< Back to front page Text size +

Obama meets with Catholic reporters

Posted by Michael Paulson July 2, 2009 05:15 PM

Obama_20090702.jpg

President Obama this morning met with a select group of reporters for Catholic publications, as well as the religion reporter for the Washington Post. Obama outlined his thoughts on the upcoming visit to the pope, his relationship with American bishops, the abortion issue, economic justice, and the Middle East. There was no major news, but Obama revealed a couple things I had not previously known about his faith life -- first, that he is considering choosing a group of churches in Washington, rather than a single congregation, to reduce the impact of his presence on any one community. And second, the president said that Joshua DuBois, the president's faith adviser, sends Obama's BlackBerry a devotional prayer each morning for the president to reflect on.

The president opened with a preview of his meeting with Pope Benedict XVI, which is scheduled to take place July 10 at the Vatican:

"I've had a wonderful conversation with the Pope over the phone right after the election. And we in some ways see this as a meeting with any other government -- the government of the Holy See. There are going to be areas where we've got deep agreements; there are going to be some areas where we've got some disagreements. So in that sense there's a government-to-government relationship that is already very strong and we want to build on. But obviously this is more than just that. The Catholic Church has such a profound influence worldwide and in our country; the Holy Father is a thought leader and an opinion leader on so many wide-ranging issues. And his religious influence is one that extends beyond the Catholic Church. So from a personal perspective, having a meeting with the Holy Father is a great honor and something that I'm very much looking forward to. And hopefully coming out of this meeting we will be able to continue to find areas where we can cooperate on everything from Middle East peace to dealing with worldwide poverty, climate change, immigration, a whole host of issues in which the Pope has taken extraordinary leadership."

Asked about his relationship with the American bishops in the wake of their heated criticism of his appearance at the University of Notre Dame, Obama said:

"The American bishops have a profound influence in their communities, in the church, and beyond. What I will say is that although there have been criticisms leveled at me from some of the bishops, there have been a number of bishops who have been extremely generous and supportive even if they don't agree with me on every issue. So in that sense the American bishops represent a cross-section of opinion just like other groups do. Cardinal George is somebody who I've known since I was in the state legislature, and he and I had a meeting in the Oval Office and I expressed to him my interest in working in as constructive a manner as possible with the bishops on a range of issues. You know, part of why establishing a relationship with the bishops is important to me is because I have very fond memories of Cardinal Bernardin, who was in Chicago when I first arrived to be a community organizer -- funded in part by the Campaign for Human Development -- and working with Catholic parishes on the south side of Chicago. And so I know the potential that the bishops have to speak out forcefully on issues of social justice. I think there are going to continue to be areas where we have profound agreements and there are going to be some areas where we disagree. That's healthy."
Obama was also asked about his support for a "conscience clause" for healthcare workers, which is a goal of antiabortion groups. His reply:
"I think that the only reason that my position may appear unclear is because it came in the wake of a last-minute, 11th-hour change in conscience clause provisions that were pushed forward by the previous administration that we chose to reverse. But my underlying position has always been consistent, which is I'm a believer in conscience clauses. I was a supporter of a robust conscience clause in Illinois for Catholic hospitals and health care providers. I discussed this with Cardinal George when he was here in the Oval Office, and I reiterated my support for an effective conscience clause in my speech at Notre Dame."

And one other interesting exchange came when Obama was asked about controversial remarks made by Harry Knox, the religion and faith program director for the Human Rights Campaign, which is a gay rights organization. Knox, now a member of the President’s Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships, has been attacked as anti-Catholic for allegedly referring to some American bishops as "discredited leaders" and calling the Knights of Columbus "foot soldiers of a discredited army of oppression.'' Obama used the question to reflect not only on the relationship between rhetoric and dialogue, but also to reflect on the relationship between the gay community and Christianity:

"You will recall that my first question I strongly defended the rights of American bishops to engage in some fairly incendiary language when it came to me, right? And I would be happy to have them be here in the White House and participate in a whole host of roundtables in which we try to work through these problems. So I can't -- I can speak for those who are on my payroll and who report to me. There are occasions in which we try to bring together groups that historically have been in conflict. There's always risks involved in doing that because many of these issues generate great passion. For the gay and lesbian community in this country, I think it's clear that they feel victimized in fairly powerful ways and they're often hurt by not just certain teachings of the Catholic Church, but the Christian faith generally. And as a Christian, I'm constantly wrestling with my faith and my solicitude and regard and concern for gays and lesbians. And to the extent that I weighed into these debates, what I often discover is that there's a lot of heat and sound and fury on both sides of these debates, even among people who I consider to be good people on either side. So I guess I would stand by my statement in Cairo that a position that dismisses religious belief and faith as intolerant without -- in a knee-jerk fashion I think is -- doesn't understand the power and good that faith can serve in the world. On the other hand, I think that those of us who are people of faith also have to examine our own beliefs and wrestle with them and assure ourselves that we're not causing pain to others. And I think any of us, of whatever faith, would have to acknowledge that there have been times where religion has been used in the service of not such good stuff. And it's incumbent upon us to -- at least in my own view -- to engage in some deep reflection and entertain a willingness to question whether we are acting in a way that's consistent with not just church teachings but also what Jesus Christ our Lord called on us to do: treat others as we would treat ourselves. Be our brother's keepers."

The journalists who were present for the interview are just starting to report on the session in more detail. Here are the reports from Jacqui Salmon of the Washington Post, Tim Drake of the National Catholic Register, Patricia Zapor of Catholic News Service, Joe Feuerherd of the National Catholic Reporter and the Rev. Drew Christiansen of America magazine. The other publications present were Avvenire/Vatican Radio, Catholic Digest and Commonweal. Each journalist got one question -- the National Catholic register spells out who asked what.

(Photo, by Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP, shows President Obama at the White House on July 2, 2009.)

  • CommentComment
  • Email E-mail

Email this article

Invalid email address
Invalid email address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

10 comments so far...
  1. It's simple.
    Pick one church so we can avoid it ... and him.
    Check it out ,,,
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVN2MMuiedI&feature=sdig&et=1242466852.02

    Posted by GR July 2, 09 11:44 PM
  1. These statements represent the thinking of many catholics at least those who have some senseof balance.. If catholics who live in the USA including Clergy and Bishops would only expose their minds to other parts of the catholic community throughout the world they would have a better reaction to these words of the President. They should also remember that USA Catholics are only 6 SIX percent of the catholic population in the world. Of course they then have to overcome the maniac idea that we have to control the thoughts and actions of the whole world. let us put aside the Theological illiteracy of some of our bishops suported by the likes of Wiegal, Novak Lawlor and others in the extreme right and focus on the teachings John XXIII, PaulVI , John Paul I and John Paul II and Benedict the XV and XVI calling us to live the Gospel of Jesus in matters especially of Peace and Justice.

    Posted by Paul J McLaughlin July 3, 09 07:20 PM
  1. The Natural Law is written in the hearts of all people, and murder is wrong whether you are Catholic, Hindu, Protestant or Muslim. Obama is the most pro abortion president of all time. Rather than openly passing FOCA as he promised Planned Parenthood , he is giving it to us by a "slow drip" by overturning legislation which has safeguarded the unborn in the past, having started on the very first Friday after his innaugeration in spite of the well-attended Right to Life March on Washington the day before.

    I maintain that social justice beings in the womb. Those Catholics who rationalize their vote for him on the basis of "social justice" should recall Pope John Paul II's statement: "The common outcry, which justly made on behalf of human rights--for example, the right to health, to home, to work, to culture--is false and illusory if the right to life, the most basic and fundamental right and the condition for all other personal rights, is not defended with maximum determination."

    Posted by Frances M. Holmes July 5, 09 08:57 PM
  1. An interesting post to be sure with some interesting quotes. Unfortunately, as usual, Obama's words about such matters important to Catholics are far more moderate than his actual policy moves.
    Plus, anyone aware of the spectrum of Catholic media will know that the journalists allowed in the room are very clearly cherry-picked as being sympathetic, if not enthusiasts, for the President. Not even National Catholic Reporter's painstakingly objective John Allen was allowed in the room which ought tell you quite a lot.
    If you follow the questions in the links provided, there's an awful lot of softball. Should we be surprised?

    Posted by Justin July 6, 09 10:57 AM
  1. #4 posted by Justin...two telling points, Justin. Good work!

    Posted by Kathryn July 6, 09 02:09 PM
  1. I thank god every day for Barack Obama. keep your religion out of our government!

    Posted by separationof church &staste July 6, 09 06:38 PM
  1. Posted by Frances M. Holmes July 5, 09 08:57 PM

    Frances, does that right to life include those Iraqis who lost their lives as a result of the US invasion and occupation? First of all, Obama is pro-choice, not pro-abortion. He has spoken repeatedly of reducing the number of unwanted pregnancies as a means of reducing the number of abortions - a position that makes so much sense that it comes as no surprise that religious zealots simply reject it. Your church has a history of opposing family planning. But, to reiterate #6 - it's our country. Not your religion.

    Posted by OnTheLeft July 7, 09 12:24 AM
  1. Obama: When once the pregnancy occurs, remove all barriers to abortion and enable the murder of millions of unborn babies. This "common ground" is a sham. While everyone wants to reduce unwanted pregnancies, once they occur, Obama is hell bent on removing all obstacles to them. He wants it to be easier to get an abortion, even for minors without parental notification, where to administer an aspirin to a minor requires notification and permission. He position is utterly evil, and renders the viable fetus fewer rights than a wart to be removed. Obama is the most dangerous person in the world on many levels.

    Posted by KJR July 7, 09 12:00 PM
  1. ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS TAKE AN OBJECTIVE LOOK AT HISTORY. IN 1938 WE HAD HITLER AND THE NAZI PARTY NOW WE HAVE OBAMA AND THE DEMOCRAT PARTY. THE SIMILARITIES ARE FRIGHTENINGLY OBVIOUS. PITY THE CHILDREN AND WHAT THEY WILL HAVE TO PAY.

    Posted by Marty Kulick July 7, 09 02:25 PM
  1. I am not a religiuos man. I know little about the bible. But I do know that EVERYONE should read the book of Revalations. It is the begining of the end. It has started, it began Nov 08, and it WILL end. You dont have to be a believer. Check the FACTS. Check his record. Keep an open mind. Allow yourself to weigh the actual {published} facts and comments. Dont lert this man no matter how prowerful he is, make up your mind for you. Stand up for yourself. Dont be a lamb, be a lion. Check his record. He will destroy ALL that oposes him and/or his ideals. He is NOT this countrys savior. He is evil. Again, check things for yourself, keep an open mind dont be swayed by anything or anybody. Use your God given sense to judge for yourself. Its up the all the American People to either allow this to happen to us OR to stop it from happening. ONLY we can change things. ONLY we can allow it.

    Posted by Dan B. August 20, 09 09:13 AM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

Blogger

Michael Paulson covers religion for The Boston Globe. He shared in the Pulitzer Prize in 2003, won the Mike Berger, Templeton and Supple awards in 2008, and is a four-time winner of the Wilbur Award.
E-mail mpaulson@globe.com.

views

Harvey_Cox_cow.JPGHarvey Cox, the Hollis professor of divinity at Harvard University, marks his retirement by asserting a little-used right of his professorship -- to graze a cow in Harvard Yard. Photo, by Barry Chin of the Globe staff, taken on Sept. 10, 2009 in Cambridge, Mass.

archives