updated
Saturday, 2:15 PM
From the Metro staff at The Boston Globe

Woman is acquitted of arson after spending 10 years in prison

February 18, 2009 03:43 PM Email| Comments (15)| Text size +

Fire%20Five%20Killed.jpg
(AP File Photo)

Kathleen Hilton at a 1999 court appearance.

By David Abel, Globe Staff

After 10 years in state prison without a trial, Kathleen Hilton finally got one over the last five weeks.

And after deliberating for about 14 hours over the past three days, a Lawrence Superior Court jury today set the 62-year-old grandmother free.

The jury this afternoon found Hilton not guilty of seven charges of murder and arson in a 1999 fire in Lynn that killed five people, including three children, said Steve O’Connell, a spokesman for the Essex district attorney's office.

Judges, legal scholars, and lawyers who practice criminal law have said they could not recall a similar case in the state of someone found competent to stand trial who had been imprisoned for so long without one. Under Superior Court rules, murder cases in Massachusetts should not take longer than a year between arraignment and trial.

O’Connell declined to comment on the verdict.

“As a matter of policy we don't comment on not guilty verdicts,” he said in an e-mail.

Prosecutors argued that Hilton set the fire at a three-decker where her son's former girlfriend lived because she was angry the woman wouldn't let her son see his two children. Her grandchildren survived, but the fire killed five others who lived there. Heriberto Feliciano, his wife, Sonia Hernandez, their two daughters, Sonia and Maria, and a niece, Glorimar Santiago, were trapped and died on the third floor.

Hilton’s case had been held up as a result of a long legal feud between prosecutors and her lawyer that has sparked two rulings from the Supreme Judicial Court and multiple decisions in Superior Court.

The dispute arose from statements Hilton made after she was arrested in February 1999 on charges of five counts of second-degree murder, arson, and causing injury to a firefighter. Hilton was arrested three days after the fire and allegedly told police that she had struck a match and dropped it on the wooden porch, which she said she had soaked with a flammable scented oil. After watching the house erupt in flames, she allegedly told police, she walked home.

A few days later, after her arraignment, Hilton allegedly told a court officer escorting her to a holding cell that "I hope he forgives me." When asked what she was referring to, Hilton responded: "I hope my son forgives me. I could have killed my grandchildren."

Michael F. Natola, Hilton's lawyer, could not be reached this afternoon.

But he argued that Hilton, who has been diagnosed with mental retardation and various psychoses, made the statements involuntarily. She had been initially declared incompetent to stand trial, but after a few weeks of evaluations at Taunton State Hospital, psychiatrists found her competent, meaning she could understand the charges against her and assist in her defense.

Natola attributed her alleged statements to an effort to protect her son, Charles Loayza, who was in the middle of a custody fight with his girlfriend, Krystina Sutherland, and had threatened to burn down her house. He said Hilton fabricated her story because she believed her son, then 22 years old and a prime suspect, would go to prison. Police eliminated her son as a suspect after confirming his alibi.

Shortly after the arraignment, Natola filed motions to suppress the statements, which started the decade-long battle with prosecutors.

Reached at her home in Lynn, Rose Zarba, Sutherland’s grandmother, said she was shocked by the verdict.

“I was very surprised,” she said in a telephone interview. “I really thought it would be a guilty verdict. I really thought she did it.”

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
15 comments so far...
  1. Who gets on these juries?

    Posted by FrankD! February 18, 09 04:30 PM
  1. Praise God, this poor soul can move on!

    Posted by Lisa Sears February 18, 09 04:46 PM
  1. I am so happy the jury found Kathleen Hilton not guilty. I watched the trial and I just know in my heart that she wouldn't set that fire, especially knowing her grandchildren were in the house.

    Congratulations, Kathleen.

    Posted by Lana Gavin February 18, 09 05:08 PM
  1. Wicked to keep someone locked up for 10 years without a trial!

    Posted by JennaH February 18, 09 05:34 PM
  1. So who did it?

    Posted by neena February 18, 09 10:22 PM
  1. Kathleen Hilton not guilty, what a joke. She did a great job of bamboozling everyone. She without question has some form of mental illness but she is guilty and has now gotten away with murder.

    Posted by Joe Melborne February 18, 09 11:14 PM
  1. The sad part is - she has no recourse against the State of Massachusetts for the 10 yrs she spent behind bars awaiting trial - with no treatment - obviously worse for wear - and now - with an added culture shock - finds herself pretty much back where she began. This, aquittal notwithstanding - and justified, is really a sad story. Humanity deserves better. She tried to protect her son by whatever means she had - and he betrayed her at trial - just as he did from the moment she was arrested. In this case, the real culprit - got away.

    Posted by Mac Ambo February 19, 09 12:49 AM
  1. She's guilty of either obstructing justice (pretending that she had set the fire) or of actually setting the fire.

    And if it wasn't her then it was her son.

    Didn't the investigators find traces of the accelerant used?

    The Son's alibi checked out? The son who threatened to burn down that house?

    I'd like to see thie case SOLVED.

    Let's not forget that the PRE-TRIAL manuevering is what took TEN years.

    Posted by FrankD! February 19, 09 10:08 AM
  1. I would like to Know how you keep someone locked up for ten years and not give them a trial? I think the courts have a lot of questions to answer. What is this poor lady to do now what kind of life is she going to live. a lot has changed in ten years. Best of luck to her and her family. the state should pay for her to get what she needs to get her up to speed with times. Housing , schooling , and a job.

    Posted by Boston Reader February 19, 09 10:21 AM
  1. people can think what they want about Kat ,but me as a personal friend of hers knows that her time has been served.So now it's time to move on Kat.i wish you the best of luck....Your friend Ice.

    Posted by Ingrid February 19, 09 12:50 PM
  1. So Ingrid "Ice" -

    You are saying that she DID set the fire?

    Those innocent people died and just serving 10 years for that is okay?

    "Kat" and her son belong locked away.

    Posted by FrankD! February 20, 09 11:52 AM
  1. Who knows what kind of mental issues she has or dont have. i do however know that lawyers play games. I did see where she admitted to the crime among the other evidence. Also from what I hear it took ten years because her laywer and the other side were screwin around, so she can thank her lawyer for ten years. But I can say if she is that screwed up that she would set a fire and it ended up killing people, she will be back in handcuffs soon enough When she does another crime to someone. Also she will answer to a higher judge at end of life. She dont need to worry about our courts.

    Posted by Brian February 24, 09 11:40 AM
  1. The Defendant had a masterful attorney who was able to communicate the truth to the jury...that the Government couldn't prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. Fair trial is more important than speedy trial. The talk-radio commentators above would prefer to live in a Taliban-like state where "swift punishment" comes without a trial and without Attorneys like the brilliant Michael Natola to fight the state. The jury system remains our best means of achieving justice.

    Posted by RG Shalhoub February 25, 09 09:42 AM
  1. I am very thankful that our judicial system did not fail this woman. My prayers go out to the families of the innocent victims in this case. I hope the prosecutors will not be so blindsided so that they refuse to search for the
    guilty party or parties in this case.

    Posted by Carol A. Padgett February 26, 09 10:26 AM
  1. Statute of limitations are over...this case will never be solved.

    Posted by BBBBBB March 14, 09 01:40 AM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

loading video... (please wait a moment)