Secrecy on Medicare cost called legal
Much higher figure kept from Congress
WASHINGTON -- Bush administration officials broke no laws in withholding from Congress estimates of the cost of the new Medicare law, says an internal investigation made public yesterday.
The Health and Human Services Department inspector general, the agency's internal watchdog, said its three-month investigation found that administration officials used aggressive tactics to keep from Congress its much higher estimates of the legislation's cost -- $100 billion more than the president and other officials were acknowledging.
Yet the effort -- including threats by Thomas Scully, the administration's Medicare chief until December, to fire Richard Foster, the chief Medicare actuary -- did not violate federal law, the inspector general said.
Scully, the administrator of the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, ''has the final authority to determine the flow of information to Congress," the unsigned report said.
That conclusion contradicted the findings of the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service, which in May said that threats against Foster designed to keep him from giving Democratic lawmakers his projections of the bill's cost probably broke the law. The Justice Department, in an opinion attached to yesterday's report, said CRS was wrong.
Bill Pierce, an HHS spokesman, said yesterday's report showed the administration acted properly.
Democrats, however, said the inspector general's report underscores the need for an independent investigation.
The various investigations highlight the trouble the Bush administration has had in promoting the new Medicare prescription drug law, thought to be an election-year boon for the GOP. In addition, the law's first widely available tangible benefit, the Medicare-approved discount drug card program, has gotten off to a slow, confusing start.
The Associated Press reported a year ago that Scully threatened to fire Foster if Foster released his calculations to Democrats. Scully said his comments were ''heated rhetoric in middle of the night."
But the matter took on a new life when the administration projected in the budget it submitted to Congress in January that the 10-year cost of the bill would be $534 billion, instead of the $395 billion estimate used in writing the legislation.
