updated
Saturday, 2:15 PM
From the Metro staff at The Boston Globe

MIT to cut spending by $50 million

November 18, 2008 07:19 PM Email| Comments (8)| Text size +

By Tracy Jan, Globe Staff

Responding to the national economic downturn, MIT plans to cut its budget next year by $50 million and delay renovations to an undergraduate dorm.

The Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the latest in a string of local universities to announce budget cuts, plans to trim 10 to 15 percent of its spending in the next two or three years. It will begin by reducing next year's $1 billion general budget by 5 percent, according to a letter by President Susan Hockfield and Provost L. Rafael Reif.

“The continuing uncertainty about the length and depth of the economic downturn makes accurate predictions impossible,” Hockfield and Reif wrote Monday evening in a letter to the university community. “However, we must take action now to plan for a protracted period of financial constraint.”

The letter warned of a potential slowdown in hiring, but did not detail what cuts would be made. Neither Hockfield nor Reif were available for comment tonight.

While the economic downturn will likely shrink MIT’s endowment, tuition revenue, federal research funding, and pool of major donors, Hockfield and Reif assured the community that the university remains committed to need-blind admission and need-based financial aid for undergraduates.

Boston University called for a freeze on hiring and future construction last month. Harvard last week announced possible cuts to programs and compensation.

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
8 comments so far...
  1. You know that the economy is bad when the big three teaching instituations are cutting their spending. This is the first time I recall such action. May they rebound quickly.

    Posted by hank November 18, 08 07:46 PM
  1. Yep time to cut down on spending, and potential cut in jobs and new positions, yet at no point will her salary of $808,000 be affected. Well played.

    Posted by sully November 18, 08 08:45 PM
  1. Again the hell with the students our investment growth is more important.

    Posted by wilbur November 18, 08 09:30 PM
  1. I can't stand when the media does this. It's a 5% budget cut! Pretty dang reasonable, no matter what the economic environment is like. Meanwhile a top-of-the-fold headline with "cut spending by $50 million" grabs attention, so that's what reports write (and, apparently, editors publish). Put it in perspective Tracy, et al. $50 million ain't what it used to be--and it's ALL relative.

    Posted by Bill F. November 18, 08 09:57 PM
  1. All these colleges and universities want to make cuts and lower cost on certain items which makes sense, but at the same time they should not be cutting staff if needed when endowments for places like Harvard are in the multi billions of dolllars. Isn't the point of having these endowments to use them when a tough economic time is upon the school, the school can dip into it's "savings account" a family would do to make sure the school runs as usual.
    I don't get it.

    Posted by Dean November 18, 08 10:02 PM
  1. Bill F., you need to put it in perspective. For those of us working at MIT, a 5% budget cut is a pretty big deal. They're not cutting need-based financial aid, and lord knows more people are going to need it, so that translates to a bigger cut to resources material and human. Facilities tends to take the first cut, and they're the people in the toughest situation--often unskilled, generally living paycheck to paycheck. A 5% cut there means 1 in 20 people! A 5% cut in researchers means one person from each research team. That's a big deal.

    Also, if you look at President Hockfield's letter to the community (available on the MIT website), you see that she's thinking about far deeper cuts, possibly 15%. That 5% number is a baseline. And those are some scary figures.

    Posted by Concerned researcher November 18, 08 10:53 PM
  1. Hello Concerned Researcher (et al). I know people (and things) will be affected by budgets cuts. It's not that I wish anyone to lose their job (quite the contrary!)--no matter the circumstances. It's the headline on this article that irks me; it has TV "7 News" pizzaz. Sad to say there will be plenty of economic carnage in the months to come (really sad!). But the media needs to parse it out better...and have more reasonable headlines. OpEd is where the "sizzle" should be.

    Posted by Bill F. November 18, 08 11:47 PM
  1. Maybe MIT ought to take a page from Harvard and admit more affluent, dumb kids who can pay the freight.
    Oops, my bad !

    Posted by Harold November 19, 08 01:32 AM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.