A substantial number of GOP lawmakers, however, strongly oppose deep military spending cuts.
Republicans’ continued stand against higher tax rates for the wealthy bewilders some Democrats, who say last month’s presidential election should have settled the matter. But most House Republicans come from districts where they won re-election easily, and Obama lost to Mitt Romney.
The only realistic way these GOP lawmakers can lose future elections is by being ousted in a Republican primary by a hard-right challenger who vows to be even less compromising with Democrats. Their instincts for self-preservation are stronger than their inclinations to protect the Republican Party’s overall image.
Rep. Lynn Westmoreland, a Georgia Republican who was among the first to join the tea party caucus in 2010, said the idea that reaching a compromise will be easier after Jan. 1 is ‘‘certainly being discussed over breakfasts and lunches and dinners’’ in Washington.
‘‘Some people don’t believe the fiscal cliff is going to be as bad as what they say,’’ he said, referring to economists and administration officials.
Westmoreland said he opposes any tax increase ‘‘until we stop spending.’’ He said he might support higher government revenues if they are packaged with serious spending cuts.
‘‘That’s a lot to ask for’’ between now and Dec. 31, he said.