Boston.com THIS STORY HAS BEEN FORMATTED FOR EASY PRINTING
GLOBE EDITORIAL

Yes on 1: Wine sales in groceries

IN 34 OTHER states, shoppers at grocery stores can buy wine with their steaks. This has not caused an epidemic of drunken driving or teenage alcohol abuse. But the availability of wine with groceries does make life a little more convenient for the many adults who like to sip wine with their dinner.

Massachusetts allows only limited sales of wine at supermarkets. By loosening some of the state's restrictions, Question 1 would promote competition among retailers, and convenience for consumers. The Globe urges a Yes vote on this question.

Under existing law, food stores that wish to sell wine have to obtain retail liquor licenses, which are in short supply. And no company can obtain more than three licenses, regardless how many stores it owns. Question 1 would vastly expand those sales by creating a new class of licenses for retailers that sell products typically found at grocery stores.

The measure -- which deals only with wine, not beer or hard alcohol -- has sparked vigorous opposition from liquor stores and some law-enforcement interests. They say the measure would lead to wine sales at convenience stores, and no doubt some would try to stock just enough arugula to satisfy Question 1's requirements. But no store could get licenses to sell wine without the approval of local authorities.

Opponents tout research suggesting that having more alcohol outlets means more drunken driving and more opportunities for minors to buy (or steal) alcohol. But these aren't arguments against selling wine in supermarkets; they're arguments for banning alcohol altogether. Something is amiss when liquor interests promote a campaign with prohibitionist overtones.

The bottom line: Question 1 would help consumers without hurting public safety, and voters ought to pass it. 

© Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company