THIS STORY HAS BEEN FORMATTED FOR EASY PRINTING

Inspection, assurances after Red Line warning

Patrick orders review, vows no fare hike

By Noah Bierman
Globe Staff / November 5, 2009

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

  • E-mail|
  • Print|
  • Reprints|
  • |
Text size +

The man who spent much of the last three months studying the MBTA said yesterday that he would personally avoid riding on certain portions of the Red Line, triggering a series of reassurances from state officials but also an immediate inspection of a vulnerable part of the subway line.

The statement, from former John Hancock chairman David F. D’Alessandro, underlined the dire warnings contained in the report he officially unveiled yesterday, detailing the dozens of delayed maintenance projects at the MBTA that have been deemed critical to public safety.

Despite the startling findings, Governor Deval Patrick emphasized the system’s safety yesterday, even riding the Red Line himself on his way to the airport for a trip to Washington, where he will meet with US Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood to press the case for increased funding. Patrick also promised no fare increases “for the next year or two, longer if possible.’’

“I want to assure the traveling public that the system is safe for riders and that the good people of the T will recommit to keeping it so,’’ said Patrick, who commissioned D’Alessandro to prepare the report in August and was by his side as it was unveiled yesterday.

“There’s regular monitoring going on of all of the system’s capital needs and safety issues,’’ the governor said.

As a result of the report, Patrick ordered the state’s transportation secretary, Jeffrey Mullan, to review the MBTA’s entire $3 billion backlog of maintenance projects to rank which ones are critical to keeping riders safe. But Patrick had no immediate answer for the major question raised in the D’Alessandro report: how to pay for them.

Many riders interviewed on the Red Line yesterday were unaware and unconcerned about the report’s findings. Even those who were worried said they had no choice but to use the public transit system and trust that managers and elected officials would keep them safe.

“It makes me a little more nervous,’’ said Nicole March, a 29-year-old graduate student from Medford who was riding over portions of track that were highlighted in the report and received an extra inspection yesterday. “Especially considering we’re underground, and we’re going at fast speeds.’’

But without a car, March must rely on the T to take her to class at Brandeis and other appointments, unless, she said, she wanted to “walk 3 miles in the snow like my great-grandparents.’’

Like other riders who were learning about the report yesterday, March was reconsidering past incidents, like the 15-minute delay she experienced Tuesday, wondering whether they were the result of a deeper problem.

Robert Halperin, a 53-year-old consultant from Lexington, said T riders have to approach their commutes with a sense of fatalism, recognizing that all life’s journeys carry a certain amount of risk. “That doesn’t mean they shouldn’t address the problems,’’ Halperin said. “I’d rather have stations be a little dirtier and a little safer.’’

At a press conference yesterday after making his comment about the Red Line, D’Alessandro adopted a more measured tone, seeming to temper the safety concerns he had dramatically outlined in his report.

“There are not imminent safety dangers,’’ D’Alessandro said. “That’s not to say there might not be an accident. There may be. But there are a lot of reasons with 1.2 million rides every day.’’

It is more certain that safety problem will arise if more money is not spent on repairs “on a timely basis,’’ he said.

In fact, the MBTA’s internal statistics show the agency’s subways and trolleys have been running with fewer speed restrictions in recent months than at any time since 2003, an indication that maintenance problems have been kept in check. The T restricts speeds when workers discover potential safety threats that require extra caution.

Still, the critical maintenance projects cited in D’Alessandro’s report were derived from internal MBTA data, an indication that managers are well aware the system’s age and lack of investment are catching up with it.

“We found the iceberg, but we don’t yet know how deep the iceberg is,’’ said Christopher Hart, a local transit consultant and advocate who is familiar with the MBTA’s operations.

The report was delivered at least a year too late to influence a high-profile transportation debate in the Legislature that ended over the summer with some dramatic changes in the transportation bureaucracy but no long-term solution for infusing more money into the system.

Patrick’s plan to raise money for transportation through an increased gas tax failed earlier this year, and he repeated yesterday that he had no immediate plans to revisit that debate.

A sales tax increase passed this summer will help defray some of the T’s short-term operating deficit but will not be enough to balance the agency’s books for more than another year or so, a conclusion reinforced in the review.

While the independent review recommended halting all of the T’s expansion projects, Patrick refused yesterday to put the brakes on two costly initiatives: the expansion of the Green Line into Somerville and Medford and the extension of commuter rail to Fall River and New Bedford.

Despite disagreement over some of the report’s findings, there was a strong sense among political leaders and advocates yesterday that the report would join a short list of others that have altered the debate surrounding the state’s transportation system. The MBTA is an essential service to hundreds of thousands of riders every day, and a key cog in the economy.

“We’ve been very public about the T’s problems for years, but this report demonstrates that those problems are much greater than we imagined,’’ said Michael J. Widmer, president of the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation.

Mullan and William Mitchell, interim MBTA general manager, issued statements calling the report sobering.

Patrick and Mullan promised to step up efforts to find permanent professional leadership for the MBTA, which has several vacancies at the top of its operations management. The House and Senate cochairmen of the Transportation Committee said they would like further review of D’Alessandro’s findings.

Senator Steven A. Baddour, the Senate chairman, said he was particularly concerned when he heard that D’Alessandro said he would hesitate to ride the Red Line, where the MBTA has been unable to afford an $80 million project to remove and replace rail ties damaged by flooding. He made the comments on the Jim & Margery radio show, with Jim Braude and Margery Eagan, and to the Associated Press. The report stated that the corrosion and damage on the tracks between the Alewife and Harvard Square stations could lead to a train derailment.

Baddour said the MBTA or the Massachusetts Department of Transportation should be sending out engineers to determine whether or not his statements are accurate.

MBTA workers were out yesterday banging and measuring rails to make sure nothing had slipped out of place.

Andrew Ryan of the Globe staff contributed to this report. Noah Bierman can be reached at nbierman@globe.com.