivably death by stoning for what was in her case truly a choice. I am saddened as Catholic Christian that the subject was raised at a commencement address at a school named for the mother of Christ; due solely to the insensitive choice of Father Jenkins, who knew his choice would offend, but went ahead anyway.

    Posted by Kathy May 17, 09 08:40 PM
  1. Curious that no one was complaining when Bush spoke there years ago... as the governor of Texas, he sentenced many a man to death. Obama's history of community service seems to me very much in line with the teachings of Christianity. Notre Dame should be honored to have him speak on their campus.

    Posted by democracynow May 17, 09 09:00 PM
  1. Isn't it amazing that the hateful comments are from those who are supposedly Christian? You are all proving what President Obama and Fr. Jenkins are saying. Such hatred accomplishes nothing. The plans Obama has will accomplish so much more to eliminate abortion than all your hatred and rantings. Open your minds people! And BTW, I am a Christian and Pro-Life. I prefer to follow a path that will actually make a difference than one that will only create more hate. I firmly believe the Religious Right is the greatest threat Christianity faces today!

    Posted by Maureen Deyo May 17, 09 09:03 PM
  1. When will Planned Parenthood honor Pope Benedict XVI or one of the bishops of the United States? That would be absurd, wouldn't it?

    It is just as absurd for Notre Dame to honor President Obama. Why should a (supposedly) Catholic institution honor someone they completely disagree with on a serious issue? Let him speak, yes, but honor him? No.

    Posted by Peter May 17, 09 09:05 PM
  1. Too many people missed Obama's courageously direct statement that the two sides cannot be reconciled. He didn't try to fudge on any "common ground." You had to listen to what he said AFTER that to get the substance of the speech and the essence of the message. (Warning: change in tone here to civil sarcasm.) I thought they should have invited Bush back instead of letting Obama speak. After all, what's 1 million dead Iraqis between "pro-life" friends? Oh, and thanks for telling me I can't be pro-choice and a Catholic. Sorry if I don't want the U.S. government to enforce my belief. on abortion.I really don't believe all sins should be crimes.

    Posted by Joe Earls May 17, 09 09:10 PM
  1. I frankly don't care about Notre Dame inviting the president and giving him an honorary degree - it's a school tradition, and he's not the first pro-choice/abortion speaker they've had - but you do NOT let him spout his ideological and political beliefs like he was still on the campaign trail.

    A commencement speech is supposed to be about encouraging the graduates as they go out into the world and offering some advice as they join the workforce, NOT about his views on abortion and stem-cell research!!! It was extremely wrong for the school to allow him to do that.

    To Brendan: Any (properly) practicing Catholic, and many pro-lifers believe that abortion IS an intrinsically evil thing. That is part of our faith and to try telling us that we're wrong for that belief is not only stupid, but offensive. God has his mind made up on every issue, the flaw in the system is and always has been the human who is interpreting his words. And, in case you didn't know, Catholics believe in a FORGIVING God. If you have true remorse for an action, God will forgive you - it's ALWAYS been this way in the Church! In most cases of abortion, it's a cope out. A woman was stupid enough to get herself pregnant and took the easy way out because she "didn't want the hassle." Also, I'm willing to bet that any "Catholic Agenda pusher" is more willing to have an intelligent discourse that you are.

    Posted by Cy May 17, 09 09:17 PM
  1. To #46... you are ignorant of a very important and simple fact: ND is run by the Congregation of the Holy Cross - NOT the Jesuits.

    Posted by Don Muench May 17, 09 09:19 PM
  1. I am a pro-life atheist. I think all life is important. Which is why I was so discouraged with Bush when he showed such a callous disregard for life by urging the US into a war based on lies. How many people have lost their lives over this terrible man's actions. That is is why it is so disappointing to see the few protestors who were out there with their pro life signs, never once mentioned this evil and terrible war that the US has found itself in. And where are the pro lifers in terms of the lives of the planet. All the earth's life is in peril from climate change. Where were the signs urging for respect for every life - plant, animal in addition to human. I think the pro-life christians must extend their view .

    Posted by arcaterra May 17, 09 09:25 PM
  1. I WILL SAY TO REV. JENKINS WHAT I HAVE SAID TO THE PRESIDENT ON HIS EMAIL. IF YOU TRULY BELIEVE THAT YOU HAVE THE POWER TO END WHAT GOD HAS BEGUN THROUGH ABORTION BY ALLOWING OBAMA TO SPEAK THAN I GUESS YOU ARE NOT AFRAID TO FACE YOUR MAKER WHEN YOU DIE.
    NO MAN OR WOMAN HAS THE RIGHT TO END WHAT GOD HAS ALLOWED. DON"T YOU DARE CALL YOURSELF A CHRISTIAN! WHERE THERE IS NO ONE STANDING UP AS LEADERS IN THEIR CHURCHES WE AMERICAN CHRISTIANS WILL STAND UP FOR THE UNBORN ''FETUS'' LIFE THAT GOD HAS BEGUN.

    Posted by LISA May 17, 09 09:35 PM
  1. Wow! The level of hatred and intolerance expressed by those who claim to follow the teachings love and patience amazes me.

    Posted by Michael May 17, 09 09:46 PM
  1. And yet, I believe that Christ would have said (as he did in other circumstances)

    Let him who is without sin --------

    It's nice to see so many who have not sinned and feel free to take a stronger judgmental position than Christ did

    Posted by Warlock3187 May 17, 09 09:48 PM
  1. KJR (#6), Warren(#13), Dr. Abella (#19), Kenneth Jones (#26), Stephen the sad (#43),

    I want to thank you all for your interest and curiosity about Pro-Life Catholics for Choice. You're more than welcome to read my PLCC 'blog to find out more: http://www.usatoday.com/community/profile.htm?plckPersonaPage=PersonaBlog&plckUserId=5d811832a16fbcb1&UID=5d811832a16fbcb1

    The important question to ask is "What sort of policies are actually going to save lives of the very young?" Will they be policies that attack the symptoms of the problem (a woman's access to abortion) or will they be policies that attack the root of the problem (a lack of respect for the lives of the unborn, a lack of protection from unwanted pregnancy, a lack of support by fathers, societal acceptance/pressure for premarital sex, lack of support for single mothers etc. etc.)

    The policies that attack the symptoms all involve attempts to control the behavior of desperate or confused women who feel as if they have no legitimate choice for protecting the lives of their children. The policies that attack the root of the problem are all about giving women MORE choice.

    It's a mistake to think that the goals of 'life' and the goals of 'choice' are always at odds with each other. After we've confronted the root causes of the barbaric practice of abortion we will have a society where women are able to 'choose life'.

    Paul Bradford, Pro-Life Catholics for Choice

    Posted by Paul Bradford May 17, 09 09:52 PM
  1. Although I approve of the invitation to Obama at ND, I do understand that there are times when an invitation would be abhorrant. Imagine Hitler being honored with a degree from one of the great German universities. One hears a lot of talk about "intrinsic" evil. Is it intrinsically evil to assert falsely that an enemy is ready to "nuke" us and then start and prosecute a war that kills tens of thousands of innocent people? I have to wonder if it is intrinsically evil to persuade people to vote for incompetent politicians who will ruin the country (and maybe the world) in other ways - only because they are "pro-life"? But Obama has to prove he can reduce abortions, or else he's an empty suit.

    Posted by Don Muench May 17, 09 09:57 PM
  1. "There is no such thing as a "pro life Catholic for choice".
    If you are pro abortion you cannot call yourself a Catholic. If you are against a basic tenant of the Catholic church you are not a Catholic! That has been made very clear by the American Bishops. " Posted by Manuel Abella MD May 17, 09 07:32

    Are these the same American Bishops who protected, shielded from prosecution in the name of public relations, and re-assigned the men who sexually abused the children of the faithful to different churches where they abused even more children? They repeatedly violated the trust and bodies of LIVING children. Should they have not all been excommunicated? How can you profess to care so much for the unborn when you did not rise up and demand that all involved, including the venerated bishops, be removed from their positions and punished by the church and/or the state? You folks who were more embarassed by the scandal than outraged didn't have your priorities straight.

    It is not a contradition to be Catholic, pro-life, and pro-choice. While many Catholics would not chose abortion as an option for religious reasons, they also recognize that it is a legal choice in a nation that has citizens of many religious groups who are not subject to the teachings of the Catholic church. As the president pointed out today, there is no need to demonize those who have different views. What I hear posted here is that it is the obligation of every Catholic to hate, disparage, and revile any other human who doesn't share their views on abortion - without exception. What brand of Christianity is that???

    Posted by citizen45 May 17, 09 10:01 PM
  1. Let's lighten up people.Did FatherJenkis not say the Catholic Church does not share President Obama's views on abortion and stem cell research? As a practicing and devout Catholic, I share the views of our Holy Catholic Church. However, should we not open up our minds and hearts to people of opposing views. Let's not polarize ourselves. WhileI have attended or visited Notre Dame, I will always the Fighting Irish as well as ourJesuit brothers ofBoston College.

    Posted by Bob Blanco May 17, 09 10:05 PM
  1. Paul Bradford - I won't speak for the others but your handle is a contradiction in and of itself, and part of the phony "watering down" of the issue. Its a fraud to call youself a "Pro-life Catholic for Choice". You are no different than Kennedy, Kerry, Pelosi, Dodd, Leahy, Cuomo, Ferrarro, the bast majority of the Massachusetts legislature.

    You handle should be: "Dissenting Catholic who supports legal abortion". That would be more accurate.

    Posted by KJR May 17, 09 10:05 PM
  1. As an ex-Catholic who proudly voted for Obama, I must say I'm proud of both Father Jenkins and Obama. I'm sickened by the uber-conservative, hypocritical Catholics on this broad spewing their garbage and calling for the head of Jenkins. Don't you people get it? The Catholic church, more than any other religious institution in the world, is shrinking at a rapid rate. People aren't entering the Priesthood, old members are tired of the stone-age values and logic that the church continues to follow, and people are starting to think for themselves. I think Father Jenkins is attempting to appeal to a new generation of people. If the Catholic church finds more open and accepting Priests like Jenkins, there is hope for the future

    Posted by Ben May 17, 09 10:05 PM
  1. As Catholics, can't we hold firm to our beliefs and still be tolerable of others.

    Posted by anthony bellino May 17, 09 10:11 PM
  1. We are ND.

    Posted by michelle perez May 17, 09 10:13 PM
  1. "Obama is serving MoveOn, DailyKos, George Sors, Planned Parenthood, NARAL, NOW etc etc etc"

    Yeah, and the majority of people who voted in November. Get used to the idea.

    Obama just gave the anti-abortion crowd the best advice they've ever had. They'd be wise to take it, and say 'thanks'.

    Posted by Harris May 17, 09 10:14 PM
  1. Dr. Hammond (#22),

    Whenever people get into a discussion of the human soul they spend a lot of time talking about things they can't prove and don't really understand.

    We do, however, understand a little bit about the human body, and a human body can be said to be present from the moment of fertilization. There are, roughly speaking, an average of 1,500 new human bodies produced every hour in the United States and, as you suggested, about 900 never live long enough to become embryos. It's pointless to speculate whether 900 unimplanted blastocysts generate 900 souls in heaven. That, truly, is a question that's above our 'pay grade'.

    We can, however, fruitfully investigate whether there is something people can do to improve the chances of bodily survival for the 900. We understand how to deal with bodies and we ought to focus our attention on that. Remember, we once had a pediatric death rate that was much higher than it is now. We improved that survival rate based on improved medicine and health care. We can, by learning more about prenatal medicine and health care, improve the survival rate for the 900 blastocysts that perish every hour.

    We simply have to set our minds to the task.

    Paul Bradford, Pro-Life Catholics for Choice

    Posted by Paul Bradford May 17, 09 10:14 PM
  1. A sad chapter for Catholic Higher Ed...A road to Hell has been paved.... Obama is a tool of the Devil and ND took the bait--hook, line and sinker....As for Pro Life Catholics for Choice--you have got to be kidding yourselves!

    Posted by Paul Q May 17, 09 10:22 PM
  1. You have the great saints in heaven Lord - I thank each and every one of them for their love and loyalty to you and I'm sorry that I didn't pray enough and I didn;t do more to help stop what happened today. I am very, very upset and I don't think I can ever forgive Jenkins or McBrien - how can they be priests Lord when they do the devil's work and are leading all those young, foolish people astray. Teach me to forgive Lord because I hate abortion with every fibre of my being.

    Posted by Lizzie May 17, 09 10:22 PM
  1. Maureen Deyo (#53):

    You say, "The plans Obama has will accomplish so much more to eliminate abortion than all your hatred and rantings."

    After listening to Obama's address (and reading Fr. Jenkins' introduction) I have more hope than ever that there will be a big drop in the abortion rate during Obama's administration. Bigger, even, than the drop we realized during Clinton's administration (which was 17%).

    The president has always maintained that we shouldn't extend human rights to previable fetuses. That's why he always talks about reducing the 'need' for abortion rather than reducing abortion. He's careful to avoid saying anything that would concede that there's something about abortion that makes lowering the abortion rate a good thing.

    Just the same, though, there's no one in the universe who stands to gain more with a lowering of the abortion rate than Barack H. Obama. If he knows what's good for him -- and I really believe he does -- he's praying more fervently than any Catholic bishop for the care and protection of the unborn.

    Paul Bradford, Pro-Life Catholics for Choice

    Posted by Paul Bradford May 17, 09 10:31 PM
  1. I love how pretty much every commenter who has posted something negative about ND's decision to bring in Obama obviously did not read Fr. Jenkins' speech. They just came to the page to leave their ignorant thoughts. As a member of the ND class of 2006, I'm thrilled to see the university moving forward and refusing to give in to the lunatic ramblings and ravings of those who would ruin it by burying their heads in the sand.

    Posted by Lawrence May 17, 09 10:39 PM
  1. citizen45 (#64)

    You say, "It is not a contradition to be Catholic, pro-life, and pro-choice. While many Catholics would not chose abortion as an option for religious reasons, they also recognize that it is a legal choice in a nation that has citizens of many religious groups who are not subject to the teachings of the Catholic church."

    Your reasoning is similar to the reasoning our Catholic Vice President, Joe Biden, expressed during the campaign. But I disagree with him.

    Pro-Lifers weaken their position whenever they turn concern for the unborn into a "Catholic" issue or a "Christian" issue or a "religious" issue. The best thing to do is to make it a justice issue, or a human rights issue. You don't have to adopt any Catholic beliefs in order to conclude that the very young have as much right to live as you do.

    The big issue, for me, is what to do about it. The question isn't whether our society should protect the unborn but how. I'm not satisfied saying, "Well, you Catholics need to follow the Catholic rules and steer clear of abortion but everyone else may do as they please." If I care about people who are growing in the womb of a Catholic woman I should care about people who are growing in the womb of any woman.

    Paul Bradford, Pro-Life Catholics for Choice

    Posted by Paul Bradford May 17, 09 10:40 PM
  1. some of you would fit right in with radical islam.
    the same intolerant spouting off hoping to impose catholic sharia on an unsuspecting populace.
    I for one am thankful that ND isn't the madrassa of ignorance and hate you would insist it become.

    Posted by pb May 17, 09 10:50 PM
  1. abortion is the woman's choice and the woman's alone. Everybody else needs to stay out of it and keep their big fat mouths shut!

    Posted by FapFap May 17, 09 11:00 PM
  1. If you are a product of the Class of Notre Dame Lawrence then I am not surprised that the biggest proponent of abortion was given an honorary degree today. Show some respect for your elders by granting them the same courtesy that was extended to Obama. Incidentally, are you a practising catholic - do you in fact attend mass - I guarantee you don't, so do not lecture committeed Christians on their views. You are a disgrace to your class of 2006.

    Posted by Siobhan O'Hara May 17, 09 11:00 PM
  1. I must say that I have never been more proud to ne an ND student than today. The way that the class of 2009 and the other classes at ND have responded to this "controversy," has been with a respect for all parties and a willingness to look at both sides of the issues. President Obama coming may not have lead to world-wide discussions about abortion between those who support it and those who oppose it, but it did cause intelligent discussion on campus. Even though the majority of students at ND are pro-life, there are some that are pro-choice and everyone was willing to talk and listen to others on their positions. I can't even recall the number of discussions I have had on the topic of abortion since the announcement of President Obama as our commence speaker, but I know it has been many, many more that I have ever had summed throughout my 22 years. My views on abortion were never changed from these discussions and if anything they were solidified, but they allowed me to see and consider others opinions and it allowed us to walk away with a mutual respect for each other and our points of views.

    I was never a very big Fr. Jenkins fan (too conservative and uptight) until he invited President Obama to speak and since then my respect for him has only increased and my liking of him has also increased. I commend him for giving a great speech today (might have been more pertanient and better than Obama's) and allowing for all of us to grow in our faith, without violating others, whether they hold our beliefs or not.

    I have been Catholic all of my life and these Catholic extremists, who are calling for Fr. Jenkins to be fired and saying that all of us students are going to rot in Hell since we didn't oppose President Obama speaking, are making me wonder if we even have the same faith. My Catholic faith is based in treating all with respect and dignity, as well as serving others, especially those less fortunate. Calling someone the spawn of Satan is not respecting them. To you extremists, try to be more like Jesus and talk and appreciate those who are different from you instead of condemning them. It's amazing what some kindness, compassion, and true caring can do for you and how many people you can actually influence through these actions.

    Posted by Meghan May 17, 09 11:03 PM
  1. I know Father Jenkins personally and I'll tell you that the LAST things he is are conservative and uptight. He was raised in a large liberal household. He is open to other ideas and schools of thought.

    Posted by Joe May 17, 09 11:12 PM
  1. Lawrence is not a disgrace at all. You, O'Hara, on the other hand...

    Posted by Ben May 17, 09 11:14 PM
  1. The ugliness of the protests today are a stark reminder that the tragedy of abortion is nothing compared to the violence done to the Gospel when fanatics reduce it to a vote on a single issue.

    Posted by A. Catholic May 17, 09 11:15 PM
  1. Respect isn't given, Siobhan, it's earned. And you (and nearly everyone I've talked to who opposed having President Obama speak and receive a degree today) have done exactly nothing to earn it. I'm glad you're quick to assume "how Catholic" I am and how often I attend mass- Lord knows that turning that into some kind of contest is always a good way to win an argument.

    Posted by Lawrence May 17, 09 11:15 PM
  1. There is far too much hatred in the world. I don't believe that the people who made the hateful comments posted follow the teachings of Christ. I am saddened to see that so many Catholics are so hateful and divisive. I applaud Father Jenkins and the University of Notre Dame for inviting the President of the United States. I applaud you for not buckling under pressure. The President of the United States deserves our respect, not our hatred. He is as entitled to his beliefs as is any one of us.

    "More than any problem in the arts or sciences - engineering or medicine – easing the hateful divisions between human beings is the supreme challenge of this age. If we can solve this problem, we have a chance to come together and solve all the others." –Fr. Jenkins

    I wish that more people would reflect upon Father Jenkins' remarks and be more tolerant of others who may not share our beliefs.

    Posted by Jennifer May 17, 09 11:23 PM
  1. A lot of people seem to think believing in "dialogue" is all that is necessary. They have totally convinced me. This morning I believed that abortion was morally evil, but now I realized I just need to be more open minded and that with "dialogue" we will all heal the division which divides our common purpose under which we all stand ready to do for the nation what it has done for us.

    Richard Harry
    Pro Life Catholics for Abortion on Demand

    Posted by Richard Harry May 17, 09 11:57 PM
  1. Obama has now a doctorate on what exactly?

    I guess we should all refer to him as Dr. INFANTICIDE from now on.

    The way this Jenkins twisted the words of Gaudium et Spes to benefit his own interest is shameful.

    A person like Obama who has no regard for human life should be given no regard. Mr. (not Father) Jenkins. Get it?

    Jenkins should be ex-communicated immediately.

    Posted by Mira May 17, 09 11:58 PM
  1. A famous Canadian Catholic theologian, Fr. Bernard Lonergan SJ, said before we can begin to discuss things theological, we need to first:
    Be attentive
    Be intelligent
    Be reasonable
    Be responsible
    Be loving.
    Fr. Lonergan was very influential in writing many documents for Vatican II. Being Catholic means being these things in one's relationships with God, others and oneself.
    There is no room in Catholic dialogue for slander, hatred or the kind of divisive language I've seen here. Let us first be attentive, intelligent, reasonable, responsible andloving, then converse.

    Posted by Lonerganian May 18, 09 12:03 AM
  1. To Meghan regarding her comment:
    Posted by May 17, 09 11:03 PM

    Sweetie I have news for you. YOU ARE NOT CATHOLIC.

    He supported infanticide not once, but 4 times. What don't you get about that?

    Respect is earned. And tell me, does a politician who denies the care of mostly already wounded babies who survived an abortion without anesthesia and who were left to die a slow painful death deserves respect or deserves to be challenged?

    Like I stated before. A person, no matter who it is, that has no regard for human life should be given no regard.

    Posted by Mira May 18, 09 12:09 AM
  1. Slavery was legal, (and intrinsically evil as well) so this non-sense about "oh, I am personally against it, but it is legal, blah blah blah, is nonsense.

    Legality does not make it moral (except to the secularists like ontheleft and others).

    As I stated earlier, so long as your mind cannot distinguish between the Church defined and unequivocal intrinsic evil of abortion from other important issues, you are missing the point.

    Posted by KJR May 18, 09 12:22 AM
  1. There is no gray area when it comes to abortion and Father Jenkins making this sound like his way of opening the dialog is blasphemy. If he wants Obama to speak then so be it, but don't pretend his intent was to open a dialog. Obama could not answer the abortion question pre-election and got elected, so why should he change his beliefs now?

    Posted by VZE3TWZX May 18, 09 12:27 AM
  1. Jesus preached love thy neighbor and that was it. He didn't preach love thy neighbor, unless she had an abortion. He didn't preach love thy neighbor, unless he or she is gay. He said LOVE! Any so-called Christian who uses the words of Christ to preach hatred and divide us as humans is very simply, MAKING A MOCKERY OF JESUS HIMSELF. Wake up false Christians.

    Posted by Matt S May 18, 09 12:48 AM
  1. The extremely high level of hatred shown by the people who claim to follow Christian Catholic teachings is pretty disappointing.
    To Numbers 68 and 80 (and the others who have said similar things): thank you for demonstrating true Christian values.
    To all the people who are demanding that Fr. Jenkins be fired, and suggesting that President Obama is pure evil, and that all who do not agree with you on these issues is automatically going to hell: I would ask you to take a moment to ask yourself if you are actually living as Jesus Christ commands (with love and respect for all people including those we consider enemies) but I don't think you will , because you don't seem even remotely interested in actually discussing these issues with anyone who may disagree with you. Did you even read Fr. Jenkin's speech or did you just jump on so you could call for his resignation and send himn to hell?

    Posted by A Pro-Life Catholic who thinks Obama shouldn't have gotten that honorary degree but still thinks tha May 18, 09 12:49 AM
  1. Obama was only filling his responsibility to speak at Notre Dame. The fact that he was invited is the problem. The Catholic Church should reconsider their leadership in this case.

    Obama should not have been invited and this will only further destroy the Church by making impressionable teens think their leadership is confused or stupid when it comes to who should speak at such events. Too bad for the students.

    Posted by Onebythesea May 18, 09 01:12 AM
  1. No matter what the issue and no matter who is right or wrong, we have to 'obey Jesus'commands' namely 'love your enemy', 'pray for your enemy', 'do good deeds for / to your enemy'. St Paul follows up with a very clear definition of what the attributes of love are: kind, gentle, not puffed up, not holding grudges, speaks no evil, etc.' Also, this past week, Pope Benedict spent a lot of time preaching about 'peace, the use of reason, listening and dialoging respectfully. Let us pursue finding out the root causes of the decision to abort and work to changing those circumstances. The biggest problems are actually beneath the surface.

    Posted by Marilyn Muench May 18, 09 01:17 AM
  1. I'm surprised as always at the heat and discomfort that is created by a simple statement truth. That truth, by the way, is that unborn children are human beings as you and I are human beings and have the same intrinsic right to life and breath as we do. The fact that babies inhabit the mother's body (as all of you at one time did) does not make them either less human or less intimately deserving of life. They are full human beings from the moment of conception. There is no magic spark which confers humanity 6 weeks or 3 months later. The power of a mother to do her child harm does not confer the right. Just as we cannot kill our neighbor simply because we are able and find them difficult or troubling.

    Posted by vickyg May 18, 09 01:28 AM
  1. The absurdity of some of the remarks here amaze me, such as "if you don't want an abortion, don't have one." (an old,still stupid response). To see how absurd this is, try a little substitution. "If you don't like murder, don't kill anyone." (or) "If you don't want slaves, don't get one." Remarks like this are a symptom of the extreme narcissism of our society. To people like this all moral good has to stand up to that most stringent of all laws, the law of self. Is it good for me? Do I like it? Will it further my life. What do I want? Huh...glad my life doesn't yet depend upon this kind of reasoning.

    Posted by vickyg May 18, 09 01:35 AM
  1. I am aghast at the ignorance and hate spewed by all of the so called "Christians" in these posts. Unbelievable! It is no wonder the world will march on without you. "Burn him at the stake?" Really? Is that what your Christianity teaches you? Having been raised Catholic my entire life, I am in disbelief of the sentiments from the majority of you. Where were your blood thirsty cries when Bush spoke there a few years back? Though he's anti-abortion and against stem cell research - did you all bemoan the thousands upon thousands whose blood is on his hands from the war in Iraq? Your venom sickens me, and I would pray for your heart to open and tolerance to prevail - but your ignorance is far too rooted. Sad.

    Posted by Scott May 18, 09 01:55 AM
  1. "it is about honoring a man who enables evil. Lord have mercy on us."
    Posted by KJR May 17, 09 07:01 PM

    KJR, you supported Bush the 21st century Butcher of Baghdad and Torturer In Chief, right? And you support the Vatican and the Catholic hierarchy, right? The same Vatican and hierarchy that aided and abetted the rape of thousands of innocent kids. You have spent years enabling evil. You casually disregard of war and torture and then claim that others are evil? You'd best ask for mercy for your own soul.

    Posted by OnTheLeft May 18, 09 02:24 AM
  1. "Its a fraud to call youself a "Pro-life Catholic for Choice". You are no different than Kennedy, Kerry, Pelosi, Dodd, Leahy, Cuomo, Ferrarro, the bast majority of the Massachusetts legislature. You handle should be: "Dissenting Catholic who supports legal abortion". That would be more accurate."
    Posted by KJR May 17, 09 10:05 PM

    Do you ever tire of your unbounded arrogance, KJR? Who the hell are you to question anyone's beliefs? Mr. Bradford hardly needs your approval of his Catholicism. You remain the very embodiment of the "whitened sepulchre", and it is you who is an utter fraud. You claim to follow a man of peace while supporting war and torture. Amazing hubris on your part.

    Posted by OnTheLeft May 18, 09 02:34 AM
  1. As a Boston native and Notre Dame Alumnus, I am very proud to have Fr. Jenkins as Notre Dame's President. If Notre Dame wants to continue to show that is it a premier national university then it needs to encourage open dialogue - that is what great universities do. Just think about all the conversations that occurred in dorm rooms and around kitchen tables over the past couple months as a result of President Obama's visit to South Bend. This is exactly what Universities should be doing - encouraging constructive engagement in an educational environment. Some individuals wish that Notre Dame didn't extend Obama an honorary degree, and I understand that. It's clear that Notre Dame recognizes that encouraging constructive engagement of conflict is a crucial characteristic that all great universities must possess...and I believe that Fr. Jenkins respects President Obama's ability to effectively communicate with those that don't necessarily agree with him.
    I am proud of my Notre Dame affiliation and hopeful that under the current leadership it will continue to make me proud.
    GO IRISH.

    Posted by Michael D May 18, 09 02:40 AM
  1. "If you want to be pro choice, then you are not a practicing catholic. End of story."
    Posted by Warren May 17, 09 07:19 PM

    And so Warren has spoken and all must obey. Actually, Warren, I know lots of pro-choice practicing Catholics, and they are far more in tune with the teachings of one Jesus of Nazareth than any of you on the right will likely ever be.

    Posted by OnTheLeft May 18, 09 02:40 AM
  1. Abortion is not just the intrinsic evil that the Catholic Church teaches against. It is, first of all, a violation of Natural Law. It follows that a president who espouses unnatural behaviors, i.e., infanticide, homosexuality, cloning for human parts, etc. should not be honored by those who respect the law of nature.

    You cannot dialogue with someone who has no respect for nature, no matter how charming. And to confer an honorary degree to someone who violates nature is an insult against God, nature, and all that is good. Fr. Jenkins has it all wrong.

    Posted by Naturally Catholic May 18, 09 05:55 AM
  1. Notre Shame

    The president deceitfully spoke about "stem cell research," pretending that all his opponents are against all stem cell research, when he knows that Catholics and others are only against Embryonic research, not adult or umbilical cord, both of which have proven of more practical use so far. Catholics and others are against embryonic stem cell research because it uses, it instrumentalizes, one person for the use of another person, and that first person was not able to give consent.

    The prez also spoke of "reducing unwanted pregnancies." Do you think he meant chastity until marriage for the ND kids, or artificial contraception, which is against Catholic doctrine even if it is used by the majority of Catholics?

    Notre Shame.

    Posted by gaudete May 18, 09 09:48 AM
  1. People, let us not be hypocrites! Let’s see who among those priests & bishops who are so vocal about pro-birth / pro-life that do not have illicit relationships with men or women. And what do these pro-life priests advice their girlfriends (prostitutes) when their girlfriends get pregnant? ABORTION! This is really true.

    Posted by alberto cutie May 18, 09 09:57 AM
  1. Conservative Catholic, as pointed out, it is not the liberal Jesuits who staff Notre Shame, it is the equally liberal Holy Cross Fathers, who also staff Stonehill, so boycott them too, and do not send them your kids, grandkids, neices, nephews nor money.

    Michael @ # 60, and many others say: "Wow! The level of hatred and intolerance expressed by those who claim to follow the teachings love and patience amazes me." There's an old Catholic saying that goes back at least to St. Augustine: Love the sinner, hate the sin." So we love you, Fr. Jenkins, President Obama etc. enough to tell that you're opinion on abortion is wrong, sinful, and endangers your immortal soul. That is not hateful, that is loving and tolerant in its deepest, not your shallow, meaning. Besides, there are many intolerant remarks from the lib side too, e.g., #78

    "abortion is the woman's choice and the woman's alone. Everybody else needs to stay out of it and keep their big fat mouths shut!"

    The slogan "we are ND" is about unintelligently contentless as "yes we can" and "change we can believe in." Any ND grad who spouts that slogan
    should demand their parents' money back.

    Lonerganian @ #88,

    "Fr. Lonergan was very influential in writing many documents for Vatican II." Bernard Lonergan certainly did not "write" any of the Vat. II documents. The bishops of the Council did, with the help of expert theologians, of whom Lonergan was not one, simply because he was a philosopher, not a theologian. Back to school, you.
    Peter @#54. excellent retort:

    "When will Planned Parenthood honor Pope Benedict XVI or one of the bishops of the United States? That would be absurd, wouldn't it?
    "It is just as absurd for Notre Dame to honor President Obama. Why should a (supposedly) Catholic institution honor someone they completely disagree with on a serious issue? Let him speak, yes, but honor him? No."

    Typical leftie hypocrisy "do as they say, not as they do." No, on second thought, don't do as they say either.

    Posted by gaudete May 18, 09 10:06 AM
  1. It's the same old back and forth on these blogs with respect to this issue. Obviously we live in America and have the right to disagree. I just hope those who are pro choice would understand that to those of us who are against abortion believe in our hearts and minds that killing the unborn is the same as killing a one day, one week, or one year old. It has nothing to do with an agenda. So for us we no more believe it's OK for a pro choice person to receive and award at a Catholic University then it would be for someone who would feel a person has the right to kill their born child. IF you disagree that again is your right but I would at least feel you could understand our position. Most abortions occurr when the unborn child looks entirely like a small human and I would find it hard to believe people couldn't understand how the act of an abortion could horrify an individual. What bothers me is the pro choice individuals who won't even educate themselves on the actual procedure. As someone said in a past blog I strongly urge you to check out silentscream.org

    Peace and Blessings

    Posted by proud2bcatholic May 18, 09 10:25 AM
  1. I was in Maine when Rose Kennedy's funeral was televised and I watched with horror as Cardinal Law gave Ted Kennedy and his second wife the host. I felt the same reaction yesterday as I watched Obama and Jenkins on the stage together. When evil is involved there is always disquiet in a person's soul. Cardinal Law ended his days in disgrace and I have no doubt the same will happen to Jenkins - whether in this life or the next and for his sake I truly hope it is in this world. Abortion is the most grevious of all sins. We know the truth and we are required always, always to do the right thing by God.

    Posted by Joanie May 18, 09 11:02 AM
  1. What courage did Obama show by going to ND? He spoke before faculty who voted for him and students who voted for him. He obtained political advantage by using the prestige of ND to cloak his nefarious deeds in Catholic sanctity.

    Science clearly shows that human life begins at conception. By supporting abortion, Obama advances an anti-science, anti-life agenda that results in the powerful oppressing the powerless. He should be ashamed of himself, as should Fr. Jenkins.

    Posted by Batman May 18, 09 11:04 AM
  1. The Pro-Life movement has to ultimately be about a conversion of hearts; it has been overlooked and absent in these postings that yesterday's liturgical readings proclaimed that "God is Love".

    If we continue to perpetuate a vitriolic discourse in attempts to save and promote the humanity of all life, we have failed. In this Pauline year, we should look to our tradition-- our tradition of conversion-- of men and women like St. Paul having a conversion of hearts when they have experienced the God of Love.

    Fr. Jenkins quite clearly noted Obama's policies are anathema to Catholic teaching, but his message to approach the table with another who may not share your convictions is an endorsement of the Gospel message- a chance for salvation and redemption.

    During this season of Easter let us remember that Christ came to save us all, and in his time here to whom did he reach out to most? Not the self-righteous, the public pious, but rather the weak, the sinners, the ostracized. We must as Catholics be beacons of light for those people in life who are at a crossroads; President Obama is one of those. We must pray for his conversion of heart, and the hearts of all men, that all life is precious. Obama's closing remarks actually harkens to possibly his greatest flaw in his policy and comments; he espouses a dignity to be extended to all people's, yet neglects to truly recognize the significance of the dignity of the life of all.

    This is where Fr. Jenkins message should ring most true; let us create an environment where President Obama and others who share his beliefs might be treated with Christ's love. Let us pray that through interactions with those of us who try to serve Him and be reflections-- beacons of light-- of his Glory that Christ is seen in us and a conversion of hearts might take place- for the benefit of the person with whom we are in contact, and for the respect and dignity of all human life.

    For us Catholics, that is truly what God has intended- for us to love our neighbor and to serve Him by loving; hate the sin, not the sinner. Let us pray that yesterday fosters a sense of love, not hate, and as God is Love I pray that hearts will be converted and that the sins and transgressions that all of us are guilty may be made revealed to us, and we ask for His forgiveness and to be reconciled with Him.

    I truly believe If that is what we all prayed, and how we all tried to serve Him, life would be preserved and cherished. Will it happen overnight, in a decade, a century? Even if there is only one person who is converted because of His love as evidenced through our actions, that is one more life that has been preserved, and it has been worthy.

    Pray for all life, live as Christ lived, ask for the forgiveness of one's sins, and love thy neighbor. When at the crossroads, may His light guide and His love manifest in you.

    Yours in Christ love and peace. We are ND!

    Posted by cyberbackpacker May 18, 09 11:35 AM
  1. The Catholic Church - and Jesus, in Matthew 19:8 and other verses makes it clear that he agrees - that Divorce is wrong.

    Therefore, Notre Dame should only allow speakers who support a federal constitutional amendment to outlaw Divorce.

    Anything less than enthusiastic endorsement of this divorce-is-illegal amendment is proof that the speaker does not share Catholic principles.

    Posted by JohnJay60 May 18, 09 11:55 AM
  1. To #56 whose comment was...
    "In most cases of abortion, it's a cope out. A woman was stupid enough to get herself pregnant and took the easy way out because she 'didn't want the hassle.' Also, I'm willing to bet that any 'Catholic Agenda pusher' is more willing to have an intelligent discourse than you are..."

    Your comments prove that you may not be qualified to have an intelligent discourse. The attitude displayed in your statement "a woman was stupid enough to get herself pregnant" only serves to underscore one of the problems with many "pro-life" supporters. It takes TWO people to create a pregnancy. Until people like yourself focus their moral certitude on fostering a culture that understands that the males of the species ALSO bear responsibility for the choices that they make, there will continue to be unwanted pregnancies.

    Posted by SKG May 18, 09 12:31 PM
  1. Gee - does the Catholic Church stand for anything anymore? I mean if Father Jenkins subjectively wants to vote for Obama - okie dokie with all free thinking Americans - but he cannot seriously AWARD and COMMEND in the context of representing the Catholic Church and its membership that Obama is a man of religious conviction, of pure intent, of racial tolerance and love for others, when Obama's personal 20 year long record of membership in a Christian Church has been recorded to be choosing the most offensive and racially intolerant of one's - headed by controversial Jeremiah Wright.

    Posted by Loreann May 18, 09 12:32 PM
  1. "Science clearly shows that human life begins at conception. By supporting abortion, Obama advances an anti-science, anti-life agenda that results in the powerful oppressing the powerless."
    Posted by Batman May 18, 09 11:04 AM

    Except that science shows no such thing, but instead indicates that ensoulment occurs at the end of the second trimester with independent brain waves. You claim that the Catholic Church is pro-science? Is that based on the 360 years it took them to acknowledge their errors in the Galileo matter? I'm presuming that you're yet another right wing Republican voter. Presuming that you supported Bush and McCain, you actually want to accuse others of being anti-life, anti-science and favoring the powerful at the expense of the powerless? Were you asleep during the Bush administration?

    Posted by OnTheLeft May 18, 09 01:03 PM
  1. "Typical leftie hypocrisy 'do as they say, not as they do.'"
    Posted by gaudete May 18, 09 10:06 AM

    Right, gaudete, coming from a far rightie who votes for the mass murderers and torturers who instigate war for profit, those who callously torture prisoners in the hopes that the tortured will give them the answers they want to justify their war. What's your opinion of Dick Cheney, gaudete? Tell us all, from your perch on the far right, what a decent man you think he is, this sick, sadistic excuse for a human being who apparently authorized the use of brutality against prisoners in violation of US and international law, and in violation of all standards of human decency. Can we presume that you voted for him, gaudete? Talk about hypocrisy - sanctimony and moral denunciation from those who glory in the mass murder of those who are born.

    Posted by OnTheLeft May 18, 09 01:14 PM
  1. Posted by Loreann May 18, 09 12:32 PM

    Loreann, you belong to a church whose hierarchy sanctioned the rape of children. Now I'm damned certain Jeremiah Wright never did that. However, based on your post, should we impugn your "religious convictions", your "pure intent", your "tolerance and love of others", as you do with the president, based on your association with that church and its hierarchy? It only seems fair that we do, wouldn't you agree? If you want to make association an issue, your own associations are equally an issue.

    Posted by OnTheLeft May 18, 09 01:22 PM
  1. In America, we all know it is God before Country. That is the way the founders saw it before us, maybe that's why our motto is "In God We Trust". The University of Notre Dame belongs as part of the "Body of Christ", not of the body politic. Obama's speech is ingeniously divisive. No true Catholic is independent of God and his Church. Morals can not be separated from politics. No woman or man or state, except for a just war, has the power over life and death, especially over the innocent life of their own offspring.

    Posted by Frank V. Arundell May 18, 09 01:43 PM
  1. Reading all of these comments was like having your
    toilet overflow.

    Posted by Martin Pal May 18, 09 01:50 PM
  1. ontheleft: May 18, 09 01:14 PM:

    "Except that science shows no such thing, but instead indicates that ensoulment occurs at the end of the second trimester with independent brain waves. You claim that the Catholic Church is pro-science? "

    Wow ontheleft, science proves this? When, where? Do you have pictures of this ensoulment? is it on YouTube?

    But for the purposes of this blog, since that is where you are, will you now condemn all third terms and partial birth abortion? It would be a start...

    Posted by KJR May 18, 09 02:18 PM
  1. Batman,

    Below is part of OnTheLefts comment

    I'm presuming that you're yet another right wing Republican voter. Presuming that you supported Bush and McCain, you actually want to accuse others of being anti-life, anti-science and favoring the powerful at the expense of the powerless? Were you asleep during the Bush administration?

    You should feel truly blessed that Mr, Mrs or Miss Left can now determine all your beliefs and everything about you just from reading one post. He has figured out that all practicing Catholic love war and torture and that anyone whom believes abortion to be murder is totally unreasonable. The Pope and all his henchmen hate women and homosexuals and are only interested in amassing a fortune and hurting others. I believe this all comes from his deep prayer life and study of the Bible and the Catechism.

    Posted by we praise youonthleft May 18, 09 02:20 PM
  1. Obama honors the Holy Spirit in everything he said in this address. We cannot have a world where one religious group enforces its beliefs on other religious groups -- and "religions do not agree on abortion". Obama's words -- "We are all fishermen" -- are a heroic and beautiful statement, true to the depest intent of Jesus Christ.

    Posted by Bruce Schuman May 18, 09 02:57 PM
  1. What religions teach abortion is OK?

    Posted by proud2bcatholic May 18, 09 03:17 PM
  1. There is NOTHING NEW about these positions for the pro-choice, feminist community. It's what we have called for as long as I have been doing this work.
    Rev. Debra Haffner
    http://debrahaffner.blogspot.com

    Posted by Rev. Debra Haffner May 18, 09 03:37 PM
  1. I don't get it. There's lot's of the type of "catholics" that supposedly "defend inocent life and " and see abortion as a great sin and evil. True I agree, BUT. Unfortunately, we many times find this type of christians contradicting themselves and not being genuine about the meaning of the Real Respect for Life that the church teaches. The Catholic Church (at least the one I'm familiar with, in case the US church is a different one jaja!) does not empahasize nor defend life of ONLY a certain stage or age. No, the teaching is: "FROM CONCEPTION TO NATURAL DEATH" So when I come across those who claim to b really "Pro-life" but you see them as war-lovers, with pro-imperialistic positions, attitudes of pro- policing the whole world to impose a very particular model of "democracy" be force. I wonder... Because all this has always come and continues at a great price. Through Great losses of INOCENT LIVES. Killings of women, children and the elderly mostly, being slaughtered daily...So I wonder if being a true Pro-Life Person means more.

    Posted by Tobal G. May 18, 09 03:53 PM
  1. We as Christians talk too much, if were praying more than saying we would not be in this predicament. Also Love is an action word. If we really lived what we say we believe exhibiting the relationship with God through love and obediance to him and service to mankind we would not even be in this predicament now. Real prayer changes things. We ought to have the attitude, I can show you better than I can tell you. If we did more of that it would truly be a different place. So don't blame a man for his conviction when we as Christians haven't shown stability in the faith. One thing I know in walking with God is that signs do follow when we believe and obeyhis word.

    Posted by Louise Freeman May 18, 09 04:34 PM
  1. So silly, all of you. It is just a matter of time before all of the neo cons die out and the younger generation under forty will takes over. Then we will be the power players and the politicians. Your days are numbered. The last gasps of a dying body. Look at the research of the attitudes of those under forty, both Catholic and not, there is vast acceptance of choice. So, be careful or we will cut off your Medicare benefits!

    Posted by fathershrink May 18, 09 05:19 PM
  1. Yes yes, Rev Haffner, it is all about you and the feminists.. We know. We are grateful that you have come along to save civilized society in this era from the big bad Catholic Church and traditional Christianity, since you have so much more historical and authoritative insight than the 2000 years of history and its incredibly unreasonable position since the 1st century that babies should not be ripped out of their mother's womb. Are you the Reverend for the unborn child as well?

    Posted by KJR May 18, 09 05:56 PM
  1. @Sherry Thacker
    I understand you are against homosexuals and pro lifers preaching from your pulpit. How do you feel about the decades where there were thousands of pedophiles preaching from Roman Catholic pulpits, known and supported and protected by the hierarchy of the RCC?

    Posted by Kai May 18, 09 06:51 PM
  1. "I just hope those who are pro choice would understand that to those of us who are against abortion believe in our hearts and minds that killing the unborn is the same as killing a one day, one week, or one year old. It has nothing to do with an agenda."

    Wow, what a bald-faced lie that is. I hope for YOUR sake you are aware that you are lying, because otherwise what detestable cowards you must think yourselves. You lack the strength of that conviction in spades, otherwise, frankly, you'd be eating up the news cycle with action. Most of you, however, are simply joining a church social function, which is why you have all the fire of a Shriner parade at your rallies. You are being handed an 'issue' that comes in a set, and weakly feigning sincerity that fools no one.

    Posted by Harris May 18, 09 07:54 PM
  1. I just loved Father Jenkin's speech. How wonderful to hear what a Catholic University can and should be. I admire him so much for standing up to people who only want to demonize those different from them. Jenkins understands what Catholic Theology is all about: Faith seeking Understanding. What has happenned in the Church (and I am a practicing, educated Catholic) is that the dialogue between faith and understanding has broken down. Notre Dame is blessed to have such a forward thinking, courageous, intelligent, faith filled president. Go ND and Go our President.

    Posted by Nicole Hawkins May 18, 09 07:57 PM
  1. "On the left" #116) I am stellar as to MY assessment of President Obama - and if the best you can do is try and condemn ONLY the actions and words of others over the span of the last 20 years and not include in that scrutiny the actions and truly indefensible associations of Barack Obama - at the intolerably racist knee of Jeremiah Weight you make NO headway as to clearing up any distinction between the two - at all. Clearly he thinks - until all of us force him to lucidly explain "why", that he can go the totality of his time in high elected office not ever explaining away that unacceptable "choice" of his - and how it was he could volunteer up his young children to be influenced by a racist minister, too.
    Turns out Father Jenkins failed in excusing all of that away, too. And failed as to honoring his own church's doctrine. Be clear and honest, "on the left". Obama is not. Neither is Jenkins.

    Posted by Loreann May 18, 09 08:07 PM
  1. Some seem to think pro-lifers favored going to war. I can't speak for everyone, but I remember weighing life when I had to decide between Kerry and Bush for President. Vote Bush, and loose 5,000 US and Iraqi lives each year. Vote Kerry and ensure the continued loss of 1,370,000 American lives to abortion each year. It's a terrible choice to have to make.

    Posted by rwr May 18, 09 08:10 PM
  1. 'Vote Bush, and loose 5,000 US and Iraqi lives each year. Vote Kerry and ensure the continued loss of 1,370,000 American lives to abortion each year. It's a terrible choice to have to make.'

    Oh, give me a break. Bush kept all those abortions from happening, did he? May want to check your numbers on yearly deaths in Iraq. You're WAY the hell off on the Iraqi count, shamefully so, and the U.S. death toll hasn't ever been that high in a year. Yeah, this 'terrible choice' you made must weigh on you heavily if you can't be bothered to know anything about its outcome. 'Terrible choice' indeed.

    Posted by Harris May 18, 09 09:02 PM
  1. @ #40 Steve, and others...
    It wasn't about inviting an abortionist to speak at ND... It was about inviting the President of the United States. That is one of the wonderful things about this country. We can have discussions and debates, disagree with the national leader. If I have a set of political positions and am invited to meet the President, with whom I disagree on most issues... I am still going, not because of the person, but because of the OFFICE of the president, because he is a symbol of our country for his term in office. My understanding is that ND invites the President every year, whatever his party affiliation or beliefs. This President just chose to accept the invitation.

    Posted by Kai May 18, 09 09:03 PM
  1. To hear opposing views is commendable since it allows learning something of the mindset of another human being, yet Truth is non negotiable, nor can it denied behind the façade of 'ecumenism'.

    And what is this fundamental scientific truth? If there is anything we have learnt during the last fifty years is this: After Conception with the cleaving of male and female gametes of finite lifespans –sperm and ovum- carrying each its own half of the genetical makeup of the human species, nothing inherently humanizing occurs throughout the entire pregnancy that did not occur at the beginning; that is at conception. The only things that occur in that time interval of nine months are development and growth. So, when human life begins? At CONCEPTION!!

    Anybody who denies this truth is either an ignoramus of the worse kind, -since he/she does not know where he/she came from-, or an unstable fanatic, whose ideology would not allow to recognize a defenseless, but distinct human being, being marred by scientific obscurantism -that intellectual attitude of systematic denial of scientific facts and simultaneously presenting this denial as alter knowledge or science, or as an alter evidence or fact.

    Christ after hearing the 'opposing' point of view of the Pharisees and without contradicting them, since it is clear that it was the correct reading of the Law of Moses, made this remark: 'Neither will I condemn thee. Go, and now sin no more.' [Jn 8:11] Thus, 'ecumenism' cannot deny the truth. Further, the Law of God must always prevail: 'Thou shalt not kill!' [Ex 20:4] Did we hear or read these words in Jenkins appeal to justify himself? Of course not!

    Posted by Milton L Pozo, MD., FACP May 18, 09 11:40 PM
  1. Vickyg, @ 96
    So, you know truth? I am impressed. The greatest thinkers in the world usually don't claim that.
    Given that some 80% of conceived embryos do not even implant how can conception make a few cells the equal of someone who has survived to birth? At conception, to me, those cells are simply potential life, a potential human. Since I am recovering from a youth in the RCC, and a pedophile priest, I have learned that there is no god, hence no such thing as a soul, so that question is not relevant to me. When a fetus gets to the point of viability, then I will start to agree that it should be afforded rights, but until it is born, the life/health/safety of the mother still outweigh those of the fetus/potential human. I, however, reserve the right to be wrong, since we do not know these answers for sure, unless we believe in an anachronistic mythology thousands of years out of date.
    Although he is not necessarily one of the great philosophers of our day, Billy Joel has some words that strike true to me, in the song Shades of Grey… He speaks about those who speak with absolutely certainty when nothing is that black and white.
    Some things were perfectly clear,
    seen with the vision of youth
    No doubts and nothing to fear,
    I claimed the corner on truth
    These days it's harder to say
    I know what I'm fighting for
    My faith is falling away
    I'm not that sure anymore

    Shades of grey wherever I go
    The more I find out the less that I know
    Black and white is how it should be
    But shades of grey are the colors I see

    A later verse says,
    Now with the wisdom of years
    I try to reason things out
    And the only people I fear
    are those who never have doubts
    Save us all from arrogant men,
    and all the causes they're for
    I won't be righteous again
    I'm not that sure anymore
    It is interesting… one faith, like another, all full of moral certainty, and the need to impose that certainty on others who do not share the same system of beliefs. The only people I fear are those who never have doubts. So true.

    Posted by kai May 19, 09 12:00 AM
  1. @117 Frank
    You do realize, that "In God We Trust did not have any official place in this country until 1864 when it was applied to the $.02 coin? Our motto, at the time of the Founders, was "E Pluribus Unum," "From Many, One." That seems pretty secular to me. In fact, "In God We Trust" officially became the motto of the US in 1956 to help differentiate us from "those godless commies," during the Cold War.

    Posted by Kai May 19, 09 12:17 AM
  1. Mr, Mrs, and or Miss Harris

    Thank you for pointing out I was lying. I obviously didn't even realize it. Thank God for you and ontheleft whom know more about what I believe then I do. I actually believe tearing a baby limb from limb an tossing them into a medical waste bucket is fine. How could any rational human being not think that was OK.

    The 90% of my free time volunteering in youth ministry is all a ploy to fool everyone. But you have caught me. I love you!

    Posted by proud2bcatholic May 19, 09 08:19 AM
  1. Can I tell you how many open-minded pro-choice liberal friends of mine have refused to speak to me anymore when they found out I do not share their views on abortion "rights?" These are people I've known for years, partied with, gone to school with...At the mere mention that I am a pro-life activist, they have never asked why, just simply shut me off. Yet, for all those years, I have known THEIR positions - so opposed to my own - and cherished and valued their friendship.

    With regard to dialouge, when we look at Catholic politicians today who are chastised by the bishops (a toothless bunch, I will admit) for their reception of Communion while promoting abortion in their public lives - and make no mistake, they are promoting it - it is not the Church who have stopped talking to them, THEY have stopped talking to the Church. It's a two way street folks. Don't portray the pro-life side as close-minded.

    Use some logic here - how can you say you want abortion to be rare when you applaud the President's first moves in office to remove all restrictions. Where is the reaching out by our fellow men and women to help women who find themselves in difficult circumstances? Abortion doesn't solve the problem of their abusive husband, their drug-addicted kids, their poverty. There are plenty of groups who work for legislation to provide the help these women need. There are countless numbers of people in pregnancy care centers who work with women to know their own worth and the worth of their unborn child. WIth compassion and care, they help teens girls to realize that they deserve love and respect from their boyfriends, their parents and their peers. So don't harp on the fact that there are no gentle and kind Catholics - or members of any other denomination - out there on the pro-life side.

    And please don't use wack jobs like Alan Keyes as the yardstick by which to judge those who do not share the pro-choice side of the debate. I would have arrested that nut myself if I'd been on campus. People like him set the debate back 20 years.

    The President just got up and told Catholics how to run their faith. What the heck was that?? Can you say lemmings? And please don't talk about blindly following the doctrines of the Catholic Church - I am so sick of that argument. Pick up a freakin' encyclical and read it and THEN tell me what your problem is with the teachings on contraception, abortion, etc. Try to be original. You do know what an encyclical is, don't you?

    Posted by June May 19, 09 10:07 AM
  1. President Obama and Father Jenkins both showed that intellect is a key ingredient in bridging differences in belief. Seeking common ground is the first step towards the ultimate solution.

    Posted by KWS May 19, 09 10:50 AM
  1. This isn't about President Obama attending the Notre Dame commencement. His image and ego are the most precious things he has as a politician. By declining the invitation because of all the protests, he would be admitting that he is opposed to the Church on pro-life issues. This would also be a victory for the pro-life demonstrators, something that Obama's ego couldn't handle.

    This was about a Catholic University honoring someone whose limited record in politics is in direct contradiction to the Church on pro-life issues. Father Jenkins should either step down from his post or be fired. His sycophantic behavior towards the president was similar to teen age girls fawning over a boy band. He was nothing short of embarrassing throughout this whole episode. But the larger problem is that he knowningly and blatantly ignored a directive from the Bishops that no one with a history of violating church doctrine should be honored at a Catholic University. Fr. Jenkins insults the intelligence of all by repeatedly claiming that this invitation was done in the spirit of debate with those with opposing viewpoints. A commencement address with an honary degree is not an occasion or opportunity for debate.

    The other argument that keeps popping up here is that if only pro-life candidates are to be honored, then Bush and Cheney should not be honored either because of the war and thier stance on torture. As a conservative pro-life Catholic, I absolutely agree. Its a foolish argument to say the Obama is really more pro-life than Bush because he wants to end the war and torture. In reality, Obama is not pro-life because he has openly supported the intrinsic evil of abortion. Bush and Cheny, despite what many conservatives feel, aren't fully pro-life either because they justified the evil of toture. While I supported the previous administration's efforts on pro-life issues, I will not defend thier use of torture as it is nothing short of criminal.

    Neither administration has fully embraced the Church's pro-life doctrine of sanctity of life from conception to the grave. Notre Dame could have made a powerful statement for life by disinviting Obama and not giving him the honorary degree. Those Catholic colleges over the past couple of years that honored Bush and Cheney could have also made powerful statement for the dignity of life by not honoring them on the basis of thier authorization of torture. The only way to gain credibiltiy and advance on pro-life issues is to maintain consistency in the view that all life is sacred from conception until death. By honoring pro-abortion or pro-torture public figures, Catholic universities are undermining Church teaching. This same consistency is also needed from pro-life supporters in public and in the voting booth. Washington needs the clear message that abortion, embryonic stem cell research, as well as torture and unjust wars cannot continue if we truly want this country to embrace a culture of life. We need to forget party politics and carefully choose leaders who support the full spectrum of what it means to be pro-life.

    Posted by Rob A May 19, 09 02:03 PM
  1. #25 / Sherry, your nonsensical connection between the abortion controversy and homosexuality notwithstanding, here's some news for you. If you're Catholic, you probably now have or in the past have had a homosexual pastor. Are you going to remove Catholic priests from the pulpit? The Catholic clergy is full of homosexual men; read Donald Cozzens, a priest who has written books about this. Perhaps instead of sweeping condemnation of people who are different from you or who are forced into very had decisions, some education, humility, and understanding are in order.

    Posted by Roman May 19, 09 02:26 PM
  1. "But for the purposes of this blog, since that is where you are, will you now condemn all third terms and partial birth abortion?"
    Posted by KJR May 18, 09 02:18 PM

    KJR, I'm opposed to 3rd term abortions except in cases in which the life or health of the mother necessitates it. You cannot demand that a woman die or become disabled. In short, I support Roe as it was decided. Will you now condemn war and torture and the political party (the GOP) that brought those to us in the last 8 years?

    Posted by OnTheLeft May 19, 09 11:22 PM
  1. Posted by we praise youonthleft May 18, 09 02:20 PM

    Wow, that's one hell of a leap - looking at what I wrote in your first paragraph and your bizarre, paranoid interpretation that followed. All Catholics? Interesting, bright light, since I've mentioned any number of times that I know a fairly substantial of genuine followers of the example of one Jesus of Nazareth who are Catholics who actually live their lives on the basis of his teachings. So where did you come up with that bit of nonsensical interpretation? Or are you simply projecting your own issues on the rest of us?

    Posted by OnTheLeft May 19, 09 11:29 PM
  1. Posted by Loreann May 18, 09 08:07 PM

    Loreann, if you insist that the President's associations are intolerable, then your associations must be equally intolerable. If you insist that he is a racist because his minister made a handful of racist comments, then your association with a hierarchy that enabled child rapists indicates your agreement with that enabling of child rape. You can't have it both ways.

    Posted by OnTheLeft May 19, 09 11:39 PM
  1. Posted by KJR May 18, 09 05:56 PM

    You keep bringing up 2000 years of history. The question on that is...so what? Judaism is older, as are Buddhism, Hinduism, any number of indigenous naturalist religions, and atheism. Through the vast part of that two millenia, the Catholic Church has been incredibly wrong on matters of science. For most of that time, it has been equally wrong on that most basic piece of human dignity - self-determination. If its tenets were so obviously correct, it would hardly have needed military power and forced conversions, along with the attendant executions for the unwilling, in order to have spread. The truth is that feminists have done far more for women, for their equality and dignity, than the Catholic Church has ever done. Your Church has classified women as, at best, second class citizens for centuries. It was feminism, not Catholicism, that changed that.

    Posted by OnTheLeft May 19, 09 11:55 PM
  1. "Wow ontheleft, science proves this? When, where? Do you have pictures of this ensoulment? is it on YouTube?"
    Posted by KJR May 18, 09 02:18 PM

    I said that this is indicated by the science, KJR. But you know that. Now, prove to me that ensoulment happens at conception. And by scientific reference, not because the Vatican (the source of all of your perspective, according to you) says so. Remember that the Vatican insisted that the sun revolves around the earth. That sort of nonsense may work in the State of Vatican City, but this is the United States of America - a secular constitutional republic, not a theocratic monarchy.

    Posted by OnTheLeft May 20, 09 03:07 AM
  1. Harris @132 and 133
    You're right - my guesstimate in 2004 of how many US and Iraqi deaths there'd be in 2005 was way low.
    You're also right - Bush didn't save all unborn in 2005. Progress is slow.

    The point I was trying to make was that, no matter what the numbers are, and no matter whose life it is, I'd much rather vote for zero deaths. We weren't given that choice in the 2004 election. All human life has great value, whether it's the 21 year old soldier who has been developing for 21 years 9 months, the 80 year old Iraqi grandmother killed by a roadside bomb who had been developing for 80 years 9 months, or the recently fertilized egg whose genetic makeup is complete and has just begun her journey of life.

    Posted by rwr May 20, 09 07:13 AM
  1. OnTheLeft,

    So do you find these Jesus of Nazareth following Catholics hypocritical at all. Let me explain. When you are confirmed as a Catholic, when you receive Jesus in the Eucharist and say Amen you are saying to God and in front of the whole congregation you wil follow ALL the teachings of the Church. This is also done when at Easter time you renew your vows. Of course our Pastor made sure to tell people to only say it if you mean it. So are they being hypocritical?

    Posted by we praise youonthleft May 20, 09 10:26 AM
  1. Posted by we praise youonthleft May 20, 09 10:26 AM

    People get to be who they are, whether the robed ones and you right wingers like it or not, and given the report coming out of Ireland today, it looks like the hypocrisy, as usual, resides among the Catholic authoritarians. And people can receive communion even without your approval - they need not worship you and your opinions as a prerequisite. I do find it more than a little interesting that you consider those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus to be hypocrites.

    Posted by OnTheLeft May 20, 09 01:39 PM
  1. Mr, Mrs, and or Miss ontheleft,

    Why do you refer to me as a right winger? What from my very few posts causes you to say that? What is your definition of a right winger? Also what do you mena people can receive communion without my approval and/or worship me. I think your mistaking me for someone else, like God maybe?

    I'm not in the least bit surprised you didn't answer my question? Is it hypocritical to renew your vows saying you believe in the Catholic Church and all its teachings and then go against said teachings? Yes or No.

    When did I say those who follow the teachings of Jesus to be hypocritical. To me hypocritical is saying you follow and then intentionally choose not to. In other words unless they are saying the follow a specific teaching Jesus and flat out refuse to live it they are being hypocritical. There is a difference between having different beliefs and saying something and doing something opposite. Like saying when you are confirmed and every Easter you follow all what the Church teaches and then speaking or going against one of these teachings. I'm not tellng you they are necessarily bad people just that this is a hypcritical action. Yes or No?

    Posted by we praise youonthleft May 20, 09 03:17 PM
  1. wepraiseyouontheleft -

    You are on to him wepraise... he is the ultimate hypocrite. He claim to be one "who follows the teachings of Jesus", but he posts the most vicious personal attacks one could muster on these Boards. He called me "non-human", a bigot, blah, blah, blah. He endorses gay marriage, abortion on demand, and has more hate than anyone here. He can't respond to a question without mentioning Geore Bush. And oddly, he condemns the war (which in and of itself is not a bad thing) while calling those who oppose abortion as hypocritical. He refuses to acknowlege the instrinsic evil of abortion, even though he concedes that he believes a soul in "infused" after the third trimester. He implicitly equates killing on Iraq with abortion, because he (wrongly) contends that some of us support the killing of innocent life. That is an odd position, because he, by making that argument, is implicitly concededing that abortion is just as bad, but accusing some of us of hypocracy. He can't have it both ways. If killing in Iraq is as bad as abortion, and some of use (so he thinks) have what he perceives as inconsistent positions on that, then, but implicit definition - he concedes that abortion is just as bad. But he won't explicitly say that. He is confused and lost, and I hope you will join me to continually pray for him.

    His argument is basically - "If it is legal, it is moral".... That is where he is coming from, and it is a sad state of mind. He has yet to condemn the overturning of slavery - as it was legal too.

    Posted by KJR May 20, 09 05:35 PM
  1. Vickyg, @ 96 wrote
    "So, you know truth? I am impressed. The greatest thinkers in the world usually don't claim that.

    Given that some 80% of conceived embryos do not even implant how can conception make a few cells the equal of someone who has survived to birth? At conception, to me, those cells are simply potential life, a potential human."

    Thank you for acknowledging my scientific understanding which is truth. But you can also get it, it is free. Allow me to enlighten you about biological facts that you should have learnt in a decent high school program. Conception is not implantation. Implantation is just that the taking a stake and burying itself in the lining of the womb. Conception describes the intermingling of the genetical material of both the father and mother that affords the blueprint of the entire development and growth of a unique human being, so unique in fact that DNA is used now in criminal courts to determine who the correct individual really is.

    Posted by Milton L Pozo, MD., FACP May 20, 09 09:05 PM
  1. Father Jenkins said it right. How can we expect to change people by yelling at them, calling them evil, and telling them over and over and over again that they are wrong? Only through dialogue can we accomplish this. Abortion is wrong. We as Catholics know this. But tell me, how many people that you have tried to force your beliefs on have actually changed because you told them they were wrong? Jesus himself invited those who opposed him to dine with him, and through kindness, open dialogue, and sharing, he was able to grow the faithful. He did not spat in the face of his enemies. He showed them kindness and prayed for them.

    Posted by Michelle May 21, 09 11:35 AM
  1. "Naturally Catholic" said:

    "It follows that a president who espouses unnatural behaviors, i.e., infanticide, homosexuality, cloning for human parts, etc. should not be honored by those who respect the law of nature.

    You cannot dialogue with someone who has no respect for nature, no matter how charming."

    Homosexuality is a FACT of life, a widely occurring NATURAL phenomenon. As a gay man, I often wonder if we serve as a sort of built-in form of nature's population control. Who knows? Regardless, we ARE natural, as is your ignorance.

    Posted by Peter May 21, 09 11:44 AM
  1. Michelle,

    Yeah but I don't think Jesus would give him an award.

    I wholeheartedly agree that forcing beliefs upon someone is NEVER effective.

    Also Father Jenkins wasn't referring to any prolife Catholics I associate with. calling any man evil is against the Church teaching. We can judge an act but never the person. Did he really say calling them evil?

    Posted by proud2bcatholic May 21, 09 01:48 PM
  1. Posted by we praise youonthleft May 20, 09 03:17 PM

    Or perhaps it is you who feels that he is God. Why is it that God always agrees with those of you who see yourselves as "devout"? It was you who questioned the good intentions of those who disagree with your political positions receiving communion. You said that those who follow the teachings of Jesus are hypocrites when you called Catholics who spend their lives helping the poor and downtrodden but disagree with you and your hierarchy and still receive communion hypocrites.

    Posted by OnTheLeft May 22, 09 04:34 PM
  1. Posted by KJR May 20, 09 05:35 PM

    Well, where to start with this pack of lies? Let's take it from the top. First of all, I've never claimed to be one "who follows the teachings of Jesus". I will say that my opposition to war, torture, sexism and human indignity puts me far closer to those teachings than does your support of the those things. You stated that I called you "non-human". Your quote. When? Where? What thread? I will state that, in saying that, you expose yourself as a liar. You say that I have hate, but you simply project your own hatreds, KJR. You whine that anyone who disagrees with you must hate you, but that says far more about you and your attitudes than it does about anyone else. I do endorse equal marriage, and in, fact, you have demonstrated an enormous bigotry against the members of the gay community, people who have done nothing to you. And you're damned right that I will mention George Bush to you - you supported everything he did, no matter how heinous. You supported the massacre of civilians and you supported torture. As for those who oppose abortion, if you vote for a mass murder and torturer, then you are a hypocrite. Unless you'd like to tell us all whom Jesus would bomb or torture. As for what you and your church call the "instrinsic evil of abortion", sorry, but not before infusion. And I've said that I fully support Roe v. Wade as written. So read the decision sometime, KJR. If you think you can handle that. As for your prayers, given your cavalier attitude toward all manner of human suffering, including your church's history of child abuse, I'd suggest you pray for yourself. Your argument remains "if it's OK with the Vatican, it's OK with me". That is a sad state of mind. Oh, by the way, if you think for one moment that I would consider any slavery to be less than an abomination, you are far more delusional than I ever imagined. The bottom line here, KJR, is that your above post shows you to be not just an utter hypocrite, but a typical right wing liar. No wonder you're such a fan of people like Bush and Cheney.

    Posted by OnTheLeft May 22, 09 04:49 PM
  1. "Yeah but I don't think Jesus would give him an award."
    Posted by proud2bcatholic May 21, 09 01:48 PM

    On what basis? This president has spent a lifetime in service to others less fortunate than he. He has spent a lifetime trying to bring peace. Where is he in conflict with the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth? Not the teachings of the Vatican, but the teachings of Jesus.

    Posted by OnTheLeft May 22, 09 04:51 PM
  1. Jenkins caused a great scandal to our beloved church and upset and hurt thousands and thousands of catholics and maybe caused them to sin by uncharitable acts. Catholics who try hard every day to live good and decent lives in a diffcult world. If as a consequence of his actions of having a glib and very plausible politician speak Jenkins causes one abortion (I pray with all my heart that doesn't happen) then his soul is in mortal danger. He could have done as the Bishops asked and rescinded the invitation but he chose to ignore God and do it his way.

    Posted by Maria May 22, 09 11:19 PM
  1. Posted by Maria May 22, 09 11:19 PM

    Your intolerance, Maria, is far more damaging to the human condition than anything Father Jenkins could have done. Why should he have listened to these bishops? They represent only 1/4 of the American bishops, and, more importantly, they were wrong. They spew venom and hatred, as the typical Republicans that they are. And who are you to say that anyone "ignores God"? You actually think you know the mind of God? I know Catholics who, unlike you on the right, really do try hard every day to live good and decent lives. Barack Obama, while not part of your religion, tries to live a good and decent life every day. Your attempt to blame your crowd's "uncharitable acts" on the recipients of your venom entirely misses the true point. It is you and your kind who are solely responsible for those acts, Maria.

    Posted by OnTheLeft May 23, 09 01:26 AM
  1. This is the best the Roman Catholic Church could do for the leader of it's most prestiges University ? Wow
    Take down the crosses and the Basilica .... It isn't Christian anymore !!!

    Posted by Rick May 23, 09 01:30 PM
  1. ontheleft:

    "Where is he in conflict with the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth? Not the teachings of the Vatican, but the teachings of Jesus".

    Answer: Thou shall not kill - he is an accessory to the mass murder of millions of unborn children.

    Posted by KJR May 23, 09 08:40 PM
  1. On the left:

    Get a life luvvie or better still get a boyfriend or girlfriend or there are great knitting classes out there for you to attend. To date you've posted 18 blogs all attacking and vilifying nearly every pro-life catholic on here - surely there are better ways for you to spend your time

    Posted by Procatholic and very happy May 24, 09 06:57 AM
  1. OntheLeft,

    Although you don't act as if others can have a different opinion then you, I'll try again.
    I (that's me someone who prays often and should be permitted to have his won opinion) believe that Jesus is against abortion and would no more give an award to someone who believes a mother should have the choice to terminate the life of her unborn child after conception then He would to someone who believes parents have the right to choose murdering their born child.

    Peace and Blessings my friend

    Posted by proud2bcatholic May 26, 09 10:48 AM
  1. OntheLeft,

    Have you gone mad man. Feel that I'm God? I am not even worthy to undue His sandals.

    Please read clearly. I never called anyone specifically a hypocrite. What I asked is do you believe Catholics who when they are confirmed, when they receive Jesus, and when they renew their Baptismal vows all which outloud we state we will follow ALL the teachings of the Church and then intentionally (not by sin but by taking a stand) go against the Church do you feel that specific act is being hypocritical? I am not personally judging anyone I am just askng a simple question.

    I'm sincerely starting to feel a bit sad for you. You continue to tell people who disagree with you that they are right wing radicals and support war and torture even though none have said they have and many said they don't. You turn everyone that disagrees with you or at least those who love and follow the Church into some mythical creature you have made up in your mind. I suggest you have a friend read the posts you are replying to as you appear to only pick out pieces and/or even entirely misread what other posters are writing.

    Posted by we praise youonthleft May 26, 09 11:03 AM
  1. Father Jenkins is what is known as a Judas-Priest - that is a Priest in name only. As Judas betrayed Jesus at the Last Supper Father Jenkins has betrayed the Catholic Church & its teachings. Father Jenkins, how many pieces of silver did President Obama give you to serve him?

    Posted by Mike & Theresa May 29, 09 12:38 AM
  1. What would Jesus do? He calls on his enemies...on those who oppose him and gives them love, honor and respect. Then they are moved by Him. He called on Zaccheus. He approached the Samaritan woman by the well...lots of stories in the bible about beckoning to those who the self righteous crowd feels He should never talk to. Let us follow what Jesus did. Let us respect each other and it is through love that we are able to lead and further our cause. Let us pray for those who oppose our views but let us show our love (NOT HATE) and respect. God through the Holy Spirit will do the rest. Angry words, fighting with one another is not going to solve the problem that is bothering the world. Take a moment and picture Calvary. Jesus between the two thieves: The thief on the left chided Jesus and challenged him that if he were God to help them out of the cross. The good thief asked Him to remember Him in His Kingdom. Jesus ignored the thief to his left and to the one on his right, assured him of a place in his kingdom. Jesus respected the one who recognized him. I pray that we, too should stop the bickering and the fighting. Start loving and respecting each other. God bless!

    Posted by rose July 18, 09 05:21 PM
  1. Fr. Jenkins's introduction is insulting, self-serving, and patronizing.

    Of course "open-dialogue" is welcome, especially amongst those with whom we disagree. But he COMPLETELY missed the point, as to WHY Catholics were and are so offended by Obama/Notre Dame:

    Notre Dame conferred an honorary degree on Obama.

    Where was that addressed? Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict have both encouraged "open dialouge" with Muslims, Jews, protestants, etc. What they didn't do, Fr. Jenkins, is confer a prestigious honor on them.
    Note the difference? It is one thing to speak openly about our differnces; it is quite another to HONOR acts or deeds, or persons who encourage acts or deeds, which offend our beliefs.

    Vivat Jesus!

    Posted by Member, Knights of Columbus September 1, 09 02:30 PM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

Blogger

Michael Paulson covers religion for The Boston Globe. He shared in the Pulitzer Prize in 2003, won the Mike Berger, Templeton and Supple awards in 2008, and is a four-time winner of the Wilbur Award.
E-mail mpaulson@globe.com.

views

Harvey_Cox_cow.JPGHarvey Cox, the Hollis professor of divinity at Harvard University, marks his retirement by asserting a little-used right of his professorship -- to graze a cow in Harvard Yard. Photo, by Barry Chin of the Globe staff, taken on Sept. 10, 2009 in Cambridge, Mass.

archives