THIS STORY HAS BEEN FORMATTED FOR EASY PRINTING

Senate OK's expanded wiretap power

Measure also gives telecoms immunity

Email|Print|Single Page| Text size + By Eric Lichtblau
New York Times News Service / July 10, 2008

WASHINGTON - The Senate gave final approval yesterday to a major expansion of the government's surveillance powers, handing President Bush another victory in a series of hard-fought clashes with Democrats over national security issues.

The measure, approved by a vote of 69 to 28, marks the biggest restructuring of federal surveillance law in 30 years. It includes a divisive element that Bush had deemed essential: legal immunity for the phone companies that cooperated in the National Security Agency wiretapping program he approved after the Sept. 11 attacks.

The vote was taken 2 1/2 years after public disclosure of the wiretapping program set off a fierce national debate over the balance between protecting the country from another terrorist strike and ensuring civil liberties. The final outcome in Congress, which opponents of the surveillance measure had acknowledged for weeks, seemed almost anticlimactic in contrast.

Bush, appearing in the Rose Garden just after his return from Japan, called the vote "long overdue."

He promised to quickly sign the measure into law, saying it was critical to national security and showed that "even in an election year, we can come together and get important pieces of legislation passed."

Even as his political stature has waned, Bush has managed to maintain his dominance on national security issues over a Democratic-led Congress. He has beat back efforts to cut troops and financing in Iraq, and he has won important victories on issues like interrogation tactics and military tribunals in the fight against terrorism.

Debate over the surveillance law was the one area where Democrats had held firm in opposition. House Democrats went so far as to allow a temporary surveillance measure to expire in February, leading to a five-month impasse and prompting allegations from Bush that the nation's defenses against another strike by Al Qaeda had been weakened.

But in the end Bush won out, as administration officials helped forge a deal between Republican and Democratic leaders that included almost all the major elements the White House wanted. The measure gives the executive branch broader latitude in eavesdropping on people abroad and at home who it believes are tied to terrorism, and it reduces the role of a secret intelligence court in overseeing some operations.

Supporters maintained that the plan includes enough safeguards to protect Americans' civil liberties, including reviews by several inspectors general. There is nothing to fear in the bill, said Senator Christopher S. Bond, a Republican of Missouri who was a lead negotiator, "unless you have Al Qaeda on your speed dial."

But some Democratic opponents saw the deal as capitulation to White House pressure by fellow Democrats.

The final plan, which restructures the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act passed by Congress in 1978 in the wake of Watergate, reflected both political reality and legal practicality, supporters said.

Wiretapping orders approved by secret orders under the previous version of the surveillance law were set to begin expiring in August unless Congress acted. Heading into their political convention in Denver next month and on to the November congressional elections, many Democrats were wary of handing the Republicans a potent political weapon.

The issue put Senator Barack Obama, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, in a particularly precarious spot. He had long opposed giving legal immunity to the phone companies that took part in the NSA's wiretapping program, even threatening a filibuster during his run for the nomination. But yesterday, he ended up voting for what he called "an improved but imperfect bill" after backing a failed attempt earlier in the day to strip the immunity provision from the bill.

  • Email
  • Email
  • Print
  • Print
  • Single page
  • Single page
  • Reprints
  • Reprints
  • Share
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Comment
 
  • Share on DiggShare on Digg
  • Tag with Del.icio.us Save this article
  • powered by Del.icio.us
Your Name Your e-mail address (for return address purposes) E-mail address of recipients (separate multiple addresses with commas) Name and both e-mail fields are required.
Message (optional)
Disclaimer: Boston.com does not share this information or keep it permanently, as it is for the sole purpose of sending this one time e-mail.