Connaughton shifts stance on sales levy
Republican auditor candidate Mary Z. Connaughton, in a televised debate last night, appeared to back off her earlier opposition to a controversial ballot initiative that would slash the state’s sales tax, saying she was undecided about the measure.
In an exchange with Democratic nominee Suzanne Bump on NECN, Connaughton was asked about her stance on Question 3 and said, “I’ll make that decision as it comes.’’
As recently as two weeks ago, Connaughton said, “I won’t be voting in favor of Question 3,’’ citing its impact on state finances.
Question 3 would cut the state sales tax rate from 6.25 percent to 3 percent, which would open a $2.5 billion hole in the state budget and lead to layoffs and deep cuts to state and local services. A Globe poll released this week found that voters are split on the issue, with 46 percent in favor of cutting the tax and 43 percent opposed, with the remainder undecided.
In a television appearance Sept. 16, Connaughton had aligned herself with the no camp. “My concern is that it’s not going to foster spending cuts,’’ she said. “Question 3 has an enormous effect on the budget.’’
Asked to clarify her position after yesterday’s debate, spokesman Mike Flynn said that Connaughton remained opposed to Question 3 and favored cutting the sales tax rate to 5 percent.
“She’s not reversing her position at all,’’ Flynn said. “What she really wants is a 5 percent sales tax, but that’s not on the ballot. This is not, for Mary, a black-and-white issue.’’
The debate, moderated by NECN’s Jim Braude, was a rare showcase for the candidates for auditor, the state official in charge of investigating waste, fraud, and abuse in state government. Connaughton and Bump are vying to replace Democrat A. Joseph DeNucci, who is retiring after 24 years in office.
DeNucci drew criticism this summer when he approved 5 percent raises for his staff, even as the state suffers from high unemployment and as many state employees face stagnant wages and layoffs. Both candidates criticized the raises yesterday, but neither promised to rescind them if elected on Nov. 2. Connaughton said she wanted to evaluate employee qualifications if elected, and Bump said she wanted to keep a free hand in staffing the agency.
“I’m looking at this not as a politician,’’ Bump said. “Looking at this situation as a prospective manager . . . you need to have all the management flexibility that you can have.’’
The Globe poll found the auditor’s race was close, with 33 percent of likely voters backing Bump and 29 percent supporting Connaughton, within the poll’s margin of error of 4.5 percentage points. Thirty-six percent of likely voters said they were undecided, outpacing either of the candidates.
In last night’s debate, Connaughton, a former member of the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority board and former chief financial officer of the Massachusetts State Lottery, sought to highlight her background as an accountant.
“You need to be an attorney to be the attorney general,’’ she said. “Shouldn’t you be an auditor to be the state auditor?’’
But Connaughton sidestepped several questions, including on gay marriage and state pensions.
Bump, a former state legislator and lobbyist, resigned last year as Governor Deval Patrick’s secretary of labor to enter the auditor’s race.
Pressed by Braude, she defended her past work as a lobbyist for
“We did good public policy work,’’ she said. “I’m proud of the work I did for the American Insurance Association.’’
Nathanael Fortune, a Smith College associate professor of physics, is also in the race as a Green-Rainbow Party candidate.
Alan Wirzbicki can be reached at email@example.com.