THIS STORY HAS BEEN FORMATTED FOR EASY PRINTING

Residents divided over wage hikes

'People want more and more while other people have to suffer,' said Carla Cermark of East Boston. "People want more and more while other people have to suffer," said Carla Cermark of East Boston. (Pat Greenhouse/ Globe Staff)
By Milton J. Valencia and Marissa Lang
Globe Staff | Globe Correspondent / June 8, 2010

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

  • E-mail|
  • Print|
  • Reprints|
  • |
Text size +

To some residents of Boston, the city’s firefighters are making “ridiculous’’ and “greedy’’ wage demands. To others, they are fearless public servants who deserve the pay raises and benefits awarded to them in a controversial arbitration decision.

Chris Long, of Jamaica Plain, believes firefighters should have to face drug and alcohol testing, but said they should not be paid for it, as the award calls for. Bridget Colvin, a mother of two from Roxbury, said firefighters bargained in good faith and deserve the award they got.

“They went through the whole arbitration process,’’ said Colvin, 33. “I just wish them luck.’’

To hear it on the streets, Mayor Thomas M. Menino’s heated standoff with Local 718, the city’s firefighter union, is just as divisive in the neighborhoods as it is in the chambers of City Hall.

As the City Council plans to vote, possibly tomorrow, on whether to approve the arbitration award, and as the city administration scrambles to negotiate a new deal, the contentious debate has spread to the neighborhoods. From East Boston to West Roxbury, young and old, male and female from divergent backgrounds are trying to reconcile their respect for firefighters with the reality that Boston is under financial strain, planning to lay off dozens of workers, close four libraries, and reduce other city services.

“They need to come to some type of agreement,’’ said Jamal Gathers Sr., 25, of Roxbury, stopping during a game of golf yesterday at Franklin Park.

His view: “They deserve a raise, and the drug tests are necessary, but they shouldn’t be contingent on the raise. It’s just a negotiating ploy by the union.’’

“It’s just not fair,’’ said Nancy Donnelly, a retired database administrator from South Boston.

She said that she respects the work they do — a relative is a firefighter, she said — but that the union is simply asking for too much.

“They’re not a needy segment of the population,’’ she said. “It’s just greed.’’

But to William Fraser, 83, a retired police officer from West Roxbury who has been through contract negotiations before, the city’s negotiating stance may not be as clear as it is made out to be.

“They only tell you what they want you to hear,’’ Fraser said.

“I say they deserve it,’’ he said of the firefighters. “I wouldn’t want their job.’’

Elaine Harder, 62, of East Boston, said that the city should not have gone to arbitration if it did not have the finances to support an award.

“What they did to those firefighters was wrong,’’ she said. “They’re going to save your life and my life some day.’’

The arbitration award, released last month, gave the firefighters a four-year contract with five raises, including a 2.5 percent boost on the last day of the agreement, June 30, specifically in exchange for undergoing drug and alcohol testing. The city says it cannot afford the award; the union contends it can.

After weeks of debate, the City Council could decide on funding the award by tomorrow. In the meantime, city and union officials have been scrambling to negotiate a new deal that would satisfy all parties.

But across the city, it seemed that many residents had already decided, with several saying that firefighters’ demands were out of whack in today’s economy.

Carla Cermark, 37, a mother of three from East Boston, said that she supported a raise, but not of the size set in the arbitration award and not for drug and alcohol testing.

“People want more and more while other people have to suffer,’’ she said.

Marlon Wallen, 41, of the South End said it is not fair in today’s economic climate to expect the city to pay out several years’ worth of raises in one retroactive sum.

“It’s unrealistic to say, ‘We want our share, and we want it now,’ especially in this economy,’’ he said.

David Pahl, 60, who is semiretired, said that firefighters are expecting benefits that workers in the private sector were forced to give up long ago.

“I think they should get a pay cut,’’ said Pahl, of Roslindale. “The idea of getting a raise for a drug test is absurd.’’

But others said that if anyone should get a pay raise, it is a firefighter.

“They put their lives on the line,’’ said Brian Franklin, 27, an amateur basketball player from Dorchester. He said that the firefighters may be “pushing it a little bit,’’ but that “I see them go out there every day, no complaints.’’

Brian Heaton, 23, of Brighton, recently applied to become a Boston firefighter. And while he acknowledged the tough times the city is facing, he could think of no better place to invest.

“I drive boats on the South Shore, a job you basically just need a high-school degree to do, and being a firefighter requires so much more, but they make essentially the same amount of money,’’ he said. “That doesn’t seem fair.’’

Milton Valencia can be reached at mvalencia@globe.com. Marissa Lang can be reached at mlang@globe.com.

Connect with Boston.com

Twitter Follow us on @BostonUpdate, other Twitter accounts