ALBANY, N.Y. — A person can be guilty of a hate crime even if the violence is directed at a building rather than a person, New York’s top court ruled yesterday.
The Court of Appeals unanimously said the stricter penalties imposed for such crimes apply to a man convicted of trying to bomb a Bronx synagogue in 2000.
“It is self-evident that, although the target of the defendant’s criminal conduct was a building, the true victims were the individuals of Jewish faith who were members of the synagogue,’’ Judge Victoria Graffeo wrote.
She upheld rulings by the trial court and a midlevel court on a state statute that was enacted in 2000.
“The evidence in this case proved that defendant committed an attempted arson of the synagogue because of his anger toward a particular religious group,’’ Graffeo wrote.
Mazin Assi, 30, is serving five to 15 years in prison.
Jan Hoth, Assi’s lawyer, said her client has been denied parole twice, will probably serve the full term despite having no prior criminal record, and would be free already if simply convicted of attempted arson. The Palestinian was working at a deli in New York at the time, she said.
Prosecutors said Assi and three others tried to make firebombs out of vodka bottles and threw them through the glass door of the Congregation Adath Israel synagogue on the eve of Yom Kippur.
The homemade bombs did not ignite.
Assi told police he was angry that a Palestinian child was shot by the Israeli Army and wanted to make a statement that would stop Middle East violence.