Dogs suffer over lax kennel violation follow-up
US agency ignores horrific facilities, report reveals
WASHINGTON — Dogs are living and dying in horrific conditions because of lax government enforcement of large kennels known as puppy mills, an internal government report says.
Investigators say the Department of Agriculture agency in charge of enforcing the Animal Welfare Act often ignores repeat violations, waives penalties, and fails to adequately document inhumane treatment of dogs. In one case cited by the department’s inspector general, 27 dogs died at an Oklahoma breeding facility after inspectors had visited the facility several times and cited it for violations.
The review, conducted between 2006 and 2008, found that more than half of those who had been cited for violations flouted the law again. It details grisly conditions at several facilities and includes photos of dogs with gaping wounds, covered in ticks, and living in feces.
The report recommends that the USDA animal care unit immediately confiscate animals that are dying or seriously suffering and better train its inspectors to document, report, and penalize wrongdoing.
Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said yesterday the department takes the report seriously and will force immediate action to improve enforcement, penalties, and inspector training. He noted the investigation was conducted before his time in office and called it troubling.
“USDA will reinforce its efforts under its animal welfare responsibilities, including tougher penalties for repeat offenders and greater consistent action to strongly enforce the law,’’ he said.
The investigators visited 68 dog breeders and dog brokers in eight states that had been cited for at least one violation in the previous three years. On those visits, they found that first-time violators were rarely penalized, even for more serious violations, and repeat offenders were often let off the hook as well. The agency also gave some breeders a second chance to correct their actions even when they found animals dying or suffering, delaying confiscation of the animals.
Animal care “generally took little or no enforcement actions against these facilities during the period,’’ the investigators wrote, adding that the agency placed too much emphasis on educating the violators instead of penalizing them.