Clinton calls for Bhutto investigation

Huckabee followers I don't know if you have read this

Bolton denies he is a Huckabee adviser
By: Lisa Lerer
December 28, 2007 05:24 PM EST

In recent days, Mike Huckabee has tried to answer long-standing questions about who is on his foreign policy team. On Friday morning, he listed former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton as someone with whom he either has “spoken or will continue to speak.”

At a Thursday evening press conference, Huckabee said, "I've corresponded with John Bolton, who's agreed to work with us on developing foreign policy.”

Bolton, however, has a different view. “I’d be happy to speak with Huckabee, but I haven’t spoken with him yet,” said Bolton, now a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank in Washington.

“I’m not an official or unofficial adviser to anyone,” said Bolton, who mentioned he’d had conversations with other Republican candidates but refused to name any names.

Asked to explain Bolton’s comments, Huckabee aides said the former Arkansas governor had e-mailed with Bolton. Bolton did not immediately respond to a request to address Huckabee’s e-mailing claims.

Huckabee said he’d also spoken with former State Department official Richard Haass (now president of the Council on Foreign Relations); military analyst Ken Allard; former National Security Adviser Richard Allen; former House Speaker Newt Gingrich; Frank Gaffney, founder of the Center for Security Policy, a conservative think tank; and a “number of military personnel.”

A Gingrich spokesman said the two men had spoken, on an unofficial basis, on Friday.

Council on Foreign Relations spokeswoman Lisa Shields said Haass has “briefed Huckabee on foreign policy issues as well as [briefing] many other candidates” in both parties. Shields stressed that the relationship was not exclusive and that Haass was not affiliated with the campaign.

Allard, Allen and Gaffney could not be immediately reached for comment.

Huckabee argues that foreign policy is less about experience and more about judgment. “The most important thing a president does is to make tough decisions when confronted with a crisis,” he said Friday. “[As a governor], you’ve dealt with the unexpected, a crisis, time and time again.”

The confusion over Bolton, however, is the latest in a growing list of foreign policy hiccups by the Iowa front-runner. And to succeed nationally, Huckabee must broaden support beyond his socially conservative base by proving his competency on issues such as national security.

On Thursday, he commented on the assassination of former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, saying the U.S. needs to consider “what impact does it have on whether or not there’s going to be martial law continuing in Pakistan.” Martial law, as it turns out, was lifted two weeks ago.

Huckabee clarified the point later that day. "What I said was, you know, it was not that I was unaware that it was suspended two weeks ago, or lifted two weeks ago. The point was continued: ... Would it be reinstated? Would it be placed back in?" he said.

Huckabee also raised eyebrows Thursday when he said that Bhutto’s death should prompt “an immediate, very clear monitoring of our borders and particularly to make sure if there's any unusual activity of Pakistanis coming into the country.”

And earlier this month, Huckabee said he was unfamiliar with the National Intelligence Estimate reporting that Iran hadn’t had a program to develop nuclear weapons since 2003.

Huckabee’s lack of foreign policy experience has fueled a host of critics. On Thursday, rival Sen. John McCain of Arizona said Bhutto’s assassination highlights Huckabee’s lack of foreign policy experience.

"You know, I don't think it's appropriate to respond in political way," Huckabee said.

Last week, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice denounced Huckabee’s critique of the Bush administration as having a "bunker mentality" when it comes to foreign policy.

"The idea that somehow this is a go-it-alone policy is just simply ludicrous," she said at a State Department news conference. "One would only have to be not observing the facts, let me say that, to say that this is now a go-it-alone foreign policy."

TM & © THE POLITICO & POLITICO.COM, a division of Allbritton Communications Company

Is she stupid or what? Her suggestion shows how wrong headed her approach is when it comes to foreign policy. She is another Bush when it comes to foreign policy. Pakistani government will never agree to any international probe and Musharraf will despise her for making this suggestion. If she is elected president good luck in getting any kind of cooperation from him.

Is she stupid or what? Her suggestion shows how wrong headed her approach is when it comes to foreign policy. She is another Bush when it comes to foreign policy. Pakistani government will never agree to any international probe and Musharraf will despise her for making this suggestion. If she is elected president good luck in getting any kind of cooperation from him.

Hillary Clinton is calling for an independent, international investigation into Benazir Bhutto’s assassination. Hillary is not saying the US should do it, she is saying independent, international investigation Like the UN. Do we realy care if Musharraf will despise her. No He wants our money so if she is elected president he will do it. We know he is bad and he is playing games with us so lets call him on this what is he hiding. I think it is a good call on Hillarys part.

Hillary Clinton is calling for an independent, international investigation into Benazir Bhutto’s assassination. Hillary is not saying the US should do it, she is saying independent, international investigation Like the UN. Do we realy care if Musharraf will despise her. No He wants our money so if she is elected president he will do it. We know he is bad and he is playing games with us so lets call him on this what is he hiding. I think it is a good call on Hillarys part.

I think you have to be a fool to think that a country will accept foreign interference in its internal affairs. Do you think the United States will accept such an offer? No, because it will be seen as a compromise on country’s sovereignty. Pakistan has always been very protective of its sovereignty and will never accept UN led probe into a political assassination. It was pretty naïve on Hillary’s part to call for international investigation.
It’s a poor effort show herself as some sort of foreign policy expert. Antagonizing Musharaaf will only lessen his already lukewarm cooperation. The fact that his cooperation is lukewarm at best shows that US money has only so much pull.
Also, to think that a new person will be better for the United States is again naïve. It is a power struggle going on there between old rivals and the best approach for the new US president would be to stay clear of it.

I think you have to be a fool to think that a country will accept foreign interference in its internal affairs. Do you think the United States will accept such an offer? No, because it will be seen as a compromise on country’s sovereignty. Pakistan has always been very protective of its sovereignty and will never accept UN led probe into a political assassination. It was pretty naïve on Hillary’s part to call for international investigation.
It’s a poor effort show herself as some sort of foreign policy expert. Antagonizing Musharaaf will only lessen his already lukewarm cooperation. The fact that his cooperation is lukewarm at best shows that US money has only so much pull.
Also, to think that a new person will be better for the United States is again naïve. It is a power struggle going on there between old rivals and the best approach for the new US president would be to stay clear of it.