THIS STORY HAS BEEN FORMATTED FOR EASY PRINTING

Homeland Security readies tracking plan

Program would screen foreigners departing by plane

By Spencer S. Hsu
Washington Post / November 9, 2009

E-mail this article

Invalid E-mail address
Invalid E-mail address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

  • E-mail|
  • Print|
  • Reprints|
  • |
Text size +

WASHINGTON - The Department of Homeland Security is finalizing a proposal to collect fingerprints or eye scans from all foreign travelers at US airports as they leave the country, officials said, a costly screening program that airlines have opposed.

The plan, which would take effect within two years, would collect fingerprints at airport security checkpoints, departure gates, or terminal kiosks, allowing the government to track when roughly 35 million foreign visitors a year leave the country and who might be overstaying their visas, Homeland Security officials said.

The department plans to send the proposal to the White House as soon as next month for review and inclusion in President Obama’s next budget.

Some experts and former government officials are skeptical. In a concession to industry, Homeland Security said it probably will drop plans to require airlines to pay for the bulk of the program and is looking to cut costs, which could reach $1 billion to $2 billion over a decade, largely to be paid by taxpayers or foreign travelers. In addition, the program would not operate for now at land borders, where 80 percent of noncitizens enter and leave the country, because fingerprinting travelers there could cost billions more and significantly delay commerce.

The ultimate scope of the system - how rigorous it is and its price tag - will signal how the Obama administration and a Democratic Congress balance expensive security mandates against the nation’s financial constraints. Congress might have to reexamine the value of border controls that a few years ago were deemed critical for security and for curbing illegal immigration but that might be less effective than first thought or carry unpopular economic or diplomatic costs, they added.

“It will be up to Congress to put its money where its mandate is,’’ a senior Homeland Security official said, outlining the plans on condition of anonymity because Secretary Janet Napolitano has not made a final decision. “The administration and Congress have to decide how they want to implement this in times of budget austerity.’’

Dianne Feinstein, a Democratic senator from California and a prominent supporter of the tracking requirement, said she was pleased with Homeland Security’s “long overdue’’ move.

“A biometric exit system is critical to tracking the arrival and departure of foreign nationals - not just through a paper trail, but through fingerprints, photographs, and other fraud-proof biometric identifiers,’’ Feinstein said in an e-mail statement.

The Homeland Security proposal marks the latest government step to satisfy a 1996 mandate by Congress to automatically track when foreigners enter and exit the country. Independent analysts have estimated that 40 percent of illegal immigrants enter the country legally and overstay their visas.

When the Bush administration unveiled a $3.5 billion tracking program in April 2008, air carriers protested they had not been consulted and should not bear the bulk of the liability and cost of what they argued was the government’s duty to fingerprint travelers. The requirement also bucked industry trends of cutting costs by automating boarding processes and moving passengers away from ticket counters.

Homeland Security officials accused airlines of obstructing the proposal. In the end, industry lobbyists persuaded Congress to delay the plan until tests were completed this year. Industry leaders said they still hope the administration consults them.