Text size +

Puerto Rico officially switches to June 1 primary

Posted by Foon Rhee, deputy national political editor March 24, 2008 06:53 PM

Hello, Montana and South Dakota.

If the Democratic nomination fight goes to the bitter end, those two western states will hold the last contests -- on June 3. That's barring any do-overs in Florida or Michigan, of course.

The national party today approved Puerto Rico's request to move its contest from June 7 to June 1 and to change it from a caucus to a primary. Democratic leaders in the US territory say more voters will be able to take part in a primary.

Of the 10 contests remaining, Puerto Rico's 55 delegates at stake is the fourth most, behind only Pennsylvania on April 22 and Indiana and North Carolina on May 6.

According to the latest Associated Press tally, Obama leads with 1,620 delegates, including declared superdelegates, the elected and party leaders who automatically attend the convention. Clinton has 1,499 delegates.

6 comments so far...
  1. "Democrat leaders in the US territory say more voters will be able to take part in a primary". Wow! Wonder why the DNC hasn't made that a "rule" in every State and Territory. Sure would be more democratic, like in one-person-one-vote "little d" democratic. Wonder why the DNC "ALLOWS" caucuses, which have been demonstrably UNdemocratic in this election process by being exclusionary rather than inclusionary? Wonder why the DNC has delegates and superdelegates instead of ONLY actual individual voters? Hey, just how democratic is the Democrat party? NOT VERY!! But three cheers for the DNC for "allowing" Puerto Rico to take one small step toward democratization of a grossly undemocratic process.

    Posted by ALphaOverdawg March 24, 08 08:15 PM
    Reply | Report this post
  1. "Democrat leaders in the US territory say more voters will be able to take part in a primary". Wow! Wonder why the DNC hasn't made that a "rule" in every State and Territory. Sure would be more democratic, like in one-person-one-vote "little d" democratic. Wonder why the DNC "ALLOWS" caucuses, which have been demonstrably UNdemocratic in this election process by being exclusionary rather than inclusionary? Wonder why the DNC has delegates and superdelegates instead of ONLY actual individual voters? Hey, just how democratic is the Democrat party? NOT VERY!! But three cheers for the DNC for "allowing" Puerto Rico to take one small step toward democratization of a grossly undemocratic process.

    Posted by ALphaOverdawg March 24, 08 08:16 PM
    Reply | Report this post
  1. I hope those in Puerto Rico realize what a gem we have in Barack Obama.

    http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/20080324_Why_abiding_Republican_has_switched_his_party.html?adString=inq.news/opinion;!category=opinion;&randomOrd=032408073333

    An opinion piece in the Philadelphia Inquirer says it best:

    Posted by Finally Inspired March 24, 08 11:11 PM
    Reply | Report this post
  1. I like the fact the the Democratic Party bosses in Puerto Rico are Clinton supporters.

    I also like that the moved the date ahead of sure Obama wins to blunt the effect.

    And my favorite part is that they made this a primary, not a caucus.

    I thought politicians could only change the rules in the middle of elections if they were in Russia or Pakistan.

    Posted by Jim Jones March 26, 08 06:08 AM
    Reply | Report this post
  1. Hillary Clinton's positive rating has dropped to a new low of 37 percent in an NBC/Wall Street Journal poll released on Wednesday. John McCain has an open field and his approval ratings continue to climb. McCain's team is fresh and gearing up for the race to Nov. Barack and Hillary's campaign staffs are in danger of burning out before the general race even starts. The Democrat leaders have a choice to saddle up with Bill and Hillary and let this bloodbath continue or saddle up and take on McCain and his team as a unified Democrat Party. Hillary has a 5 percent chance of winning the Democrat Nomination, and according to her own pollster she has to go even more negative. We already see this happening. Is this war worth it? Vote Obama!

    Posted by Katherine March 27, 08 03:13 AM
    Reply | Report this post
  1. Obama is not the only politician tainted by the Puerto Rico governor's corruption scandal.

    McCain's main advisor, Charles Black, contacted Senate offices to raise questions about the PR's interim U.S. attorney, Rosa Emilia Rodriguez-Velez. Why? Because he wanted to derail this corruption probe, and she was spearheading it.

    http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/03/27/puerto_rico_governor_indicted.html

    Will someone ask Mr McCain about his relationship with Charles Black, and why Mr Black was trying to derail a Federal corruption investigation.

    Isn't that obstruction of justice?

    Posted by Juan C Lopez March 27, 08 11:24 PM
    Reply | Report this post
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About political intelligence Field reports from Boston Globe reporters and editors covering the 2008 presidential campaign and the national maneuvering of Bay State politicians.

Send your comments to masspolitics@globe.com

archives

browse this blog

by category