Mayors, unions revive casino push
By Matt Viser, Globe Staff
A group of influential mayors, including Thomas M. Menino of Boston, and trade unions re-launched their campaign today to persuade lawmakers to legalize casino gambling in Massachusetts, adding further momentum to a hot-button debate that is expected to take place on Beacon Hill this fall.
The group, called the “Massachusetts Coalition for Jobs and Growth,” is sending out letters to municipal officials to try to persuade them to get behind resort-style casinos, the version that is supported by Governor Deval Patrick.
House Speaker Robert A. DeLeo, whose district includes Suffolk Downs and Wonderland racetracks, has expressed strong backing for slot parlors, with the most likely venues being the state's existing dog and horse racing tracks. Treasurer Timothy P. Cahill, who oversees the lottery, has supported auctioning three licenses for slot parlors.
Senate President Therese Murray last week added more momentum to the debate, saying the state needed to find a new source of revenue as the state struggles through a budget crisis. “Ka-ching,” Murray told a group of business leaders at a hotel ballroom, jerking her arm downward as if pulling the lever on a slot machine.
The letter from local officials, which is going out this week, was signed by Mayors Thomas M. Menino of Boston, Kimberley Driscoll of Salem, Thomas Ambrosino of Revere, and City Manager Jay Ash of Chelsea.
“We don’t have the luxury to continue a policy that exports Massachusetts tax revenues, jobs, and tourism to Connecticut and Rhode Island,” Menino said in a statement. “We have an opportunity with the authorization of resort casinos to create a new and sustainable revenue source for the state and cities and towns that will also create thousands of new jobs and stimulate tourism and economic development growth. And we need to seize that opportunity now.”
The coalition so far includes:
Mayor Tom Ambrosino, City of Revere
Mayor Tom Menino, City of Boston
City Manager Jay Ash, City of Chelsea
Mayor Kimberley Driscoll, City of Salem
Mayor Mark Hawke, City of Gardner
Mayor Carolyn A. Kirk, City of Gloucester
Sheet Metal Workers LV # 17
Greater Boston Labor Council
New England Regional Council of Carpenters
Local 103 I.B.E.W
Sheet Metal Workers LV # 17
Massachusetts Teachers Association
Massachusetts Building Trades Council
Carpenters Local 624
Massachusetts AFL-CIO
Carpenters Local 218
Suffolk Sterling Racecourse
Jason Smith, Selectman, Framingham
WFCW Local 1445
Here is a copy of the letter from the mayors:
Dear Fellow Municipal Official:
As Gov. Deval Patrick and the Massachusetts State Legislature decide the future of gaming expansion in Massachusetts, we are asking you to join with us in supporting the licensing of three gaming, entertainment and destination venues that will require the investment of more than $3 billion in private sector spending within our economy --- a critical and much-needed fiscal and economic development initiative that will generate hundreds of millions of dollars in new local aid to be distributed to our struggling cities and towns.
Each of us is well aware that most of Massachusetts’ 351 cities and towns face severe budgetary pressures likely to result in thousands of municipal employee layoffs and almost unimaginable curtailment of programs and services. At the same time, Gov. Deval Patrick and the Legislature must address a $1 billion state budget deficit --- and that budget deficit next fiscal year may well approach or exceed $2 billion.
Further, taxpayers have made it clear in public opinion polls, at town meeting, and most demonstrably in a slew of city and town budget override votes, that they are opposed to most --- if not all --- tax increases.
Operating under the existing status quo, there is very little leeway, even by cutting jobs, programs and services, that state government and cities and towns can effectively address these fiscal inequities. As local officials, this leaves us no alternative other than to cut operating budgets --- by all means necessary.
But it doesn’t have to be this way.
Studies show that three gaming, entertainment and destination venues will generate nearly $500 million in new tax revenues, create 10,000 construction jobs and more than 20,000 casino-related jobs, spawn economic development statewide, generate more than $400 million in casino-related goods and services spending among Massachusetts small businesses, and revitalize the state’s tourism and hospitality sectors.
And, as a UMass Dartmouth Center for Policy Analysis recommended, by apportioning half of all new casino tax revenues to local aid, Massachusetts cities and towns would receive more than $200 million annually in additional local aid --- an estimated 10.4% increase over existing lottery disbursements.
Additionally, by dedicating to local aid an estimated $600 million in licensing fees from the three casinos --- apportioned over three years --- cities and towns would receive another $200 million annually as the casinos were being built and entering their first full year of operation..
Since 2003, Massachusetts residents have spent more than $1 billion annually at the Connecticut casinos and Rhode Island slot parlors. All told, since the casinos and slot parlors opened in 1993, Bay Staters have spent well about $12 billion at Connecticut and Rhode Island gaming venues. That spending has resulted in Massachusetts residents generating $4 billion in tax revenues to the Connecticut and Rhode Island state treasuries, monies used to fund education, local services, police and fire, property tax relief, and scores of other initiatives --- in Connecticut and Rhode Island.
Massachusetts simply cannot continue to export its gaming, entertainment and tourism and hospitality sectors’ tax revenues and jobs into the Connecticut and Rhode Island economies.
That’s why we’re asking you to join with us in contacting your state senators and state representatives, and urge them to license three gaming, entertainment and destination venues that allows Massachusetts to reassert its fiscal and economic competitiveness --- and to provide new and sustainable local aid revenues vital to the fiscal and economic future of our Commonwealth’s 351 cities and towns.


Make it happen.
Never going to find someone to put up the $$$$$ to build. Look at Vegas, Foxwoods, Mohegan Sun, Atlantic City....All revenues way down, rooms for a song, hotel people getting their hours cut back. The ony winners here are losers.
Should have voted it in back when. Too late now!
the Governor is a idiot.. People need jobs --at the Sate House the Civil Service is corrupt. Many civil service workers came inb the back door.
There is obviously an appetite for expanded gaming in Massachusetts, so the legislature really needs to just go ahead and accept it. Since there are three different plans floating out there, I think the best plan is to merge all the ideas together. It could look something like this:
Revere/East Boston: Suffolk Downs and Wonderland have already agreed to a merger. This would be a perfect site for a Resort and Destination Casino, while maintain and focusing on a revitalized Suffolk Downs Racetrack.
Taunton: Site of Raynha,m Park Greyhound Track, you could install slots in the already existing facility.
Plainveille: Site of Plainridge Racecourse, install slots in the existing facility.
Palmer/Springfield: : The Mohegan Sun Group has plans to build a Resort and Destination Casino in Western Mass.
IND
geez, i wonder why they are pushing this...oh right they get suck more money from teh tax payers by running another failed development project.... Great, can we privatize the construction of these casinos and acutally get something that is functional and built to last.
would love to see this happen
Fat, lazy, good-for-nothing union scum. I am against anything that they support.
It is shame that the unions want to cut their noses off inspite of their faces. Build a building the exploits the working families it so proclaims to be helping it foolish.
Exploiting the elderly, weak and the poor for "the revenues" is heartless and serves only to DEVALue humanity.
Jay, if you're going to call people idiots, you might want to review your own comments before you hit 'submit'.
of course, the Governor and the Mayor ARE idiots. But that has more to do with the simple fact that they only understand raising revenues, and have no concept about cutting costs, which is obviously the more appropriate course. Until they figure that one out, they'll continue to behave like a dog chasing its tail.
Too late...........Typical of the Commonwealth
I concur with Shaboom: most regions with a large gambling industry, if not all, are also centers of high crime, corruption, prostitution, drug use, poverty, etc. It attracts the greedy and the desperate and one feeds off the other.
I grew up in Philly and I've visited Atlantic City often with family. The only signs of prosperity I've seen have been aesthetic: a 'nice looking' high school and the grandeur of the casinos and hotels. The rest of the area is comprised of pawn shops, strip bars, churches, liquor stores and run down homes.
Why are the unions all over this? oh ya - they can not accept that they had a wage freeze this year. boo hoo!
These corrupt, idiotic politicans and their fellow travelers in the labor unions are trying to generate money and influence in a recession economy on the backs of the beleagured taxpayers of this state. Casinos will create cesspools of crime, which we have enough of already in this state. These entities are essentially a way of taxing the poor and gambling addicted. I hope the citizens of the Commonwealth finally wake up and vote this pack of scoundrals out of office.
IND, anyone who uses the word "gaming' in place of 'gambling' is either an addict him/herself, or is in bed with the gambling-pushers, or both.
Notice that none of the mayors who signed are on the South Shore or in the Middleboro area. NIMBY, anyone?
I think people should think twice before putting casinos in Mass.
being married to a person that has a gambling problem/addiction
will just make it closer to home and alot more trouble for people dealing with the same issues.
and now look the craigs list killer, so they claim had a gambling problem Interesting.
I think people should think twice before putting casinos in Mass.
being married to a person that has a gambling problem/addiction
will just make it closer to home and alot more trouble for people dealing with the same issues.
and now look the craigs list killer, so they claim had a gambling problem Interesting.
I wonder how many payoffs there have been to Massachusetts pols by Foxwoods and others to keep gambling out of Massachusetts and keep it coming to Connecticut. We may as well have the jobs here. If they let the unions screw it up, however, which they probably will, it will just become another corrupt mess.
The idiot’s governor and Mayor are looking to increase more Philip Markoff cases in this Bay State?
state has enough of my money-If someone has a gambling addiction casino or no casino they will find a way to feed their habit. It's the same as an alcoholic or drug addict they won't stop until they make up their mind they want to stop and get themselves help. I'm also against casinos in Massachusetts but it's inevitable. The local stores with scratch tickets,numbers,keno,the bingo games,bookmakers taking sports bets are just as bad and those are here to stay. Beacon Hill knows if put on the ballot casino gambling will pass and people can only blame themselves.
The Massachusetts Teachers Association is on this as well.
Typical.
Speaking of gambling and crime, the most recent headline on Phillip Markoff suggests that he may have a gambling problem and was motivated to rob people to support it.
If someone from a fairly privileged background and lifestyle is vulnerable to gambling addiction, wouldn't susceptibility to addiction be worse among people in the middle and lower class?
We need to keep in mind long term effects of what we build and invest in. Isn't negligence of long term planning why our economy is screwed up in the first place?
Markoff may have had a gambling problem? Yes, MA needs casinos. More vice and more crime. Very good MA politicians. Keep up the good work.
Reality check people!!! Gambling is a regressive tax. Most who gamble are low and middle income people hoping to strike it rich. They already have the opportunity to drive to CT, fly to Vegas or just buy a scratch ticket at the corner store so why make it even easier for them to waste their hard earned money?? How about we raise revenue in a much more equitable manner by raising the gas tax by a paltry 19 cents. This would cost the typical driver $110 a year and the burden would be shared across all economic strata.
Finally, check out the possible motive of the Craigslist murder suspect. That's right, a gambling addiction!!!! So go ahead, build the casinos and encourage more people to waste their hard earned money and perhaps sow the seeds of another gambling addict doing anything for his fix. Shame on our state........
Whether some people have a gambling problem should not even be an issue...civil liberties people! I guess we should ban alcohol due to the alcoholics and make driving illegal to take care of speeders...shame on all of you
Anybody read the news today? The suspected killer is believed to have had a GAMBLING PROBLEM! HELLLLOOOO!
I have no problem with slots at Suffolk Downs but how do they expect Route 1-A to handle the traffic that a slot parlor would generate when it can't handle normal rush hour traffic now. There needs to be some serious infrastructure improvements before anything like this happens. Local neighborhoods cannot support people cutting through the already busy streets just to get to the slots. Doing so would put children and the elderly at risk.
So we vote and build casinos (plural) and we can expect a 10% increase in what the lottery is currently giving towns?
It will certainly have a negative affect on the lottery's numbers. So it appears it wouldn't be much of a windfall or even a gain for local towns.
justlikeitis,
There is a word for people who cater to other people's addiction: enabler.
Drew: no one is talking about taking away from anyone's civil rights, so that it is worthless argument. I may have missed it, but the last time i read the US or MA constitutions, i did not see anything about a right to gamble at places built with the cooperation of government.
There's this one hour radio show in Lawrence on 1110 AM that touches on this issue alot. The guys on the program focus on Casino Gambling and one of them really wants one put in his backyard. In fact, when I was listening, one of them also wants to convert Bob Kraft's Patriot Place into a casino. I concur. Perfect fit.
nobody will benefit from a casino here. desperate people do desperate things ! anyone that has a problem and wants a quick fix yes they buy tickets and play the number. and for some that's out of control. but to have casinos available will be a huge mistake for this state.
I don't think gambling has the same effect as driving. you don't get pulled over for spending money that you didn't have to spend to begin with !
people with addiction want quick action. and having something like that in our backyard is not a good idea.
Biting on the casino worm is like buying into a car that costs $14,000 but costs $1,000,000 to maintain. Don't believe the hype! Casino's are not the fix. For every $1 in revenue the state will lose $3. Read Grinols and Mustard. Don't believe me? Why do Ca,NJ,Conn. etc. all have higher tax rates than Mass. if casino's are so profitable? The truth is, they're an economic cancer. They will take your money even if you don't step one toe thru the door.
I don't think casinos would help MA at all. My husband's best friend lives in New London, CT, spitting distance from Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun. In the 15 years since Foxwoods opened, New London has remained a crime-ridden slum. Only the tribes operating the casinos have benefitted.
Very nice site!
I want to say thanks!,
Your Site Is Great!,
Best,
Nise site,
This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.
On the beat
Recent stories from the MetroDesk
Features
Inside Scoop
Lives
Teddy's Take
The Quad
Viewpoints
Editor's Choice
A pricey perk for new head of UMass
'A nightmare for all of us'
From Today's Globe
LOCAL RESOURCES
LOCAL RESOURCES
LOCAL BLOGS
Universal Hub
The Chinatown Blog
CommonWealth Magazine
Red Mass Group
Blue Mass Group
Boston 1775
The Berkeley Beacon
The Daily Collegian
The Daily Free Press
The Harvard Crimson
The Heights
The Huntington News
The Suffolk Journal
The Tech
The Tufts Daily
INside Boston.com