House Republicans raise abortion in health care debate
Would toughen restrictions on taxpayer funding
WASHINGTON — A day after their vote to repeal President Obama’s landmark health care law, House Republicans moved yesterday to put their own stamp on the issue, starting with the volatile topic of abortion.
The issue nearly scuttled passage of the health care law last year. The move to reopen that debate is part of an emerging strategy by Republicans to attack the health care law piece by piece and promote ideas of their own.
It could also drive a wedge between the majority of Democratic lawmakers who support abortion rights, and a smaller group of abortion opponents within their ranks who signed on to the compromise, thereby providing the critical margin to pass the overhaul last year.
GOP lawmakers introduced two separate bills to toughen restrictions on taxpayer funding of abortions, arguing that the language now in the law is weak. Leaders promised swift action.
“Clearly there’s an awful lot of doubt as to where the administration really is on this issue,’’ said House Speaker John Boehner, Republican of Ohio, calling the abortion legislation one of his top priorities. “I think the will of the people is that we enact this clear-cut prohibition on the use of taxpayer funds for elective abortions.’’
“The tree is rotten, so you have to cut it down,’’ said Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp, Republican of Michigan. “If we can’t do that all at once, prune it branch by branch.’’
Among other health care issues getting immediate attention from Republicans: curbs on jury awards in medical malpractice cases, rescinding an unpopular requirement that businesses report purchases of $600 or more to the IRS, and a rollback of cuts to private Medicare Advantage plans.
Yesterday, the House voted 253-175 along party lines to instruct committees to begin the work of replacing what Republicans dismiss as “Obamacare.’’
The GOP move on abortion puts ideology ahead of pocketbook issues, said Representative Rosa DeLauro, Democrat of Connecticut, a leader on women’s rights.
“These are folks who came to town saying they’d create jobs and get the economy back on track,’’ DeLauro said of the new Republican majority. “This legislation goes far beyond current law. Given the opportunity to govern, they are once again trying to deny women’s access to abortion.’’
Federal law prohibits federal funding for abortion, except in cases of rape or incest or to save the life of the mother. Known as the Hyde amendment, that basic prohibition is incorporated in many laws and generally has to be renewed annually in spending bills.
The health law created a stream of federal funding for patient care: tax credits to subsidize private insurance coverage for people participating in new state marketplaces called “exchanges.’’ They open for business in 2014.
Since abortion is widely covered by private insurers, advocates on both sides of the issue mobilized.
Abortion opponents sought to impose the Hyde amendment on plans offering coverage through the exchanges. Abortion rights supporters said that would have the effect of taking away access to a legal medical procedure now available to privately insured women.
The law struck a compromise that divided abortion opponents and displeased most abortion-rights supporters.
It allowed plans in the exchanges to cover abortions, provided they collect a separate premium from policy holders and that money is kept apart from federal subsidies received by the plans.
It also allowed individual states to ban abortion coverage in their exchanges and provided that there would be at least one plan in every state that does not cover abortions. Obama issued an executive order reaffirming longstanding restrictions on abortion coverage.
Nonetheless, many abortion opponents saw a backdoor opening.
“We are setting up a funding scheme to pay for abortions,’’ said Representative Chris Smith, Republican of New Jersey and sponsor of one of the two bills introduced yesterday.
Both bills would forbid plans in the exchanges from covering abortions. However, women could purchase a separate policy to cover the procedure.
Smith’s legislation would make the Hyde amendment permanent and apply it across all government programs.
A separate measure, by Representative Joe Pitts, Republican of Pennsylvania, would apply the Hyde restrictions to the new health care law. Energy and Commerce Chairman Fred Upton, Republican of Michigan, said it would get priority consideration.