Text size
–
+
Clinton looks ahead to Pennsylvania
Email|Link|Comments (3)
Posted by Foon Rhee, deputy national political editor
March 11, 2008 09:40 PM
Hillary Clinton's campaign issued a terse statement tonight after Barack Obama's win in the Mississippi primary.
"We congratulate Senator Obama for his win in Mississippi and thank our supporters and volunteers there for their support, hard work, and long hours," campaign manager Maggie Williams said in a statement. "Now we look forward to campaigning in Pennsylvania and around the country as this campaign continues."







With the record number of new, independent and crossover voters turning out for this year's Democratic Party presidential caucuses and primaries, one would think that Party bigwigs would be gleeful at the prospect of winning the presidency.
However Democratic Party bigwigs, like the Clintons and the opposition Republican Party, fear the change that Barack Obama represents.
Instead of using fear, division and rancor as a instrument to maintaim personal power and position, Barack Obama offers confidence, unity and reason as a means for governing.
The only thing between a landslide victory for the Democratic Party and Barack Obama in November are the Clintons and Democratic Party bigwigs.
As a Republican leaning independent voter, I will support John McCain if Hillary Clinton is on the Democratic ticket.
The Clintons would have us believe that Hillary and Bill have been thoroughly vetted. If this were true, then why don't we have answers for:
FOREIGN CLIENTS: How will Hillary know whether Bill's advice serves U.S. interests or the interests of his Russian, Chinese, Indian, Kazakhstan, Dubai, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman or Brunei clients?
MONEY: Do the tax records for the Clintons and the Clinton Foundation, Clinton Library and Clinton campaign show a proper accounting for the funds received for the Clintons' private purposes versus charitable, public and political purposes?
PARDONS: Will Hillary "reject" contributions or compensation from persons she pardons unlike her husband Bill who accepted contributions from Marc Rich, partner of Viktor Bout (the merchant of death), and her brother Hugh Rodham who accepted compensation from drug lords who were pardoned by Bill?
Hillary and Bill Clinton have made a significant issue about how the press is treating Hillary unfairly in their hyper-critical reporting on her and their “softball” reporting on Barak Obama. Hillary maintains she has been fully investigated by the media and Barak hasn’t!
As the Tony Rezko trial begins in Chicago, Clinton and her surrogates are linking Obama to Rezko and the media is speculating about whether Obama will be called to testify as a witness in the case. Obama has always admitted he received $85,000 in contributions from Rezko which Obama has now donated to charity rather than keep.
Yet the civil fraud trial of Bill Clinton for defrauduing Hillary’s largest donor in 2000 into giving her campaign more than $1.2 million, pending in Los Angeles courts since 2003, is now preparing for a November, 2008 trial. The discovery that is now proceeding after a February 21 hearing, and the pending trial, have NEVER been announced by the mainstream media.
Hillary was able to extricate herself as a co-defendant in the case in January, 2008 after years of appeals to be protected by the First Amendment from tort claims arising out of federal campaign solicitations she made. Her abuse of the intent of California’s anti-SLAPP law after the California Supreme Court refused to dismiss her from the case in 2004 is emblematic of her contempt for the Rule of Law.
Hillary will be called as a witness in both discovery and the trial according to the trial court Judge who so-advised Hillary’s attorney David Kendall when he dismissed Hillary as a co-defendant in 2007. A subpoena is being prepared this month and will be served personally on Hillary, along with Chelsea, Pa Gov. Ed Rendell, Al Gore and other well known political and media figures.
Yet the media has refused to report about this landmark civil fraud case- brought by Hillary’s biggest 2000 donor to her Senate race, regarding allegations that were corroborated by the Department of Justice in the criminal trial of Hillary’s finance director David Rosen in May, 2005. That indictment and trial was credited as resulting from the civil suit’s allegations by Peter Paul, the Hollywood dot com millionaire Bill Clinton convinced to donate more than $1.2 million (according to the DOJ prosecutors and the FBI) to Hillary’s Senate campaign as part of a post White House business deal with Bill.
The media - except for World Net Daily- has also suspiciously refused to report on Hillary’s last FEC report regarding her 2000 Senate campaign, filed in January 30, 2006. In a secret settlement of an FEC complaint by the plaintiff in Paul v Clinton, Peter Paul, the FEC fined Hillary’s campaign $35,000 for hiding more than $720,000 in donations from Paul, and it required Hillary’s campaign to file a 4th amended FEC report.
In that report Hillary and her campaign again hid Paul’s $1.2 million contribution to her campaign and falsely attributed $250,000 as being donated by Paul’s partner, Spider Man creator Stan Lee, who swore in a video taped deposition he never gave Hillary or her campaign any money.
Lee did testify to trading $100,000 checks with Paul to make it appear he gave $100,000 to Hillary’s campaign (admission of a felony) but none of that has been reported by the “overly critical” media!
Where is the outrage from Obama that the press is engaging in a double standard relating to his possible role in the Rezko trial and his refunding the $85,000 contributed to his campaign by Rezko- which Obama has always admitted taking. The media makes no mention of Hillary’s role as a witness in Bill’s fraud trial for defrauding Hillary’s largest donor- and Hillary’s refusal to refund the $1.2 million she illegally received from Paul, which she has denied taking from Paul ever since the Washington Post asked her about Paul and his felony convictions from the 1970’s before her first Senate election in 2000?
visit hillcap.org for more info
One would hope that Clinton haters would take a look at Fox News.com today.
Read the story of Obama Controversial Pastor Puts Church In Hot Water. Make sure you read entire artical. Then click on Related Stories. Obama Talks religion.
If you say you will vote McCain if Hillary is nominated dust off your Republican voting finger because if you think Obama is going to be Great for this country after reading these stories you should be ashamed of your self.
When you read the related stories I would like you to pay special attention to the bold print. It will tell you what Obama said to a Carolina Church.
However please first read Wrights comparison to how Obama's life is like Jesus's was to the Romans. Hummmmm.
This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.
Send your comments to masspolitics@globe.com
browse this blog
by category