updated
Saturday, 2:15 PM
From the Metro staff at The Boston Globe

Motion seeks to silence Turner about bribery case

January 5, 2009 03:24 PM Email| Comments (6)| Text size +

1.a.turner.jpg
(Globe file photo)

In November, City Councilor Chuck Turner blasted the government's bribery case against him during a fiery rally outside City Hall.

By Shelley Murphy, Globe Staff

Federal prosecutors today urged a judge to issue a protective order that would prohibit City Councilor Chuck Turner from talking about evidence and witnesses that the government is relying on to prosecute him on charges involving his alleged acceptance of a $1000 bribe.

In motions filed in US District Court here and here, prosecutors said that Turner's co-defendant, former state Senator Dianne Wilkerson, has agreed not to disclose evidence that prosecutors plan to turn over to defense lawyers prior to trial. The material includes FBI tapes of conversations involving alleged bribes to her and Turner, grand jury testimony, and private information about witnesses.

Turner has repeatedly attacked the government's case during public rallies and press conferences and won't agree to keep the evidence secret, prosecutors said. Turner's lawyer, Barry P. Wilson, could not be reached for comment.

Assistant US Attorney John T. McNeil argued in his motion that Turner is likely to "selectively" release evidence to the public, causing "substantial negative impacts on the administration of justice in this matter, as well as on Ms. Wilkerson's right to a fair trial'' unless a protective order is issued.

"Among other things, witnesses may be indirectly intimidated from testifying, witnesses may be influenced to alter their testimony, prospective jurors may be unfairly influenced, persons whose names appeared in the investigation but who have not been charged may be unfairly exposed, personal privacy information of witnesses and the co-defendant may be released, and grand jury material may be released," McNeil wrote.

Turner and Wilkerson pleaded not guilty last month to conspiracy and extortion charges. Turner is a member of the Green-Rainbow Party who has served in the City Council since 2000, representing portions of Roxbury, the Fenway, South End, and Dorchester. He is accused of taking a $1,000 bribe in August 2007 from a Roxbury nightclub owner who was secretly cooperating with the FBI.

Wilkerson is a Roxbury Democrat who resigned her Senate seat of 15 years in the wake of her October arrest. She is accused of accepting $23,500 in bribes from the same nightclub owner and undercover FBI agents to help secure a liquor license in her district and to push legislation paving the way for a Roxbury development.

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
6 comments so far...
  1. please, oh please. just go away already.

    Posted by rc January 5, 09 04:35 PM
  1. over a $1000 bribe!!! I would be embarassed to show my face just because of that amount :), How poor do you have to be to agree to take a 1K bribe.

    Posted by Michael Gaitsgory January 5, 09 05:01 PM
  1. Hummm.
    Who released the photos and tapes of him? Don't think it was him. So the Feds can release info, but not the defendant? Go figure

    Posted by Jon January 5, 09 05:53 PM
  1. Turn about fair play.

    The government was quick to pull the trigger, releasing "evidence" long before trial that supported their claims. This is called trial by newspaper, for which we can thank in part the Boston Globe.

    The defendant should most certainly have commensurate opportunity to defend himself.

    Why should the government reveal its jewels? Might the whole purpose be to poison the well (a jury pool)?

    Nonetheless, the system being wound in their favour, I would not at all be surprised if some judge buys the government's line.

    Posted by Mark Richards January 5, 09 05:59 PM
  1. ............WHO STARTED IN THE NEWS THE GOVERMENT OR TURNER..........

    ..........THE GOVERMENT STARTED NOW THERE SAY NO MORE NEWS.........

    ................I HOPE THAT THE GOVERMENT FALLS FLAT ON THERE .................

    ...............IF THIS TURNER IS GUILTY THEN FIRER HIM AND LOCK HIM UP....

    .


    Posted by LOGAN422 January 5, 09 06:53 PM
  1. HOW MONSTROUS IS THIS REQUEST TO SILENCE A CITIZEN! UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE WOULD I AGREE TO SUCH A REQUEST OR FOLLOW A COURT ORDER.

    THIS IS A DIRECT INFRINGEMENT OF THE RIGHT OF FREE SPEECH!

    Posted by Geno Ferri January 6, 09 03:12 AM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.