updated
Saturday, 2:15 PM
From the Metro staff at The Boston Globe

On the street, dismay and shock over the Globe's woes

April 4, 2009 07:45 PM Email| Comments (203)| Text size +

By Maria Sacchetti and Eric Moskowitz, Globe Staff

Long-time Boston Globe readers were stunned today that the New York Times Co. is threatening to close the newspaper unless the newspaper's unions accept $20 million in concessions, possibly including pay cuts and the loss of company contributions to employees' pensions.

“What’s going on?” said one reader, Daniel Doyle, 70, who was clutching a small coffee and a doughnut outside of Verna’s Donuts in Cambridge. He has read the newspaper every day for 40 years. “The Globe is the biggest paper going. How can they lose so much money when they’re the No. 1 newspaper in Massachusetts?”

He called the Globe a Bay State institution “like John F. Kennedy.”

“If you took the paper away and I can’t read sports, what am I getting up in the morning for?” he asked.

But another man at the doughnut shop shrugged in indifference.

“I don’t really read the Globe,” said 20-year-old Mike Spartichino, an electrician who prefers to watch TV news at dinnertime with his mother in Arlington. “It’s too big. I have to work and all that.”

Since the news broke, some critics of the Globe, writing anonymously on the boston.com website (see comments on this story below), have lambasted the paper for what they call its liberal bias. On the street in Boston and several other communities today, most people approached by Globe reporters said they were sorry to hear of the Globe's troubles.

Some people were critical and others said that with people on the go and getting their news from the Internet, the Globe was simply a victim of changing times.

Down Massachusetts Avenue at the Out of Town News newsstand in Harvard Square, Tommie W. Whitener, an attorney from San Francisco area, said the Globe's woes reminded him of the San Francisco Chronicle's financial problems.

"I think it's a damn shame. I think we've got to keep them alive as best we can. I don't know if they'll all survive. I hope they do. I like newspapers. I like to hold them and read them. They're an integral part of my life," he said.

Nishant Nayyar, 27, of Boston was picking up copies of the Wall Street Journal and Financial Times. "I think it's kind of tragic, but unfortunately, that's where the newspaper industry is going, except for these two," he said.

Tony Butler, 50, raised in Boston but now a New York City resident, said he was "not particularly enamored with the Globe these days. I think it's a little too politically correct for my tastes. I mean, I generally consider myself a liberal but I think it goes a little too far."

"I would read the Times over the Boston Globe any day, it's just a better paper," said Butler, a New York Times reader.

Amy Mossman, 43, of Cambridge, said, "I'm very angry about it. I don't want to lose our local paper. I've been reading the Globe since I was a kid. It's the paper that covers all of my local events. It has a home here, it knows what goes on here."

At Breads 'n Bits of Ireland, a breakfast spot in downtown Melrose, the topic of the Globe's potential demise bounced from table to table in the cozy dining room.

"It'd be a tragedy if the Globe were to close," said Steven Locke, 45, a Melrose lawyer and father of two boys, who once was a Globe paperboy in Newton.

"Could you imagine our kids going through life not knowing what a paper is?" said his wife, Suzanne, who teaches at a Cambridge private school.

Still, the Lockes admitted, they don't get the paper every day. Mornings are consumed with getting the boys ready for school and rushing off to work, where Steven Locke reads boston.com.

"I'd pay five cents an article online," he offered.

Nearby, Jean Gorman spoke up for the print edition. "I want my newspaper in my hand," said Gorman, an office manager for a real estate firm. "I want a real paper."

From the next table, Eric Wildman chimed in, calling the Globe a "victim" of the success of its own free website. He used to subscribe daily but now pays only for the Sunday edition.

"Nobody has time in the morning anymore to get up and read the paper," said Wildman, 33, a human resources manager who learned about the possible closing of the Globe on the political blog BlueMassGroup.

John Cinella, a 69-year-old lawyer who rises at 5:30 a.m. to read the paper, said he cherished his daily paper, and a stack of memorable editions.

"I've got Globes from the Great Fire, all the Red Sox victories, the Patriots," said Cinella, whose three boys all once delivered the paper.

Fifth-grader Connor Locke piped up. "When Obama won, we saved the newspaper," the 11-year-old said. "And when Papi hit the 52 home runs, I framed that and I have it hanging on my wall."

His mother beamed.

"Can't frame the computer screen," she said.

At the opening of the Grove Hall branch library, Jeannette Sisco of Mattapan counted the ways the Globe has touched her life over the years. The long-time school librarian posts stories about her students on a "Wall of Fame" at the West Roxbury Education Complex. She sends articles to relatives around the country. She used to lead a "Friday night ritual" clipping coupons for three elderly uncles, all former Pullman railroad porters from the South End.

"It's a wonderful source of freebie-weebies in the city," said Sisco. "Every single day I look for book talks and artistic activities that can be engaged in for F-R-E-E. It’s going to be a real loss in these tough economic times."

In Woburn, every morning, retired maintenance man Ollie Gonsalves rises, gels back his hair, and heads to the Moore & Parker newsstand to buy his daily Globe. The clerks at the 115-year-old newsstand and smoke shop always save him a copy if the stack dwindles.

"The Globes run out quick here," said Gonsalves, 80.

He lingered today in Moore & Parker, under the old tin ceiling and near the pile of newspapers, and contemplated the end of the Globe with friend Paul DeVito.

"That's too bad they're going to close the Globe," said DeVito, 68, a car salesman.

"Tell me about it," said Gonsalves, who clips articles to mail to his sister in North Carolina, a Woburn transplant. "I won't read anymore."

Gonsalves said he likes the editorial page, which he said stands up for people like him: "I'm a little guy."

Harry McDonough III, another Woburn native, didn't share that view -- but wanted to hold fast to his Globe just the same.

"I'll tell you what, I'm a meat-eating, God-fearing, gun-toting, right-wing conservative white male, and proud to be that way," said McDonough, a 41-year-old hardware store manager. "But I do read the Globe to see how the other side thinks. That’s important. Knowledge is power.”

One civic leader expressed shock at the idea of a world without the Globe.

"To someone like me who's very involved in civic life in the communities, it’s unimaginable," said Paul S. Grogan, president of the Boston Foundation, calling the Globe the "civic glue" that keeps the public together. "Almost every leader in Boston -- in the public sector, the private sector and the nonprofit sector -- reads the Boston Globe every day. It gives the community a shared sense of what the issues are, what the challenges are ... I just don't see that being replaced."

  • CommentComment
  • EmailEmail
203 comments so far...
  1. A 70-year-old saying the Globe is his lifeline, and a 20-year-old shrugging off the Globe's crisis. This is what you call a generational gap.

    Posted by Timm April 4, 09 03:17 PM
  1. Executives from the Times Co.

    I find it interesting the comments from all the people who do not like the Globe, read the Globe, Why? The paper is being read online or in print, it is up to the Executive of the Times Co. to become resourceful and solicit online advertisement dollars. I see it as a marketing failure of not being proactive / insightful / mindful of the future and how it will unfold. If the Globe was a plane flying over the ocean full of Time Executive and an emergency required they had to toss out dead weight, they would all vote to get rid of the pilot.
    One of the despicable actions of the “Times” are taking advantage of the bad situation: well things are tough all over, yes they are and union busting or simply put contract breaking is not the answer.
    This is similar to the AIG Executives and the differences of attitude with UAW. The public ignorant of union contracts wrongfully believes it is ok to cut someone else’s money because they are not making the same money. At the same time the Times Co. Executives are being monetarily cared for.
    For the people who don’t read the Globe please quit making comments. For the marketing group of the Globe, find the money, and for the executive of the Times Co please find a conscience.

    Posted by Coconuts April 4, 09 03:29 PM
  1. To the Globe-haters who will write in to say "good riddance," keep in mind that as much local political corruption as we have around here already, we'll have even more corruption as a one newspaper town because less of it will get attention. Most recently the Globe broke the Marian Walsh appointment story and ran with it. "News" is not something that comes about by magic. Plus, you'll lose so much of your "entertainment" if you're no longer able to complain on the Globe comment forum. :-)

    Posted by smozo April 4, 09 04:08 PM
  1. So one reader is surprised? Doesn't really bear out the headline, does it? Too bad you no longer have a Mike Barnicle or a Patricia Smith to fabricate some more compelling man-on-the-street quotes.

    Then again, maybe that's why the Globe is failing.

    Posted by Bob Loblaw April 4, 09 04:08 PM
  1. i have no use for print news, it is a waste of trees and TV news is horrible, i totally depend on the web for news. it seems rather obvious, that print news is no longer profitable. it's time for the globe to wake up and charge for online subscriptions or go out of business and the unions are delusional what is a pension? who gets those?

    those are only for government employees

    Posted by brian April 4, 09 04:11 PM
  1. Other than Charles Emerson Winchester III and anyone east of 495...nobody will care of the Globe goes under...

    Posted by Lewis Frost April 4, 09 04:13 PM
  1. Oh, boy, it seems like everything is going to hell.

    (Sheepish: Actually, I read the Globe on-line. But I read it every day and am in NY.)

    Posted by Martha1 April 4, 09 04:18 PM
  1. Everyone would be better off if they kept publishing the globe and closed the new york times

    Posted by joe021 April 4, 09 04:21 PM
  1. The death of the Globe should come as no surprise to anyone who works, or has worked, there. The executives who run the business side of the Globe have failed miserably in partnering with other divisions and addressing market changes that everyone knew were coming. Revenue has been steadily declining while expenses have been steadily increasing for years. Turnover in the finance department is astronomical because of its leadership team lacks basic business acumen. They don’t know how to run a profit-making company. They only know how to lose money.

    Posted by exemployee April 4, 09 04:23 PM
  1. O God - how self serving can you commie pinko's be. Don't worry - IF the Globe goes away - we'll all survive just fine. Maybe a news organization that tells the TRUTH about Boston Corrupption, Kennedy Murders, and the gay agenda will arise.

    Posted by nancy April 4, 09 04:27 PM
  1. Good. Maybe a less biased paper will spring up in it's place when the economy returns.

    Posted by Brian April 4, 09 04:32 PM
  1. “The Globe is the biggest paper going. How can they lose so much money when they’re the No. 1 newspaper in Massachusetts?”

    Easy, bad money management, specifically, ridiculous bloated union benefits, lifetime guarantee of jobs, etc. Unions had a very necessary role at one point in history. Now we're seeing how much they are the cause of the undoing of business and industry, and ultimately costing jobs.

    Posted by JC April 4, 09 04:32 PM
  1. Truth is, the Globe has not been wonderful for many, many years. The editorial page has long been consistently and predictably liberal and a bore to read. Even the sports pages have become moribund with far too much "balanced" coverage of women's sports and extravagant and expensive coverage of marginal sports like figure skating and tennis that have diminished the coverage of the mnainstream sports. Most of the good writers have already left for various reasons and the Globe has become just a shell. While I regret the loss of quality at the Globe I shall not grieve the ultimate demise of this damaged newspaper.

    Posted by Richard Chamberlain April 4, 09 04:36 PM
  1. Interesting that this article ignores the 300+ comments on the globe website on the subject....

    Posted by charles April 4, 09 04:44 PM
  1. Perhaps if the Globe weren't so politically biased, and so poor at fact-checking, more people would be willing to pay for it.

    Posted by Emoto April 4, 09 04:45 PM
  1. Is this an attempt by the Globe to lobby for itself? If so, please do a little more than get a couple of quotes from a guy at a coffee shop. Thanks.

    Posted by Matt April 4, 09 04:46 PM
  1. You have stooped to the lowest of lows, actually writing an article praising yourselves and how people can't go on living without you...pathetic...

    Posted by BRboston April 4, 09 04:50 PM
  1. Not surprising since the Globe ceased being a newspaper and became a propaganda organ years ago. Combine that with the realities of the marketplace and the result is................
    Maybe someone who knows journalism and has a few bucks will buy the Globe name and bring it back to life as real newspaper.

    Posted by Jim V April 4, 09 04:59 PM
  1. Surprise surprise! The Globe like many other dishonest papers are taking a beating becuase they don't have the peole's trust anymore. These papers are ideologocal clearing houses for liberal points of view. Its no wonder that the likes of the NY times, Seattle Post, San Diego Trib, Chicago Trip are all on the verge of bankruptcy. Those in the liberal camp will retort that its becuase of the emergence of internet based media outlets and cable news. BS,,, I still buy a paper every day wherever I happen to be although I have to be carefull to read between the lines

    Posted by Brantly April 4, 09 05:00 PM
  1. I read the Globe but I have not always been a fan. What bothers me, as a reader, has been its liberal agenda. It has always seemed to be more interested in promoting issues, like gay marriage. Sometimes it seems to be more interested in being PC than anything else. This agenda seeps into every aspect of the paper.... even the sports. This agenda undermined its ability to present articles that people want to read and caused the Globe to lose its relevency. Mantras about "Global Warming" would never be questioned in the pages of the Globe.

    What I have liked is its breadth and depth. There's no question that it's our area's most important news organization and deserves to survive.

    The Globe has, too often, been more interested in being cozy w/our state's political hierarchy than in doing what a real newspaper needs to do........... which is question authority. Make the comfortable uncomfortable. A good sign has been the Globe's coverage of Marian Walsh situation and Speaker DiMasi. These are exactly the kinds of stories the Globe needs to print.

    Being a lot less PC and a lot less willing to challenge authority will go a long way toward keeping the Globe alive and thriving.



    Posted by Tom M April 4, 09 05:02 PM
  1. Best news in years. RIP

    Posted by Sue April 4, 09 05:03 PM
  1. This is hilarious. Good riddance! Here's a scoop Maria and Eric... start looking for a new job!

    Posted by bob April 4, 09 05:03 PM
  1. The last time I felt like this the Boston Braves announced they were moving to Milwaukee.

    Posted by Arthur J Singer April 4, 09 05:06 PM
  1. It seems that all newspapers are struggling, probably because of the internet. But the Globe is mainly struggling because it stopped being about news a long time ago. During the past decade or two, the Globe has instead concentrated on advancing its liberal agenda. Unfortunately for them, they did so to an extreme that many not only disagree with but are disgusted by. The Globe is getting what it deserves.

    Posted by AF April 4, 09 05:09 PM
  1. It's the unions fault,it's the ecomony, it's the old readership it's George Bush's fault!
    I quit reading the Globe years ago because of it's biased reporting.
    I'm sorry to see the Globe's demise but "I could have told you so".

    Posted by Tim E April 4, 09 05:10 PM
  1. Sweet! No more whining about cops parking where they please to... This is great news.

    Posted by BPD April 4, 09 05:11 PM
  1. Welcome to the internet world.....The demise of a major propaganda sheet is a step forward.

    Posted by whynot- April 4, 09 05:13 PM
  1. It took two reporters to write this "story"? Really? Boy, that says a lot about the mess the Globe is in. Do union rules require two writers on a puff-piece?

    Posted by Miguel April 4, 09 05:14 PM
  1. Lets face it, You have to read at least two or three different newspapers to get the facts. This paper or boston.com gets about 20% of my attention. The sports is its best section. If I only cared.
    People are seeing the light.

    Posted by roco April 4, 09 05:17 PM
  1. What is taking so long??? Bye, bye... You won't be missed at all. That is the destination of all liberal newspapers!

    Posted by Paulo April 4, 09 05:17 PM
  1. terrible times we're living in...that a NYC paper can decide to shut down a Boston one is criminal. People in Boston should be po'd.

    Posted by brooks April 4, 09 05:19 PM
  1. Remember those famous words...Goes around comes around!!

    Posted by William Taylor April 4, 09 05:20 PM
  1. Are you kidding me? Where in this story is the headline validated? Shouldn't the headline read "70 year old man at doughnut shop is surprised, other doesn't care that Globe is dying"

    No wonder no one wants to buy that rag anymore. Ever hear of serious, unbiased reporting?

    Posted by Jay April 4, 09 05:24 PM
  1. Time for you to go. Your completely bias intrepretation of news events with seldom regard to the truth has created and sustained an ignorant mindset amongst many MA illegals and legals.

    Hopefully the illegal drivers who deliver the Globe go away with you.

    Posted by Capitalism is still alive ... April 4, 09 05:24 PM
  1. Although "long-time ... readers were stunned," this article only mentions a solitary example. And I love how the only other quote is from a guy painted as, what, finding it too much of a chore to read? Nice work.

    Yes, it would be a terrible loss if Boston lost its only non-hysterical, well edited, mostly grammatically correct print source of daily news; however, if this is the average level of reporting (your intrepid journalists on the scene! In the donut store! Performing a perfunctory inventory before filing a hasty story!), it's probably time.

    Posted by MissMartini April 4, 09 05:29 PM
  1. The comment by Mr. Spartichino is typical of generations younger than mine. They essentially no longer read newspapers. Too many actually no longer read. Period. Unless "coerced". (I know - I am a teacher. ) Thus there is little concern among them about newspaper closings around the USA. So sad

    Posted by TexLeeger April 4, 09 05:35 PM
  1. The famously liberal Times demanding union concessions? Priceless. Knowing how well unions care for the companies with which they negotiate, don't be surprised if they take the whole thing down just out of spite and stupidity.

    Posted by Jeff from Maine April 4, 09 05:39 PM
  1. Ye gods. Even when writing about its own possible demise, the Globe produces the standard pap: Head to a non-representative locale, get one person to say "yes," get another to say "no."

    If it were to happen, you'd be missed, Globe. But not for this.

    Posted by jk April 4, 09 05:41 PM
  1. The Globe is a dinosaur. Let it die.

    Posted by Mike April 4, 09 05:41 PM
  1. It's outstanding, in-depth reporting like this that makes the Globe such a treasure.

    Posted by adm April 4, 09 05:45 PM
  1. I would be devastated if the Globe stops publishing, although I realize the print media is in its' death throes. I like to read the paper, handle it, turn the pages as I drink my coffee and get ready for the day Reading online is not the same to me. I think there will be a terrific loss to journalism, the community and everyone if t his is allowed to happen. I hope the unions and The NY Times corp are working on this issue in good faith to resolve this. Time to start charging microfees for accessing online, as many have suggested. And what about raising the cost of delivery/ I would definitely pay a bit more to have my paper.

    Posted by paperfan April 4, 09 05:47 PM
  1. sign of the TIMES (PUN) I hope the union makes concessions and saves the jobs for these people tough time to be out of work

    Posted by Allan April 4, 09 05:47 PM
  1. Unfortunately times have changed. I read the Globe on the internet like i'm sure a lot of people do. The physical act of buying the paper at the news stand is becoming a thing of the past.

    Posted by Shaune April 4, 09 05:48 PM
  1. Another liberal news paper biting the dust. Maybe the state will wake up now and stop voting for so many crooks or Chavez will by it for them. No Bail Out.

    Posted by Big Jim April 4, 09 05:52 PM
  1. Why stunned? If readers have been paying attention this is old news. The Globe has been under closing rumors for months. The interesting part is the lateness of these proceedings. Is there something on the table that guarantees the paper will stay in business if the unions meet the concessions? Paper readership has dropped and will continue to drop, as have ad revenues. Face the facts, the paper is not the cash cow it used to be and is an outdated format. Unfortunately, the same might be said of unions too.

    Like other media outlets in the Boston market the Globe was slow to embrace what people wanted or needed and tried (and succeeded at least for a while) to manipulate the consumers point of reference. I say, let it die a quicker death.

    Posted by Jackson April 4, 09 05:58 PM
  1. How can anyone be shocked at the news? Anyone who's been paying attention to the news would know that Print has been dying out for years now. Struggling to find a way to be profitable in the digital age...

    People would've known all about this...by reading it in the paper.

    Posted by Steve M April 4, 09 06:01 PM
  1. The globe doesn't get it - dinosaurs!

    It took two reporters to write this article, and they only talked to two people ?

    Why are you not soliciting feedback from your on-line reader ?s. Don't you think the readers who set up an account and log in have more vested with the Globe than two people in a dougnut shop ? You could solicit reactions from hundreds on line, and get a much more represenatve

    Posted by Tom Riddle April 4, 09 06:01 PM
  1. BOSTON GLOBE WROTE "Globe's woes stun readers"

    We are not surprised at all.

    Posted by oscarbozach April 4, 09 06:02 PM
  1. Wow, with such cutting edge stories like this one, I'm surprised the Globe might fold. Did it really only take two reporters to gather all this info? Amazing.

    Posted by Extra-Extra April 4, 09 06:03 PM
  1. Many people refuse to read the Globe because of its anti Israel stance and its left wing leaning. The Globe is not objective in reporting the news. It is not suprising that it is in trouble.

    Posted by janower April 4, 09 06:07 PM
  1. I say "Shut it down!" if this online article is any indication of the Globe's journalistic standard for homepage, major headline news. How flakey (and self-serving) can you get? The article doesn't mention sources, explain reasons, or differentiates between online and print, with a sensational ("shocked"!) headline that is hardly backed up by 2 man-in-street interviews with a stupidly oversimplified 50% for, 50% against format.

    Posted by John Howe April 4, 09 06:11 PM
  1. The paper was better before the Times took over. The local interests and the arts section was far more thorough and wide in scope. Maybe the Times should just sell it and it can go back to be the worthy metro area paper it was.


    Posted by Strizi April 4, 09 06:16 PM
  1. Good, maybe if you stay in business, you'll stop your overly Democrat-biased reporting. That's the main reason you've become irrelevant.

    Posted by Mark April 4, 09 06:23 PM
  1. glad this happened, unions give stupid people a job. What happened to every person representing themselves?? If you are not continually challenged, you skirt by, like a state worker. Unions sole purpose is to protect stupid people. ban unions and you ban stupid people. It is as simple as that. Any independent person worth their salt will try to work hard, union people just work within rules, they cannot think for themselves. Unions are the worst.

    Posted by jen April 4, 09 06:28 PM
  1. I am not surprised.

    Posted by That's A Man April 4, 09 06:28 PM
  1. thank god unions are going away, they made this country weaker, because unions dont hold people accountable for their actions, very sad, so this is the best thing!

    Posted by bill April 4, 09 06:31 PM
  1. What do you expect! We live in one of the most corrupt states in the the US and the globe rarely ever gives an apposing view point to politicians and laws that steal our money and tax us to death. Its not a democrat /republican issue, the globe for too long has never apposed anything controversial. The Globe has become buddies with every hack in this town and may finally see what good it has gotten them.

    Posted by BrianO April 4, 09 06:32 PM
  1. why is this a surprise? unions cause mismanagement of funds, unions are the problem. get rid of unions, get rid of the problem.

    Posted by nancy April 4, 09 06:33 PM
  1. Close it down!!!!! w00t w00t!!!

    Posted by Guy April 4, 09 06:33 PM
  1. Who is shocked? This paper has been awful for 20 years. This recession is a blessing. We get an opportunity to get rid of the garbage.

    Posted by Sean Healy April 4, 09 06:34 PM
  1. why is anyone stunned? The globe was on a WSJ list of the 10 most likely papers to fold in 2009 weeks ago

    Posted by southietransplant April 4, 09 06:39 PM
  1. I smell..... Bailout!!!

    Honestly, could care less. Wake up and smell the world wide web.

    Posted by Jonny April 4, 09 06:47 PM
  1. boy, would I miss The Globe. . . .

    Posted by Jennifer Stix April 4, 09 06:50 PM
  1. Frankly, I am not 'shocked'. The paper has jettisoned it's best writers and replaced them with people who don't know South Boston from the South End. To add to it's woes, the Globe has significantly increased advertising prices, while shrinking the size of the sheet of paper it is printed on. Add in the plunging reader base, and you have a recipe for disaster.
    Remember, this is America, a capitalist nation. If the Globe goes under, and there is demand for a competitor to the Herald (and there will be demand), then a replacement will spring up quickly.

    Posted by Joe Williams April 4, 09 06:53 PM
  1. The Globe was a far better paper before it sold itself to the New York Times. Now it has too much drivel in it and far more about so called celbrities than city council meetings. Back to basics is sometimes far better than making sure some MBA peawit keeps a job by allowing change for the sake of change.

    Posted by Harry April 4, 09 06:54 PM
  1. Dear NTY Board:

    Do it!
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .....
    but give the middle and lower staff sev packs and outplacement. It ain't their fault.

    Posted by Farewell, Fifth Columnists April 4, 09 06:59 PM
  1. Any newspaper that keeps Dan Shaughnessy on its payroll for all these years deserves to be shuttered.

    Can't. Wait.

    Posted by HappyFormerGlober April 4, 09 07:01 PM
  1. Why is this such a surprise? Newspapers are folding across the country. The Globe has been getting thinner and thinner over the last couple of years. Not much advertising sold. The industry is in deep trouble. Didn't people know this? Did they think the Globe was immune?

    Posted by Mike April 4, 09 07:01 PM
  1. It was only a matter of time before you weasels started censuring this post with opinions you did not like. You have never had any journalistic integrity and you never will.

    Posted by sdis April 4, 09 07:25 PM
  1. Another company going bankrupt that has union employees. Let the market determine wage and maybe you'll be around a little longer.

    Posted by Eric April 4, 09 07:26 PM
  1. Its about time, They have tried to pollute peoples minds for years. Good Riddens You reap what you sow and they have been spweing liberal venom for years.

    Posted by BPrice April 4, 09 07:27 PM
  1. Not really surpised by this story, the Globe is a failing newspaper that is out of touch with mainstream America. It's views and slants on it stories is pushing it away from many readers. It never fails to back failing Dem-O-rats on Beacon Hill and in the governors office, as well as the crooks in Washington.

    Posted by BobW April 4, 09 07:30 PM
  1. It would be delicious if this piece of yellow journalism went down the tubes. This paper is nothing but a mouthpiece for the ultra left wing. I wouldn’t even use this rag to wrap fish.

    I’m sure the “reporters” could find work at Moveon.org or some other contemporary hate group.

    Posted by MiloT April 4, 09 07:32 PM
  1. Liberals read the Globe and the New York times as their religious devotionals.
    Christians read their Bibles. When liberal devotionals collapse, they collapse with them. Listen to the panic in this article! Bibles never collapse. They never go out of style. Frequently, liberals accuse Christians of being inflexible, dogmatic, incapable of adapting to the modern times. But we see here that the opposite is true. Liberals lose their minds when their views are unpopular and no one will pay for them anymore. Liberals are dogmatic - the globe refuses to change its views, and it can't change the subject. And as far as liberals want government subsidies to hold back history. Inflexible dogmatists!

    Posted by Andy April 4, 09 07:37 PM
  1. The sad truth is that today's Globe is not even in the same league as the Globe I read as a teenager. The quality of reporting has plummetted. But I am glad to see that the Globe has maintained its independent, non-biased viewpoint, WAIT>>>>>. Whew! For a minute there I almost forget which paper I was writing about. In the old days, the Globe Spotlight team would have investigated the no show overtime shifts by the MSP at Logan as well as the BPD officers earning more than $200,000 per year including details and overtime. Today's Globe is afraid of investigating the police. Creampuff stories about parking marked crusiers in no parking spaces is NOT investigative reporting.

    Posted by WilfredOLearysprodigalson April 4, 09 07:38 PM
  1. This Globe is a bunch of pin-headed liberal Democrats posing as journalists. We bid you farewell, sooner is better . . .

    Posted by Larry Latimore April 4, 09 07:38 PM
  1. The Globe is nothing more than liberal propaganda.

    Posted by todd April 4, 09 07:39 PM
  1. One more biased newspaper is about to go..

    Posted by I love America April 4, 09 07:42 PM
  1. The wingnuts are out again, the people so far to the right that Mussolini looks like a liberal to them. "If only you'd pander to our rigid conservatism and raging xenophobia like Fox News, you'd be a financial success." About what you'd expect from an emotional mob of ninnies suffering from group cognitive dysfunction. And really, who gets targeted in this latest drama? Who is being held up as the reason for the imminent collapse? Why, those nasty old unions. Yup, that's what every liberal newspaper does when times get tough, take the opportunity to put the thumbscrews to the working stiff. That's liberal bias at work, right? Radical conservatives need to hire someone to think for them. Obviously they can't figure out what's happening here.

    Posted by Amused April 4, 09 07:43 PM
  1. How many people still listen to cassette tapes? Writing, print press, television, internet, etc. --its an evolution. Newspapers will become a luxury item.

    Posted by who cares April 4, 09 07:43 PM
  1. Bye Bye Lib Bird....

    =================
    How about a wonderful new concept to save these newspapers..

    Print both sides of all the issues.. Like ....at least investigating Obama's background....

    Nahhhh, they never would.... Good Bye Globe....


    Posted by jindy60 April 4, 09 07:45 PM
  1. #14, they mentioned the comments in the article, cant you read?
    I am so, so, so sick of all you conservatives whining about how liberal the globe is and how they slant the stories. Ever read Jeff Jacoby? Do you think he's liberal? I don't think so! As for biased, ever heard of Fox news? Do you think Fox would allow some one as liberal as Jacoby is conservative on the air? NO! A more biased one-side group you wont find. Complaining about liberal bias in the news is a deliberate strategy by the Republican party to divert attention from what they are doing. The globe is at best moderate, they are far, far from liberal.

    Posted by Mad Liberal April 4, 09 07:45 PM
  1. Stop buying AP and UPI feeds that I can read everywhere on-line. Go back to the local, unique, real reporting, and I'll buy the paper. Why spend money for a packaged AP feed?


    Posted by Marc April 4, 09 07:47 PM
  1. It is way overdue. Watch these silly unions. 125K to drive a truck...110K to fill inserting machines with parade magazines....way overdue...you cannot run a business with employees getting high end salaries. The Auto Makers, Newspapers all should have been looking to cut expenses as revenue decreased. They have not and now will be run out of business. It is about time...What did we expect all the aging ex-hippies to be able to run corporations? Yah right, it takes one type of exec to keep things at status quo and another to adjust and grow a business... Hippies from the 60's are not capable to do this. .. so we will just bankrupt America as we listen to Sgt Pepper all over again ...fools!!

    Posted by Jl Rowlings April 4, 09 07:51 PM
  1. I live in Denver, CO. I never have lived in MA. I have the Globe on my toolbar on my computers. I think it is one of the best newspapers in the country.
    How about more ads on the internet. Required before accessing an article, view the ad?

    Posted by Michele April 4, 09 07:51 PM
  1. Get with the times, folks.

    Everything is online now. I don't even watch TV. I simply download whatever I want.

    Evolve or die.

    Posted by Flash Drive April 4, 09 07:56 PM
  1. What a shock! I'm stunned. A one trick pony exposed for the farce it is. Will the Kennedy's try to save the paper that has saved the career of Teddy for too numerous waitress sandwiches? Oh yes the Kennedy's tried to kill the Herald a few years back. Forget that. How will Deval be saved in 2010?
    The Globe smeared Ray Shamie and that is why we are stuck with the phony like JFK. (John F. Kerry for you moonbats).
    Print pictures from a gay porn site and say they are the US military abusing inmates in Iraq. Yea I'm stunned the Globe is in trouble.

    Posted by kevinr April 4, 09 07:57 PM
  1. I expect this article (by journalists, in sympathy with journalists) to be biased, quoting more of the people who are sad.

    But there's a good way to flush out if all this sympathy for the newspaper is true: Charge $2.00 per day, about the same price as a cup of Starbucks coffee. This will give the people who really want the paper to put their money where their mouths are. If it works, great. If it doesn't, we know not enough people want it any more.

    Posted by william April 4, 09 07:58 PM
  1. Herein lies the rub.

    Posted by Andrew Palmer April 4, 09 08:01 PM
  1. Depending on the blogger, your comment may or may not go live right away. We want to keep the discourse civil, so this blogger may choose to look over the comments he or she receives before posting them.

    Posted by Andrew Palmer April 4, 09 08:02 PM
  1. I think people forget that the Globe broke the story of the church sex scandal. No one else had, including law enforcement. That action alone makes them worth it in my opinion.

    Posted by northshoreguy April 4, 09 08:03 PM
  1. I grew up in downtown Boston and I love the Globe
    One big problem is the big debt taken on by the NY Times
    The various Globe unions will make the concessions requested and the Globe will survive the tough times
    As for those individuals who hate the Boston Globe.... get over it as we need a two paper city

    Posted by Bill G April 4, 09 08:04 PM
  1. Who will bring out graft and greed in the BPD and beacon hill?

    Posted by paul@aol.com April 4, 09 08:04 PM
  1. Once the printed paper closes, there will be little content on the paper's online site.
    The online business model for all newspapers is a loser.
    It is no better than the current printed edition's business model.

    The revenue from any newspaper's online edition is too small to carry the costs.
    The ad rates for online are pennies on the dollar compaired to the printed ad rates.
    The advertisers have moved to online, but the rates are too low.

    Whether it is the Globe or any other newspaper, once it stops printing a hard copy it will stop being a news source.
    Almost all the news that we read on the Web is from newspapers. It is simply picked up by the various Web sites for free.

    Regardless of the political leanings of a paper, losing a paper also means losing investigative reporting.

    Newspapers were a necessary part of our democracy.
    We better find an alternative if they are all going to die.

    Posted by Frank Wesner April 4, 09 08:05 PM
  1. It's not a surprise to those that know that Mexican Billionaire, Carlos Slim, bailed out the Times with a $250 million dollar financial deal.

    January 19, 2009
    "The New York Times Company has entered into a private financing agreement with Banco Inbursa, S. A., Institucion de Banca Multiple, Grupo Financiero Inbursa (”Banco Inbursa”) and Inmobiliaria Carso, companies connected to Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim for $250 million in senior unsecured notes due 2015."

    The Times said it would use the new funding to refinance existing debt
    , including part of the $400 million that was facing repayment in May. "

    Posted by BobinVA April 4, 09 08:06 PM
  1. The wing-nuts keep repeating the mantra about the Globe's liberal bias, yet they haven't named one example to support their supposed point. I don't see liberal bias in blowing open the Church abuse scandal, or in exposing pension scandals among elected officials, or in reporting on the Bush administration's use of signing statement to evade laws signed by the president. The op-ed and editorial pages are opinion, to be sure, and often predictable (including the pathetic conservative Jeff Jacoby, who makes me pine for Bill Kristol), but they're not reporting. Go ahead, tell me who is going to pay for investigative journalism when the major papers go away.

    I'm waiting for the answer wing-nuts.

    Posted by Not an idiot April 4, 09 08:06 PM
  1. Globe on line and lousy, stinking bloggers. The Globe as a brand is DEAD. Mmmmm ba bye.

    Posted by John Higgins April 4, 09 08:06 PM
  1. I get that you can't frame a computer. But if you think of digital photograph displays, etc. this comment makes no sense. Cut, Paste, Print and Frame! On line information distribution is the direction the WORLD is moving in! Catch up Boston...I'm 34 years old, an MBA graduate and business professional. Harvard is putting their entire library (the best in the world) on-line. I think if the best b-school is going the on-line direction, sacrificing a few pleasures for some old-timers out of touch with what can keep our economy humming is worth it.

    Posted by Ron Taupier April 4, 09 08:07 PM
  1. I think it's amazing that it took two people, Maria Sacchetti and Eric Moskowitz, to write this prequil to the Globe's obituary. Please tell me they're not getting paid, too. $1,300,000 a week in losses; big surprise.

    Posted by Robert Stien April 4, 09 08:12 PM
  1. Good riddance! Let the unions and the liberal press corps fight over the remaining morsels on this rotting carcass. The people have moved on.

    Posted by Paul Revere April 4, 09 08:12 PM
  1. I will miss the sports. However, perfect example of this papers not living in the present is there refusal to allow their sports writers to appear on WEEI radio. Think you could have used the extra pub?

    Posted by Steve April 4, 09 08:15 PM
  1. The Liberal NY Times tells Globe Union workers "you gotta give up a ton".,

    They say a Liberal turns into a Conservative after he becomes the victim of violent crime--or moves up to high tax bracket.

    Liberal Newspaper Owners turn into Conservatives--when they have to deal with Unions in tough times.

    Posted by John Mesovic April 4, 09 08:17 PM
  1. I hope they sell the globe, it's only a reiteration of the time's stories with a regional inclusion. And the regional stories are nothing beyond trite or ordinary, nothing in-depth or worthy of purchasing the paper. also boston sucks, so I'm glad to see anything negative happen to your scummy, defiled, low-life city!

    Posted by john April 4, 09 08:17 PM
  1. Boot the union slugs and hire some of the unemployed to take their jobs. Seek more internet advertising.

    Posted by Jack Bower April 4, 09 08:18 PM
  1. It is about time the 'union gliteratti' joined the real world with the rest of us. Quite frankly, this is the tip of the iceberg. You can't get blood out of a stone so the rest of them better re-think their positions. Political postions are irrevelant at this point, either share the pain or go the way of the dinosaur. In the infamous words of that sage leader in Foxboro 'it is what it is'. Unions across the board better bite the bullet, get in the economic boat and start paddling, the option is much more unpleasant for the everyday joe.

    Posted by Kevin O'Connell April 4, 09 08:20 PM
  1. I do not read the Globe all the time but they certainly have one of the better sports sections in the country. Too bad as it will make Boston a (1) newspaper town and this is not good. Let;s hope they can roll along somehow.

    Posted by Bernie April 4, 09 08:22 PM
  1. Red Sox : Yankees as NY(T) : Boston = Winners:Losers

    Posted by Eyeguy April 4, 09 08:23 PM
  1. "Radical conservatives need to hire someone to think for them."

    Mega dittos.

    Posted by Harrybosch April 4, 09 08:26 PM
  1. "Many people refuse to read the Globe because of its anti Israel stance and its left wing leaning."

    Prove it.

    EVERY newspaper that uses newsprint is not doing well.

    Posted by Erik April 4, 09 08:26 PM
  1. In a way it is sad, but this has been a long time coming. The Globe is so cozy with the Democratic establishment in this state that they have failed to do any serious investigative reporting in years. If you want to be read be serious and impartial. The Globe is neither; it is kneejerk liberal and has spent years covering up the problems of the Kennedy family, Kerry, and the Boston political elite. The eight part hagiography they did of Ted Kennedy was nauseating, but oh, so typical. A truly balanced, intelligent paper would certainly do well here, but the Globe is nowhere near that. Speaking truth to power doesn't mean just hating George Bush and promoting the liberal social and political agenda, you know. We've got an embarrassment for a governor, a throroughly corrupt Democrat establishment, and the Globe does all it can to continue to promote the one party state that leads to this corruption.

    Posted by Bill Jenczyk April 4, 09 08:26 PM
  1. The unions strike again!

    Posted by cmc April 4, 09 08:26 PM
  1. Pure economics are at work with the Globe and it's employees. They are not selling a product that the consumer will buy. No politics are involved. No rightwing or leftwing comments will save this company. They are not selling a product that the public will buy. They can and will be out of business if they don't change. Same is true of the auto industry and the airline industry.

    A little down turn in the economy will kill the weakest businesses and that is the free market and free enterprise system at work.

    Posted by Bill Brinson April 4, 09 08:27 PM
  1. Biased rag, go under.....

    Posted by will67 April 4, 09 08:31 PM
  1. Please DO IT Union men and women...Call Their Bluff.

    You're going to lose your jobs? Can't put food on the table or pay the bills?
    Nobody at the top level of the Globe gave a crap for the last 20 years...so screw their families. They will find work at other newspapers, I'm sure that a famed age-old, crashed newspaper will look great on a resume for those execs, as they run to to...where? The Washington Post? The Providence Journal? These losers have nowhere to go...they are not going to let the Globe die because of Unions. Don't fall for that nonsense.

    Posted by Gail S. Cummings April 4, 09 08:32 PM
  1. What will my parakeet read once The Globe is gone?

    Posted by I will miss it like a bad rash April 4, 09 08:32 PM
  1. My prediction is the Globe will continue and the Unions will cave in with huge benefit cuts and possibly some wage cuts. Where else are 700 or more employees going to find newspaper jobs in these trying times. Possibly when the good times revive the workers will get some of their benefits back.....Tony

    Posted by Tony April 4, 09 08:36 PM
  1. Well at least the trees won't be crying.

    Posted by Kevin April 4, 09 08:37 PM
  1. If the Sunday Globe goes away, how will I get coupons to use at the supermarket?

    Posted by Richard April 4, 09 08:40 PM
  1. The CEO of the NY Times Company made 5 and a half million last year (you can look it up). I am reminded of the automotive executives who flew in company jets while demanding that union members tear up their contract and throw away their pensions and health care. Any Bostonian who buys the NY Times after this is committing treason to the local cause and to the cause of the working middle class.

    Posted by Bostonian who moved to NY April 4, 09 08:43 PM
  1. I moved to Seattle from Boston almost 13 years ago. At first I was Globe deprived, but was able to catch up by Internet. I decided to subscribe to The Seattle Post- Intelligencer, as it was mostly local Seattle area news, while the Seattle Times had (and has) a lot of news from AP, Reuters, and other wires services.

    The Seattle PI closed last month, and now only has an online presence, which I try reading online every day so that it won't completely disappear.

    All my life I've had a newspaper to read. My newspaper life started with The New York Times. I probably learned to read using classic comics and the daily newspaper. TV News is increasingly in multi-second sound bites, and as the anchors started chatting, and/or making bad jokes, and not reporting news, I have looked more and more to newspapers to get news. I usually try to read 6 worldwide papers on line a day - headlines and articles.

    Boston, please accept my condolences. I have been out-of-sorts since the paper PI died. Can’t even sleep in later or have breakfast without feeling deprived. I do know what you are, and will be, going through. It is another great loss for freedom of information if the Boston Globe shuts down.

    I can only hope that NPR isn’t going under as well! That’s increasingly becoming the only source in America for in depth news and background information.


    Posted by Ronni Wolfe April 4, 09 08:43 PM
  1. yet one more example of how liberals kill things.

    Posted by sam waterson April 4, 09 08:44 PM
  1. As a 45-year Globe reader and a personal friend of a Globe employee, I am saddened by the news. But honestly, I'd feel worse if the Globe had kept their opinions off the front page. They dug their own grave with me, and many others that know that news reporting should be objective. Its been a tool of the democrat liberal establishment that ruined this state, and probably the nation.

    Posted by Eastsider April 4, 09 08:45 PM
  1. Even though I benefit personally, I can't fathom why The Globe doesn't charge for online access. I live in Alabama so hard copy of the paper is not practical for me but if it were I'd certainly expect to pay for it.

    Toby in Alabama

    Posted by Toby Coleman April 4, 09 08:45 PM
  1. Who cares what the long-time readers think? It's the hundreds of thousands of long-lost readers who haven't touched this liberal rag in decades that matter. We've voted with our wallets, and the Globe is done. Good riddance.

    Posted by Obviously April 4, 09 08:48 PM
  1. Classic case of union breaking.

    Posted by Tim April 4, 09 08:48 PM
  1. It's all about attitude, I called to cancel my home delivery after 20+ yrs. It was the recent article by a "correspondent" trying to paint Bill Ayers as the victim of the right in the controversy at BC. This is not about editorials, they have every right to their opinion. Any thinking person enjoys a well argued opinion, especially if one disagrees. It just might make you think! Rational people like that.
    The person taking my call did ask why I was canceling, I will give him that. But as soon as I tried to explain my dislike for liberal leaning in it's reporting verses it's editorials, it was good bye, I don't want to hear itititit.


    Posted by Mike Bower April 4, 09 08:49 PM
  1. Who cares just hit it right on the head. People are walking around with the internet in their coat pockets. Of what use is a printed newspaper? You may rail at the "liberal agenda" or mock the high school-level journalism but, a dwindling audience, inadequate ad revenue and deep red ink are not unique to the Globe. Print as a medium has been coughing up blood for years and would be well served to die quickly and with some dignity.

    Posted by prairiemike April 4, 09 08:50 PM
  1. I'm in central Alberta and flood this region with Red Sox chatter year 'round. The Globe is my home page and my life line to civilization. I also love the city and it's people when I'm there. You go Boston!

    I will chip in funds if necessary to maintain this link to baseball heaven.

    Posted by Duane W. Berke April 4, 09 08:55 PM
  1. The first mistake was selling the Globe to the NYTimes in the first place...

    It was the beginning of the end. I thought so at the time (and of course, so did so many others)...having out of town ownership was a death knell.

    But here's hoping that somehow, some way, the Globe can be saved. And can be saved from the Times. Are there any potential local owners willing to step forward and save it?? How about members of the local biz community, or the Taylors who made so much money from ownership and the sale?

    Posted by Arlo April 4, 09 08:56 PM
  1. It is easily possible to have mixed feelings about the Globe.

    On one hand, I have found factual Globe reporting of the stories that I have broad inside knowledge of (a couple in the last 10 years) substantially biased and not as well informed as most people would want.

    Conversely, the paper's drumbeat of corrupt local politician stories is very consistent with reality here. There are no other sources with the Globe's history and (relative) credibility to push some of these in a publicly beneficial way. Even more frighteningly, it is a much better paper today than 30 years ago.

    Continuity is, to me, the biggest issue. Local institutions like the Mass legislature have a consistent message and history, as annoyingly corrupt as it might be. This is something that needs to be challenged by an entity with more heft than transient blogging or the Herald's tabloid shreiking.

    Posted by somewhat saddened April 4, 09 08:58 PM
  1. "Goodbye, Boston: It is with great sadness that we say goodbye to you today..."

    Posted by Brian April 4, 09 08:59 PM
  1. It is time to end the costly and wasteful practice of distributing printed newspapers. I would not object to paying as much for reading the Globe on-line as I now pay for the printed paper provided that the revenue all went into reporting.

    Posted by RFS April 4, 09 08:59 PM
  1. Amused, the only problem with your theory is that the Globe routinely fails to report on stories that are unfavorable to the left. For example, when the pro-illegal immigration protests were going on in Boston, the Globe reported on it (front page, above the fold).

    When the other side held a demonstration a few days later, the Globe didn’t report on it. The Globe Ombudsman commented that there was a debate about running the story but they killed it. He strongly disagreed with the vote. He resigned shortly after that. The Globe does that all the time.
    Milo

    Posted by MiloT April 4, 09 08:59 PM
  1. I have read all the posted comments. Only one mention all the folks who will lose there job. I'm no big fan of the Globe, however, I feel for the people who work at the Globe and there families, so many folks and losing there jobs. Put yourself in there position.

    I hope the folks at the top will come up with some why to save the paper.

    We care!

    Posted by Martha Donovan April 4, 09 08:59 PM
  1. When a city loses it;s institurions It is dying

    Posted by MLFEIN April 4, 09 09:00 PM
  1. The Globe is propaganda, not news.

    It should fail, and be replaced by publication(s) which will at least try to see more than the liberal side of an issue.

    Posted by Steve April 4, 09 09:01 PM
  1. Boo Hoo. If the Globe shuts down where will everybody get slanted one-sided views, cherry picked facts, and 'news' delivered with an agenda? This is karma catching up to the arrogant, single view editors and shamelessly biased writers who want to shape news not report it. Pandering to a small core of like minded smug readers and thumbing your nose at everybody else has a shelf life after all.

    Posted by Greg Witham April 4, 09 09:04 PM
  1. Who knew a quality newspaper like the Globe had so many downright ignorant readers?

    Posted by craig April 4, 09 09:07 PM
  1. My first job, in the mid-80s, was delivering the Globe. I was 14, and it was a great experience. Almost everyone on the street where I grew up got the paper, and what a great way to get to know your neighbors. It was a quick downturn after that...they got rid of the paperboy/girl program, then the internet comes alive, and now no one can figure out how to make a traditional, local newspaper profitable. It stinks -- I am still a subscriber, getting the Globe delivered every day from someone I never see. Still, I always LOVE reading the sports section, the op/ed, the comics, doing the crossword -- really the best $1 (+/-) I spend each day. If it went away...I'd be more than a bit at sea.

    Posted by Ted April 4, 09 09:07 PM
  1. Having read the NYTimes on alternate weekends when at a friend's house, I can promise you that if the Globe folds, I will NOT become a NYTimes subscriber. I too think the Globe was better before the Times took over and did all of those budget cuts. But it is still better than the Times in covering health and science news. And I want local news from the state I live in, not from the Associated Press. If the Globe does fold, I might have to suck it up and subscribe to the Herald.

    Posted by viking gal April 4, 09 09:09 PM
  1. Why is this stunning? The Sports section (which used to be best-in-the-nation) went downhill years ago, and the rest of the paper has since followed suit. I used to love this paper, but I stopped buying it a couple of years ago. The internet is not to blame.

    Posted by Brian April 4, 09 09:13 PM
  1. How sad. Sad that the Globe may go under. Sad that people want to read articles which agree only with their own political position. Sad that people who obviously read the Globe (you'd have to have read it to have seen and commented on this article) are so willing to simply allow a Boston institution to vanish (to a NY company to boot!). Where are you going to get the local news now? The Herald?
    I for one would be devastated if the Globe vanished. Since moving away from Massachusetts (where I was born and raised) for work, the Globe has been my daily connection with the state that I know and love. I would gladly pay for an online subscription.

    Posted by DG in NY April 4, 09 09:14 PM
  1. What about saving the trees? I thought liberals cared about saving the trees? How many trees has the Globe killed in it's life run?

    Posted by Rotten April 4, 09 09:16 PM
  1. Dear Times,
    I don't subscribe to the newspaper because I don't need all the paper piling up in my apartment. I read it online for free every day. I'd gladly pay the subscription price for online access, but you give it away for free. It's no wonder you are going broke.

    Posted by realfan2004 April 4, 09 09:17 PM
  1. That's what you get when you support Obama and union labor. You're getting what you deserve.

    Posted by chris April 4, 09 09:18 PM
  1. I am a 56 year old professional woman. I do a lot of work, resaearch and reading of news on the internet all day long and nightly. But I would be lost without having the Boston Globe physically at my fingertips each morning to read or skim most every article and ad. There is something about holding the paper during breakfast and/or during commute to work and having having the ability to take a look at every corner of every page, clipping and saving some articles or ads or putting a section away for further reading that is so ingrained in my being. . The internet versions of newspapers just don't do it for me.

    Posted by moh April 4, 09 09:18 PM
  1. I stopped subscribing to the Globe a few years ago due to its consistent and seemingly knee-jerk anti-Israel stance -- both in editorial columns, op-ed pieces and "reporting" the "news".

    As a "liberal commie pinko" (as another poster wrote) I will be disturbed that a voice of reason in some areas (corporate greed, local and state government corruption, environment/energy) has gone silent.

    Will I lose any sleep? NO. Sic Transit Gloria Mundi.

    ... and for those antisemitic/anti-zionist conspiracy morons: Yes! we, the Jewish cabal that rules the world, got together in the middle of the night and said BOO.

    Good night and good luck!

    Posted by Limbix April 4, 09 09:18 PM
  1. I never cease to be amazed by how far right-wing the majority of comments on Boston.com articles are. Even when the commenters aren't raving quasi-fascists, they seem to think that the Globe is somehow virtually socialist. Uh, no, it isn't.

    Posted by Max April 4, 09 09:21 PM
  1. I find it ironic liberals are upset by the Darwinian evolution of media from print to electronic. I always thought they were big fans of evolution. I do not find it ironic that they refuse to accept basic capitalism - the market has declared it does not want printed, clearly biased coverage.

    Posted by Stop OBAMAPELOSIREID now April 4, 09 09:21 PM
  1. The Globe;

    Anti Catholic
    Anti Israel
    Anti Police-
    Good riddance

    Posted by George Frazzier April 4, 09 09:22 PM
  1. Somewhat ironic that such a left-leaning paper may go bankrupt due to its union not wanting to give up concessions to keep it alive.

    Posted by union_lover April 4, 09 09:23 PM
  1. The only reason the Globe may stop is the Internet. It has nothing to do with its views on issues. People simply are too lazy or busy to read a newspaper.
    All wingnuts on the right may not like it, but the Globe reflects more peoples' views today. Just reference last election for evidence of that. You wingnuts have less influence than ever which is fine by me. White House ....lost Senate ...... lost Congress ...... lost ....................... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
    Enjoy this little victory if you get it.

    Posted by Robert1776 April 4, 09 09:30 PM
  1. 1) It's hilarious that the Times and the Globe, who love to constantly tell us that unions are Awesome(tm) and need to be stronger and better paid, are trying to stick it to their own unions. Chalk another one up for liberal hypocricy.

    2) It's not like anyone can trust the Globe's alleged "news" anymore anyways. It's so slanted and in bed with the editoral side of the paper (though I'm sure that'll be denied) it's not even funny.

    Good riddance to bad rubbish. Though I admit I'll miss Mike Reiss should the blessed event the NYT is threatending actually happens.

    Posted by Quantum Mechanic April 4, 09 09:32 PM
  1. I was ten years old when I delivered the Boston Globe in Newton. I remember reading the sports page on Sunday mornings before I had to put them together and deliver them. That is when I first starting reading Peter Gammons' baseball notes. I'm now forty-six and living in the Tampa Bay area and look forward to reading Boston.com. every day. This would be disgusting if the newspaper was shutdown.

    Posted by Rick April 4, 09 09:33 PM
  1. Great. All these good folks will be glad when the only view is FoxNews. Won't have to think then. At all.

    Posted by AliceDaisy April 4, 09 09:36 PM
  1. Ha, ha, ha, ha...!!!

    Posted by Peter Marlow April 4, 09 09:37 PM
  1. If the Globe dies, tell me WHERE we can go to keep drinking the liberal Kool-Aid, or at least continue reading about how wonderful Kennedys are?
    As a final favor to some of us, could you please reprint some of the best Barnicle plagiarisms before you turn out the lights?

    Posted by Jacob April 4, 09 09:40 PM
  1. The Boston Globe is way too liberal. If it were not for Jeff Jacoby, I wouldn't read that paper. In fact, I recently cancelled my subscription. The paper does not offer fair and balanced reporting, and their reporters are too PC.

    Journalism school teachers/professors are leaning way to the left. Our kids are not learning how to make honest judgments about politics, religion, etc. What a shame! Americans are the loosers!

    Posted by Barbara McGonagle April 4, 09 09:44 PM
  1. Not shocked at all.

    Oh I read all the time, the magazines and especially the online media so I can get the full unfiltered story.

    Only once again, the story the Globe portrays is only one very small part of the story. Iraq war, smorgasbord of lies. Upcoming war on Iran, smorgasbord of lies. Need to pass Patriot Act laws on everyone, protect from anyone who is a Muslim, smorgasbord of lies. Yeah the Globe has been good alright, good all its years at churning out propaganda. I'm sure people will not miss it.

    Posted by TheGlobeFraud April 4, 09 09:44 PM
  1. I grew up reading the Boston Globe. I'll admit that through the years I did not like the Globe's "extreme" left wing viewpoint. Now that I lived in several metropolitan areas (Raleigh; Charlotte; Houston; Philadelphia and currently Milwaukee) I realize that most newspapers lean left (except for the Milwaukee paper). Most people I know of do not read the newspaper from cover to cover anymore ( although I'll admit I do). It is still sad to see a institution such the Boston Globe go through this. I personally would like to see it survive.

    Posted by H Williams Jr April 4, 09 09:50 PM
  1. Hey, what happened to all the comments from earlier today?

    Shocked? Bull. This is the price the Globe pays for being a self indulgent yuppie liberal rag. And I am still glad Ty Burr will be out of a job.

    Posted by Rydal April 4, 09 09:51 PM
  1. Maybe the Archdiocese of Boston could buy the Globe.

    Posted by jay mcfergus April 4, 09 09:52 PM
  1. So what!
    Today's news is tomorrow's junk.
    A fire here... an accident there... and a crime somewhere else. People are tired of that.
    Want real knowledge read a book.

    Posted by Bez April 4, 09 09:52 PM
  1. Someone call the WAAAHAMBULANCE.
    The Globe is trying to save its self by placing this on the Home page.
    Like anyone cares?
    Maybe if you stuck to real journalism instead of shameless propaganda you wouldnt be broke !


    Posted by BrenArt April 4, 09 09:52 PM
  1. They missed the market they were servicing. I don't mind listening to PC but don't go overboard. I get all the news I need from the TV from 5 until 7 every night. My morning coffee means sports pages and headlines with my caffine and I will read on from there if I need to. The Herald makes that easier than the Globe does. They have missed the market in favor of being upscale and eliteist.
    Best of luck to the workers because this is not their fault

    Posted by Tom April 4, 09 09:54 PM
  1. As someone whose heart bleeds black ink as well as dollar signs, this threat is stupid. Calm down.

    Posted by maryregina April 4, 09 09:55 PM
  1. Don't flatter yourselves by calling it a newspaper. It's nothing but a propaganda machine by liberal Democrats for liberal Demcrats. You stopped being newsworthy years ago. Poor Derrick Jackson.........the white folks are out to get him again.

    Posted by batman77 April 4, 09 09:58 PM
  1. Where will all the losers and shut-ins go when they cease commenting, a la Comic Boy guy...

    "Worst... newspaper.. ever!"

    or

    "This is why the Boston Globe is going out business!"

    Have fun, commenting now from your XXXL large pajamas. Enjoy your blogs (and the lack of any news therein to comment upon). Seriously.

    Posted by Chuck April 4, 09 09:58 PM
  1. Amused-

    Mussolini (and fascism) was a darling of the Left in the 1920s and 1930s. You must be a Globe reporter in disguise.

    Posted by rialto55 April 4, 09 10:01 PM
  1. Problem with the Glbe is that it is deceptive. They don't tell you the whole story. For instance the guy at the coffee shop in Melrose saying how wonderful the Globe is, Eric Wildman, just so happens to be the chairman of the melrose democratic party. He is a longtime partisan activist. Think the globe would let its readers know that?

    Posted by nottooblue April 4, 09 10:04 PM
  1. I find it very interesting that for years the Globe pushed liberal causes, and supported most union causes against the big bad corporations. Now they need to cut wages of the union workers to survive and to insure that Carlos Slim gets a return on his investment. Do you think we will see an editorial asking the executives to take large salary cuts before the unions get hit? Not on your life...the Globe is part of the do as I say, not as I do liberal crowd. Bring back the Record American!!

    Posted by Jim Steele April 4, 09 10:06 PM
  1. The Globe should increase and embrace its liberal stance. It should position itself as the nation's progressive newspaper. Run only liberal columnists. It needs a niche audience and this is it. It must become the must have newspaper.

    Run some free content on the web. Make sports reporting, for example, a web exclusive. Tell on the website what people would be missing if they don't buy the newspaper today. Don't worry about a conservative view. The BostonHerald could position itself as the Globe's opposite. Both newspapers would thrive, I believe, with healthy competition. massachusettsobserver.blogspot.com

    Posted by Brent April 4, 09 10:07 PM
  1. Did we get the truth about Saddam's weapons of mass destruction from the Globe? Oh, I guess not, I'll go back to the blogs that I read to find out what is really happening.

    Posted by Jim Jones April 4, 09 10:14 PM
  1. Hold up!! Can you imagine the POS, tabloid Boston Herald as the only newspaper in this fine city? NYT I call BS!
    Can you imagine the same scenario if the New York Times went under and the only other alternatives were the New York Post or New York Daily News?

    BG: regroup, downsize, charge a fee for online readership, find a way to be relevant but please do not take it lying down!!

    Posted by Patricia Kelly April 4, 09 10:33 PM
  1. Couldn't happen to a nicer group of looney lefty liberals.

    Posted by Mitchell April 4, 09 10:37 PM
  1. While you're at it, shutdown Boston.com
    It's one big pop-up

    Posted by Rob April 4, 09 10:39 PM
  1. Areas of the country where technology adoption has been swifter and deeper have seen newsprint media affected first. This includes Boston, San Francisco, and places like Seattle as well. Others will follow in time. The problem is the Globe's inability to communicate the value of their heavy online traffic to advertisers. Part of that seems to be the inability of online content to display relevant ads for local providers. There's probably more time spent by more people reading the news today in the Boston area than years ago, but the Globe hasn't successfully translated their web traffic into ad revenues. Placing one or two talented people to do this (perhaps from web-exclusive innovators) could fix this problem. It can be done. As I write this at the top of the page I'm seeing a generic ad for Vonage. Why not an ad for Hub Plumbing, or Jordan's Furniture, or some local Subaru dealer? Many of the same retailers who pay to advertise in the print paper?!

    Posted by puzzling April 4, 09 11:28 PM
  1. You all understand that if the Globe goes, Boston.com does too, right?

    Posted by Esme April 5, 09 12:03 AM
  1. I'll have to find another way of lining the bird cage

    Posted by rsmith April 5, 09 06:52 AM
  1. It's about time. The Globe's liberal commentary is among the worst in the country. I haven't bought or even touched an issue for 40 years because and only because I decided I shouldn't pay to bring that garbage into my home.
    The same with Time and Newsweek.

    Posted by John Sangenario April 5, 09 08:57 AM
  1. You liberals just don't get it. Most of us are sick of your consertive bashing liberal defending reporting. Not to say that many people are getting their information from other sources, but the liberally slanted news networks are also losing viewers. Wake up and report FACTS only, and give us credit for being able to sort the truth ourselves.

    Posted by Ross April 5, 09 09:43 AM
  1. The Globe revealed the Catholic Priest scandal while everyone else kept their mouths shut. Oh yea, thats what I call a PC, liberal bias paper. NOT. Careful what you wish for folks. You'll get the cabbie's favorite paper ("headless body found in topless bar". How does a newspaer that outsells a rag like the Herald (5 to 1) be on the heels of going out of business? Ridiculous!! Th Herald is a privately owned paper (no financial info available to the public) so who's to say they aren't on the brink of folding? They sure would like you to think otherwise!

    Posted by costaki April 5, 09 09:46 AM
  1. I really hope that this can be turned around. Losing the Globe would be a huge loss for Massachusetts, and for New England. While the quality of reporting may have declined in recent years, the Globe is a Boston institution. Perhaps it can be retooled, resold, repackaged as something that really caters to New England. Can you imagine the NYT closing in favor of the Post? Come on, do we really want the Herald to be our main source of local news?

    Posted by anna April 5, 09 10:06 AM
  1. I don't understand why people think shutting down print publications is going to solve the financial problem. News flash: it's not. How much money do Web sites actually make? Not much. By ceasing to print, a paper is going to lose most of its income and, unless someone creates an ingenious business model for the Web, and does it now, there is no way you can generate enough revenue with Web only. If you try to do that, employees will take further salary and pay cuts effectively turning any sort of remaining newsroom into a sweatshop.
    As a 20-year-old journalism student, I am extremely put off by my peers who can simply shrug off a world without newspapers. And maybe I’m a little too cynical, but the death of newspapers would mean the death of a different level of intellect. It’s easy to keep up-to-date with social networking tools like Twitter, Facebook, whatever. And, yeah, OK, so you can read articles online, but attention spans are already short and the Web offers far more distractions to readers as it is. I feel safe in saying that my generation will be one of the least informed. I grew up in a house where the paper came every morning. Mom and Dad both set up to read the entire thing (minus sports for Mom). Newspapers have always been a part of my life. I continue, every day, to pick up a copy of the Cincinnati Enquirer and a number of free-circulations publications in the Cincinnati area.
    There is no way we can let newspapers continue to close. Think of all the great things journalists have done. Think of all the scandals they’ve uncovered. Think of all the incredible things they have written, the people they’ve interviewed, photographed.
    To anyone who can simply wave off the idea of the newspaper industry disintegrating, you are a damn fool. If things continue the way they are let’s see just how much you don’t know in 5 years, in 10 years. Let’s see how much more the government and big business can get away with.

    Posted by Taylor April 5, 09 10:15 AM
  1. Prescription for success:

    1) Suspend all union contracts.
    2) Completely restructure the paper (organization, design, distribution, etc.) so that it's profitable.
    3) Operate for a year or two.
    4) If you can't make a go of it, shut it down. The business model is dead.

    Posted by Tory April 5, 09 10:32 AM
  1. When I was a kid, I read the Record-American (now the Herald). When I grew up and could understand the bigger words, I switched to the Globe. As the Globe has gotten more and more liberal, I have gotten less and less interested in reading it. In particular, I am disappointed at the editorial insistence on at least one instance in each Sunday paper promoting and/or praising the gay lifestyle, often for no story-critical reason.

    Posted by Fish April 5, 09 10:41 AM
  1. Yikes! After reading these comments I'm surprised the Globe has lasted this long! How can a newspaper survive when the only emotion it can wring from its audience is contempt?

    But I digress the fact of the matter is this; technology has made information cheap and easily accessible. Buying and then carrying around a newspaper to read while you sip your coffee and munch on a doughnut may be nirvana for some retired gent but not for the rest of us. Delivering information via paper is environmentally unsound, very expensive and now totally unnecessary. Saving the Globe is akin to saving the horse and buggy.

    Cut your losses, say your goodbyes and close it down while a few people can still remember the good times.

    Posted by Dan Flynn April 5, 09 12:04 PM
  1. Sunday morning will never be the same if they stop printing the Gold, I've been reading the Sunday Glode for over 45 years now and nothing came come close to coffee and the glode on Sundays. The other Boston paper is a rag, the few times I read it, it reminded me of the supermarket tablods.

    Posted by Wat April 5, 09 12:17 PM
  1. GOOD. What a joke of a paper. The sports page is OK , but close it down. Internet baby Internet. Feel bad for the reporters but they can always find something. NY times paid 1.1 billion for this crap. Just like the houses you overpay and you got bust.

    Posted by Vince April 5, 09 12:49 PM
  1. Despite the generational gap in the readers, the Globe is still a staple of MA. People need news, and that tactile sense of reading a paper makes one feel more attached to the news. Children can read the comics and may browse thru a section and voila! a spark for reading is created. Online does not have that appeal since anyone reading can be easily distracted from the site with flashy commercials and navigate away, forgetting that there is more news to read.
    I agree that to save the Globe would require some effort: marketing, advertising, responsible executive decision making, possible changes online, etc, but it is not impossible nor a worthless effort. As one person said, they may not agree what is being said by a liberal newspaper, but they like to see the other side of things. They are right, the more you read, the more you know, the better off you are in society (and a better help). Fine, there were some gaffes with Mike Barnicle and the such, but do not condemn the institution for the actions of 1 idiot reporter. It would be the same as being racist, sexist, or prejudiced in any way. The truth has many sides, and it needs more than 1 person reporting for people to formulate and opinion and take some action.

    Posted by myrmidon2k4 April 5, 09 01:25 PM
  1. I can only hope Mayor Menino and all the surrounding town's executives are watching and take the same approach to the public "service employee unions. ( Read MBTA, Police, Fireman, DPW, and teachers ) These unions should not exist at all , these people have civil service protection and are directed and controlled in most instances by self centered greedy thugs. Privatize and centralize all these services with reasonable salaries and benefits and lets move on. When the unions intimidate the legislature and the town managers/mayors it's well time to get tough before they break the tax-payers completely.

    Posted by herbert wilson April 5, 09 02:44 PM
  1. time for the globe employees to hit the soup lines and food pantrys
    just like the rest of us in this state! I blame the unions

    Posted by philip mahoney April 5, 09 04:14 PM
  1. Gee, if the Globe goes where am I going to get my daily dose of anti-male, anti-Republican, anti-Conservative, anti-NavyMarinesArmyAirForce,anti-car, anti-hunting/guns, anti-small business and pro gay, pro feminist, pro France, pro Democrat, pro liberal/leftist/socialist, tofu eating, bow tie wearing, volvo driving, knee crawling Harvard loving, tax fine fee permit pushing news?

    Where? I'm going to have to detox with back issues of Pravda.

    Posted by Paul April 5, 09 04:28 PM
  1. It was a good paper. Their biggest mistake was selling out to the NYTimes.
    It's a Boston institution that paper. I can't believe how many right wing fox fanatics are on here. Right wingers call the truth liberal, while they are blind to the outrageous lies on fox news. To stupid to even recognize the truth.

    Posted by Lou April 5, 09 06:05 PM
  1. Don't forget: Even conservative, Republican-run, non-unionized newspapers are in dire financial straits these days. (I know; for 25+ years I worked for one that has never even endorsed a Democrat for president, and it's in awful shape right now.) Even conservative papers can suffer from bad business management and a deep slump in ad revenue. Its political stance has very little to do with whether a newspaper survives today. There are much larger forces at work here. And btw, to those of you who are rejoicing to see people put out of work -- you should be ashamed of yourselves. Your job could be next.

    Posted by Ex-Bostonian April 5, 09 06:52 PM
  1. The Globe might still save itself, but first it must rediscover the basic principles of journalism and stick to them. Journalism is supposed to be neutral, unbias and factual. The Globe has been neither for decades and it is that irresponsibilty that has brought about its demise.

    On another note, just because the fact is interesting; the Globe is a paper that has had a strong liberal slant for a long time. The paper supports a socialist agenda and demeans business at every opportunity. Here, the paper's leaders find themselves with a choice from the union...accept cutbacks in their own salary and the union will agree to cuts as well. No movement on that front and don't expect any...it's been my experience that anytime one who touts sacrifice as an ideal, only does so until it is his or her turn to sacrifice...at that point, he or she once again becomes a businessman who is obliged to also join the other evil profiteers. Sick,eh?

    Enjoy the sensation of free falling. You've worked very hard to create it when it comes to throwing individual liberty under the bus. You've achieved what you worked so hard for...government inspired propaganda. It's just too bad that you won't be along for the ride. Enjoy the ride down. I hope your creditors leave you with nothing.


    Posted by Rick from Billerica April 5, 09 09:38 PM
  1. What do you do when times get tough? Ask yourself this question:

    What would Tania Deluzuriaga do?

    HA!

    Posted by Big Mike April 5, 09 10:21 PM
  1. "what is a pension? who gets those?"

    This is exactly what we can look forward to in a world without newspapers. I'll start a slow clap for that statement.

    Posted by 25YearsandFurious April 6, 09 02:31 AM
  1. Wow! Pensions and lifetime job guarantees!! Does the Globe's failure and socialism enter your mind?

    Posted by daniel b carroll April 6, 09 08:30 AM
  1. Remember that this is a NEW YORK paper trying to shut down a BOSTON institution. I propose that if the New York Times does indeed make good on its threat to shut down the Boston Globe, then ALL NEW YORK PAPERS AND PUBLICATIONS SHALL BE BOYCOTTED IN THE BAY STATE until the Times agrees to sell its share in the Boston Globe to a LOCAL publisher/entity willing to take on The Globe's debt instead of just folding it. Better yet, perhaps Governor Deval Patrick can even impose a $2.00 "embargo" TAX on all New York publications sold in Massachusetts to help enforce this boycott.

    Posted by John K. April 6, 09 08:33 AM
  1. I subscribed to the Globe for over twenty years until the closing days of the last election when I just overdosed on the bias. I'm heartened to see from the comments that I may not be the last conservative in the state.

    Posted by Rich in Acton April 6, 09 03:52 PM
  1. Why is it that every time a newspaper goes under, the morons come out in droves to whine about how everything will be so much better now that we don't have that naughty liberal newspaper around anymore? Let me make the same point others have made here: At every good newspaper, there is a difference between the editorial page and the news columns. You may not believe it, but it is a fact. And even more important, corruption will flourish where there is less oversight, especially oversight by newspapers. The local newspaper is the court of last resort, the place you go when the cops and the courts and the housing authority and the mayor turn you away. Finally, it's the place where the community -- at least, the part of it that thinks -- is galvanized by important issues and ideas. We face a big hole as our newspapers go away, and I would surely like to know what alternative these knuckleheads propose.

    Posted by mike flagg April 6, 09 04:22 PM
  1. Poster Mike Flagg couldn't be more correct. I've worked for newspapers for 35 years (not in the NE). All those who think their problems are due to "liberal agendas" are totally clueless. TV stations are in worse shape. You just don't hear about them. Magazines are hurting. And other industries? Autos? Finance? Retail? Newspapers have more audience and readership than ever before. It's an advertising depression, folks. So if you choose to believe this is comeuppance for "liberal agendas" and that your city will be a better place for their loss, enjoy your ignorance. As for those who say, "Hey, I read on the Internet..." Where do you think the "news" (real news) comes from? Nnewspapers.

    Posted by CalifCasey April 6, 09 06:25 PM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

loading video... (please wait a moment)