updated
Saturday, 2:15 PM
From the Metro staff at The Boston Globe

State's high court says state should change rules for homeless sex offenders

February 14, 2008 03:29 PM Email| Comments (1)| Text size +

By John R. Ellement, Globe Staff

Homeless sex offenders who list a shelter as their address cannot be prosecuted for violating the sex offender registry law if investigators learn they do not spend every night in the shelter, the state’s high court said today.

Angelo M. Rosado was a Level 3 sex offender in the fall of 2005 who listed the Pine Street Inn in Boston as his address when registering with Boston Police. But when mail from Sex Offender Registry Board was returned as undeliverable, Suffolk Country prosecutors charged that he violated the registry law. Rosado was convicted by District Court Judge Rosalind Miller, who imposed a 30-day suspended sentence.

In a unanimous ruling, the Supreme Judicial Court threw out Rosado’s conviction, saying that the state needs to change its record keeping to reflect the reality that a homeless person is not routinely guaranteed a bed.

“Because homeless sex offenders, by the very nature of their situation, lack a permanent residence, they have little control over where they live,’’ Justice Roderick Ireland wrote for the court. ”Where the Inn distributes beds based on a lottery system, the defendant may have attempted to secure a bed but was just not selected.’’

Rosado’s attorney, Andrew Crouch, said Rosado remains homeless, but has regularly checked in with police as required. He said the SJC ruling means that homeless sex offenders still must register, but they should not fear imprisonment because of chronic bed shortages in shelters.

"We have more homeless people than shelters, and sex offenders do not have a legal right to be at a shelter on any particular day,'' he said.

The SJC also said that the SORB should change the documents homeless sex offenders fill out so they can explicitly record that they do not have a fixed address. Charles McDonald, spokesman for the SORB, said the state agency will comply with the suggestion.

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
1 comments so far...
  1. the board should be able to fine those who do not register, but should not be able to have the discretion to reclassify those who do not register as a higher level of sex offender. When one is faced with foreclosure or homelessness, one should not be (kicked in the teeth) by the "discretionary powers of the Board or Police". This happens with level one and two- some of which are just the sentence of disciplining recaltrant children.

    Posted by helaine becker January 19, 09 01:58 AM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.