Jake Suski, a spokesman for the committee supporting the proposition, said it’s not about the balance of power in Sacramento.
‘‘It creates a playing field where the individual voter has a bigger voice in the political process,’’ rather than unions or corporations, he said.
Recent independent polls found the proposal trailing, but many voters remain undecided.
Left-leaning California would seem an unlikely state to challenge labor.
Business interests — led by railroad magnates — held a lock on Sacramento lawmakers into the early 20th century, but that began to change during the Progressive Era when reformers sought to curb government corruption and corporate power. The state is the birthplace of the farm workers union, and a dock strike in the 1930s led to the unionization of ports across the West.
Jaime Regalado, former executive director of the Pat Brown Institute of Public Affairs at California State University, Los Angeles, said while there has been some backlash over union benefits he doesn’t see the labor conflict witnessed in other states taking hold in California. State polls have found routinely that corporations tend to be viewed more negatively than unions.
Compared to more conservative states ‘‘it’s going to be a much harder sell,’’ Regalado said. ‘‘It doesn’t mirror what we are seeing in the Midwest. It’s not a hostile climate here.’’
Follow Michael R. Blood at http://twitter.com/MichaelRBloodAP .