< Back to front page Text size +

Previewing the papal-presidential parley

Posted by Michael Paulson July 9, 2009 07:11 PM

Tomorrow (Friday) is the much-anticipated first meeting between President Obama and Pope Benedict XVI, and there's lots of discussion about what to expect. The two men have shared interests in economic and environmental issues, but those have generally been overshadowed by the abortion divide, which has dominated reaction to the Obama presidency by the Catholic church hierarchy in the United States.

Benedict_20090808.jpgThis afternoon, Catholic Democrats held a teleconference to talk about the pope's recent encyclical and tomorrow's meeting; while on the phone, I asked US Representatives Jim McGovern, a Massachusetts Democrat, and Rosa L. DeLauro, a Connecticut Democrat, whether they view the pope-president meeting as largely symbolic, or as having some more substantive significance.

Here's what McGovern, who represents central and southeastern Massachusetts, including Worcester, had to say:

"In the past, they have been symbolic meetings that have amounted to more than photo ops and a nice press release. But my sense of President Obama is that he doesn't do symbolism. He's not going through the motions. This is a man who ran for president with a deep desire to change the world for the better, and I believe that he really wants to change things. And I think this pope, with the encyclical that he has issued, has put forward a framework, not just for the US, but for the world. I have high expectations for this meeting. I believe this meeting has the potential to have a lasting impact, not only to inspire, but to provide political cover to move forward in some areas that have been difficult for politicians to deal with – the delicate crisis in the MidEast, or poverty, or hunger. My hope and my expectation is that it will be about real things, and results-oriented. I'm very, very hopeful.''

And here's DeLauro, who represents south central Connecticut, including New Haven:


"The pope is a very deep theological thinker, and he's laid out a roadmap that is very clear about the moral and economic consequences of what we do. He is trying to, in a very thoughtful way, address very serious issues. The meeting is about building relationships, and our president, President Obama, has demonstrated this equally deep thinking about very serious issues, and that he is someone who is not afraid to take on deep, serious issues which cause tension. (DeLauro then mentioned Obama's speech about race during the campaign, his discussion of abortion at the University of Notre Dame, and his speech about Islam in Cairo.) This is not a photo opp, or posing for holy pictures. There is a reality and a difficulty about the serious issues that face all of our societies, and I too am optimistic that we're looking at people who will say they're complex, they're not easy, and let's find the common ground and see what we can pull out of this to move the dialogue forward.''

There are a variety of other pieces out there anticipating the meeting. The National Catholic Register posts an interview with Carl Anderson, supreme knight of the Knights of Columbus, who said, "There’s a possibility for great good to come out of the meeting," but also said, "You'd still have this irreconcilable difference which would have deep, practical consequences."

Obama_20090809.jpgWhite House press secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters a bit about his expectations for the visit with the pope in a conversation with reporters aboard Air Force One yesterday (Wednesday). Here's the exchange:

"Q: When he meets the pope, Robert, do you think there's going to be frank discussion of their differences on things like abortion, gun control, gay rights, or is it mostly a courtesy call from your view?

MR. GIBBS: I think there will be frank discussion. I think -- I mean, I think that there's a lot that they agree on that they'll get a chance to discuss. We know the Pope has been keenly aware of the president's outreach to the Muslim world. The pope shares the president's view on reducing the number of nuclear weapons. So I think there's certainly a lot of common ground. And I actually think even in the issues that you mentioned where there isn't total agreement, I think if you go back and look at what the president said at Notre Dame, there's -- even if we don't see eye to eye on everything, there are steps that can be taken on a number of issues that will show progress, whether it's on something like unintended pregnancy or adoption -- some of those things that I think the pope and the president will get a chance to discuss, and I assume it will be a very frank conversation.

Q: Will there be an announcement coming out of that, you think, from that meeting -- new initiatives or efforts?

MR. GIBBS: I don't know that there will be new initiatives or new efforts as much as -- hopefully we'll get a chance to talk to him about -- the president will get a chance to talk to the pope about some of those things I mentioned and get his thoughts and input on their implementation and their impact. Obviously he's somebody that gets to see a lot of the world and I think getting his continued support for these efforts is obviously important."

And today, deputy national security advisor Denis McDonough spoke to reporters about the visit:

"The president will meet with the Holy Father. The president will meet also with Cardinal Bertone, the Secretary of State of the Vatican, as is traditional for such visits. And the President will also be joined on the visit by the First Lady. We've talked about this heretofore, underscoring the fact that in many ways the visit is not unlike visits with other heads of state -- that is to say that there are issues on which they'll agree, issues on which they'll disagree, and issues on which they'll agree to continue to work on going forward. The fact, however, is that given the influence of the Catholic Church globally, as well in the United States, and frankly, given the influence of the Catholic Church and Church social teaching on the President, himself, he recognizes that this is much more than your typical state visit. So I do believe that it's fair to say that the President looks very much forward to this visit since a very good conversation he had with the Holy Father as President-elect in, I believe it was in early December. The President has been looking for an opportunity to visit the Holy See and to meet in person with the Holy Father."

And here is McDonough reflecting on the role of Catholicism in his own life as well as that of the president:

"The President, in both his words and in his deeds, expresses many things that many Catholics recognize as fundamental to our teaching. One is that the President often refers to the fundamental belief that each person is endowed with dignity, and as it relates to the issues I work on most frequently with the President, the President often underscores that dignity of people is a driving goal in what we hope to accomplish in development policy, for example, and in foreign policy. That's one. Two, I've also heard the President speak very movingly about what Cardinal Bernadin called the seamless garment of Catholic teaching. That garment speaks to not just taking care of the poor and the needy but also investing in the kind of health care infrastructure that would ensure that people like those on the South Side of Chicago, who the President is very familiar with are oftentimes finding their health care not in publicly funded hospitals but in Catholic hospitals, for example. So the President I think has been very impacted not just as he's talked publicly about his time on the South Side when he was funded partly as a community organizer by a Catholic Church campaign for human development funding, but also as a younger person when his mother was doing so many things consistent with that tradition as somebody focused on economic development and issues similar to that in poor communities overseas."


(Photo of Pope Benedict, by Giampiero Sposito/Reuters, was taken on July 8, 2009 at the Vatican. Photo of President Obama, by Vittorio Zunino Celotto/Getty, was taken on July 9, 2009 in in L'Aquila, Italy.)

Email this article

Invalid email address
Invalid email address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

10 comments so far...
  1. Of course, the brief, in-person meeting between the Pope and the President will mean little. It is only the media who think that personal meetings count for much, like King Kong vs. Godzilla, or Michael Jackson meets Oprah Winfrey. Superficial.

    And this Pope, and every Pope, will meet with virtually anyone. What the Church does is to try to pluck whatever good might be happening in that country, emphasize that, and more or less gently challenge that leader/country to move away from whatever is not positive in that country. This attitude comes from the
    Church being over 2000 years old, while the US is only 233. this too shall pass. What does this [meeting] mean sub species aeternitatis, in the light of eternity? To that extent, we Catholics are like the Muslims, we think in terms of centuries, not milliseconds, like contempo culture.

    While Denis McDonough's comments mean well, when he speaks of Cardinal Joseph Bernadin and the so-called 'seamless garment' of Catholic social
    teaching, is that, yes, all human rights are based on the fact that every human is made in the image and likeness of God, and all those rights are interconnected and inseparable, but the first and inalienable of those rights is the right to life, the right to be born. If you ain't born, then you cannot acquire the right to food, shelter, education, health, etc.

    Posted by gaudete July 9, 09 10:24 PM
  1. I think a lot a people are expecting way too much from this meeting. I think it was John Allen of National Catholic Reporter who stated that after the photo ops, the Pope and the President will proably spend about 10 minutes in private conversation. There is not enough time for this two men to come to a deep understanding of each other. That will be the job of their respective diplomats.

    Posted by Jonathan Jones July 9, 09 10:34 PM
  1. Why isn't he meeting with the head of Scientology, or the head of the church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster?

    He might as well go to Disney World and meet with Mickey Mouse. He also leads a fantasy world full of magic and gumdrops!

    Posted by monkeycaller July 10, 09 11:08 AM
  1. As a non-Catholic ... I don't really understand why meeting with the Pope is so important. But maybe it's just me.

    Posted by sabend July 10, 09 11:37 AM
  1. The media does not rest on its canonization of Obama. This week, a story Newsweek is writing is entitled "Is Obama more Catholic than the Pope?" The article goes on to say that American Catholics align more with Obama than the Pope - as those the Pope needs to get his act together - and that secular Catholics, it implies, are the "true" Catholics. The author? Kathleen Kennedy Townsend. This gets sicker and sicker.

    Posted by KJR July 10, 09 12:01 PM
  1. I don't think this meeting is going to change anything, President will still be leading
    as a president, and the pope will just devoted himself in his community. It is wrong
    for the President Obama be otherwise.

    Posted by just the way should be July 10, 09 12:01 PM
  1. KJR:

    Truth hurts, doesn't it? Glad to see the Holy Spirit brought you to it's door, however. Now you just need to knock.

    Posted by N. T. Climacus July 10, 09 03:04 PM
  1. "As a non-Catholic ... I don't really understand why meeting with the Pope is so important. But maybe it's just me."

    Posted by sabend July 10, 09 11:37 AM

    No, Sabend, it is not just you, it is most Americans, including most Catholics, who do not understand. Most, especially the media, look at things from a materialist, political, 'dog bites man' viewpoint. In other words, what's the bottom line, who
    benefits, what's the practical upshot, etc.? that way of thinking was epitomized by Stalin, who asked, "how many divisions [of soldiers] has the pope?" Military divisions, none, unless you count the Swiss Guards! Taken from that angle, a pope and a president meeting for a few minutes is no big deal, almost a side visit as if the Obama's were average Roman tourists.

    But the truth is more subtle. The President and the the Pope are both highly intelligent men. One is directly responsible for the worldly good of the USA, and indirectly for the prosperity and peace of the whole world. the other is directly
    the spiritual pastor of a billion people, including 20%+ of Americans, and indirectly for the spiritual good of the whole world. Thus their weighty duties overlap. Even on a very practical level, the Church is present in every country in the world, and has diplomatic 'intelligence' from all those countries, perhaps especially about how both the US and the church can deal, cope, with Islamic countries and especially with jihadism.

    President Obama and/or his advisors seem to have a sense that they know that all the nations of contemporary Europe are in varying degrees remnants of Christendom, and those deep roots are still there, despite secularization. He also seems to sense that, although he is a very bright man, he is only in his 40's, with little international experience, whereas Pope Benedict has at least Obama's intelligence, plus an almost unbelievable scholarly erudition and wisdom of 82 years, the vast majority spent administering a worldwide 'organization' at the highest levels. That humility speaks well of the President.

    Posted by gaudete July 10, 09 07:06 PM
  1. sabend:

    As soon as you realize Catholics have all the answers, you'll stop making such silly observations. After all, the Pope is a man, with wisdom, and erudition, and Obama is just....well, in his 40s.

    Posted by A. Republican July 10, 09 08:09 PM
  1. For #3,4 ... meeting with the Pope is important for a head of state, particular one like the US, because he is the single titular religious leader of a denomination with over 1billion members and has a lot of influence. I agree that he is the leader of a cult and a fantasy but he has tremendous influence on the mass of worshipers. Also, Vatican City is an independent city state... so he is also a head of state.
    The leader of Scientology? For a head of state like the leader of the United States... that is worse than pointless, because it would give a small, fringe group legitimacy. He should avoid that like the Inquisition.

    Posted by Kai July 11, 09 12:52 AM

Blogger

Michael Paulson covers religion for The Boston Globe. He shared in the Pulitzer Prize in 2003, won the Mike Berger, Templeton and Supple awards in 2008, and is a four-time winner of the Wilbur Award.
E-mail mpaulson@globe.com.

views

Harvey_Cox_cow.JPGHarvey Cox, the Hollis professor of divinity at Harvard University, marks his retirement by asserting a little-used right of his professorship -- to graze a cow in Harvard Yard. Photo, by Barry Chin of the Globe staff, taken on Sept. 10, 2009 in Cambridge, Mass.

archives