Mass. voters OK decriminalization of marijuana

(Barry Chin/Globe Staff)
Whitney Taylor, chairwoman of the Committee for Sensible Marijuana Policy, left, and Question 2 supporter Dr. John H. Halpern, associate director of substance research at McLean Hospital, celebrated after hearing that the measure passed.
By David Abel, Globe Staff
Massachusetts voters today approved a ballot initiative to decriminalize possession of small amounts of marijuana, making getting caught with less than an ounce of pot punishable by a civil fine of $100. The change in the law means someone found carrying as many as dozens of marijuana cigarettes will no longer be reported to the state’s criminal history board.
“The people were ahead of the politicians on this issue; they recognize and want a more sensible approach to our marijuana policy,” said Whitney Taylor, chairwoman of the Committee for Sensible Marijuana Policy, which campaigned for the ballot initiative. “They want to focus our limited law enforcement resources on serious and violent crimes. They recognize under the new law that the punishment will fit the offense.”
The proposition will become law 30 days after it’s reported to the Governor’s Council, which usually meets in late November or early December. But the Legislature could amend or repeal the new law, as they've done with some prior laws passed by the voters, said Emily LaGrassa, a spokeswoman for Attorney General Martha Coakley. The Associated Press called the outcome at about 9:20 p.m.
The proposition will require those younger than age 18 to complete a drug awareness program and community service. The fine would increase to as much as $1,000 for those who fail to complete the program.
Proponents of the initiative, who spent about $1 million promoting it, argued the change in the law would maintain the state's existing penalties for growing, trafficking, or driving under the influence of marijuana, while ensuring that those caught with less than an ounce of pot would avoid the taint of a criminal record. They also argued it would save the state millions of law enforcement dollars and match similar marijuana possession laws in 12 states, all of which have adopted some form of decriminalization.
The opponents, who included the governor, attorney general, and district attorneys around the state, argued that decriminalizing marijuana possession would promote drug use and benefit drug dealers at a time when they say marijuana has become more potent. They warned it would increase violence on the streets and safety hazards in the workplace, and cause the number of car crashes to rise as more youths drive under the influence.
The opponents said that most of those charged with marijuana possession are arrested for other reasons, such as driving under the influence or possessing a more potent drug like crack cocaine. They also said most people arrested for marijuana possession have their records cleared within six months.


pass the dutchie to dee left hand side!!
Finally some understand the truth behind the usage of marijuana. Thank you mass voters!!
Unfortunately, one's record does not get cleared because the arrest still shows up on a CORI report. CORI reform is the next obstacle to tackle.
Way to go Mass! The rest of the country thanks you, and will reward you with additional tourist dollars. See you next summer!
Yah mon!
“They want to focus our limited law enforcement resources on serious and violent crimes."
Hmmmm I wonder if drugs have any correlation to violent crimes?
Ugh. The result of this vote sickens me. What's next? Less than 1 ounce of cocaine? Less than 30 tabs of acid? Less than a few rounds of illegal ammunition? Illegal substances are just that... illegal. Great message for kids.
People that smoke weed are probably less likely to be violent criminals, not more.
Ask ANY police officer - who is more violent? Drunks or stoners? DRUNKS EVERY TIME!!!
when does this come in effect?
"They warned it would increase violence on the streets and safety hazards in the workplace, and cause the number of car crashes to rise as more youths drive under the influence."
Hahah, yeah right. It will actually cause less probably. More people will be driving 15 miles/hr under the speed limit
CORI are you kidding me! People mixed up with pot don't need to be around kids period!
What's up with the "as many as dozens of marijuana cigarettes" comment? Let's get an objective journalist reporting here. Marijuana is a plant, not a drug!
i'll put one in the air for this news
Regardless of whether you think marijuana (or more generally, cocaine and other narcotics), the idea that an individual can get arrested for using a substance is absurd. When an individual makes a choice which poses no direct threat to others in society, they should not be able to be jailed.
I fully support VERY strict punishments for those that use drugs and drive, or for those that distribute drugs.. However, there really is no justification for the arrest of a drug user
Yes it should be legal to have under a oz of coke and 30 hits of acid, BECAUSE THEY ARE VICTIMLESS. The bullets have victims
Finally a move in the right direction. I'm sick of seeing people's lives ruined over something so stupid. Thank you Mass. voters.
I believe the great message to kids would be the one their parents give them. If parents are losing touch with there kids and not getting the correct message across the law will not matter.
Thank You! Thank You! Thank You! Hey EAP....did you know that everything you mentioned has killed at least 1 person? Did you know marijuana is responsible for ZERO deaths? Enough with the ignorance already. Let the punishment fit the crime! It's a beautiful day!
YES!!!!!!!!!!!!! Big win for everyone. :)
“They want to focus our limited law enforcement resources on serious and violent crimes."
Hmmmm I wonder if drugs have any correlation to violent crimes?"
_________________________________________________________
...and if you don't push the sale of this plant to the black market, violent criminals willing to break the law will be obsolete....
The (smart) voters of MA have spoken!
#2 - There would be no arrest, therefore no blemish on CORI report.
#4 - Show me a pothead who commits a violent crime, please.
#5 - Keep drinking your legal alcohol.
Its ABOUT TIME !!!
casual pot use is not a crime. common sense prevails....however jst wait and see what the Mass Legislature does to this one ! Remember the sales tax question????????????????????????
Ugh. The result of this vote sickens me. What's next? Less than 1 ounce of cocaine? Less than 30 tabs of acid? Less than a few rounds of illegal ammunition? Illegal substances are just that... illegal. Great message for kids.
In Islamic countries they stone you to death for sexing your donkey. I suppose you are against this as well? So what is it? Drugs or the donkey? I theenk we know which one you favor....
Great News ! If Alcohol is legal, then why would cannabis be illegal?
If the legislature overturns this, vote them out !!
best news aside from obomb boomaye
WOOOH!
A sensible proposition that deserved to pass. Note to State Legistlature: Don't mess with the will of the voters. Let this law stand for a couple of years to assess its effect. No more dumbass posturing on this issue. Note to "users": this DOESN"T mean you can drive while high.... use common sense, folks!
“They want to focus our limited law enforcement resources on serious and violent crimes."
Hmmmm I wonder if drugs have any correlation to violent crimes?
__________________________________________________________
Wow, you just don't get it. Once you take this plant off the black market, violent criminals willing to break the law won't sell it. They become obsolete.
EAP,
jaywalking is illegal. speeding is illegal. parking in a handicap spot is illegal. maybe we should fill the jails with these scofflaws?
Finally!
I love the slippery slope argument EAP. This is a substance that is less dangerous than alcohol yet is still illegal due to irrational point of view such as yours. First of all, marijuana will no longer be illegal. Secondly, to compare marijuana to coke and acid shows a lack of understanding of the nature of the substance. It is akin to alcohol and nicotine, consumption of which should be left to a person's own personal compass. To say what's next, coke, acid, ...etc. does not follow. As for the kids, please teach your kids values and decision making skills so they can make their own informed decisions. If they want to try marijuana, fine,when they are adults and old enough to form their own opinion and do it responsibly.
“They want to focus our limited law enforcement resources on serious and violent crimes."
Hmmmm I wonder if drugs have any correlation to violent crimes?
__________________________________________________________
Wow, you just don't get it. Once you take this plant off the black market, violent criminals willing to break the law won't sell it. They become obsolete.
It "removes the threat of arrest, jail, loss of student loans, loss of driver's licenses, and other sanctions for possession of an ounce or less of marijuana. Instead, a $100 fine, similar to a speeding ticket, would be imposed." It "ends the creation of a permanent record (CORI) and barriers to housing and employment. Police would be freed up to focus on serious crimes, rather than arresting 7,500 people annually for marijuana possession. Taxpayers would save $30 million a year in arrest costs. All other marijuana-related crimes, like sales or DUIs, remain untouched. Stricter than current law, juveniles would have their parent(s) notified and must complete a drug awareness program and community service. Question 2 would not increase marijuana use. Eleven other states have similar laws and have shown no increase in marijuana use." Finally.
Can't wait to see if the money saved from prosecuting pot users will have a noticable effect on the state.
EAP, you need to relax with a nice joint, I'd be happy to pay your $100 fine if your that stupid to get caught! - Lighten up and light it up!! =)
None of those measurements are relative. I'm pretty sure its a hefty criminal offense to possess any amount of cocaine, and if you have an ounce you are more than likely distributing, an ounce of cocaine is alot of cocaine. 1 tab of acid is a federal offense. I am not quite sure of what you mean by illegal ammunition? Guns dont kill people, people kill people.
i guess it's safe to say happy 4:20 y'all
Thank you Mass., I'm from a town where it is decriminalized in our city but not decriminalized state wide. Thanks for a more sensible approach! Much appreciation from Columbia, Missouri (Mizzou). Thank you
a historic moment.
Its about time the punishment fit the crime for this victimless offense. Why should students have financial aid - and the likelihood for a great education - taken away for the petty crime of smoking pot?
To those who complain about kids getting the wrong message - it is YOUR DUTY, as parents, teachers, and law enforcement officers, to spread the message of responsible decision making. It should be the benefits of sobriety (read: not the punishments of intoxication) that persuade our population to say no to drugs.
Do not make the students pay for what the state can't seem to teach.
Oh good. Because obviously not enough kids were smoking weed before.
Sorry for posting twice. I am for decriminalization. However, I am embarrassed by the comments of some posters. To say there will be more people driving at 15/mph is disgusting (along with any other moronic comment). This doesn't excuse idiot behavior. I am for possession and responsible use, but, I hate being associated with persons who have no clue how to be responsible or just speak to cause a reaction. Please grow up. You make those of us who are responsible and partake look like immature and irresponsible like yourself.
Yeah I can remember when I got in that drunken bar fight high on some kush. lol get real gramps, Jim try this, go smoke a J and tell me whether you want to beat someones head in, or sit n watch TiVo'd episodes of Jeopardy, k?
I'll tell you what though, if the state repeals the voice of the people, it would be the first instance of widespread violence and rioting because of weed in the history of violence or weed.
Weed is no way as harmful as cocaine is. It is a natural substance that has been growing before without the help of man and all man has done with it is harness its good and use it in order to relax the body without having to become highly addictive to drugs like pain killer. In my opinion i think that weed should be legal over tobacco products because tobacco do cause serious harm to the body like cancer. Legalize IT BABY it would make the world better and more relaxed because who would want to fight a war if they were high?
Duuuuude!
It is about time.
So carrying pot is ok, but the moonbats voted down the right to buy wine at a grocery store last year? Get me the hell out of this state.
It is about time.
It's a sad day when there's a smoking ban just about everywhere in Massachusetts, even some apartments won't rent to cigarette smokers....and yet, they want to allow marijuana.....hhmmm..I wonder what the secondhand smoke from a joint does to someone??
@4
“They want to focus our limited law enforcement resources on serious and violent crimes."
Hmmmm I wonder if drugs have any correlation to violent crimes?
Let me fix that for you. "Hmmmm I wonder if drug *prohibition* has any correlation to violent crimes?"
Am I missing something or is that first sentence in the last paragraph a little weird. It says is meant to support the opponents but in all those cases the other offenses would be the reason for arrest and punishment anyway. Is there any good data from the other 12 states?
Oh, yeah, those people stoned on weed are definitely known to be MORE VIOLENT. Watch out now, they'll be, ah, they'll, eh, stand there smiling and laugh most likely. What straw-grasping politician concocted thie pipe dream? And lets ignore the basic fact that any kid who wants to drive stoned already can at will, new law or no law. Pot is as easy to get as beer, maybe even more so. Ah, common sense triumphed. There was no rational argument against this one, just the mandatory blithering of the paid authorities and silly ideas by people who wouldn't know a joint from a stick of insense.
Oh, yeah, those people stoned on weed are definitely known to be MORE VIOLENT. Watch out now, they'll be, ah, they'll, eh, stand there smiling and laugh most likely. What straw-grasping politician concocted thie pipe dream? And lets ignore the basic fact that any kid who wants to drive stoned already can at will, new law or no law. Pot is as easy to get as beer, maybe even more so. Ah, common sense triumphed. There was no rational argument against this one, just the mandatory blithering of the paid authorities and silly ideas by people who wouldn't know a joint from a stick of insense.
The next task is to write your state rep and insist they not modify, amend or void this referendum. Write Patrick too- he's proving to be a real loser but perhaps he'll act in the interests of the citizens and represent the consensus on this one.
It's about time soft drugs get treated properly. Now the cops can work on busting real criminals and drug cartels instead of teenagers and hippies.
woooohooooo!!!!!!!!! wish i still lived there. im proud of u mass!!!
> Hmmmm I wonder if drugs have any correlation to violent crimes?
Jim, you're absolutely right - as long as Marijuana prohibition remains in place it benefits those criminals who choose to get rich at society's expense.
Luckily Massachusetts just took the first step to ending this ridiculous "drug war". As we move closer and closer to full legalization you will continue to see the separation of those upstanding citizens who choose Marijuana as a safer alternative to alcohol from the criminals that profit from the drug war.
Who cares about the kids? It the parents job to raise them, not the voters.
I'm buying a Hummer because with all these people that are going to DUI now I want more protection on the roads People of Mass. should have thought about that first!
Is alcohol a drug? I think it must be...criminal s drink it all the time.
Since criminals drink and do crimes ...alcohol must be a gateway drug.
Personally I would rather smoke pot than drink...never woke up once hung over from smoking pot and my kidneys love me.
Thank you for voting to make pot a better drug than alcohol Massachusetts
“They want to focus our limited law enforcement resources on serious and violent crimes."
Hmmmm I wonder if drugs have any correlation to violent crimes?
Sure, drugs like PCP, Meth, Coke, etc. Not pot. You are an idiot if you think pot makes a person more likely to commit a violent crime. Smoke weed!
finally plants will be treated equally!!!!
and anyone on here who complains about this law needs to open their eyes and see that this is not going to bring gang wars to your suburban home. i guarantee this law will benefit someone you know. and the cocaine and acid comparison are ridiculous, if you want to see dangerous substances look in your medicine cabinet, if you have a prescription pain killer than you have synthetic heroin (its called a synthetic opioid for a reason). prescription pills kill 3x more people a year than heroin, cocaine and meth combined.
as the saying goes "whats of the earth has the greatest worth"
GO GREEN!!!!!
Thank god for Mass voters. I always put it this way, If you were moving into a new place, and you could move next door to potheads, or alcoholics, which would you choose? Potheads hands down right? Why? Because alcoholics are noisy violent animals and potheads like to watch cartoons and eat junkfood.
marijuana - a substance smoked that is naturally occurring ... tobacco, same, alcohol?? more dangerous than marijuana, yet it's still legal ... hmmm, a drunken bar or a smokefilled marijuana room? which do you think will be more problematic? EAP, did u know that tobacco is illegal ... for KIDS ... and alcohol is illegal ... for KIDS ... duh... so because those things are legal for adults, we're sending kids a message that they should do it all the time too? and Jim - ummm, what violent crimes have you ever heard of being because someone smoked marijuana?? maybe crack, meth, heroine, ALCOHOL ...
Jah - better take your face out of the bong and check your stats. Ignorance indeed. Deaths aside, this is about making it okay to break the law. Is it okay to rob a bank if you only take $1,000? Okay to commit assault if you only break the guy's nose? Okay to have just a "small" stash of child porn? Sorry, I think it sucks.
Are you that ignorant? ...Alcohol has been legal for years and has caused many deaths not only from car accidents but also from ALCOHOL POISONING! (aka "overdose") ...all marijuana does is make people happy and mellows them out (and is also physically impossible to overdose on)! ....Does anyone even know how marijuana was made illegal? Lies, racism, and fear ...look it up if you don't believe me...haha Peace!
ONE LOVE!!
yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeessssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
Good job mass.
To the idiot who thinks that marijuana is even slightly related to violent crimes...you definitely never really studied the effects of marijuana. It is the drunks and hard drug users in the US that commit the violent acts, not marijuana users who would much rather be on the their couches with the little debbies not bothering a soul. Consider that...
Not to mention, what is the point of our violent crime laws???...to hold people accountable for their actions. If one immature person decides to drink too much red bull and rob a store, then we punish him for robbing the store, not for drinking too much red bull. We need to be held accountable for our ACTIONS, not our personal consumption of anything! And anyone who blames drugs for their problems needs to look in the mirror and ask themselves who made that choice to put the drug in their body. If you can handle the effects and not hurt anyone in the process, then all the power to you...If you can't stand the rain, stay inside.
Education made this vote possible. I just hope our government honors the peoples choice.
So, Big A...you say that smoking marijuana is not addicting? Then why do so many who smoke it end up, maybe not for years but still end up, addicted to harder stuff, cocaine, etc...?? It is addicting, and it destroys brain cells. I really hope those that banned cigarette smoking due to second hand smoke go after this for the second hand smoke. I'd hate to see Mass turn into another San Francisco.
way to go mass voters!! Alcohol is far more dangerous than marijuana, what's worse? an angry aggressive drunk or a munchie, laughing stoner? c'mon, let's be serious. People believe that pot is so terrible merely because the government has said so for decades, yet alcohol, which causes waaaay more trauma to the body is legal....at least this is a step in the right direciton
> Oh good. Because obviously not enough kids were smoking weed before.
So Brian, you think that this measure makes weed *easier* for kids to get? I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you are simply out of touch with today's youth, rather than a complete idiot.
I work with high-school kids and here's what they tell me: beer is a lot harder to buy because liquor stores card them to a strict degree. Weed on the other hand, is easy - because it comes now from drug dealers who are selling illegally anyway - what do they care?
So if you *really* care about the kids - you should support full legalization. It will take the profit away from the drug dealers, who will then lose interest, and you can bet those who have a license to sell will check the IDs of buyers. Think about it.
hey # 4, marijuana isn't a drug, its a plant, it just grows that way. if you happen to set it on fire, there are some effects. but that's not the same as drugs, drugs you have to do things to it; add baking soda, water, stir it up. i don't know the recipe, im just sayin'...
"Did you know marijuana is responsible for ZERO deaths?" You are absolutely stupid. Learn your facts before you post. There was a woman in Tennessee who was a baby sitter and drove to a friends house to smoke weed and left the baby in the car. She was so stoned that the baby actually froze to death in the car.
Also, I am sure of other stories that has caused death due to Marijuana.
LOL @ # 21 (Sooo true!)
Deaths aside, this is about making it okay to break the law. Is it okay to rob a bank if you only take $1,000? Okay to commit assault if you only break the guy's nose? Okay to have just a "small" stash of child porn? Sorry, I think it sucks....
________________________________
that is a terrible argument.
If you thought that was a good rebuttal, then you are stupider than any pot head i know.
Deaths aside, this is about making it okay to break the law. Is it okay to rob a bank if you only take $1,000? Okay to commit assault if you only break the guy's nose? Okay to have just a "small" stash of child porn? Sorry, I think it sucks....
________________________________
that is a terrible argument.
If you thought that was a good rebuttal, then you are stupider than any pot head i know.
If George Washington were alive he'd be rolling in his grave.
> this is about making it okay to break the law.
Oh EAP, maybe you didn't notice, but possessing Marijuana is no longer a criminal offense in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts! There's a reason robbing banks, assaulting people and possessing child porn are crimes - they all have victims. Just as there's a reason the good people of Massachusetts just made Marijuana possession *not* a crime - it's nobody's business but their own. Certainly not yours!
This one is a slap in the face to inner city blacks because it plays into the hands of the gang bangers dealing the stuff in the streets. They're the ones who are going to profit from this because they'll be able to deal small amounts with impunity so you'll see the dealing out in the open, which just further contributes to the urban decay.
It's short sighted on the part of the voters -- most of whom wouldn't venture into Roxbury or Mattapan if their lives depended on it.
EAP your ignorance is astounding. Just because something is illegal does not make it automatically wrong. If you look into the history of marijuana laws you would realize that they were racially charged. The history of marijuana laws are fraught with lies. They following quote was propaganda used to trick people into its illegality.
"There are 100,000 total marijuana smokers in the US, and most are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos, and entertainers. Their Satanic music, jazz, and swing, result from marijuana use. This marijuana causes white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers, and any others."
END OF DAYS!!!!
But the CHILDREN! WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN?
(Bravo, MA - now we'll see if the state legislature ignores the will of the people yet again)
Lots of people seem to be taking this as marijuana now being legal. It's not (sadly). It's just that the type of offense has been reclassified from criminal to civil... speeding, which causes accidents & death, is not legal... but the penalty is a fine, not a record & jail time. That's what's happening here with marijuana. Driving while high remains a serious offense.
I don't think this sends a pro-drug message, anymore than speeding tickets send a pro-speeding message. It's just recognizing the severity of a particular crime and the amount of resources we want to expend on punishment/correction as well as limiting the government's reach.
Bravo, Massachusetts voters! Unfortunately, our beloved herb is still illegal and distributed through a criminal market. As a country, we need to recognize that the War on Drugs has failed because of its unjust purpose - pretending that the forms of intoxication offered by alcohol, caffeine and nicotine are morally superior to that of marijuana is simply misguided and promotes the kind of nonsensical circular logic that has perpetuated this "anti-drug" dogma: it's illegal, so it's wrong; it's wrong, so it's illegal.
The worst part is, keeping drugs illegal is what's keeping them dangerous. Take responsibility: educate yourselves. If protecting children is truly what is most important to you, don't leave drugs in the hands of criminals who don't ask for ID. Marijuana is, as ever, easier for kids to obtain than alcohol. Ask yourself why.
Re: Comment #41
"If George Washington were alive he'd be rolling in his grave."
Was he buried with pot and papers?
Marijuana is a natural, unchemically altered substance that has been used for hundreds and hundreds of years. It is a natural sleep aid and stress reliever- I'd rather smoke a bowl then pop some junk made in a lab on a restless and stressful night. Marijuana also has less health risks then alcohol does. Smoking a joint can be dangerous due to the inhaltion of the paper, not the pot. However devices such as vaporizors or even a water pipe or hooka make for a less toxic consumption. Let's not forget all the treats you can make with it as well!
Marijuana use does not begat violence. The only time it would would be a situation in which it is laced. Pot should be legal, bottom line. Go ahead and research the benefits of it before you go saying otherwise.
Comparing pot to hard or even Rx drugs is asinine. Alcohol definitely is worse for society and the individual then pot is. Don't just regurgitate what was stuffed down your throat in middle school health class.
Think for yourself- do your research before forming an opinion.
Finally,
alcohol makes people act stupid and crash cars
crack, cocaine, and heroin are leathal..
Pot relaxes you, subdues feelings of anger and stress and fosters a creative thought process. It has always been lumped into the category as crack and harder drugs. "gateway drug" BS!!! people try hard drugs when they are drunk 9 out of 10 times. Think of the money this country could make off of this benevolent crop, and get the buisness out of drug dealers hands, which is right where marijuanna laws put it.
EAP.... it is the fundamental nature of our society to question our laws, and that is exactly what we accomplished with the passing of question 2. This question is not making it okay to rob a bank, or keep a stash of child port, it allows you to keep a small amount of marijuana without the fear of being punished for it for the rest of your life. It is not making it okay to break the law, it is merely decriminalizing the punishment for the law. Let me break it down for you.....
If marijuana doesn't kill anyone, which is proven....then what basis to we have for as harsh punishment as we did in massachusetts. Your generation may have been brainwashed from an early age to believe that marijuana does HORRIBLE things to people...but that is all a bunch of out-dated and under researched bullshit. Every study that has come out in the last 20 years has shown that the effects of marijuana are LIGHTYEARS less than what was originally "believed." Go ahead, I challenge you....do the research...actually learn about the subject that you are claiming to be an expert on. Then, come back and tell me your stats. Marijuana doesn't kill people, stupid people kill people. And to call someone ignorant when you yourself is ignoring scientifically proven facts is ridiculous.
"If George Washington were alive he'd be rolling in his grave."
What, was George a Goth?
If Thomas Jefferson were alive, he'd be applauding.
EAP, next thing you'll see is the pot smokers wanting to make it legal to smoke,tey won't be satisfied with just getting a fine, they won't want to be punished at all. This country is going downhill fast.
To EAP,
Equating marijuana use with actual, serious crimes is a bit of a stretch don't you think? Can you make a fair, sound argument?
How about we take your tax dollars and fund police work for the very things you name: child porn/abuse, rape, assault, murder, etc. It's a much better use of the money than hassling college kids bothering nobody, don't you think?
Please get rational.
Mazel Tov
Natural herbs growing from the earth should be legal everywhere... Go Mass
> This one is a slap in the face to inner city blacks
Nope. sorry scotbo, but this is the first step in repairing the HUGE damage that has been done to inner-city black communities by the so-called "war on drugs". Removing the risk removes the profit which removes the criminal elements from the equation.
Once we stop the drug war for good, then the inner-city areas will finally get the peace they deserve.
Type your comment here...absolutely despicable
ask yourselves this when you argue against this prop, How many people do you know who smoke weed are violent, irresponsible or otherwise unlike you!
i know more than a handful! i didn't start smoking weed until i was 18, i waited because of the effects it has on your mind and body while still developing! Thus i took the responsible path, most teens think the same way and if they don't they are already smoking cigs, so again it all comes down to the judgment call of the individual! i also have never seen someone peer pressure to smoke it and from experience(which is the only true facts of life) i have found no reason for this to be opposed!
People who think this will cause more people to drive stoned (and that they should buy hummers) is absolutely absurd. I guarentee there is someone on a blunt cruise in every single town of Massachusetts on every single night of the year. If anything, this new law will decrease smoking while driving; Now, people are going to go down to the town park, sit on a bench, burn the J, hit up 711 (stimulating the economy), go home, sit on the couch, watch tv, and eat their chips and salsa. 1st step to legalization here. Proud to be from Mass.
EAP - Are speed limits laws? Is it ok to break those laws? If you get pulled over for going 5 MPH over the limit do you think it's more sensible to get a $50 fine, or be hauled off to jail and have a criminal record? This is a more accurate analogy to this change from a criminal offense to a civil one.
Just because the punishment has been changed, doesn't mean it's now any more OK to break the law, now it's just not as likely to ruin someone's life if they do get caught.
As for children, as it's been said, it's up to the parents to teach their children how to be responsible for themselves. Under the current law, any cop that catches a kid with pot basically has two options, let them go, or run them through the system. If your child does hang out with the "wrong" crowd, or becomes "rebellious," or simply "experiments," and they get caught, which would you rather have happen? A) The cop gives them a break and lets them go, with you never knowing. B) The cop arrests them, you have to get a lawyer and deal with courts, criminal record, no financial aid so you have to pay full tuition for their college. OR C) The cop sends a written citation to you with a $100 fine and your child has to enroll in a drug awareness program and do community service?
Deaths aside, this is about making it okay to break the law. Is it okay to rob a bank if you only take $1,000? Okay to commit assault if you only break the guy's nose? Okay to have just a "small" stash of child porn? Sorry, I think it sucks....
1. This really is a horrible argument. Like Jeff says, just because something is illegal doesn't make it wrong.
2. "If George Washington were alive he'd be rolling in his grave."
If he were alive he wouldn't be in a grave...
Thank you, Massachusetts!
For a teenager weed is a LOT easier to get than beer.
You want to curb teenage pot use? Legalize it and sell it only in liquor stores 21 and over with a valid ID.
Think about it because prohibition never worked.
George Washington and Thomas Jefferson both grew hemp. Ben Franklin owned a mill that made hemp paper. Jefferson drafted the Declaration of Independence on hemp paper.
"Make the most you can of the Indian Hemp seed and sow it everywhere." -President George Washington, 1794
I'm sick of feeling like a criminal for wanting to smoke one joint in my own home for pain relief and stress relief, thank you MA!
Thank God this question passed. For someone to be jailed, tried, convicted, and then have a record for possessing marijuana is a joke. I smoke weed nearly every day. It helps me relax, it helps me de-stress, expands my imagination, and most importantly, it makes me happy. For most people who do smoke weed habitually, this is a great day in this twisted state of Massachusetts. Now we can feel at ease that we'll never have to worry about being jailed or convicted of doing what makes us feel good. Marijuana is a great gift from God and our Mother Earth. Now that we have decriminalized it, Our next step will be to Legalize it.
I've never gotten any violent urges under the influence of pot.
Decriminalize all drugs and tax the hell out of them. Now there's no crime. More $ to the Commonwealth. Fewer criminals in jail = less $ to maintain them, build new jails, hire personel. Those who become hopeless drug addicts can be helped with the new money in the coffer. Those who refuse treatment can be arrested as dangerous to selves and others.
You want to create criminals, pass a law. You want to empty jails and give people a break, repeal some of these stupid laws.
Have to disagree Joe. Ever been to Kingston, Jamaica? That's what inner city Boston is going to eventually resemble. BTW, the murder rate there is sky high.
There's a reason that the inner city black clergy was so strongly against this.
But who cares, in our lilly white suburbs where you don't have to worry about getting hit by a stray bullet on your way home from work, you can smoke a J and not get hassled -- which you could still do before this passed.
pot heads.....thats what this state has become
Well, now there will finally be an explanation for all the bad drivers. (Especially in those hellish roundabouts.)
Ummm, before we all get too happy:
"But the Legislature could amend or repeal the new law, as they've done with some prior laws passed by the voters, said Emily LaGrassa, a spokeswoman for Attorney General Martha Coakley."
We need to hold our legislators responsible for making sure this law gets on the books. It looks like the current enforcement establishment will try to subvert passage of this law approoved by the people 2 to 1. If you really care, make sure they carry out our wishes.
Now I can get high if I want without concern that I could have a record that would preclude me from many jobs. But I still have to go to my local DEALER who is part of a large criminal enterprise rather than be able to buy my pot from a legal, controled,TAXED enterprise that would operate along the lines of a liquor store.
Nothing is black and white... all issues are always hades of gray.
The opponents say that these people are arrested for other reasons such as driving under the influence, etc. This law isn't saying you won't still get busted for all that crap, the marijuana possession just won't show up.
the inconvenient truth is that the ozone is bad cause i've been smoking all the trees
If pot was legal and regulated, there would be no pot related violent crime. period. the reason there is violence is because of the black market pot is associated with.
are people in the city shooting each other over cigarettes? alcohol? i don't think so...
regulation, not prohabition is the answer to the problem
Its far less harmless then alcohol is and to think that people are going to act violently if under the influence is ridiculous. This is the type of ridiculous propaganda they used back in the 70's and 80's saying that your more likely to kill and do crazy things high. The only thing i've wanted to do high was relax and or enjoy time with my friends. The majority of people have tried it at some point and your nieve to think otherwise
First off I think it is wrong to group marijuana with acid, ammunition and cocaine. Marijuana cannot kill you. come on. Hardline drugs should never be decriminalized because those are the drugs that ruin lives and increase violent crimes. I feel as though EAP, you have never smoked marijuana before and just because the law says it is illegal, you make the direct connection that marijuana is as dangerous for you as heroin, crack, or any other hard drug. If you want your comment to hold any weight, you should either come from direct experience with the issue or research it thoroughly instead of making an outlandish statement.
___________________________________________
I think there would be a very strong and swift backlash directed against anyone on Beacon Hill who tried to stop this from becoming law. This was not a close vote. The People have spoken, and overwhelmingly they want the current marijuana laws reformed.
___________________________________________
___________________________________________
____________________________
Especially in light of current scandals,the citizens of Massachusetts would have a "zero tolerance" policy for any Beacon Hill politician who went against the will of the People.
That was my skull!
___________________________________________
I think there would be a very strong and swift backlash directed against anyone on Beacon Hill who tried to stop this from becoming law. This was not a close vote. The People have spoken, and overwhelmingly they want the current marijuana laws reformed.
Especially in light of current scandals,the citizens of Massachusetts would have a "zero tolerance" policy for any Beacon Hill politician who went against the will of the People
___________________________________________
___________________________________________
____________________________
Especially in light of current scandals,the citizens of Massachusetts would have a "zero tolerance" policy for any Beacon Hill politician who went against the will of the People.
Finally.