Text size +

Poll shows racial divisions in view of pastor's remarks

Posted by Foon Rhee, deputy national political editor March 18, 2008 04:20 PM

Even as Barack Obama preached racial unity today in a much-discussed speech that sought to put controversial comments by his former pastor in a broader context, a little-noticed poll shows racial divisions in how the remarks were perceived and might affect Obama's campaign.

While 77 percent of white voters surveyed by Rasmussen Reports said the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright's remarks were racially divisive, only 58 percent of African-American voters said so.

While 56 percent of all voters and 44 percent of Democrats said that Wright's comments made them less likely to support Obama, 29 percent of African Americans said the remarks made them more likely to vote for Obama and half of black voters said they had no impact.

And while voters overall were evenly divided over whether Obama should leave his Chicago church, 68 percent of African Americans said he should not.

The survey, released Monday, was conducted Friday through Sunday among 1,200 likely voters across the country and has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.5 percentage points.

UPDATE: A CBS News poll released this afternoon found that one-third of voters who had heard at least something about Wright's remarks said their views of Obama had become more negative. Republicans and independents were more apt to say the remarks gave them a less favorable view of Obama.

12 comments so far...
  1. Let me say that EVERYONE should read Obama’s Sermon he gave at a Selma, AL church, then make your own decision whether or not Obama is playing with the race card.

    SELMA, ALA.--From the pulpit of the historic Brown Chapel A.M.E. church, White House hopeful Barack Obama talks about the job of the "Joshua generation" and his own claim to a place in the civil rights movement.
    http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2007/03/obamas_selma_speech_text_as_de.html

    Posted by Search4Truth March 18, 08 05:16 PM
    Reply | Report this post
  1. I listern today wating him to take this sick feeling away that I have felt since his pastor made the news ,I wanted to believe in him ,I wanted him to be president
    BUt......... today he did not give me a good reason why he stayed in a church for 20 years and listen to that ,he would not but his hand over his heart at the national antem,his wife said she was never proud of her country ,all this fits the pastors
    rubbish,so I believe he not only stands with this pastor ,he believes the same values,I wish i was wrong.but he didnt convince me at all

    Posted by Peggy March 18, 08 05:21 PM
    Reply | Report this post
  1. While 77 percent of white voters surveyed by Rasmussen Reports said the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright's remarks were racially divisive, only 58 percent of African-American voters said so.

    And while voters overall were evenly divided over whether Obama should leave his Chicago church, 68 percent of African Americans said he should not.

    ------------------
    Every rational common human been will definitely view Wright's comments as a really offensive, abusive, coward and racist. The only group of people viewing it the opposite way is the blacks. I am not surprise at all why the blacks have enslaved for over 400 years…. Have been. A slave will always be a slave and a wild animal will always be a wild animal.

    Posted by Edward March 18, 08 05:22 PM
    Reply | Report this post
  1. wow Edward, you are quite the vile, disgusting human being. but then lumping you in with the rest of the human race would just bring the rest of us down. don't think too hard on that one, it might hurt your little brain.

    Posted by John March 18, 08 06:44 PM
    Reply | Report this post
  1. wow Edward, you are quite the vile, disgusting human being. but then lumping you in with the rest of the human race would just bring the rest of us down. don't think too hard on that one, it might hurt your little brain.

    Posted by John March 18, 08 06:44 PM
    Reply | Report this post
  1. Edward's comment is indeed vile and disgusting. That said, Obama must go. He uses the race card out of convenience. Wright's words fr/ a white person would lead to hell on earth and the calling of that person's resignation, etc. Fr/ Obama's perspective it becomes the victim's scream of, oh stop it, it's racism against us to point out that we're racist. Obama speaks out of both sides of his mouth, everything is about convenience and political expediency. Huckster, empty suit, whatever you'll call it, a salesman in the quintessential sense.

    Posted by Democrat March 18, 08 07:19 PM
    Reply | Report this post
  1. NOBAMA! words, speeches, electric kool aid.. were just tired of it! We want someone who has done change and who has a plan for change not just talk change. That will bring true unity! HILLARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT!

    Posted by Roger March 18, 08 07:39 PM
    Reply | Report this post
  1. Sadly, this is a country that elected, then re-elected, George Bush as president.
    As it's economy appears to be spiralling rapidly downwards (though appearances can be deceptive so we must not yet abandon all hope), was it even within the realm of imagination that it's voters would chose risk (Obama) over safety (McCain)?
    In bad times, people will look for safe ground, and bringing back Bill, albeit through Hillary, may well seem like the safe option.
    Obama is the candidate for hope, but I suspect the USA wants comfort.
    How did it come to this?
    Clinton vs. McCain:
    who wins, who cares?

    Posted by Harlan Leyside March 18, 08 10:23 PM
    Reply | Report this post
  1. Sadly, this is a country that elected, then re-elected, George Bush as president.
    As it's economy appears to be spiralling rapidly downwards (though appearances can be deceptive so we must not yet abandon all hope), was it even within the realm of imagination that it's voters would chose risk (Obama) over safety (McCain)?
    In bad times, people will look for safe ground, and bringing back Bill, albeit through Hillary, may well seem like the safe option.
    Obama is the candidate for hope, but I suspect the USA wants comfort.
    How did it come to this?
    Clinton vs. McCain:
    who wins, who cares?

    Posted by Harlan Leyside March 18, 08 10:24 PM
    Reply | Report this post
  1. OBAMA ACTING LESS LIKE A PREACHER FROM NOW ON…
    I always felt Obama's style was like a preacher, but I didn't know until recently that Reverend Wright was his mentor for twenty years. Obama was obviously a good student. Now, after a week of having the reverend being broadcast non-stop across the country this past week and turned into a comparison of Obama, will we ever hear Obama being the fire and brimstone preacher again? Or will he be soft-spoken from here on in, hoping that people won't wonder what else he learned from the Reverend after 20 years in his pew????

    Posted by Steve S March 19, 08 12:21 AM
    Reply | Report this post
  1. From Reverend Wright and his student Reverend Obama's own lips:

    Don't tell me words don't matter!

    "God damn America" - just words?

    "Hillary aint never been called a Ni**er" - just words?

    "The government lied about inventing the HIV virus as a means of genocide against people of color. The government lied!" - just words?

    Posted by Carl Fay March 19, 08 10:38 AM
    Reply | Report this post
  1. The reason I voted for Obama was that he was the post-racial candiate, he would "heal" the nation of racial divisiness. After all, weren't we all moving beyond the racial divide by putting our hopes in the first black president?
    Now we learned that he sat through--and took his kids-- to hear that bigoted anti-white, anti-semitic paranoid racist spew for 20 years. And he said nothing. Why?
    Because slavery is the stain of this nation. Because Jim Crow laws distorted our society. Because racism is still alive and well.
    Well, I thought we were trying to move beyond all that by electing him president. Now he's telling me we haven't, and we need to undersand and emphathize with Wright's raving rants. Fraud.

    Posted by John March 19, 08 12:17 PM
    Reply | Report this post
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About political intelligence Field reports from Boston Globe reporters and editors covering the 2008 presidential campaign and the national maneuvering of Bay State politicians.

Send your comments to masspolitics@globe.com

archives

browse this blog

by category