THIS STORY HAS BEEN FORMATTED FOR EASY PRINTING
Exit polling

State's young voters pivotal for Obama, tax issue

By Frank Phillips
Globe Staff / November 5, 2008
  • Email|
  • Print|
  • Single Page|
  • |
Text size +

On two of the biggest questions facing Massachusetts in this election, younger voters played a big role, according to exit polls.

Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama ran up huge margins among those voters under 30 in Massachusetts, while those over 45 were far less enamored with the Democratic nominee, splitting their ballots between him and Republican John McCain.

Voters under 30 along with liberal, college educated, and middle-income voters also were key to the wide margin that opponents racked up in defeating the ballot initiative that would have eliminated the state's income tax.

Those are the conclusions of interviews with voters, who, after voting yesterday, were contacted by a survey company, Edison/Mitofksy, which performed state-by-state exit polling for the national media.

The survey of 743 Massachusetts voters indicated that Obama won 75 percent of those under 30, and McCain received 21 percent of that age group's vote. Among those between 30 and 44, Obama outpolled McCain, 58 percent to 36 percent. But the Arizona senator ran closer among those 45 and older, 44 percent to Obama's 54 percent.

Jeffrey Berry, a political science professor at Tufts University, said the exit polls in Massachusetts and New Hampshire reflect serious problems for the Republicans in the future. He said new, young voters tend to stick with their original affiliations for some years to come.

"Voters don't flip back and forth," said Berry. "The trend in Massachusetts is part of a larger trend where young, new voters were inspired by Obama while turned off by the last Bush administration."

Residents of varying income levels supported the candidates differently - with Obama's margin of support shrinking among wealthier people. Obama edged McCain 50 percent to 45 percent among those making more than $100,000 a year. Those making between $50,000 and $100,000 went for Obama, 58 percent to 40 percent. And Obama beat McCain by more than a 3-to-1 margin among those making less than $50,000 annually.

How the issue of race played in the Massachusetts results is not clear from the exit polling because the sample of the African-American vote was too small.

Looking at the responses from white voters, Obama ran significantly better among white women voters, getting 60 percent of their vote to McCain's 36 percent. Among white men, 50 percent of the white male voters backed the Democrat, while 48 percent voted for McCain.

US Senator John F. Kerry, seeking his fifth term, also scored heavily among young voters in defeating Republican challenger Jeff Beatty, getting 80 percent of their vote.

Beatty did best among those making more than $100,000, wining 39 percent of those voters compared with Kerry's 60 percent. Kerry won 71 percent of those making less than $100,000 and got 60 percent of those making more than $100,000 a year.

Obama's strong win in New Hampshire came from his popularity among women in that state. The exit polls indicated that, among the 2,203 voters surveyed, 63 percent of the female vote went to the Democrat, but only 52 percent of the men casting ballots voted for him. Also, McCain beat Obama handily among those who decided at the last minute on their presidential vote in the Granite State. Some 53 percent broke yesterday for the Republican nominee while 44 percent went for Obama.

According to the 737 interviews of those who voted on the Massachusetts income tax question, 70 percent of those between 18 and 29 voted to reject the proposal and 30 percent approved it.

Voters in the middle-age bracket were more inclined to repeal the income tax. Among those between 30 and 44 years old, 44 percent registered approval.

Berry said the proponents pushing the income tax cut reached too far by trying to completely eliminate the tax, losing some key constituents, including the business community. Wiping out the tax would have cost the state about $12 billion in revenues, opponents said, an argument they were able to use effectively against the measure.

"The key factor in its defeat was that the proposition was too radical and went too far," Berry said.

  • Email
  • Email
  • Print
  • Print
  • Single page
  • Single page
  • Reprints
  • Reprints
  • Share
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Comment
 
  • Share on DiggShare on Digg
  • Tag with Del.icio.us Save this article
  • powered by Del.icio.us
Your Name Your e-mail address (for return address purposes) E-mail address of recipients (separate multiple addresses with commas) Name and both e-mail fields are required.
Message (optional)
Disclaimer: Boston.com does not share this information or keep it permanently, as it is for the sole purpose of sending this one time e-mail.