Federal report: Mass. should require firefighters to wear seat belts
Federal authorities say Massachusetts should enact laws that require firefighters to wear seat belts and be tested on air brakes before they are allowed to drive fire trucks, according to a recently released investigation report on a fatal fire truck crash in Boston last year.
Lt. Kevin M. Kelley (Boston Fire Department) |
The investigation conducted by the Firefighter Fatality Investigation and Prevention Program of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health concludes that a fire lieutenant who was killed and two firefighters riding in a ladder truck when it lost brake pressure and crashed into an apartment building on Jan. 9, 2009, were not wearing their selt belts. The driver also was not adequately trained on how air brakes work, the report says.
Boston Fire Department regulations did not require firefighters to wear selt belts at the time of the crash, and Massachusetts law exempts "operators and passengers of fire vehicles from having to wear a seat belt."
"Due to the severity of the fatal incident, a seat belt may not have saved the victim, but is recommended as a good safety practice," the report says.
Current law requires drivers of commercial trucks to pass extensive testing to obtain commerical driver licenses, but firefighters are exempt because firetrucks are not considered commercial vehicles. NIOSH investigators recommend that drivers of fire apparatus be required to be certified on "knowledge and skill of air brake systems, thus making the fire apparatus driver better capable of operating the fire apparatus."
The NIOSH probe cited four key factors that led to the crash in Boston and ultimately led to the fatality: brake failure, poor maintenance, inadequate training, and failure to wear seat belts.
Lieutenant Kevin M. Kelley was killed instantly when Ladder 26 crashed into an apartment building in Mission Hill, while three other firefighters riding in the truck were injured.
On the beat

Reporter
Milton J. Valencia is covering the federal appeals court ruling striking down the Defense of Marriage Act. |
|
Recent stories from the MetroDesk


Features

Editor's Choice

A pastor's dream, a church in crisis

Out of pain long past, he forges hope
- Ambitious emissions plan called lagging
- Adrian Walker: Stopped for being black
- Science with a beautiful, and complicated, view
- Chairs bring change of pace to Harvard Yard

From Today's Globe
- Federal court in Boston rules US marriage law unconstitutional
- A year after deadly tornado, Springfield neighborhood still reels
- Warren camp seeks to allay concerns over ancestry questions
- Elizabeth Warren says of ancestry, ‘I won’t deny who I am’
- Boston looks to curb clutter of satellite dishes

LOCAL BLOGS
Universal Hub
The Chinatown Blog
CommonWealth Magazine
Red Mass Group
Blue Mass Group
Boston 1775
The Berkeley Beacon
The Daily Collegian
The Daily Free Press
The Harvard Crimson
The Heights
The Huntington News
The Suffolk Journal
The Tech
The Tufts Daily







