< Back to front page Text size +

Analysis: Obama counts on voters looking to big picture

Posted by Foon Rhee, deputy national political editor  April 16, 2008 10:39 PM
  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

E-mail this article

Invalid email address
Invalid email address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

By Peter S. Canellos, Globe Staff

WASHINGTON -- Barack Obama tonight staked his presidential campaign on the idea that the American people will look beyond the inevitable gaffes and errors and character attacks of a 24-hour campaign cycle to meet the challenges of a "defining moment" in American history.

Hillary Clinton staked her campaign on the idea that Americans won't -- and that her tougher, more strategic approach to countering Republican attacks is a better way for Democrats to reclaim the White House.

The first half of tonight's debate in the august National Constitution Center in Philadelphia was a tawdry affair, as ABC news questioners called on Obama and Clinton to address a year's worth of dirty laundry, and each combatant eagerly grabbed at the chance to befoul their rival a little more.

But while some in the audience groaned, the litany of nasty questions -- about such matters as Obama's comments on the working class and Clinton's exaggerations about dangers she faced in Bosnia -- helped to flesh out a long-simmering subtext to the Clinton-Obama battle: The Clinton campaign's insinuation that Obama is more vulnerable to GOP-style attacks on his patriotism.

For Obama, the harsh questioning from Charles Gibson and George Stephanopoulos of ABC News probably felt as though the media was trying to make up for a year's worth of allegedly ginger treatment all in one night. But it clarified the sharply different postures of the two campaigns.

On a range of matters -- from his comments about the "bitter" working class, to his pastor's controversial statements, to why he doesn't wear flag pins, to his association with a former member of the Weather Underground -- Obama was mostly unrepentent: Even as he sought to explain himself, he rarely missed a chance to call on Americans to take a higher path.

"If it's not this it will be something else," he said when asked how he would respond if Republicans attacked him for angry statements by his pastor, Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr.

"Unless we can bridge some of these divides, we're not going to solve problems in this country," he said at another point.

Clinton wasn't so high-minded. At times, she seemed to revel in her tough-gal statements, sounding like a character in a 1940s film noir.

"I may be a lot of things but I'm not dumb," she stated in response to a question about her exaggeration of the dangers she faced in Bosnia.

Later, she quipped, "I have a lot of baggage, and everyone has rummaged through if for years."

But the overall tone of the debate undermined the personas that both candidates were trying to present. Clinton wanted to show her tough skin, but she sometimes seemed a little mean, throwing gas on old Obama controversies with gratuitous statements such as her claim that Obama had given "some kind of seal of approval" to Rev. Wright.

Obama, for his part, tried to resurrect some old Clinton controversies, including her famous 1992 complaint about not wanting to "stay home and bake cookies." He seemed eager to remind people that she could be condescending, too.

The tit-for-tat comment showed how off-message Obama was for most of the evening, able to conjure up little of the hopeful energy that has marked his campaign for much of the year.

"The tone of what he's been saying has been down, a little on the negative side," said Donald F. Kettl, a political scientist at the University of Pennsylvania, near the end of the debate. "He has that great message of change, but that didn't come through tonight."

What did come through, however, was how crucial Obama's self-described "bet on the American people" will be to the future of his campaign.

Obama has said on countless occasions that he believes the American people want "an honest conversation," and not a campaign of charges and countercharges.

For 15 months, he has flayed away at such "politics as usual," with good results. But lately, politics as usual has struck back, and Obama has been wounded.

At tonight's debate, some of the wounds were apparent. But he asked not so much for forgiveness, as for the right to move on.

  • E-mail
  • E-mail this article

    Invalid E-mail address
    Invalid E-mail address

    Sending your article

    Your article has been sent.

About Political Intelligence

Glen Johnson Glen Johnson is Politics Editor at boston.com and lead blogger for "Political Intelligence." He moved to Massachusetts in the fourth grade, and has covered local, state, and national politics for over 25 years. E-mail him at johnson@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @globeglen.
archives

browse this blog

by category