The bishops made me tweet

First, a confession: I am a Twitter skeptic. The whole phenomenon strikes me as more than a bit ridiculous. Plus, frankly, between the story writing and the blogging and the Facebooking and the e-mailing and the phone-calling and the occasional actual in-person conversation, I'm not sure how much more communicating I need. And there are some indications of trouble in Twitterdom.
But when I got the news release from the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, announcing that their media relations folks have launched three Twitter feeds, I knew it was time. Turns out that I had already been auto-tweeting -- the good folks at Boston.com had set up a username, GlobeReligion, that was sending out my blog posts. And last week I finally sat down with Joel Abrams, the Globe's leading Twitter evangelist (we're not dead yet!) and de facto Twitter tutor, for a crash course in micro-blogging, short-messaging, or whatever it is that twittering means. I'm not quite sure what I'm going to do with Twitter, but I don't think I'll be sharing what I had for breakfast today (OK, it was a bowl of Cranberry Almond Crunch) or how well I slept last night (just fine, thanks) but rather flagging interesting items in the Globe and beyond about religion, and maybe offering a backstage view of the glamorous world of religion reporting. (Inevitably, Editor & Publisher took a look at the ethical implications of newspaper twittering this week.) You'll notice that in the right rail of the blog there is now a widget with my most recent Twitter updates and instructions for following along, and for finding my fellow Boston.com twitterers.
Meantime, I'm trying to understand how others are using Twitter. Obviously I'm now following the bishops. And happily, as it turns out, JTA had just published a list of the world's 100 most influential Jewish twitterers, so I plan to take a look at those. And if you know of other interesting religion news twitterers, please let me know, either by adding a comment below or sending me an e-mail.
![]()
Loyal readers of this blog may also notice that we've made a slight design change -- we've reworked the Articles of Faith banner to add a little more pizzazz in the form of an initial letter in the style of an illustrated manuscript -- we were aiming for something that was evocative of religion but nonsectarian, so all kinds of icons were rejected (even the color purple was nixed as overly liturgical). The new drop cap "A" was designed by Dan Zedek, so many thanks go to him.
This blog is now ten months old, and as of this writing the first 390 posts have drawn nearly 1.5 million page views and 12,500 comments. By far the most popular characters in this unfolding saga have been three women -- Sarah Palin, Mary Ann Glendon, and Susan Boyle -- so my thanks to each of them for existing. And my thanks to all of you for reading; as always, if you have suggestions or concerns, fire away.



Congratulations on your success! I do have a suggestion. When you wrote that Sarah Palin piece you heavily relied on the Alaska Daily News which is extremely liberal. The press in general has presented Palin's adament PERSONAL beliefs but always fail to report that she is a Constitutionalist, which is to say that regardless of those personal beliefs she feels obligated to govern under the rule of law. So, for example, as a politician her aim is not make abortion illegal, but to return the right to legislate the matter state by state, as gay marriage is now, and as our Constitution specifies. Anyway, good luck and happy writing!
Except on matters of doctrine, you can be sure that if the Catholic bishops have belatedly jumped onto a fad, then everyone else is already preparing to abandon that fad. You're right, Michael, to paraphrase Socrates, the over-communicated life is not worth living--I should (not) talk.
Can you reassign a priest fairly quickly and quietly with a twitter?
I thought Twitter was silly, too -- until I started using it and discovered that it's a great way to get news out. As it happens, I'm a tournament bowler -- so I use my Twitter feed primarily for one thing: to broadcast scores and results from events I'm competing in. The people who follow me are people who are interested in candlepin bowling -- a small group, no doubt, but people who are now getting information not obtainable any other way. Twitter is not about "narcissistic, self-absorbed people who think everyone cares about what they had for breakfast," as we keep reading -- it's a way of getting information out. Useful information, in some cases. If you don't like hearing about what someone had for breakfast, don't follow them -- follow people who are broadcasting something you want to hear. Why is this any different from TV or radio? (urbie4, in case there are any bowling fans out there)
Posted by gaudete May 16, 09 05:24 PM
To keep up with tradition, however, they've hired consultants to see if they can also tweet using stone tablets and eventually parchment scrolls!! Sort of modern and (extremely) retro simultaneously!
This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.
Blogger
E-mail mpaulson@globe.com.
Articles of Faith on Twitter
views
featured comments
Faith-based gardening: A rose for the popebrowse this blog
by categoryEVENTS
CAUSES
BLOGROLL
Headlines
Media blogs
Media criticism
Politics
Catholicism
Episcopalianism
Evangelicalism
Islam
Judaism
Mormonism
Unitarian Universalism
ALSO OF INTEREST
From our archives
Ma Siss's Place
Benedict visits the US
O'Malley's elevation
The new pope
Pope John Paul II
Parish closings
Catholic church abuse
INside Boston.com