updated
Saturday, 2:15 PM
From the Metro staff at The Boston Globe

Poutre trial halted as attorney falls ill

November 10, 2008 11:20 AM Email| Comments (10)| Text size +

Jason-Strickland-6.jpg
(Stephen Rose for the Boston Globe)

Jason Strickland (left) sat with attorney Alan Black last month at a pre-trial hearing.

By Patricia Wen, Globe Staff

SPRINGFIELD - The child abuse trial of Haleigh Poutre's stepfather was abruptly called off today when the judge announced that one of the defense attorneys, Alan Black, was ill, a development that could jeopardize the completion of the trial.

Hampden County Superior Court Judge Judd Carhart told jurors the news at 9 a.m. just as they had taken their seats for the start of the second week of testimony in the criminal case against Jason Strickland. The trial was originally scheduled to last about two weeks. Jurors were told to return Wednesday, unless otherwise notified.

Black's co-counsel, Richard Rubin, said outside the courtroom that Black had been taken to the hospital for some routine screening tests, though Rubin would not say what was causing Black to feel sick. Rubin said Black does not have any chronic health problems.

Black apparently had been feeling poorly throughout last week. After the opening statements last Tuesday, the judge cut short the day around 11 a.m. after announcing that a "quasi-emergency" had come up. Later, an assistant clerk said that a participant in the trial was not feeling well, though he would not specify the individual's name. Rubin and an assistant clerk acknowledged today that it was Black.

When asked after opening statements last Tuesday who was feeling sick, Black said he was instructed by the court not to say. He did not appear visibly sick last week during the five days of the trial.

Rubin said that he should know by Tuesday whether Black will be well enough to return on Wednesday. The courts are closed on Tuesday in honor of Veteran's Day.

Strickland, 34, is accused of participating in a pattern of child abuse against Haleigh, culminating in near-fatal brain injuries that put her in coma in the fall of 2005. Haleigh, now 14, has recovered to the point that she is able to attend a day school in a Brighton rehabilitation hospital.

If Black's illness causes a prolonged absence, the judge would have to make some serious decisions. Jurors had been told originally the case would last no more than two and a half weeks, and it is unclear whether they could accommodate a longer trial. Rubin said he is not able to take over all of Black's roles because the two lawyers shared duties, and he is not well-versed enough in all aspects of the case to run the entire legal defense. A prolonged delay raises the possibility of a mistrial, Rubin said.

If a mistrial is declared, it would be the second time that the case has been delayed due to issues related to the defense attorneys. Last fall, the case was scheduled to go to trial when Strickland's original defense attorney, Greg Schubert, recused himself.

Schubert made the decision when Juvenile Court Judge James G. Collins was temporarily appointed to Superior Court to preside over the criminal case against Strickland. Collins had overseen Haleigh's custody and end-of-life decisions, and he and Schubert frequently sparred bitterly during juvenile court hearings.

After failing to get Collins to step down, Schubert resigned as Strickland's attorney, saying, among other things, that his client needed a lawyer who did not have a history of such contentious relationships with the judge. Black was appointed to represent Strickland in the trial this fall. Rubin joined Black to help with Strickland's defense.

Weeks later, Collins also recused himself from the case, which is now being presided over by Judge Carhart.

Patricia Wen can be reached at wen@globe.com.

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
10 comments so far...
  1. I'm assuming the original defense attorney recused himself, not rescued. The editing on boston.com articles has been really bad lately.

    Posted by bostonrrsponder November 10, 08 12:47 PM
  1. Good lord, that's exactly what I was coming here to state - it's RECUSED, not "rescued".

    Where the hell are the editors and if they're being paid a decent amount of money, perhaps I could take over for them! With my mother and both grandmothers being speech and English teachers, and having gone to Katharine Gibbs many years ago, I've got to be better than the Globie editors!

    Posted by Linda November 10, 08 01:56 PM
  1. Seriously: as a journalist/reporter, shouldn't you know better than to rely on spell-check exclusively? Lately it seems like almost every article I read on here has silly mistakes that would be caught by an old fashioned proofreading.

    Posted by eos1 November 10, 08 02:22 PM
  1. Lets not talk about the spelling here. Lets talk about how this "sickness" is a great way to prolong the trial and give the bastard more time. This guy deserves life with no chance of parol for what he did to her. Trust me. It wouldnt be close to justice for what he did to Haleigh, but if he was locked up for life, it may make him feel some sort of guilt for forcing her to be "locked up" for life in her broken body.

    Posted by BDA November 10, 08 04:04 PM
  1. Wow Linda you really need to go back to school. The word "recused" is used in legal terms to disqualify or remove oneself as a judge over a particular proceeding because of ones conflict of interest. So instead of bashing Boston.com use google and look up the word. By the way open mouth and insert foot. Plus a little girl was abused and three idiots were more concerned about how a word was spelled then about the facts in the story. Society is failing really fast I just hope it can be saved.

    Posted by chris98 November 10, 08 04:09 PM
  1. chris98: raed Linda's comment and then your own. Open mouth and insert foot indeed...

    Posted by aging cynic November 10, 08 05:13 PM
  1. . . .and Chris98, you need to read more carefully before posting a comment about Linda putting a foot in her mouth (reread to see that the article should read "recused" rather than "rescued"). I have to agree with Boston.com's embarrassing spelling errors. During election night, their vote tally map read "Deleware".

    And yes, I think that all can agree that what happened to the little girl was horrible, so we don't really need to comment on it.

    Posted by grabbit November 10, 08 05:35 PM
  1. cynic please insert foot in mouth yourself. Read the story they are referring to RECUSED not being spelled right. When in fact it is and it is used in the right context. Also its read not raed. LOSER. Again society is dying quick when people get write, read, or vote.

    Posted by chris98 November 10, 08 05:42 PM
  1. They corrected the word in the story. Why is that not obvious? It was previously incorrectly "rescued" instead of "recused" and then was updated to reflect the correct word choice and spelling. The presence of the original misspelling had initiated a discussion by some readers on Globe editing. Perhaps that very discussion in the comments section drew the Globe's attention to the spelling, which was, as stated, later corrected. Anyway, moving on...

    Posted by jenny November 10, 08 07:31 PM
  1. Thank you, BDA. Oh, Strickland will get justice - jailhouse justice. I hope these articles are pasted in every jail cell in the Commonwealth.

    Posted by reindeergirl November 10, 08 11:19 PM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.