THIS STORY HAS BEEN FORMATTED FOR EASY PRINTING
Political Notebook

President moves to reverse policy on mercury pollution

February 7, 2009
  • Email|
  • Print|
  • Single Page|
  • |
Text size +

WASHINGTON - The Obama administration signaled yesterday that it will seek more stringent controls on mercury pollution from the nation's power plants, abandoning a Bush administration approach that the industry supported.

The Justice Department yesterday submitted papers to the Supreme Court to dismiss the Bush administration's appeal of a lower court ruling striking down its plan to allow some power plants to release more mercury pollution than others. That would create localized "hot spots" where concentrations are higher, states and environmental groups argued.

The Environmental Protection Agency said it would begin crafting a new rule limiting mercury emissions from power plants, which are the biggest source of mercury, which finds its way into the food supply. It is commonly found in high concentrations in fish. Mercury can damage developing brains of fetuses and very young children.

Representatives of the utility industry said that a new rule would further delay cleanup of mercury and cost more than the Bush proposal.

"From an environmental perspective, the thing that is a real shame about all this is, had the court left the mercury rule in place we would have had much greater mercury reductions at a lower cost," said Jeff Holmstead, head of the Environmental Strategies Group at the law firm Bracewell & Giuliani, which represents power producers.

ASSOCIATED PRESS

Obama's order pushes project labor agreements
WASHINGTON - President Obama issued an executive order yesterday backing the use of union labor for large-scale federal construction projects, the fourth union-friendly order he has signed in three weeks in office.

The order encourages federal agencies to have construction contractors enter project labor agreements. Those agreements require contractors to negotiate with union officials, recognize union wages and benefits, and abide by collective bargaining agreements. Obama's order restores a Clinton administration rule that was rescinded by President George W. Bush.

Stephen Sandherr, chief executive officer of the Associated General Contractors of America, said in a statement that the order "has the unfortunate potential to limit contractors' ability to compete for projects at a time when the government is reporting that over one million construction workers have lost their jobs" and that his group will "strongly encourage officials to exercise the discretion this order provides and avoid government-mandated labor agreements."

ASSOCIATED PRESS

Unions criticize GOP over inaction on Solis
WASHINGTON - Labor unions accused Republicans of seizing on questions about unpaid taxes to stall the confirmation of Labor Secretary nominee Hilda Solis because they dislike her policies.

The nation's largest labor federation, the AFL-CIO, along with other unions and women's and Hispanic groups, began calling and writing lawmakers yesterday, urging them to confirm the California congresswoman.

"Enough is enough," AFL-CIO president John Sweeney said, warning GOP senators "to stop obstructing and confirm Rep. Solis now."

Solis's nomination had already been delayed for nearly a month when a newspaper reported Thursday that unpaid tax liens on a California auto-repair business owned by Solis's husband were settled this week for about $6,400. That led Democratic and Republican leaders of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee to postpone a vote on her nomination.

ASSOCIATED PRESS

  • Email
  • Email
  • Print
  • Print
  • Single page
  • Single page
  • Reprints
  • Reprints
  • Share
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Comment
 
  • Share on DiggShare on Digg
  • Tag with Del.icio.us Save this article
  • powered by Del.icio.us
Your Name Your e-mail address (for return address purposes) E-mail address of recipients (separate multiple addresses with commas) Name and both e-mail fields are required.
Message (optional)
Disclaimer: Boston.com does not share this information or keep it permanently, as it is for the sole purpose of sending this one time e-mail.