THIS STORY HAS BEEN FORMATTED FOR EASY PRINTING
Campaign 2010 | The governor’s race

Candidates dig in their heels

Hone messages, defend pasts in final debate

Gubernatorial candidates (from left) Jill Stein, Charles D. Baker, Timothy P. Cahill, and Governor Deval Patrick discussed the economy, taxes, and illegal immigration last night in a televised debate moderated by Charles Gibson. Gubernatorial candidates (from left) Jill Stein, Charles D. Baker, Timothy P. Cahill, and Governor Deval Patrick discussed the economy, taxes, and illegal immigration last night in a televised debate moderated by Charles Gibson. (Yoon S. Byun/ Globe Staff)
By Michael Levenson and Frank Phillips
Globe Staff / October 26, 2010

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

Text size +

In the final televised debate of a long, heated campaign, the four candidates for governor sharpened their messages and political profiles last night, presenting voters clear choices on taxes, spending, immigration, and even lessons learned from the Big Dig.

The debate, which set the stage for a weeklong sprint to Election Day next Tuesday, distilled the major themes that have defined the 2010 gubernatorial campaign. Although the candidates seemed testier after enduring one another’s charges for 15 months, the overall mood was largely restrained, at times even cordial.

None of the four broke new policy ground. Each was put on the defensive. All had their good moments and their weak ones.

Governor Deval Patrick pushed his theme that he has successfully led the state out of a recession through strategic investments in health care, education, and economic development.

“We didn’t cause this global collapse, and nobody’s working harder to get us out of it,’’ he said.

But Patrick was forced to deflect criticism from Republican rival Charles D. Baker over raising taxes, failing to make what Baker called necessary government reforms, and a loss of jobs over his first term. Baker challenged the governor on the most recent jobs report, which showed that Massachusetts had slipped, losing 24,000 jobs in August and September.

“You’ve got to be real about what’s really going on out there,’’ Baker said.

But Baker was also on his heels when questioned by moderator Charles Gibson about a newly leaked memo on the Big Dig that he wrote as the state’s chief fiscal officer in 1998, in which Baker suggested that he knew the project’s costs were going to rise sharply, and that it would crowd out other transportation projects, as critics have always contended.

Timothy P. Cahill, an independent who is trailing Patrick and Baker in the polls, sought to stake out his own territory as the lone voice of the working class who understands the struggle of small business owners. The Green-Rainbow candidate, Jill Stein, attacked Patrick from the left, saying she was the only candidate with no ties to special interests.

The debate — sponsored by a six-member media consortium that includes WHDH, NECN, WBUR, WGBH, and the Globe — was held around a table at WCVB-TV studios in Needham.

The toughest exchanges came over Baker’s role in financing the Big Dig.

Gibson asked Baker if he was contradicting himself as the state’s chief budget officer in 1998, when he said publicly that the Big Dig would not take money from other road and bridge projects. In private, he wrote an August 1998 memo, reported Sunday by the Associated Press, that expressed concern that spending on the Big Dig was “simply amazing’’ and could crowd out other things.

But in the memo, Baker suggested waiting until “after November 5’’ — or two days after Election Day — to consider a politically unpopular proposal that included cuts in statewide road and bridge spending and withdrawing $300 million from the state’s rainy day fund.

Last night, Baker maintained that the Big Dig did not short-change other road and bridge projects around the state. “It’s not a contradiction,’’ he said.

Then he addressed Patrick, trying to change the subject to the estimated $2 billion budget deficit for next year, which he has accused Patrick of ignoring: “I certainly hope somebody’s writing a memo to you.’’

But Patrick kept up the attack on the Big Dig. “We all knew the financing plan was flawed from the start,’’ Patrick said. “It turns out Charlie knew it was flawed from the start and for political reasons didn’t make that public. I am very reluctant to take fiscal advice from the architect of the Big Dig financing plan.’’

Patrick then found himself fending off attacks on immigration. Baker criticized Patrick for reversing Governor Mitt Romney’s 2006 policy that deputized 30 specially trained State Police troopers to detain illegal immigrants. Patrick said he was concerned that such policies ensnare legal immigrants.

But Baker argued that legal immigrants want tougher crackdowns on illegal immigrants. He said he had visited with some of them in Brockton who told him they live in a “climate of fear.’’

Reflecting on a spate of violence in Boston, Patrick said he never imagined he would be comforting the families of 14-year-old and 2-year-old murder victims. Pressed on his broken vow of 1,000 new police officers, the governor said that given the economic collapse he could not spare any promises or programs.

“I felt like everything had to be touched,’’ he said.

But it was the economy that dominated much of the discussion.

Cahill said neither of the two front-runners understands job creation at the “organic level,’’ citing his own experience running a Quincy cafe.

“It’s about attacking the jobs problem one job at a time, one business at a time,’’ he said.

When Gibson challenged Patrick moments later on the unemployment rate doubling during his term, Patrick again pinned the blame on the financial crisis.

“I’m not declaring victory by any means, but we’re making progress,’’ said Patrick.

Gibson then pressed Baker on what makes him think he would be any more successful at pushing his agenda through the Legislature than Patrick has, especially given that state lawmakers have already rejected a number of Baker’s proposals.

“I’m going to lead on some of those issues,’’ he said. “I’m going to take the ball and run with it.’’

Baker said Massachusetts is suffering because it is not competitive with states that have lower taxes and less regulation. He said taxpayers and small businesses, the “people who pay the bills,’’ demand a clear, consistent message from Beacon Hill.

Patrick attacked Baker’s economic plan, which calls for reductions in the sales, income, and corporate tax rates to 5 percent. Baker’s policies, Patrick said, would have “exactly the same impact’’ as a ballot initiative to slash the sales tax rate, which Baker opposes.

“So this is another example, I think, of saying one thing and offering something else,’’ he said.

Baker hit back by accusing Patrick of plotting to raise taxes again. “The governor’s only proposal, from what I can tell, to deal with the current $2 billion problem, is going to be to raise taxes,’’ Baker said.

“You’ve never heard that proposal from me,’’ Patrick shot back.

In the final question of the night, the candidates were asked to put animosity aside and say a kind word about one another.

Cahill said if he ever got sick, he would want Stein, a doctor, to take care of him. Stein said she admires Cahill’s “passion and conviction and courage.’’

Patrick called Baker “one of the smartest, most engaged business leaders,’’ and said he would borrow some of his ideas in a second term. Baker, criticized in the past for his reluctance to acknowledge anything positive about Patrick, cited his opponent’s compassion and said the governor, who rose from poverty, “is a wonderful story about what a great country America is, start to finish, all the way.’’

Noah Bierman of the Globe staff contributed to this report. Frank Phillips can be reached at phillips@globe.com. Michael Levenson can be reached at mlevenson@globe.com.

Connect with Boston.com

Twitter Follow us on @BostonUpdate, other Twitter accounts