Clinton, Obama camps go at it
Let's get ready to rumble!
Actually, the war of words between the Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama campaigns is already ratcheting up today.
Hitting back at Clinton after her attacks helped her revive her presidential hopes with wins in Ohio and Texas on Tuesday, Obama's camp on Wednesday questioned why she hadn't released her income tax returns, asking what she was hiding.
The Clinton camp responded by referring to Tony Rezko, the former Obama fund-raiser on trial on unrelated federal corruption charges.
This morning, it peddled a video of Susan Rice, an Obama foreign policy adviser defending him against a Clinton TV ad in Texas questioning his commander-in-chief readiness with the proverbial red phone ringing in the White House at 3 a.m.
"They're both not ready to have that 3 a.m. phone call," Rice said on MSNBC.
Later today, the Clinton camp sent out a memo to reporters attacking Obama for criticizing Clinton.
"Sen. Obama’s decision to go explicitly negative suggests that he is unable to make an affirmative case for his candidacy beyond ad hominem attacks," the memo said. "....Apparently, the Obama campaign's idea of new politics is to recycle the same old Republican attacks on Senator Clinton that have failed for years. Imitating Ken Starr is not the way to win the Democratic nomination.
That drew this response from Obama spokesman Bill Burton:
“It is absurd that after weeks of badgering the media to 'vet' Senator Obama, the Clinton campaign believes that they should be held to an entirely different standard. We don’t believe that expecting candidates for the presidency to disclose their tax returns somehow constitutes Ken Starr-tactics, but the kind of transparency and accountability that Americans are looking for and that’s been missing in Washington for far too long. And if Senator Clinton doesn't think that the Republicans will ask these very same questions, then she’s not as ready to go toe-to-toe with John McCain as she claims."
And it's still nearly seven weeks until the next big showdown, the Pennsylvania primary on April 22.






We are praying for you OBAMA. I am sending you our best wishes from the beautiful island of St. Lucia. My mum adores you.We are so proud of you. PEACE & LOVE.
Regards
Jemma Baptiste
The Rezko story is fairly simple. Let's look at its essence. A husband (a sitting US Senator) and wife can't afford to buy a mansion and garden that they really want; its too expensive. Unlike most American families, the couple did not set their sights lower and buy a house in their budget. Instead, they engaged in some fancy footwork. The seller was somehow persuaded to split the property in two -- the mansion and the garden are sold separately. The seller is somehow persuaded to drop the price of the mansion HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of dollars; the mansion is suddenly and magically affordable. The couple, calling in a favor, recruits a political patron (who, it is now known, was in severe financial difficulties) to buy the garden lot at FULL price. The sale of the mansion and garden occur on the same day, in a coordinated deal.
Was it right for the Senator to seek a favor from a financially-distressed political patron, or should the Senator and his wife have simply bought another house? My guess is that every working family (without a "real estate fairy") knows the answer to that question.
The war of words will continue; however most importantly, there are bigger issues to resolve in the interest of US citizens which we should be bothered about. I came across a hilarious discussion between Hillary and Obama arguing how they would solve some of the issues in hand..http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7150u9sfCo
This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.
Send your comments to masspolitics@globe.com
browse this blog
by category