updated
Saturday, 2:15 PM
From the Metro staff at The Boston Globe

Patrick says he'll cut local aid by $128 million

January 23, 2009 11:32 AM Email| Comments (58)| Text size +

ryan_patrick-remarks4--_met.jpg
(David L. Ryan/Globe Staff )

Faces were grim today at the Massachusetts Municipal Association Annual Meeting at the Hynes Convention Center.

By Matt Viser, Globe Staff

Governor Deval Patrick announced today that he will cut local aid to cities and towns by $128 million in the current fiscal year and will propose an additional cut of $375 million for the next fiscal year, responding to the economic crisis that is gutting state revenues.


ryan_patrick-remaks1--_met.jpg
Governor Deval Patrick

The governor also proposed increasing the statewide meals and hotel tax from 5 percent to 6 percent, which he said would raise $150 million that would be distributed to cities and towns to at least partially make up for the loss in other aid.

"We have tough choices among miserable options," Patrick said in a speech before hundreds of city and town officials gathered in Boston for a convention of the Massachusetts Municipal Association. "My job is to make those choices, and I have."

Patrick also said he would penalize local communities and their municipal unions if they don't reduce their health care costs by joining the state's health insurance plan, run by the state Group Insurance Commission, or curb their costs to rates that are comparable to the GIC.

The governor says he would reduce a community's local aid distribution unless it achieves that savings, but he did not say how large the penalty would be.

As expected, Patrick said he would not touch the $3.9 billion that goes to communities for public schools.

The announcement on the cuts was greeted with resignation by local officials, who have been bracing for news for weeks.

"It's a start,'' said Mayor Thomas M. Menino. "I have faith if we work together we'll solve these problems. ... It's not going to be easy.''

"These are dire times, and we want more flexibility,'' Somerville Mayor Joseph A. Curtatone said, referring to the ability to increase taxes on a local level.

Curtatone seemed wary about the healthcare proposal. "It seems to put municipalities at a disadvantage from a management perspective,'' he said.

With cuts on the table, local and state officials are watching progress on a federal stimulus package that would include relief to state governments. Lieutenant Governor Timothy P. Murray has been compiling a list of municipal projects that could begin almost immediately after federal money arrives.

But the list has grown excessively large as local officials contemplate the possibility of new money injected into their communities.

There's no way "we're going to get all that money," Mayor John Barrett III of North Adams said Thursday. "Too many people are going to the trough here. They've really got to streamline them down."

Inevitably, the tough times are pitting major constituencies against one another. The cities and towns, led by Menino, have, in the past, favored legislation that would allow them to impose local meals taxes as a way to ease the burden on property taxes. But restaurants say that they are getting crushed by the recession and that this would be the worst possible time to let cities impose a new tax on the bills that diners pay.

"Why single us out?" Peter G. Christie, president of the Massachusetts Restaurant Association, said Thursday. "Don't single out one industry, particularly an industry that is really reeling right now. I don't think many people in the Patrick administration realize that."

"They can tell you a lot about biotech, why it's important, and why we need to give them $1 billion," he added. "But they want to tax your hamburger."

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
58 comments so far...
  1. WOW, wait till someone gets killed in a fire, because he cut the fire dept and crime rate goes up... OF course he will have someone else to blame... politicians in MA need to get things straightened out, maybe lighten their budget, get rid of travel pay, fancy cars etc... IT IS AFFECTING THE WORKING CLASS PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Posted by distraught January 23, 09 11:38 AM
  1. Where do these insane taxes stop? This is the only state in the country that penalizes you if you don't have healthcare coverage. We cannot afford it both of us being unemployed so we get hit with 800.00 penalty each when we file our taxes this year.

    Instead of calling this state taxachutessets it should be called rapeachussettes.

    Posted by William January 23, 09 11:40 AM
  1. Where's my property tax cut that you promised Mr. Governor???????

    Posted by BobtheMusicMan January 23, 09 11:56 AM
  1. Restaruants remain packed....it's retail that's getting slammed....Been to an olive Garden on a Friday night recently? It's still an hour wait. They can afford the 1-percent.

    Posted by TheRon January 23, 09 11:59 AM
  1. I don't think there should be an addition tax for the restaurants as they're hurting in this economy.

    Posted by dtiger January 23, 09 11:59 AM
  1. Good,
    He can start by taking back the raise the the state reps gave themselves.

    Posted by Louis January 23, 09 12:06 PM
  1. Its good to finally see The Union Democratic Power Machine devower itself. The unionized government is nothing more that a Ponzi Scheme ! Until the unions are dissmantled and cost are brought under control,there will never be enough money. Just like a Ponzi scheme once the money slows down the entitled party is over.

    Posted by Nomorehacks January 23, 09 12:08 PM
  1. Tax and spend, tax and spend...We have a democratic governor and house, it now becomes a free for all....They aren't figuring how to cut costs, they are figuring out how to get more revenue in, i.e. taxes...

    Posted by duckman January 23, 09 12:08 PM
  1. It should be anything but not property tax we are sick of footing all the bills ,they should have an apartment rental tax why should they be speared the housing tax . You have people on section 8 with live in boyfriends or girlfiends with 2 incomes but reporting 1 and having rental rooms ect.

    Posted by redzone300 January 23, 09 12:10 PM
  1. 1 cent? You mean 1 percent!

    Posted by Indy January 23, 09 12:10 PM
  1. It's actually a 20% increase, not a one-cent increase, in the tax.

    Posted by tim January 23, 09 12:16 PM
  1. Of all things to tax this is not a bad idea. If this is going to make a difference when you decide to go to a resturant; you shouldn't be eating out.

    Posted by jack January 23, 09 12:18 PM
  1. Simply more...

    Change You (Dupes) Can Believe In.

    Together We Can!

    Posted by swimmerkennedy January 23, 09 12:25 PM
  1. A better solution would be to increase the sales tax by one cent for all purchases and to target every penny of into local aid...

    That would permit local aid to continue untouched help to address the property tax issue (part of the campaign promises)...

    Further as the economy recovers a significant portion of these 'local aid' sales tax derived funds could be set aside in a local aid stabilization fund so that the next time (and their will be a next time) there will be funds to prevent this cyclical hit to municipal finances...


    Posted by thinkingdem January 23, 09 12:30 PM
  1. While Deval Patrick may not touch the Chapter 70 funding for education, he will likely cut critical state grants such as Circuit Breaker and Kindergarten funding that will result in layoffs in schools.

    Time to let local communties have decision over where their income tax and sales tax revenue goes - not the state. A certain percentage should go back to local communities to decide how they are to be spent. At least it will be spent locally and from where it originated.

    Posted by George January 23, 09 12:43 PM
  1. The Governor is right about at least one thing. The cities and towns must be do whatever is necessary to force their unionized employees join the GIC. Having each city and town cut a separate deal with each bargaining unit is ridiculous and incredibly wasteful. Now if the Governor can convice the Legislature to go along with that idea, we'll be in business.

    Posted by jimmind January 23, 09 12:44 PM
  1. HOGWASH!!!! Not sure if everyone realizes it or not, but our dear Gov has given 100K jobs to a few of his friends. People that supported his campaign and these jobs were not in the budget. So again the citizens get screwed and things are taken away for a leader who gives jobs out that were not necessary. Those jobs were payback and the globe is not even questioning him about it.


    Posted by Happy January 23, 09 12:45 PM
  1. So backwards as usual- we are going to lose so many of our restaurants already, and not just the less popular or weakest financially. Then to go ahead and pile on a meals tax...Cowardace by the governor and the legislature- rather than make the easy decision to axe all the patronage jobs, rewrite the government labor agreements, eliminate redundant or unnecessary positions, or reform compensation, they attack high profile, high drama targets. Better to put the state in a sustainable fiscal position now while they can so we arent the perpetual basket case of the nation...you get the government you deserve.

    Posted by mynameisbob January 23, 09 12:49 PM
  1. I will gladly pay 1% extra on Tuesday for a hamburger today

    Posted by Neal January 23, 09 12:50 PM
  1. I thought the budget was out of whack by $1B+ and he is cutting $128M to cities & towns? A 1% increase in the meals and hotel tax will do nothing as people can't afford to eat out and business are cutting back on T&E. Having people join the state health plan is a good idea but when is he going to have the testicular fortitude to cut salaries forst on Beaon Hill and then in every state agency. Come on , together we can....... remember!!!!

    Posted by mbuss January 23, 09 12:52 PM
  1. how about getting rid all together police details. One it will create jobs. Two it will save the state and towns millions of dollars a year. Three it will force the police to police not direct traffic (ie create enhance safety without additional cost). But the corrupt system and governor decided to cut local funding (ie schools, churchs, hospitals, homeless shelters, roads, etc.) REAL SMART Gov. Dimwit Patrick

    Posted by Jason January 23, 09 12:55 PM
  1. It's not a 1 cent increase in the tax, it's one percent. Unless, of course, your meal only costed a buck.

    Posted by AL5000 January 23, 09 01:22 PM
  1. That's the spirit, implement new taxes on already struggling businesses when employment is dropping like a rock. Together we can!*

    *go broke!

    Posted by Calypso 53 January 23, 09 01:24 PM
  1. It's a good thing we voted down the elimination of the income tax. That would have led to a decrease in funding to local communities and an increase in other taxes. Bullett dodged!

    Posted by TakeMy$$$$ January 23, 09 01:30 PM
  1. "They can tell you a lot about biotech, why it's important, and why we need to give them $1 billion," he added. "But they want to tax your hamburger."

    Are you kidding me??!! Yes, raise taxes on non-necessity, “luxury” food. People are still just as lazy and will eat out just as much. That industry isn’t “suffering”. Maybe now FATAmerica will start losing some weight.
    Biotech is for scientific advances, the betterment of human kind. It deserves funding.

    Posted by Red January 23, 09 01:31 PM
  1. "They can tell you a lot about biotech, why it's important, and why we need to give them $1 billion," he added. "But they want to tax your hamburger."

    I think not, this industry is well noted for it's spending habits. I think we as citizens need to put our foot down and stop this free giveaway of 1 billion dollars. On several occasion we gave millions to private biotech companies
    that will eventualy get into the pockets of individuals. This will be his last term in office if he continues to throw money out the wrong window.


    Posted by Crasius January 23, 09 01:50 PM
  1. Life science initiative/Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 23I

    Another massive waste of tax payers money that we most likely will get a negitive return on spending.

    Shut this program down and save a Billion...I think this can be done next week?


    Posted by Dearhunter January 23, 09 01:56 PM
  1. Patrick,
    what kind of health insurance do you have?
    You want to make budget cuts but still gave the reps and senator's their 3000+ raises why didn't you cut them And the fact that you want to penalize unions if they do not join the GIC is disgraceful Unions where formed to help the working person. Are you and all of our legistrators insured by GIC

    Posted by g.grimaldi January 23, 09 01:59 PM
  1. That biotech giveaway will be the downfall of our Governor. We need to fund
    more public programs not the companies that operate in our state.

    Posted by Wendy January 23, 09 02:03 PM
  1. Massachusetts Motto..."Need More Money, Raise Taxes".
    The Governor's plan to raise meals and hotel taxes 1% will do nothing. People aren't going out fine dining anymore and hotels will remain unoccupied because people can't afford a weekend get a way, let alone the business traveler coming to Boston.
    Lets tax the people from NH that come to Mass. to work. Let's tax the businesses that outsource jobs out of the country.
    They want us to pay more and get less, That's the Massachusetts Way.

    Posted by shaboom January 23, 09 02:07 PM
  1. Good luck staying safe, there will be less Police and Firefighters working in your city or town now.

    Posted by laidoffjake January 23, 09 02:19 PM
  1. It's extremely disingenous for the govenor to say he will NOT touch the aid to schools. To think that the state aid being cut will not harm education is ludicrous. Cities and towns bear the burden of most of the cost of education. I'll bet 3.9 million doesn't cover any where close to the cost of state mandated programs like MCAS and others. Local municipalties will certainly be forced to make cuts right across the board, including to the schools.

    Meanwhile our legislators accept raises. Sickening. Where is the leadership?

    Posted by Dan Clifford January 23, 09 02:20 PM
  1. Typical approach for all politicians and large businesses. Rob from those who are lucky enough to be working, because there isn't enough money coming in the door to support the expected income. Raise Taxes, Prices on Goods & Services and provide a lesser amount of product. IE. Ice cream containers are now 1.5. quarts and the same price as the previously packaged 2 quarts. How much more does the working class have to give before there is nothing left to give? TAX-A-CHUSETTS lives on!

    Posted by David of Hubbardston, MA January 23, 09 02:20 PM
  1. Biotech thats brilliant!

    Thier failure rate is higher than resturants?
    Let's give them 2 Billion instead?

    Posted by Gotham January 23, 09 02:22 PM
  1. Great idea Dev, raise taxes to kill off even more businesses, when will the voters of Massachusetts realize the the Democrat party has destroyed the state,
    The decline in Massachusetts industry corelates almost exactly with the post war Democrat take over of state government,
    For goodnes sakes Dev read a history book.

    Posted by Marty January 23, 09 02:31 PM
  1. "Patrick said he would not touch the $3.9 billion that goes to communities for public schools."
    - Then he should at lease split up the Mega-$$'s that were awarded for the Newton School to other towns

    Posted by 35824lyjean January 23, 09 02:31 PM
  1. Why cant we start with structure/chain of commands?
    Get rid of some of the chiefs in the state payrolls.
    my my my, our we backwards?

    Posted by Canaan January 23, 09 02:38 PM
  1. What a bunch of baloney. He'll penalize the towns if they don't join the State's health insurance plan. The towns have no authority to make the unions accept it and he knows it. Until the legislature votes to give towns the right to set health insurance rates the same way the state does (without union approval), he's wasting his breath.

    Posted by newfoundqueen January 23, 09 02:42 PM
  1. Hey Deval, how about some real cost cutting and layoffs before you start talking about additional taxes, er, I mean revenues.

    Posted by Kalajen January 23, 09 02:44 PM
  1. Welcome to the Republic of Ma.!!! Tax you to oblivion. My question about tolls on the state borders. Are they going up to keeps us in??

    Posted by closaa January 23, 09 05:18 PM
  1. together we cans.

    change we cans beliebs in.

    Posted by nicetrylosers January 23, 09 06:25 PM
  1. They shouldn't be raising meals taxes. Restaurants are highly suseptible to the downturn in the economy and employ a lot of harworking people. Last thing they need is a higher tax to keep everyone home. Even if the tax is raised only 1%, people will still be reluctant to go out knowing that it went up. Cut taxes and cut state government. As a state employee, I see it first hand, there is waste!

    Posted by Isee January 23, 09 06:38 PM
  1. It's disheartening to see all the narrow-minded comments here poking at state government and trying to cast blame. We also should be reminded of the citizen's petition which lowered tax revenues by hundreds of millions if not billions back in 2000/2001. When this happened we were on our way to even lower taxes - which is simply not sustainable. Stop to recall all of the "fees" and other "non-tax" charges that came into play to make up for the loss of income tax revenue. If you want services, the government needs to collect taxes. Former Governor Mitt Romney promised us a lot and delivered little to nothing; in fact, I believe we're in this mess because he cooked the books to make it look like Governor Patrick was inheriting a surplus which ended up being a deficit fairly on. As for politicians with fancy cars, I don't know how that is, but my elected official drives a Ford Crown Victoria - not fancy in my world. If we don't fully support our Governor, and stop griping about the taxes we will never dig ourselves out of this mess. Let's work together here, people.

    Posted by Rob January 23, 09 07:24 PM
  1. I want to know ho much we spend on non-citizens! When the money is there, they might be an option. Perhaps, THIS is the best place to start cutting the budget, yeah?

    However, if our officials are more interested in non-citizens in times like these, then they have to go. We no longer have the luxury to care for the world when our own citizens are suffering, simply put. It's us or them. We paid for the place with our backs and blood, so we're not going quietly. "Let us hang together, or we will all hang separately" (Franklin, B.)

    Posted by anonymous January 23, 09 07:32 PM
  1. Please look at the jobs at the State Level and compare it to the functional role of what is actually done. Does a Clerk really need to be paid 65K a year to order supplies or does a College Professor really need to be paid 165K a year to teach Marketing? Why doesn't the State offer early reitement with years? There are other options then taxing the working people.

    Posted by Sammy January 23, 09 07:34 PM
  1. CRIME IS SKYROCKETING, murder spree in Brockton (a Jewish Bingo event to be targeted as police get shot at, and apprehend suspect), daily shootings in Boston, home invasions, and robberies on the rise, muggings, stabbings, and shootings on our public transportation, pharmacies being robbed at gunpoint as we pick up our prescriptions. If you don't think this is happening, get a police scanner and listen for yourself. LOCK YOUR DOOR AND WINDOWS, AND DON'T GO OUT, YOU'LL BE OK????
    What will happen when these nuts attack our children and seniors????
    SOLUTION Cut local aid for the police that protect us = INSANITY

    Posted by commonsense January 23, 09 07:40 PM
  1. A meals tax is a no brainer. Is someone really not going to buy that hamburger on the dollar menu because it is going to cost an extra penny???? Common! ! Municipalities are in desperate need of funds and this is a solid proposal.

    Posted by Matt January 23, 09 07:40 PM
  1. "Why single us out?" Peter G. Christie, president of the Massachusetts Restaurant Association, asks????

    Because it's FOR THE CHILDREN you numbskull!

    Posted by billiejean January 23, 09 07:59 PM
  1. BLAME THE UNIONS, ALL OF THEM. STATE WORKERS, FIRE, POLICE, TEACHERS......

    PLAIN AND SIMPLE

    Posted by FED UP January 23, 09 08:32 PM
  1. but, but, but Governor ... you said if I voted for Question One, local aid would get slashed and police and fire would be cut. That it was just too risky.

    I voted against Question One and you're doing what ?????

    Posted by Oranje January 23, 09 08:46 PM
  1. Note to g.grimaldi...yes, in fact the Governor and all state reps and senators are insured by GIC. You act like it's some third rate insurance, when most of us in the private sector...and people like me who pay 100% of health insurance costs...would LOVE to have the cadillac health insurance that state reps, senators, governors, and workers have. WAKE UP! The free ride is (hopefully) over...Amazing...truly amazing

    Posted by BC January 23, 09 09:02 PM
  1. Just hold another state wide Police examination in the spring to raise money for the state......... Wait, you're already going to do that.

    Posted by Paul January 23, 09 09:17 PM
  1. Patrick will no doubt propose that tolls be set up at all town borders. His thinking through this crisis is most questionable and picking on the restaurants and hotels is pathetic, especially during hard times.

    Posted by Fred January 23, 09 09:23 PM
  1. Hey Gov, if cutting local aid is the last resort, why has spending from the General Revenue account gone up 300% in the last 12 years while aid to municipalities has gone up just 50%? I think some cuts at the State level are in order first. Too many frivilous projects are being spared, while basic services like Fire, Police, road repair and schools get the axe.

    Posted by Dan January 23, 09 10:14 PM
  1. Watch out all you liberal morons who think an increase in any tax is OK. Wait until they start taxing your grocery bill from the supermarket.

    Posted by wilbur January 23, 09 11:15 PM
  1. Let me ask a question here...if you go out to a resturant with your family, and the total bill for the evening comes to say $100 bucks, are you telling me that extra 1% in additional meal tax ... that extra $1 on this bill is going to stop you from going to a resturant? Let's get real people !!

    Posted by Mark January 24, 09 12:14 AM
  1. He wants GIC because his GIC is another Gvt. Hole We need to subsidize his socialistic policies.

    Posted by Dan P January 25, 09 10:14 PM
  1. Just as President Obama has done - ALL EMPLOYEES MAKING OVER 100,000 NO RAISES! Ask around different towns and you'll find it isn't the "little guy" making a decent living thanks to town managers and local selectmen. The Globe should REALLY do a news report on this FACT.

    Posted by hender January 26, 09 07:31 AM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

loading video... (please wait a moment)