THIS STORY HAS BEEN FORMATTED FOR EASY PRINTING

Province's forest operations called unsustainable

Email|Print|Single Page| Text size + By Michael Tutton
May 7, 2008

HALIFAX, Nova Scotia—Measures intended to save the severely degraded forests in Nova Scotia are too little, too late, a new report says.

The Halifax-based research group GPI Atlantic, in a report released Wednesday, says more needs to be done to counteract decades of over-harvesting, clear cutting and other industrial forestry practices.

"As a result, the average age of Nova Scotia's forests has never been younger," says a release from the institute. "In the 1970s, only 4 per cent of the province's forests were under 20 years of age, compared to 16 per cent in the 1990s and 24 per cent today."

GPI says there has been some improvement in forestry practices, but it's a "far cry" from what's needed to deal with a massive increase in logging and clear cutting over the last 25 years.

"The current reliance on pulp and paper production is unsustainable, from an economic perspective and an environmental perspective," said Ron Colman, director of the think-tank.

The Canadian findings are of interest in Maine, a heavily forested state where sustainability has also been a concern. The Legislature has responded with laws such as one governing liquidation harvesting. Also having an impact is forest certification, a market-driven approach that rewards environmentally and ecologically responsible practices.

The group that evaluated Nova Scotia's forests says there has been a marginal increase in "selective harvesting" since its 2001 report, from 0.9 per cent to 1.5 per cent of total production. Selective harvesting involves logging only mature trees while leaving the younger ones still standing.

As well, the report notes there's been a small drop in clear cutting, and more land has been placed under protection.

The report says Nova Scotians have virtually no chance of ever seeing the towering trees of the Acadian forests that once covered the province, providing masts for a thriving wooden shipbuilding industry.

"Our mostly young, single-species, single-aged tree plantations today bear no resemblance to the magnificent and diverse" forests of the past, says the report.

The group makes eight main recommendations to begin restoring and protecting the value of Nova Scotia's forest wealth.

They include more incentives to woodlot owners to improve forest management, a sharp reduction in clear cutting and development of a value-added forest strategy.

Report author Linda Pannozzo notes that in Manitoba the average value derived from a cubic meter of harvested trees is $425, while in Nova Scotia the same amount of wood only produces $107.

In 2007, only 13 per cent of all wood exports from Nova Scotia were value-added products, such as furniture, compared to 28 per cent in New Brunswick, 57 per cent in Ontario and 75 per cent in Manitoba.

In 1999, the Natural Resources Department decided to set aside 8 per cent of Crown land in 38 districts of the province. However, "the province is still far from those targets," writes Pannozzo.

Meanwhile, the pulp and paper industry in the province has struggled in recent years, despite the continuation of clear cutting practices.

For example, the owners of the New Page operation in Port Hawkesbury published warnings in a recent prospectus that the rising Canadian currency had "impaired the ability of the Port Hawkesbury mill to compete profitably in the United States market."

In Liverpool, the AbitibiBowater mill was spared by its parent company in a November 2007 round of closures and cuts, and a recent agreement allowing it to generate its own power appears to have given it added security.

However, Premier Rodney MacDonald has noted the mill faces challenging times in the years to come.

Colman argues the pulp and paper industry has long exhibited signs that it is a dying industry, and that other industries would be more profitable in the long term.

"If you rely on pulp and paper alone, you're moving into a world where you lose more and more of your high-quality timber ... You close off your options to move into other kinds of production."

more stories like this

  • Email
  • Email
  • Print
  • Print
  • Single page
  • Single page
  • Reprints
  • Reprints
  • Share
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Comment
 
  • Share on DiggShare on Digg
  • Tag with Del.icio.us Save this article
  • powered by Del.icio.us
Your Name Your e-mail address (for return address purposes) E-mail address of recipients (separate multiple addresses with commas) Name and both e-mail fields are required.
Message (optional)
Disclaimer: Boston.com does not share this information or keep it permanently, as it is for the sole purpose of sending this one time e-mail.