updated
Saturday, 2:15 PM
From the Metro staff at The Boston Globe

A surprise file disrupts Connolly jury deliberations

November 6, 2008 12:12 PM Email| Comments (14)| Text size +

By Shelley Murphy, Globe staff


MIAMI -- Jury deliberations in the state murder trial of retired FBI agent John J. Connolly Jr. were interrupted briefly this morning when jurors discovered that a file containing documents that were not presented during the trial was accidentally left in the bottom of a cart containing other evidence they were reviewing.

Sixty-eight-year-old Connolly, his lawyers and prosecutors were quickly summoned to the courtroom around 11:30 a.m. and appraised of the slip-up after Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Stanford Blake received a note from the jury foreman asking if it was alright for the six-woman, six-man panel to review the contents of the file.

Defense Attorney Manuel L. Casabielle said he was compelled to ask for a mistrial, but the judge immediately denied his request.

The file contained excerpts of testimony from several witnesses who testified, various motions -- including one from the defense insisting that no "derogatory" terms be used to describe Connolly during the trial -- and portions of a deposition of a witness.

Jurors, who were called into the courtroom for questioning, said they had not reviewed any of the documents in the file. They said they saw the file in the bottom of the evidence cart and had just pulled the stack of documents out when they discovered a packet of blank yellow tags used to mark exhibits and wondered if the file had been mistakenly left there. They said they immediately sent the note to the judge.

When asked if any of them had reviewed the material in the file, the jurors unanimously answered, "No."

When asked if they saw anything that would affect their deliberations, they again answered no.

Blake told jurors they were not allowed to see the documents in the file, and sent them back to continue deliberating.

"I think it's clear they did not review it,'' said Blake, who reviewed the contents of the file and said, "There was nothing to look at that would be prejudicial to Mr. Connolly.''

Connolly is accused of first-degree murder and conspiracy to commit murder for the 1982 slaying of Boston business consultant John B. Callahan.

He's accused of leaking information to longtime informants James "Whitey" Bulger and Stephen "The Rifleman" Flemmi that prompted the gangsters to enlist a hitman to lure Callahan to Florida and kill him.

Hitman-turned-government witness John Martorano testified that he reluctantly shot Callahan, former president of World Jai Alai, because he feared he would implicate him, Bulger, and Flemmi in a 1981 slaying they had done at his behest: the 1981 slaying of World Jai Alai owner Roger Wheeler.

After seven weeks of testimony, jurors deliberated for an hour Tuesday, all day yesterday, and resumed deliberations this morning.

Connolly, who retired from the FBI in 1990, faces life in prison if convicted. He's already serving a 10-year federal prison term for his 2002 racketeering conviction. He was found guilty of protecting Bulger and Flemmi from prosecution and warning the gangsters to flee just before their 1995 indictment. Seventy-nine-year-old Bulger, who is wanted for 19 murders, remains one of the FBI's 10 Most Wanted..

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
14 comments so far...
  1. Gee, wonder who left it there.

    Posted by Joe Blow November 6, 08 12:49 PM
  1. he is not guilty

    Posted by samoy2e November 6, 08 12:50 PM
  1. Wow -- I wonder how much that cost. I'll bet someone is going to be able to take a nice vacation on that "mistake."

    Posted by Nicho1 November 6, 08 01:13 PM
  1. you're kidding right? Of course he's guilty, everyone who knows the Whitey saga knows that. The question is whether or not he will be convicted or not.

    Posted by Gerg November 6, 08 01:23 PM
  1. Can't wait for the guilty verdict. Peace out you two faced criminal.

    Posted by Hinesy November 6, 08 01:41 PM
  1. i am one that said not guilty and my name is pam ok joe

    Posted by samoy2e November 6, 08 01:52 PM
  1. samoy2e: He is guilty, he is dirty and he is going to rot in a Florida prison.

    Posted by Watcher November 6, 08 01:55 PM
  1. Whitey put it there.

    Posted by WHG November 6, 08 02:04 PM
  1. Guilty as sin!

    Posted by pikolo November 6, 08 02:21 PM
  1. Whitey left them there.

    Posted by FransBevy November 6, 08 03:08 PM
  1. "...asking if it was alright [sic] for..."

    Would it be all right if we just had a quick look at the Globe's style manual?

    Posted by Th. Donaghey November 6, 08 03:15 PM
  1. Breaking News just announced that he has been found GUILTY. What a creep.

    Posted by Watcher November 6, 08 04:04 PM
  1. I knew John,during the 1980's-1990's. He is not the guilty one! Unfortunately mud always slides down hill dosen't it? My heart aches for Liz and the boys.

    Posted by Mary November 6, 08 04:24 PM
  1. He is not guilty. I continue to pray for his family and to God with hope that he does everything he can to let John and his family be together.

    Posted by Julie November 7, 08 10:50 AM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.