updated
Saturday, 2:15 PM
From the Metro staff at The Boston Globe

Bay State artist claims P. Diddy stole his work

January 29, 2009 06:37 PM Email| Comments (8)| Text size +

cologne.jpg

These photos, which were included in the lawsuit, show Patti's "Compacted Gray With Clear and Ribs'' (left) and P. Diddy's "Unforgivable." Artist Tom Patti says the resemblance is striking.

By Jonathan Saltzman, Globe Staff

In 2006, hip-hop and fashion mogul Sean "P. Diddy'' Combs launched a new cologne with a citrusy scent and risque marketing campaign - ads showed Puffy sitting on a bed with two alluring women - that made it a best-selling fragrance. Combs called it "Unforgivable.''

But an influential glass artist from Pittsfield says a more appropriate name might be ``Stolen,'' and forgiveness isn't on his mind.

In a lawsuit filed in US District Court in Springfield Wednesday, Tom Patti, 65, contends that the cologne's packaging - the bottle fits inside an attractive ridged plastic cradle - is a ripoff of two copyrighted tabletop glass sculptures he created in the early 1980s called "Compacted Gray With Clear and Ribs'' and ``Modulated Solar Airframe.''

"A couple of years ago, my phone started ringing," the glass artist said yesterday in a phone interview. "Everywhere I went, people started congratulating me on the success of my fragrance container. I didn't know what they were talking about. Eventually, I realized that Combs had replicated my work."

Patti, whose works have been displayed in the Louvre and Metropolitan Museum of Art, said the fragrance bottle "has the same vocabulary" as his art pieces, including exposed ridges and a translucent gray color, but is a crass commercialization of his work. He is seeking a halt to the use of the design and wants all profits traceable to the alleged copyright infringement.

A spokeswoman for Combs had no comment.

Combs is one of a slew of celebrities to market colognes and perfumes, but his "Unforgivable" scent, launched by his Sean John fashion line in partnership with Estee Lauder, became one of the biggest sellers in 2006. A blend of Sicilian lemon, Moroccan tangerine, Tuscan basil, sage, cashmere, and rum, it was marketed as "the ultimate expression of masculine confidence and passion. ... Unforgivable's vibe is explosive yet chill, sensual and sexy, much like the man whose name adorns the bottle."

Patti said people quickly noticed the resemblance between the bottle and his designs. So did art specialists, according to the 19-page lawsuit. The Urban Glass Art Quarterly last fall featured photographs of Patti's "Compacted Gray With Clear and Ribs" and the cologne bottle under the headline "'Unforgivable,' Indeed."

The magazine contacted the two purported designers of the fragrance bottle, James Gager and Johan Liden, about the strong resemblance, but they replied that the bottle simply reflected Combs's interest in architecture, according to the article.

Neither designer could be reached for comment today. Both are listed among the defendants along with Combs.

Patti said the two art works he believes were copied have been extensively photographed and exhibited. The suit says "Modulated Solar Airframe" was shown in 2006 at the Heller Gallery in New York, where it was stolen and never recovered. At the time, it was on sale for $40,000.

"I believe they were aware of my work," Patti said of the designers of the fragrance bottle. "You don't just come up with that kind of a thing. It took me many years to develop it."

Although the suit seeks money for the alleged infringement, Patti said he is financially well off and that the case has more to do with his reputation. "I take my work as one of the most important things that I do," he said. "It has a lot of meaning to me, and to see it compromised this way, I have strong objections to it."

One of his lawyers, Stephen F. Roth of Westfield, N.J., said Patti is as well known in the world of glass art as Diddy is in the world of hip-hop.

"They never consulted him," Roth said of the bottle designers. "It's no different than taking someone's music."


Jonathan Saltzman can be reached at jsaltzman@globe.com


  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
8 comments so far...
  1. Sean Combs has stolen everything else that he has received credit for, why not this?

    Posted by Bulldog 28 January 29, 09 07:53 PM
  1. Not to rain on Patti's "Compacted Gray With Clear and Ribs'' work of art, but as for P. Diddy’s bottle holder, I too have see that before. I do not remember the name of the art shop, but once it was in Province Town and again in a shop on Boston’s Newbury Street, a semi random layering of sheets of glass that was further “chipped” or hammered away to form a sculpture. In short, the ribs of Diddy’s bottle looked very similar to other works by glass artists.

    As for Pitti’s over priced bottle or vase, all I see is a retro bottle of sorts perhaps made of black glass, or if he were influenced by Japanese, a handsome wood vase which was black lacquered. Yes there are resemblances, but lets face it, Diddy’s is amateur where by Pitti’s is truly stunning in the simplicity of square lines plus careful curves. But honestly I think it will be a hard case to make.

    Posted by followtheboys January 29, 09 08:00 PM
  1. Shame on you, diddy.

    Posted by jayzizzle January 29, 09 08:36 PM
  1. Umm... forgive my ignorance of, ahem, art and applications of copyright law... but it's just a box with horizontal lines. And not really that similar, let's be honest.

    Sounds to me like Tom might be a little short on cash, and figures Combs (I refuse to use whatever ludicrous nickname he's using this week) will just settle out of court.

    If this guy wins, does that mean the B's should sue anyone that makes a wheel with spokes? Or should the members of Black Sabbath sue anyone who plays a song in drop-D tuning? Come on...

    Posted by dcode January 29, 09 10:35 PM
  1. striking? hardly. It's not even much of a "design" in the first place.

    Posted by Mooninite January 30, 09 01:38 AM

  1. You go boy!!!!!!!!!!!!! i strongly agree take Diddy down,before he remakes something else.

    Posted by Donna January 30, 09 07:06 AM
  1. This is stupid. It's just a box with a ribbed pattern. we see this all the time everyone. Buildings, boxes, cases. how can he say thats his? And how stupid do you have to be to take years to think of that? Did he never get to play with blocks when he was younger? Whats wrong with Pittsfield people? Everyone I have met from there is weird. I think the condom companies should sue tom for stealing their "ribbed" design.

    Posted by mg January 30, 09 09:35 AM
  1. Yes this is absolutely rediculous! its a design comeon...Um and like the article says its not like diddy came up with the design hisself he hires people to do it! ummmm you people that are against diddy are haters! you just hate the fact that he runs the hip hop industry and the clothing industry and every other industry that he runs! leave the guy alone and try to get money on your own and not suing a rap star!

    Posted by krystal January 30, 09 10:43 AM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

loading video... (please wait a moment)