Text size +

Clinton camp says Obama's rhetoric "isn't his own"

Posted by James F. Smith February 18, 2008 08:19 PM

By Susan Milligan, Globe staff

YOUNGSTOWN, Ohio -- Taking aim at one of Illinois Senator Barack Obama's greatest campaign strengths -- his ability to move voters with a powerful speech -- Senator Hillary Clinton's campaign has accused Obama of plagiarizing words from his friend and political ally, Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick.

"Senator Obama is running on the strength of his rhetoric and the strength of his promises and, as we have seen in the last couple of days, he's breaking his promises and his rhetoric isn't his own," Howard Wolfson, Clinton's communications director, told reporters in a conference call on Monday.

Obama, as the Boston Globe detailed in an article in April 2007, has periodically used themes and even direct lines that echo speeches by Patrick, including the one cited by Clinton's campaign. Obama's campaign manager, David Axelrod, also worked closely with Patrick in his successful effort to become the Bay State's first African-American governor in 2006.

Obama used Patrick language again recently, remarking at a Milwaukee dinner on Saturday night that it was not true that ``words don't matter.''

```I have a dream' -- just words? 'We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal' -- just words?"' Obama said at the event in Wisconsin, which holds a primary today. Those lines -- referring to a famous speech by civil rights leader Martin Luther King and the US Declaration of Independence -- are very similar to words Patrick uttered during his 2006 campaign.

Patrick, who has endorsed Obama and is campaigning for him, yesterday shrugged off the controversy as insignificant, while Obama acknowledged that he should have credited his Massachusetts friend but added that he and Patrick agreed not only on many issues but on the language to describe them..

``Senator Obama and I are long-time friends and allies. We often share ideas about politics, policy and language," Patrick said in the statement. "The argument in question, on the value of words in the public square, is one about which he and I have spoken frequently before. Given the recent attacks from Senator Clinton, I applaud him responding in just the way he did.''

Obama said Patrick was aware of his use of the governor's verbiage.

"I was on the stump. He had suggested that we use these lines and I thought they were good lines," Obama told reporters on a trip to Ohio before returning to Wisconsin.

Further, Obama added, the New York senator has borrowed from him as well, including a couple of his signature phrases.

"I really don't think this is too big of a deal," Obama said. "When Senator Clinton says 'It's time to turn the page' in one of her stump speeches or says she's 'fired up and ready to go,' I don't think that anybody suggests that she's not focused on the issues that she's focused on."

Politicians commonly pick up on each other's themes and even words -- especially if they see the approach is working. Former Nebraska Senator Bob Kerrey was an early proponent of health care reform in 1992, but it was Bill Clinton who developed the idea into a central campaign theme and won his race in large part because of it.

While Obama hasmade ``change'' a buzzword of his campaign, Clinton, along with former North Carolina Senator John Edwards and Republicans Mitt Romney, John McCain and Mike Huckabee, have thrown around the popular word on the trail.

The Clinton campaign's accusation comes at a time when the two colleagues are locked in a close battle for the nomination. Obama is favored to win today's contest in Hawaii, where he grew up, while polls in Wisconsin's Democratic race show a smaller lead for the Illinois senator.

Both campaigns are fighting hard ahead of the march 4 contests in Ohio, Texas, Rhode Island and Vermont. Clinton, who has won a strong majority of low-income voters in most primaries, is believed by political analysts to have an edge in Ohio, which is struggling economically. Clinton's popularity among Latinos also gives her an edge in Texas, although a poll released yesterday showed her just two percentage points ahead of Obama.

The Illinois lawmaker yesterday dismissed charges that he was -- as Clinton put it at a Texas rally last week -- ``all hat and no cattle,'' saying he has been able to energize new voters with his speeches.

``I make no apologies for being able to talk good,'' Obama told a crowd of about 6,000 at Youngstown State University, drawing chuckles at what was apparently a deliberate grammatical error.

Obama repeated his stump speech line about being labeled a ``hope-monger,'' but before the Youngstown crowd, he made an admission: ``Actually, I made up the hope-mongering,'' Obama said, owning up to embellishing the criticism of his campaign theme.

1 comments so far...
  1. The Clinton camp's desperation and do-anything-to-win mentality again serves up another bogus charge against Barack Obama, one also delivered from a [seemingly] ethical high ground. This time the charge is that Obama plagarized words his friend and supporter Gov. Deval Patrick used, and later suggested Obama use. This truly is a tempest in a teapot. We can expect more of the same: grasping at straws by slinging mud, and hoping a gullible populace will help make it stick.

    Moreover, the Clinton camp's heavy-handed and ominous warnings that in a dangerous world rhetoric is the only tangible Obama has to offer his country (and the world) is a grave disservice--not only to his years of community organizing, law school, teaching of Constitutional law, and accomplishments and experience as a state and U.S. senator, but also to the millions of people who support him.

    Obama supporters are not anti-female idiots. I, myself, am a feminist. To me feminism means we have more choices, not less. And this also means I won't be dictated to by any group--including that of other women.

    We do our research before we vote: we have read material from the candidates' websites, have watched 18 debates, heard many speeches and read many articles. We have discussed these with our friends, family and co-workers. We are individual citizens, not part of an impressionable mass under the sway of a stump speech or the charisma of its speaker.

    The character, courage, integrity, reason and healthy debate shown by Obama on many issues (such as the war in Iraq) before and during a campaign are as important as after the election. In short, they are a predictor of what kind of president we deserve and elect to represent the best in us.

    Posted by Patricia Bull February 19, 08 01:56 PM
    Reply | Report this post
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About political intelligence Field reports from Boston Globe reporters and editors covering the 2008 presidential campaign and the national maneuvering of Bay State politicians.

Send your comments to masspolitics@globe.com

archives

browse this blog

by category