Text size +

Candidates applaud Castro's resignation

Posted by Foon Rhee, deputy national political editor February 19, 2008 05:41 PM

The presidential contenders are weighing in on the resignation of Fidel Castro, saying that it opens the door to more movement toward democracy in Cuba -- and that the US should be at the ready to assist that progress.

Republican John McCain issued a statement saying the move "is nearly half a century overdue."

"For decades, Castro oversaw an apparatus of repression that denied liberty to the people who suffered under his dictatorship," McCain continued. "Yet freedom for the Cuban people is not yet at hand, and the Castro brothers clearly intend to maintain their grip on power. That is why we must press the Cuban regime to release all political prisoners unconditionally, to legalize all political parties, labor unions and free media, and to schedule internationally monitored elections.

'Cuba's transition to democracy is inevitable; it is a matter of when – not if. With the resignation of Fidel Castro, the Cuban people have an opportunity to move forward and continue pushing for the moment that they will truly be free. America can and should help hasten the sparking of freedom in Cuba. The Cuban people have waited long enough."

UPDATE: GOP rival Mike Huckabee issued a statement that called for "free and fair elections, which would provide the only hope for a prosperous and democratic Cuba.

"Until Fidel Castro is dead, there can be no significant movement towards reform in Cuba," Huckabee added. "Raul Castro has proven that he's as much a tyrant and dictator as his brother Fidel. Simply providing more power to another dictator does nothing to promote freedom and democracy to the Cuban people."

Democrat Barack Obama said Castro's departure "should mark the end of a dark era in Cuba's history."

"Fidel Castro's stepping down is an essential first step, but it is sadly insufficient in bringing freedom to Cuba," Obama said in a statement. "Cuba's future should be determined by the Cuban people and not by an anti-democratic successor regime. The prompt release of all prisoners of conscience wrongly jailed for standing up for the basic freedoms too long denied to the Cuban people would mark an important break with the past. It's time for these heroes to be released.

"If the Cuban leadership begins opening Cuba to meaningful democratic change, the United States must be prepared to begin taking steps to normalize relations and to ease the embargo of the last five decades. The freedom of the Cuban people is a cause that should bring the Americans together."

Democratic rival Hillary Clinton pledged that if she were elected president, she would work with partners in Latin American and Europe to do "everything possible to advance the cause of freedom, democracy and opportunity in Cuba."

"The new leadership in Cuba will face a stark choice -- continue with the failed policies of the past that have stifled democratic freedoms and stunted economic growth -- or take a historic step to bring Cuba into the community of democratic nations. The people of Cuba want to seize this opportunity for real change and so must we," she said in a statement.

"I would say to the new leadership, the people of the United States are ready to meet you if you move forward towards the path of democracy, with real, substantial reforms. The people of Cuba yearn for the opportunity to get out from under the weight of this authoritarian regime, which has held back 11 million talented and hardworking citizens of the Americas. The new government should take this opportunity to release political prisoners and to take serious steps towards democracy that give their people a real voice in their government.

"The American people have been on the side in the Cuban people's struggle for freedom and democracy in the past and we will be on their side for democracy in the future."

5 comments so far...
  1. Why do americans think everyone should thnk as they do?

    Posted by whoam I February 19, 08 12:27 PM
    Reply | Report this post
  1. Americans think everyone should think as they do because most Americans haven't traveled outside the US (or even much within it), to know that different people have different background, live in different environments, and have different values.

    You can't get this by watching television all day long, no matter which channels are on the tube.

    Posted by Alan February 19, 08 12:58 PM
    Reply | Report this post
  1. Obviously, US administrations and corporations could care less if there is a functioning democracy in Cuba. The US implemented the embargo because a revolutionary uprising overthrew the US-backed puppet in place and put Castro in power. Unable to exploit Cuban resources and people with Castro in power, the US turned towards collective punishment. Once again, the US has never cared about the welfare of the Cuban people, only the exploitation of Cuban land and resources.

    Posted by Bill February 19, 08 04:40 PM
    Reply | Report this post
  1. For nearly 50 years Cuba has been ruled by a dictator that has deprived his people of the basic liberties and freedoms that we take for granted here in the US. If you happen to think that way of life is great, so be it, but I would bet you anything you wouldn't want to live there yourself or have your children grow up in that type of system.

    The truth of the matter is that the US really doesn't do anything to change things in Cuba. The rhetoric from all the candidates (including the hard line Republicans) has never led to any change in nearly 5 decades. No one really has the answer to how and when true changes will take place. Don't blame the embargo and don't rely on the empty promises of our presidential candidates. They are all anti-Castro and anti-communist now, but once in the White House, nothing ever happens. It is a shame...

    Posted by Alberto February 19, 08 06:39 PM
    Reply | Report this post
  1. Democracy is no panacea. Hitler came to power fair and square in a parliamentary democracy. Hugo Chavez, while not in the same class as Hitler, was also freely and fairly elected, as were George W. Bush and Dick Cheney (at least we think so). Democracy is easily subverted, leading to the likes of Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe. A good democracy is better than anything else, but I'll take a benign monarch over a democratically elected but evil leader any day.

    Posted by lnmonster February 19, 08 06:40 PM
    Reply | Report this post
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About political intelligence Field reports from Boston Globe reporters and editors covering the 2008 presidential campaign and the national maneuvering of Bay State politicians.

Send your comments to masspolitics@globe.com

archives

browse this blog

by category