News

Stem cell debate highlights difficulty of judging contrarian research

Kimimasa Mayama/EPA

This is a summary. To read the whole story subscribe to BostonGlobe.com

The strangest and most gripping story in science during the past few weeks has been the Japanese and Boston stem-cell papers, in which researchers appeared to show that mature cells could be transformed into powerful stem cells with a startlingly simple method.

As soon as they were published in Nature, the discovery was greeted with amazement, excitement, and also a heavy dose of skepticism. Last week researchers seemed to be backing away, with four of the co-authors agreeing to consider a retraction. But as of now, the papers stand, and nobody wants to dismiss a technique that really could be a breakthrough.

The difficulty of sorting out visionary ideas from crackpot ones — or even outright fraud — has long been part of science, especially at the cutting edge.

Full story for BostonGlobe.com subscribers.

Get the full story with unlimited access to BostonGlobe.com.

Just 99 cents for four weeks.

Share