< Back to Front Page Text size +

Obama speaks out on Bush 'appeasement' charge

Posted by Foon Rhee, deputy national political editor May 16, 2008 06:27 PM

Barack Obama hit back at President Bush today, asserting that Bush's failed policies have made the country less secure and welcoming a debate on foreign policy.

"That is a debate that I am happy to have anytime, anyplace, and that's a debate that I will win because George Bush and John McCain have a lot to answer for," Obama said, listing an Iraq war in its sixth year, Osama bin Laden still at large, Al Qaeda stronger than ever, Iran strengthened by the Iraq war, and Hamas controlling Gaza.

"Those are the failed policies that John McCain wants to double down on," Obama told supporters in Watertown, S.D.

UPDATE: McCain this afternoon did not back away at all, saying he welcomed a debate about protecting America.

"No issue is more important," he said at a gathering of the National Rifle Association in Louisville, Ky.

The Arizona senator said he would not "add to the prestige" of dictators by meeting with people like Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

"It is reckless," McCain said. "It would be a wonderful thing if we lived in a world where we don’t have enemies. But that is not the world we live in, and until Senator Obama understands that, the American people have every reason to doubt whether he has the strength, judgment, and determination to keep us safe."

Obama was responding to Bush's remarks to Israel's parliament Thursday equating talks with rogue regimes to the appeasement of Hitler before World War II

"After eight years, I did not think I could be surprised by anything George Bush says, but I was wrong," Obama said. Instead of celebrating the 60th anniversary of Israel's founding, the president flouted tradition and launched a political attack before a foreign audience, Obama argued.

"That's exactly the kind of appalling attack that has divided our country and that alienates us from the world. That's why we need change in Washington," he said, sporting a flag lapel pin he started wearing regularly this week after months of questions about why he didn't.

Obama also laid into McCain, saying that the presumptive Republican nominee gave a speech Thursday calling for civility and bipartisanship, but then embraced Bush's attacks.

"So much for civility," Obama said.

UPDATE: Tucker Bounds, a McCain spokesman, issued a response: "It was remarkable to see Barack Obama’s hysterical diatribe in response to a speech in which his name wasn’t even mentioned. These are serious issues that deserve a serious debate, not the same tired partisan rants we heard today from Senator Obama. Senator Obama has pledged to unconditionally meet with Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad -- who pledges to wipe Israel off the map, denies the Holocaust, sponsors terrorists, arms America’s enemies in Iraq and pursues nuclear weapons. What would Senator Obama talk about with such a man?"

While the White House officially denied the remarks were aimed at Obama, McCain used the opportunity to argue again Thursday that Obama's willingness to negotiate shows he is naive and inexperienced in the ways of foreign policy.

But in an opinion piece published today in The Washington Post, former Clinton State Department official James Rubin accused McCain of hypocrisy and attempting to smear Obama.

McCain has attempted to link Obama to Hamas, which the State Department calls a terrorist group, citing a Hamas political adviser's comments praising Obama's foreign policy.

But Rubin said when he interviewed McCain two years ago for a British TV network, McCain suggested the United States should be willing to talk to Hamas officials in Gaza.

"They're the government; sooner or later we are going to have to deal with them, one way or another, and I understand why this administration and previous administrations had such antipathy towards Hamas because of their dedication to violence and the things that they not only espouse but practice, so ... But it's a new reality in the Middle East. I think the lesson is people want security and a decent life and decent future, that they want democracy. Fatah was not giving them that," McCain said, according to Rubin.

The McCain campaign today issued this response: “There should be no confusion, John McCain has always believed that serious engagement would require mandatory conditions and Hamas must change itself fundamentally -– renounce violence, abandon its goal of eradicating Israel and accept a two state solution. John McCain’s position is clear and has always been clear, the President of the United States should not unconditionally meet with leaders of Iran, Hamas or Hezbollah. Barack Obama has made his position equally clear, and has pledged to meet unconditionally with Iran’s leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the leaders of other rogue regimes, which shows incredibly dangerous and weak judgment,” Tucker Bounds, a campaign spokesman, said in a statement.


UPDATE: The McCain campaign this evening accused Rubin of lying, releasing a video that shows McCain's response to a follow-up question that Rubin didn't include.

Rubin asked, "So should the United States be dealing with that new reality through normal diplomatic contacts to get the job done for the United States?”

McCain replied, "I think the United States should take a step back, see what they do when they form their government, see what their policies are, and see the ways that we can engage with them, and if there aren’t any, there may be a hiatus. But I think part of the relationship is going to be dictated by how Hamas acts, not how the United States acts."

"John McCain absolutely did not advocate unconditional engagement with Hamas. Indeed, Rubin conveniently cut off his follow-up question to which McCain was clear that any engagement with Hamas would be conditioned on their actions and policies -- that any actions would be 'dictated by how Hamas acts, not how the United States acts,' " said the campaign's statement.

251 comments so far...
  1. The Bush / McCain Crime Families are major league liars and crooks! Vote them out of office and into hell!

    Posted by John Q. May 16, 08 10:46 AM
  1. Obama needs to face reality. He said what he said regarding his willingness to sit down and meet with leaders of groups or countries that avow the destruction of Israel, the United States, and others. So though Bush did not mention his name, he becomes upset. He needs to grow up. Another sign he is immature to President.

    Posted by Jazzman May 16, 08 10:48 AM
  1. Senator Obama, why are you so defensive? President Bush did not use your name. Why don't you just agree with the President and move on.

    Posted by Cosmo May 16, 08 10:48 AM
  1. get over your self Obama...I am democrat and I have heard Bush say this before you were even thought of as a nominee. I distictly heard you say that you would deal with terrorist nations . You have to grow out from your thin skin and remember what you have said on your trail to where you are now. Is anything that is said about you which is true going to be not fair game ...you said it now own it., or is this going to be your label of someone who says thjings and later on makes excuses for what is true.....you are startng to scare me

    Posted by tino May 16, 08 10:50 AM
  1. John McCain is just more of the same old Washington crap that has got us in the mess we are in now. Obama may be green, but at least he seems to be honest and hasn't thrown away all his values to secure the nomination of his party.

    Posted by Woody May 16, 08 10:52 AM
  1. Politics is full of liars and damn liars. I used to think McCain was the exception in politics, a man of integrity. I now clearly see he wants to be president so bad that he has become a damn liar who stands for whatever is popular. he has proven he will sell out his republican supporters if it is popular and now he has flip flopped on so many issues that as long as he has been on the political scene no knows what he stands for, because he stands for getting elected and will use any issue he can to achieve that means.

    Posted by chrisc May 16, 08 10:53 AM
  1. George Bush continues to show the world why he will go down in history as our worst president. He continues to damage our country by making us the laughing stock of the major world powers. Thanks George. Don't you need to feed the cattle in Texas? This cowboy is amazing. First the bullshit, then he feeds the cattle.

    Posted by Joe Zuiker May 16, 08 10:54 AM
  1. I don't see the word "unconditionally" in either McCain's or Obama's remarks. As a result, I am "confused" by John McCain's remarks.

    Posted by A Tow May 16, 08 10:55 AM
  1. This is a bunch of nonsense. Obama's position is clearly the correct position and the rest of this business about "conditions" is just pathetic posturing. What "conditions" were in place when Nixon met with Mao? Surely Nixon's engagement with the Chinese is cited as his single greatest achievement and one of the best policy events of the 1970s. Communicating may not solve all the problems, but one thing is for sure, not communicating will fail every time.

    Posted by Jeff May 16, 08 10:57 AM
  1. There's only one side which has incredibly dangerous and dimwit/weak judgment
    - The president himself and his Vice + the republican presidential hopeful.

    Posted by Roberto Ross May 16, 08 10:57 AM
  1. This election is going to be all about whether Obama can convince the American people that he has the judgment to be president. Someone who has experience can have awful judgment. He needs to remind people constantly of that fact. He also has to hit back - AND HARD - at ANY attempts by the Republicans to diminish him and smear him. Those lovely Christian-oriented, values-oriented Republicans are so, so good at that. ;)

    Posted by Alan G May 16, 08 10:57 AM
  1. Talk to your enemies before you blow them up. That seems closer to the biblical idea of loving your enemies than the McCain and Bush mantra not to talk. I thought the bible believing Christians were suppose to be on the Republican side but in this case I see Obama exercising values that are closer to the character of the Christian God.

    It is time we try to understand our "enemies" before we make life ending decisions. I support Obama on this one.

    Posted by Clay May 16, 08 10:59 AM
  1. Why is it that the author of the Mid- Eastern conflict is allowed to visit these
    country leaders in the name of an ex-U.S. president and recipient of the
    same Nobel Peace prize that the PLO terrorist leader, Arafat, received and
    without repercussions and yet Obama suggests the same approach is
    blasted out of the water ?

    Posted by gene norman May 16, 08 11:02 AM
  1. Incredibly dangerous and weak judgment is McCain's fear that he cannot deal with adversaries sitting across the table from him.

    Who is being weak here the man who wants to stare his adversary in the eye or the one who wants to hide.

    Posted by Donald May 16, 08 11:03 AM

  1. George W and Cheney should be arrested for treason, bankrupt Country, false war, New Orleans, $4 gasoline, gang violence, and the World hates us! They belong in GITMO !

    Posted by philosopherkingtomas May 16, 08 11:03 AM
  1. everyone knows what bush's words are worse, nothing
    bush and cheney are criminals and should be in jail but unfortunately thats not going to happen....
    Obama must ignore that kind of comments and instead should keep making sure
    every American remember the worst regime ever...

    Posted by bob May 16, 08 11:06 AM
  1. Dangerous? Weak judgment? Haven't we been suffering from those flaws in our current president for the last eight years? Why is talking to your enemies appeasement? There are smarter ways to disarm them. Exploit the differences between their radical and moderate elements through dialogue rather than unite them through hostility. It's just so stupid not to try that, and anyone who says that doing so is appeasment is just an idiot.

    Posted by CLR May 16, 08 11:09 AM
  1. This policy of not meeting with governments or organizations that we disagree with has worked so well in the past we should continue to use it in the future. NOT!

    Posted by Jay Davis May 16, 08 11:09 AM
  1. It was John Kennedy who said, "Let us never negotiate out of fear, but let us never fear to negotiate." Both President Bush and Sen. McCain should consider the wisdom in that observation.

    Posted by Steve from Somerset May 16, 08 11:10 AM
  1. Bush will not go out with a bang, he is probable the worst and dummest President the USA ever had.

    Posted by Willaim Reeve May 16, 08 11:11 AM
  1. Obama wishes to be the president of the United States, then he had better develop a thicker skin and stop acting a spoiled two year old throwing a temper tantrum. You want to be the president of my country then grow up!

    Bush did not say Obama's name nor did he imply Obama. Most educated thinking people automatically assumed he was speaking about JIMMY CARTER and his talks with Hamas.

    The Democratic party and their constituants have become the most immature, whinniest group of people I have ever had the misfortune to hear. Democrats have become the part y of the most asenine, nastiest sound bites of the last 15 years. You have party members who have said some of the most henious comments about this president alone. Where the hell do you people get off whinning and complaining! Maybe one the press should play back ALL the nasty remarks made by those in the Democratic party for the last year! Shame on all of you!!!!!!

    And before you work yourselves into a lather I am not a Republican. I am and have been an Independent from day one.

    Posted by beth May 16, 08 11:12 AM
  1. Read Obama's book and he declares he stands by his Muslim Brother Hood. HE cannot be trusted at all. He is a false profit, like the Bible has foretold. Beware of a smooth talker......

    Posted by Jack Ryan May 16, 08 11:14 AM
  1. Looks like the Republicans are getting seriously scared of Obama. And they should be - McCain could never beat him.

    Posted by Mister May 16, 08 11:14 AM
  1. Senetor Obama: You need to balance your arqument on this very delicate matter to avoid messing up your compaign stretegies

    Posted by Joel Tonui May 16, 08 11:15 AM
  1. Why when I see this story, in any variety of news outlets, it always stops after McCain's press release? Has no one taken notice of the very clear "switcheroo" that took place?

    I thought the conversation was about Hamas. However, he has to substitute Iran because Sen. Obama has always been very clear about not negotiating with Hamas without pre-conditions.

    We could of course get into a discussion about sovereignty and that while Iran is a sovereign nation Hamas is not and that this is a crucial distinction and goes a long way in explainin why we must negotiate with Iran, but Mr. McCain is far too busy shaking his fist and yelling at the kids to, "Get off my front lawn!"

    Posted by Rick Christie May 16, 08 11:15 AM
  1. Philosophically aligned with European Social Democrats on both domestic and international issues, the central foreign policy tenant of the Democrat party's now dominant Obama -Carter - Dukakis - McGovern wing is "America Last".

    This cosmopolitan cabal sets as its strategic goals the gradual demilitarization of the United States and the accomodation or, appeasement ,of any state or interest (formerly Soviet and Chinese Communist interests; now Hamas, Hezbullah, Iran, Venezuela, Ecuador) that challenges the U.S. and its allies.

    This is a difficult, unpredictable world. Who beyond the triumphant left-most element of the Democrat party would intrust the defense of the West to McGovern, Dukakis, Carter or Obama?

    Posted by Marshall Davidson, Sr. May 16, 08 11:16 AM
  1. is'nt obama mulisum he was born to muslium parents right we do not need some one in our white house like that we need only americans not a muslium if obama was born to musilum parents

    Posted by mary May 16, 08 11:17 AM
  1. i do believe my brain just melted

    Posted by Charles Taylor May 16, 08 11:18 AM
  1. It's okay Obama "sweetie." I'm sure Bush didn't mean anything by it!

    Posted by gaypastor May 16, 08 11:19 AM
  1. I think that McCain should attend to his own business and leave Obama alone. Is McCain going to run to president Bush for everything to start up confusion. We have enough confusion in our country now. It's time the republicans bow out.

    Posted by Betty May 16, 08 11:20 AM
  1. McCain (Bush's 3rd term) is going to loose in a LANDSLIDE.

    Posted by Chris May 16, 08 11:21 AM
  1. I just hope that people of this great nation will revolt against this type of cheap and below the belt shots just like how voters of Mississippi did.

    I'm not addressing the good and honest republicans, but those attack machines that think they are only ones that are partiotics, their actions indicates otherwise.

    The days ugly & dirty politics of Adkins & Rove are over.

    Posted by Ben KD May 16, 08 11:21 AM
  1. i believe obama is right in wanting to have talks with hamas or the iranian president when he assumes power.it is not a compromise,even if it is and as long as it will bring peace in the world,it does not matter.

    Posted by james arthur May 16, 08 11:23 AM
  1. Typical Bush double speak. It's a shame Mcain sounds like more of the same.

    Posted by Kevin from Georgia May 16, 08 11:23 AM
  1. McSquirm away McLiar. You have talked out of both sides of your mouth for a year now. Soon, when the general election gets into full swing, we're going to play it from the mountain tops.

    Posted by JTS May 16, 08 11:24 AM
  1. OBAMA, IS A SLIP AND SLIDDING WITH WORDS. OBAMA IS ON THE DEFENCE WITH THE ISSUE OF APPEASEMENT... OBAMA, THE WORD APPEASEMENT FITS. YOU ARE WHAT YOU ARE...SINCERELY, JIMMIE W BECK

    Posted by JIMMIE W BECK May 16, 08 11:24 AM
  1. I love how this silly libs try to say that Reagan talked to terrorists. Lets see, if you consider putting a cruise missal through Kadaffi's house banter then so be it. He spoke with the Russians only after embargos and hard politics broke the communist regime. America has never dealt with terrorists first, only after. Obama needs to wake up if he thinks he can say some pretty words and make muslim extremists reconsider how they feel about infidels.

    Posted by Bob May 16, 08 11:26 AM
  1. look at george. a human & presidential failure school children will study & discuss, far into the future.
    in my state, Barack Obama enjoys a broad majority of support, and we believe his policies will generate respect, stabilty, & prosperity for America.

    Posted by lawrence2xl May 16, 08 11:29 AM
  1. Remember Reagan talked to the soviets and china. What did that do? Oh, yes they were emboldened.

    Posted by Ciceroji May 16, 08 11:32 AM
  1. why does obama care what bush says at
    this time in the campaign. as a nation we have to
    cross party lines and repair the damage bush
    and his supporters have done to this counttry
    on the domestic and international fronts. another
    four years of waging a fruitless war that benefits
    no one other than the military/industrial complex
    is absurd.

    Posted by chas mann May 16, 08 11:32 AM
  1. Candidate Bush promised the American people that he would be a "uniter, not a divider." How did THAT work out?

    Posted by Fred Dobbs May 16, 08 11:35 AM
  1. There is obvious irony in Bush claiming to be working toward Middle East Peace at all, given that his administration's policies and US entanglement have only worsened the crisis there under his watch. Then, he and McCain both use an opportunity to dishonestly mangle the truth of the words of Obama, who has infinitely more potential than either of them ever will to build bridges toward a more peaceful world. More of the same politics, fewer of us are buying.

    Posted by T.Coscia May 16, 08 11:35 AM
  1. Bush and Mc Cain are trying to push Obama against Israel, Obama always said that he is an Israel supporter I have a problem with Mc Cain because he want to forget the dirty politic that the Bushes people played against him even accusing him of fathering a black kid.

    I really liked Mc Cain he fought for this country but at the same time I believe that he is able to sell himself to the devil to be the USA president it is a shame that in this country instead of trying to solve our problems we fell so low and the world is watching and the USA was an example of pride and dignity.

    Hopefully the Bushes time is going to finish and Mc Cain has nothing to offer just he is an old man ready to destroy this nation attacking every one that disagree with him.

    Posted by Felix May 16, 08 11:35 AM
  1. I think i heard that Osama and Bush were good friends once, then what happened??

    And i know that US was supporting Sadaam during 8 years of war with Iran, and then suddenly Sadamm had changed to be a bad guy !!!!!!

    Posted by jack May 16, 08 11:36 AM
  1. What about Mr. Obama comments on his utube video...saying "yes" I would meet with them...LYIER!

    Posted by E May 16, 08 11:36 AM
  1. First of all - I truly believe Bish was referencing President Carter - not barack obama. It is a charge that clearly hits close to home for barack because he is given to over-talking and talking and talking and talking and talking ... he has no plans to speak of but he keeps right on talking and talking and talking and talking.

    I think Bush was wrong on Carter though - Carter seemed to have gotten concessions out of Hamas that nobody else has -- stupid to throw them back in their face just cause President Carter got them and not President Bush - that is George though - if he didn't do its no good and if it fails its not his fault!

    Oh - and I don't think Obama can accomplish anything - he just a smooth talker - an empty suit.

    Posted by Katy in NYC May 16, 08 11:37 AM
  1. Republicans, appeasement, dealing with rouge regimes? Iran-Contra , Ronald Reagan? How soon we forget Mr. President.

    Posted by Abercrombie Pafufnic May 16, 08 11:37 AM
  1. Really, and what about this "rogue" element that we are paying to fight along side of us in Iraq? The very same people that have shot and killed our Marines with the same weapons. Isn't payment a form of appeasement ? I wonder who approached whom and negotiated this deal. I doubt they came up and said Pssssst... let's have a talk, I'm broke. This is absolute bullshit, and more than likely something Rove put in his ear at the wedding. They (this administration) throw so much of this around that high boots won't help, you need a tarp.

    Posted by Jim Collins May 16, 08 11:40 AM
  1. The only way that there will ever be "peace" in the mid east is if the US allows the terrorist regimes to wipe Isreal off the face of the earth. The appriopriate solution would be to wipe the top six feet of topsoil off every nation in the mid east who even is suspected from supporting the terrorists. And I would start with the mountain range behind Afganistan to get rid of Bin Laden and his supporters.

    Geo Bush hit it right on when he condemned any person, including Obama, who would be naive enough to think they could deal seriously with any terrorist group or nation. This country does not need another "Neville Chamberlain" anywhere near the reigns of power in this country, no matter what his color!!!!!

    Posted by Louis A, Stearns May 16, 08 11:40 AM
  1. Ronald Reagan engaged during the 80's in initial contacts, then conversations, then treaties and public appearances, with whom at that time represented the USSR, Mihail Gorbachov (allegedly the greatest U.S. enemy). Nobody now rags their clothes because of that, which was quite a revolutionary step then.

    Posted by William May 16, 08 11:40 AM
  1. I AM A DEVOUT LIBERTARIAN. I believe obama is right in wanting to have talks with hamas, the iranian president, and other terrorist governments. Then when "McCain" assumes power and these groups do not find a better way to negotiate their wants me and McCain agree, we should "NUKE THE BASTARDS" off the planet.

    Posted by Jimmy G May 16, 08 11:41 AM
  1. .Obama is an inexperienced politician who got his Senatorial seat thru Chicago corruption and McCain is a liberal. Let's get someone as President who can lead this country, represent the will of the American people, throw the illegals (they are not undocumented) out of this country and make them abide by our laws, control run away government spending, reduce taxes, stop sending billions of dollars overseas, and live by our Constitution.

    President Barak Hussein Obama, I think not. What a childish man.....

    Posted by Phil R May 16, 08 11:42 AM
  1. Some of the remarks here by some racist repub retartds are insane. These people needs to be shut out by a popular vote for Obama that exceeds 60% in the general elections this November. Americans are capable of such good, and shut out its own extremists that murder more people (americans and foriegners alike) than the terrorists do. The only difference is that these repub retards do it by foriegn policy and our guns and missles and snipers. It is easy to kill with these things, like McCain did in VIetnam, drop some napalms from the air and fly back to the air craft carrier, In 10 years it left 50,000 americals dead and 3 million vietnamese dead! More recently in Iraq, 4,000 Americans dead, and 300,000 Iraqis killed by the actions of some of the racist repub retrards! Ant their thirst for blood do not end here. Watch out America -- this is the time in our history to decide whether EVIL repub retards takes over our country or good meaning peace loving leaders!

    Posted by Lauren Miller May 16, 08 11:42 AM
  1. Did George Bush mention any names? Now, who is guilty!!!!!

    Posted by Leilani Kim May 16, 08 11:42 AM
  1. If you have an enemy and might fight him in the street. Which is that better way to find peace: tell him he has to do things YOUR way? Or, simply meet and discuss your differences?

    Obama's foreign policy seems to be the only wise and statesmanlike of any candidate. Stonewalling (ala Bush and McCain) will only get us all killed (or at the least, our sons and daughters in the sand).

    Posted by Jack armstrong May 16, 08 11:44 AM
  1. Ibelive that Bush just needs to watch what he says...well they all do because all this stuff starts fights even in our government class.

    Posted by WHSBandGeek08 May 16, 08 11:45 AM
  1. And how is talking to iran different than talking to N.Korea.....After all Korea by all standers is more dangerous. This is just stupid stuff that we have seen for past many years in our politics. Even Baker study said that in order to extract ourselves from this iraq mess we will have to talk to Iran and Syria. This is just the kind of election year politics we have come to expect and love.

    Posted by Fred May 16, 08 11:45 AM
  1. Um -remind me why we care what GW says at this point?

    Posted by T-Ray May 16, 08 11:45 AM
  1. Oh eat a little more arugala Barack, thankfully the Republicans will keep us safe from the likes of Bin Laden and Amadingdong for at least one more term, before Dems finally figure out who pays their bills.

    Posted by jdcarmine May 16, 08 11:46 AM
  1. The rogue regime is in Washington. Iran has been appeasing it. As for Israel, it's time to let it sink under the weight of its own delusions.

    Posted by David A. McCullough May 16, 08 11:47 AM
  1. OBAMA, IS A SLIP AND SLIDDING WITH WORDS. OBAMA IS ON THE DEFENCE WITH THE ISSUE OF APPEASEMENT... OBAMA, THE WORD APPEASEMENT FITS. YOU ARE WHAT YOU ARE...SINCERELY, JIMMIE W BECK


    What the hell is this supposed to mean? I honestly could barely make any sense of this post. Seriously, learn to use real sentences and apparently caps lock is the way to get your point across.

    You Jimmie, and others like you are morons. Bush has lead a failing presidency. Thanks to him and his cronies the reputation of the United States has hit rock bottom. Obama not once, has said he'd negotiate with terrorists, he did say that he'd sit down with any country thats willing to have peaceful talks. Iran for instance has stated that they would negotiate a compromise about their nuclear program.

    We don't have any reason not to give them a chance, the desire of the human race is to make life easier for ourselves. Who are we to deny the Iranians the same pleasures we have in our country? We as a country claimed they had nukes, no one has found a shred of evidence that they have nukes, or have the ability to make a nuclear weapon. It was said they could technically build one in twelve years, that is assuming they desire to make one, which they say they don't.

    Bush and his cowboy politics have undermined everything this country has stood for. His only supporters are the bible thumping christian groups, and other less educated citizens of this country. If you read Obama's book you would be well informed to note that he does support his muslim heritage, however he does not practice their religion. How does that make him any different than anyone else? I support my irish heritage, but I don't practice the culture because I've lived in this country my whole life.

    Back to world politics for a moment. Iran has said they are going to destroy israel, ok...We swore to destroy Russia at one point and they swore to destroy us. Both countries are still around aren't they?

    Mr. Obama has a level head, a good sound mind and the ability to connect with the majority of the voters. How, is this a bad thing? For years people have complained that Bush is out of touch with americans, the complaint has stretched to encompass congress as well. Obama will be a breathe of fresh air for this country. He's not corrupted by current polictics in DC and he's not afraid to be the outsider on common views. McCain will be absolutely no different than the current failed administration we have now, just with a new label slapped on it.

    Clinton..is a joke and I won't even address the circus act that is her campaign.

    Posted by Ryan May 16, 08 11:49 AM
  1. "why don't you just agree with the president..." to quote a previous poster.

    Are you serious? The president doesn't even know what he's talking about. It must be his speech-writers from Bob Jones U who only know history as told to them by a televangelist.. it's very sad and embarrasing for us as Americans to have to be represented by such low hanging fruit.

    It's no longer the American people, it's the american sheeple (just go along with whatever your told from the Party Boss or Pulpit and don't question)

    We deserve what we elect, only campaigned against Bush, et. al, since he was installed as Gov. of Tejas, so I don't take credit for the sad state of our country and only hope the next administration will take responsibility for their actions, unlike the current one.

    Posted by wing&aPrayer May 16, 08 11:51 AM
  1. Obama a false "profit" LOLOL that's rich......are you from Kentucky or West Virginia. I think the word you're looking for is "prophet."

    While we're on the subject, however, the Iraq war has meant "profit" for some, built on what we now know to have been a falsehood.

    And is it just me or should George Bush never use the word "foolish" in a sentence, after all it's a bit close to home.

    Posted by Joyous May 16, 08 11:51 AM
  1. George Bush is a loose cannon and a danger to world peace and security.

    Posted by Thomas Earlie May 16, 08 11:51 AM
  1. Ron Paul is still in the presidential race. Perhaps we should find out more about him.

    Posted by sarah May 16, 08 11:52 AM
  1. THIS WAS NEITHER ABOUT OBAMA NOR APPEASEMENT

    Why is the media focusing on the wrong story here?

    Obviously Obama picked up on the potential for headlines, but isn’t that a secondary story?

    This about the misuse of the term "NEGOTIATE"

    BUSH'S MISREPRESENTATION OF "NEGOTIATE"

    Posted by PacificGatePost May 16, 08 11:52 AM
  1. "Obama needs to wake up if he thinks he can say some pretty words and make muslim extremists reconsider how they feel about infidels."
    You need to wake up if that's your idea of diplomacy and discussion. Stop behaving as though everything were a Hollywood film and grow up. Stop using the word appeasement as though you know what it means. Stop parroting ALL terms you've heard on the radio until you've actually looked them up for yourselves. Just because you listen to someone barking all day on your favorite stations and channels doesn't make the content worth repeating. BTW, bring on the Race/Bigot/Hick War...I know which side I'm on. Can't wait for all the closet racists to actually come out into the open.

    Posted by Real Jack Ryan May 16, 08 11:53 AM
  1. Surely the lesson from the Northern Ireland peace process is that you have to be prepared to talk to ¨terrorists¨?

    Talking to people (and terrorists are people) is not the same thing as giving in to them -- President Bush is disingenuous in suggesting that the two processes are are the same.

    Winston Churchill was certainly a man who was willing to stand up to an evil regime but his maxim was still that ¨jaw jaw is better than war war¨. Sadly I don´t have a vote in your election even though the result will affect me - I can only pray that you make a sound choice on my behalf

    Posted by gypsy_roadhog May 16, 08 11:53 AM
  1. Sigh.

    Liberal Democrats like Obama are bad for America because they think they can just "sit down and have a chat" with terrorist groups and rogue states and that everything will be better. We just need to "understand" each other.
    Umm. No. You don't negotiate with terror states. Jimmy Carter style diplomacy is stupid. Everyone knows that you negotiate from a position of strength and you bully your opponent into submission. If they don't agree, then you go all SITH on them and "wipe them out, all of them". If its US verus them, I choose US. We shouldn't have liberated IRAQ, we should have flattened it. Death star diplomacy!


    \

    Posted by Dark Lord of the Sith May 16, 08 11:55 AM
  1. I am so sick of hearing you liberal Democrats whine. I am an independent who has voted both democrat and republican. the last democrat I voted for was Jimmy Carter who I consider was the weakest presidents in history and one of the most liberal. I believe obama doesn't have the experience or is tough enough to be President. If he "can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen".

    Posted by Odell Banks May 16, 08 11:56 AM
  1. Comment #9 is absolutely right. Negotiating without preconditions just means you recognize how important it is to get the conversation started. It doesn't mean you have no "non-negotiables." Those should be discussed at the negotiations and not beforehand. This is all stupid macho posturing. Obama proves himself more courageous and confident by refusing to puff out his chest.

    Posted by DAve May 16, 08 11:56 AM
  1. End divisive unnescessary wars like Iraq based on shoddy intelligence and lies that only serve to turn Americans on the left and right against one another! Go after the true perpetrators of 9/11 Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida! Stand United against tyranny by embracing truth! Gain the moral authority in world affairs by doing what is right! Seek allies to stand against rogue regimes. No more preemptive war and unnecessary invasions! Use U.S. ingenuity to create alternative fuels and end dependence on foreign oil. If Brazil can do it with sugar cane the U.S. can do it to! Let sanctions work. Congress should declare war and only as a last resort.

    Posted by N. Otter May 16, 08 11:57 AM
  1. You 'patriotic' republicans need to set aside your fear and insecurity and put your genitals back in your pants. War accomplishes much less than communication and i don't understand how any intelligent person could argue otherwise without a biased perspective due to imbalanced hormones. We dont need to negotiate with terrorists, but we dont have to waste peoples lives fighting them to feel more secure. Our technology and defenses in this country are obviously far superior, so there should be no grade school ego at stake guiding our decisions as a nation

    Posted by sense May 16, 08 11:57 AM
  1. This is best ever comment I have ever red

    George W and Cheney should be arrested for treason, bankrupt Country, false war, New Orleans, $4 gasoline, gang violence, and the World hates us! They belong in GITMO !

    Posted by nigel May 16, 08 11:57 AM
  1. Keep Your Friends Close And Your Enemies Closer. Communication is the main tool in solving problems. Without communication one can have no idea as to the enemy plans. The better we understand the way our adversaries think, the better our chances to find a solution and or make the proper decision weather or not to go to war. Yeah we got Saddam; but at what price? Oh I'm sorry Gena and bush other daughter are in no danger of getting blown up to pieces and or rape or sodomized. Bush talks of sacrifice is plain B.S. As for the economy, Bush and Chiminey don't worry about a thing. remember they are in the oil business. Sad that our leaders are willing to sacrifice our nation in their own best interest. As for Mr. Mc Mcain, they fed to much Kimchi as a POW and has brain Damage. much of a Psycho as Bush

    Posted by Angel May 16, 08 11:57 AM
  1. this one is for beth, you have such hate, why? you are an american and therefore being objective is the american way, or should be. a moron would have been able to ascertain what the statement implied, but I guess there are some that are a couple of notches below being a moron, wait until you lose your double wide to the bank, you will blame the democrats.

    Posted by cwhittaker May 16, 08 11:58 AM
  1. It is astounding to me that so many people have commented on Obama's immaturity in immediately responding to the president's insulting, idiotic statement yesterday. Obama is running, presumably, for President of the United States. We have been a country of Fear of almost 8 years created by President Bush. Why would Obama not want to make it clear, whether or not Bush referred to him directly, that words have been taken out of context, AT LEAST in his campaign. He has the right to let the American people know that more about him and not let himself be identified by the Republican Party.
    His maturity or lack of maturity is really a cop out and the wrong thing to be looking at. A strong leader comes out immediately to defend or deny what his/her position is when speaking with terrorists is compared to those who appeased the Nazis. As an American and a Jew, I am glad that someone is saying something the day after, simply about the disgusting comment referring to Hitler and the Holocaust. I want a president that is going to make the EDUCATED distinctions that the Bush administration has yet been able to do. Also, as Israel has discovered, much to everyone's surprise, you try to make peace with your Enemies NOT your Friends!!!

    The Bush adminstration believed what "people told them," and still can't discriminate between the people of Iraq and the new terrorists whom we have invited in. It is those people who say that Obama is whining etc.. should take a look at what the Democrats have let others get away with by identifying them. Morals and convictions that don't change does not make a whiner, thin-skinned nominee, it is someone willing to point out the truth. How dare anyone criticize Obama for taking responsibility for addressing this issue whether or not it was directed at him. Wake up there is a new generation in town that thinks people ought to know what others think even if they aren't being attacked. And if they are, whose parents did not teach them to "take care of themselves" in the playground.

    Posted by Laura McNamara May 16, 08 11:58 AM
  1. What wrong with sitting down and having a dicussion We haven't seen anything else work, !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


    THINK

    Posted by WILLIE HARRISON May 16, 08 11:58 AM
  1. Bush is the biggest terrorist as it gets.

    Posted by bruised lee May 16, 08 11:58 AM
  1. Obama DID SAY he wants to meet with these enemies. DOES ANYONE REMEBER THE DEBATE WITH HILLARY CLINTON? It is to the point of ridiculous that Obama is treated like a King of an Imperial Country, entitled to the Presidency, instead of being a responsible and accountable candidate to be President of the most powerful country in the world.. He is being MADE by his campaign to try and overcome his lack of experience and even less judgement. He will never be the President of this country. This candidate has shown NO alliegiance to the United States of America. And standing behind flags, wearing a flag pen and now the cross to capture Catholic voters are hypocricy at its worst.

    Posted by DEM to IND May 16, 08 11:59 AM
  1. What "Straight Talk Express" are we talking about here? McCain is a lier, he's a lier 10 times over and he'll do and say anything to get elected as presidents and continues George W. Bush's third term. Lier, lier lier!!!

    Posted by Shawn May 16, 08 12:00 PM
  1. The chicken that lays the egg cackles. If it did not fit Obama should have kept quiet. By his response he has pointed the finger at himself.

    Posted by curly May 16, 08 12:01 PM
  1. What should really concern the American people is the way this man, whose sole claim to power is his inordinate desire to do something which his father Bush Sr. has never been able to do, namely to win a second term of office, has done a great deal to damage American image and standing in the world in a way no any other president has done. Thinking Americans must see Bush as a traitor. Period. In some countries, he would be facing treason trial. To say something like that in a foreign parliament (whether friend or foe ) reveals how low he has sunk. How was this man able to go Yale? Bribe his way through in a way he bribed his way (riding on the back of his father) to the presidency?

    Posted by Dr. Jesse Kally-Williams May 16, 08 12:01 PM
  1. Bush and bin Laden are on the same side, worst of all McCain doesn't seem to have the intellectual capacity to stay away from Bush. McCain and Bush are no Reagans. Gee, the more bin Laden and his terrorist nuts act up the more we end up paying at the pump and military contracts for Halliburton. Things have changed for the worse since Bush has been President for us and for Israel. Iran wouldn't be at the brink of getting nukes if Bush would have had the wisdom of Ron Reagan before his smack talking about the Axis of Evil, without the guns and allies to back it up. Bush and Cheney went to Iraq on deception. The irony of terrorist and Middle East policy and engagement has made both Iran, the bin Ladens, Bush, Cheney and Haliburton very rich. Yes, Bush didn't give us a tax cut after all we are all paying at the pump and in inflation and joblessness. How dumb do these politicians think we are? Come November it is going to be judgement day, and the day of reckoning with us the American people is at hand and we can't wait. Maybe these Bushies will be able to get a NAFTA job in Mexico, China or India after we fire them all. Don't worry on election day, being an elected government official is a job that no one wanted in the US anyway, so we're going to send you packing to the third world country you sent our jobs to. PS good for the farm bill it is way overdue to give our farmers their fair share. Move on with ethanol and flex fuel. Obama is the new Reagan for the working American.

    Posted by Willie May 16, 08 12:02 PM
  1. It depends on who you really think the real terrorist is! In the Netherlands most people think Bush is a terrorist.

    Posted by poiuyyt May 16, 08 12:03 PM
  1. All this talk of Obama needing to grow "thicker skin" is not only ridiculous, it’s the worst political advice I have ever heard. Obama needs to respond, not because he is "immature", but because President Bush offered a perfect way for Obama to criticize the current administration and link McCain to Bush (which will be one of his primary arguments in the general election). Some of you people need to think before you respond with comments that make no sense.

    Posted by Andrew May 16, 08 12:04 PM
  1. Obama is clearly trying to play on a stage that he does not understand and has no expierence. His words are misleading, dangerious, and can result in further bloodshed on new battlefields. His campaign staff, should tell him to shut his mouth -- becasue its a smoking gun that will leed to his defeat. Now we can understand Hill Clinton stays in the race - he is in the mist of self-destruction.

    Posted by William May 16, 08 12:04 PM
  1. If there is one lesson the Democrats have learned from the Republicans in past elections is, don't allow them to swift boat you. The Repubs will throw out anything to smear you but they cant hide from their own statements from their past. YouTube is so in front of these guys finding their own warts. They cant get a smear position out in one news cycle before they have their pants down around their ankles from some video counterclaiming their BULL, which is coming from their own lips! It's hypocrisy at the highest level and the American people are waking up to it, and seeing it first hand.

    It worked in the past so "BRING IT OWN", my friends. It will be your demise.

    Posted by Gary May 16, 08 12:04 PM
  1. Such a reaction by Obama is an admission of complicity. Its no surprise that Obama rhymes with Osama, they are both muslim, nor is it a surprise that he wishes to "negotiate" with his brothers.

    Here is a man who has shown himself to be an elitist, racist, sexist and downright liar who associates with known terrorists and belongs to a radical "church" that also supports terrorist and racist ideals. That Americans could in any way consider him for president is only evidence of desperation.

    "Sweetie", you can be sure that in private he also uses "whitey", "beaner" and "kyke"

    Posted by Chungo May 16, 08 12:05 PM
  1. Obama vs. McCain is like youTube vs. feeding tube

    Posted by Adam May 16, 08 12:05 PM
  1. Yeah, right, Bush once again not appreciating the idiotic irony of his comments.
    By cozying up to the Saudis (15 or the 19 9/11 terrorists were from Saudi Arabia),
    and staging a bogus "war" in Iraq, killing Pat Tillman and crippling thousands of other young Americans, and refusing to commit the resources to capture Bin Laden (the 6 foot, 8 inch guy "hiding" in the desert), Bush knows all about "appeasement." Don't forget his treason in outing a CIA agent (Valerie Plame). Scooter Libby took the rap but Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld should be tried for war crimes and treason in our Courts, following which they should be deported as undesirable aliens (or at least executed by lethal injection, which the Supreme Court has now ruled is ok). Just as FDR saved America in 1933, I believe President Obama will be our last chance. VOTE!!!! and kick out every single last Republican who has brought our country to the brink of destruction.

    Posted by royhobbs May 16, 08 12:05 PM
  1. Bush and his buddies should be tried for war crimes for what they have done to innocent people. If you voted for this dumb ass in 2004 after all that went on in his first term you should lose your right to vote for some period of time, wake up America

    Posted by GB May 16, 08 12:05 PM
  1. I can't believe some people actually think that Obama should just let Bush make an obvious stab at his foreign policy. This is not a matter of immaturity or sensitivity, we have seen what happens when presidential candidates let their rivals falsely define them. Obama is doing the right thing in rebutting Bush.

    Posted by Chris May 16, 08 12:05 PM
  1. W's crass statement was an incredibly flagrant attack of partisanship unbecoming of any US representative abroad. Once again, he has shamed not only Democrats but all American citizens that aren't racist, spoiled brats born with a stick up their ass.

    Posted by LH May 16, 08 12:05 PM
  1. These discussioins show the difference in the Bush Republican followers and the rest of the world. They respond to the unknown and confict by the 1800's method of firing first and asking questions later.

    Also CAUTION: The US Congress defines who is a terrorist, thus politics is part of the process and not without bias. So we are going to allow the US Congress determine who the president can talk to? This makes no sense.

    Posted by Steve Brown May 16, 08 12:06 PM
  1. Surely the Northern Ireland peace process demonstrates the importance of talking to ¨terrorists¨?

    Talking to terrorists (or people as their friends call them) does not equate to giving in to them. George Bush is disingenuous in suggesting that it does. Jaw jaw is generally better than war war.

    Sadly I don´t get to vote in your election even though the result will undoubtedly affect me. I can only hope that you make a sane choice on my behalf.

    Posted by gypsy_roadhog May 16, 08 12:07 PM
  1. I do believe someone must be feeling a bit exposed or insecure.

    Posted by Mark of Gathol May 16, 08 12:07 PM
  1. I'm starting to think it will be a hellavuh lot easier talking to Hamas than it is talking to Americans who still defend George Bush's catostrophic foreign and domestic policies. For anyone to attack Obama on this particular issue, using words he NEVER SAID, means they are either biased, blind or a bigot.

    Posted by Floyd May 16, 08 12:07 PM
  1. How is George Bush a failure? He has rid the world of one of the most dangerous, violent, and hated dictators this world has ever seen. He opened the door for Democracy in the Middle East. I'm sorry, but I don't see George Bush as a failure. George Bush has made leaps and bounds as far as I'm concerned, ones that previous administrations tried and failed. I think you all buy way to much into what John Stewert and the rest of the liberal media has to say, instead of looking at the big picture.

    Posted by Greg May 16, 08 12:07 PM
  1. Our future President is making a speech in South Dakota today. We should all listen. No matter what the media says, we should listen for ourselves and consider his words carefully.

    Posted by Charlotte May 16, 08 12:08 PM
  1. what is wrong with sitting across the table with an enemy and talking to them?
    are we going to empower them by speaking to them? So help me god the next person who tells me Obama is a muslim might just get choked!!! the guy who sits next to me at work the other day said "I like him, except the fact that he is a muslim" I bet the person who wrote the muslim comment (mary) is from west virginia....anybody who says "he's a muslim I know it", even tho he says he is NOT A MUSLIM should be beaten!!

    Posted by Rob S. May 16, 08 12:08 PM
  1. What is wrong with sitting down with "terrorists"? This administration has labeled practically anyone who doesn't instantly agree with us "terrorists." Diplomacy is the only thing that will get us out of this foreign policy debacle. I hope Obama sits down with them.

    Posted by Nick May 16, 08 12:09 PM
  1. Obama should be quiet and listen. I have as much foreign policy experience as he does. And, I have none.

    Posted by Phil May 16, 08 12:10 PM
  1. And secondly: President Bush himself has talked with "terrorists." North Korea, Syria, etc. So get your facts straight, it was just another "vote for democrat, get nuked" statement the GOP has become so fond of for the last six years.

    Posted by Nick May 16, 08 12:11 PM
  1. MCain floats in the wind. He has flipped flopped more times than a cricket in a frying pan. I like him as a person, but sorry -- this is not a man who should be in charge of our government or foreign affairs.

    Posted by Rose May 16, 08 12:12 PM
  1. Hmm... methinks Obama may have a slight narcissistic streak if he believes that Bush's remarks were aimed specifically at him. To me, the President's remarks sounded more like good sense - and not a "ruthless attack" on Barak Obama. "Negotiation" with extremists (which is distinct from "talking" to them), historically, has never solved anything, has only compounded problems (ask Neville Chamberlain), and is generally a good thing for any government to avoid.

    Seems the President has struck a chord, and I must say, if the Obama campaign is so sensitive to the President's generalized remarks that they believe Mr. Bush specifically charged him with wanting to "negotiate with the terrorists and radicals," then perhaps Mr. Obama's foreign policy could use some adjustment.

    Posted by ccla May 16, 08 12:12 PM
  1. When Reagan spoke to the Soviets et al in a way more forceful than Obama would guaranteed. Can you imagine Obama saying "Tear down this Wall!", or "Peace through strength"? Hell no! And it wasn't to terrorists or terrorist supporters. Also, it does give legitimacy to groups like Hezbollah to speak with them. Speaking with Iran about stopping the support of terrorists in Iraq/Israel of which they will never admit, only gives Iran recognition of the success in their tactics. How will words give them reason to stop the support or surrender the nukes? They perceive a regional advantage against the US and Israel because of the situations they are able to foment in Lebanon, Iraq and Afghanistan. In hindsight Iraq was arguably the biggest blunder in American foreign policy history. A crushing victory in Afghanistan would have enabled diplomacy much greater weight and Iran would have responded to words. Now that option has been squandered.

    The very fact that Obama and the other left wing zealots reacted so bitterly to the “unnamed” appeaser comment means they did identify with the views Bush spoke of and were outraged that it was exposed in such a public way.

    Posted by t4e May 16, 08 12:12 PM
  1. The comments made yesterday by President Bush were inflammatory, but the worse of it is that he made them in Israel. How can we as citizens of this great nation accept this? I don't understand, where is the outrage? Where a sitting President can go across the globe and fan fear and division in his own country. Politics aside it was wrong.

    Posted by Michael Green May 16, 08 12:12 PM
  1. MCain floats in the wind. He has flipped flopped more times than a cricket in a frying pan. I like him as a person, but sorry -- this is not a man who should be in charge of our government or foreign affairs.

    Posted by Rose May 16, 08 12:13 PM
  1. Hizballah is no more a terrorist organization than all the militias in gun crazy America. Coz, you know, if Canada ever got retarded-like and decided they wanted to annex America, and assuming America's army wasn't more powerful than Canada's, those guys would be using the same tactics to protect this nation's sovereignty. Of course, they wouldn't be labeled terrorists because America is the one that gets to make the rules.

    Posted by Jonas May 16, 08 12:14 PM
  1. Does MaCain understand If Nixon did not talk to MAO or let Kissenger talk to Uncle Ho ( both being rougue and terroist counties at the time) he still might be in a box, either above ground or under ground. Takes courge to talk to your Enemies. They are not Hitler and this is not 1938/39. And is case Mcain/Bush have forgotton ( or maybe they have no faith ) we still carry the biggest stick out there. I tired of bullies, its time to bring back Teddy's " talk softly, but carry a big stick " So stop acting like a little yappy yap dog trying to sounding big and tough, and instead act like a big dog that knows it fear nothing- or maybe as Carlos said " baby we are not trying to get the bomb, we got it and we used it, just call up Japan and ask them" But then it take the will to stop playing war and turn the full resources of American against our enemies, but then they have to ask you and me to make a sacrifice to fight the war ( taxes and less consumenr goods)-- but that never happen cause here we want our cake and eat it to.

    Posted by xman May 16, 08 12:14 PM
  1. I think this is a shame, Bush has raped our Country, and now we are going to have an inexperanced spoiled kid in the white house. Wake up America, Isn't it bad enough that Mr. Bush, (noticed I did not call him President) alienated almost every Country we use to call friends. Now you have to show your stupidity by wanting to put a kid in the oval office. What is wrong with you. This country is on the down hill run and all you can think to do is talk bad about one another. I think Donald Duck could run this country better than the Dem. Or the Rep.. I am fed up with he said she said. Get over it and think about what is best for this country and do it. This country was founded on Christians fundamentles Isn't it time we revisited them again?The middle class is being hurt the most and Bushes tax cuts only benifited the rich. Are all your eyes closed dah?

    Posted by Joanie May 16, 08 12:16 PM
  1. This elections, Americans will realize, All Republicans lie, cheat; do anything and say anything to get elected. They are the ambassadors of people and corporations with fat wallets. They are the biggest traitors you will ever see.

    Posted by Shawn May 16, 08 12:17 PM
  1. This country has gone to hell in a hand basket and will continue its descent under whomever is elected. The problem is not the man/woman in charge, but the lack of morality and decency that used to define the USA. Until we get back to basics as far as how people are supposed to treat others and forget all this "me me me" garbage that consumes the American public, nothing will change for the better. By the end of the next presidential term, you probably won't be able to tell this country from communist China or North Korea.

    Posted by Louise May 16, 08 12:17 PM
  1. if you can't talk to them, NUKE 'EM! If they want to attack you, NUKE 'EM!Glass the the whole area that Bin-Laden hides in. We have enough hydrogen bombs, lets use some. Early 4th of July!

    Posted by bin laden and his 7dwarf brained muslim May 16, 08 12:18 PM
  1. Some of the comments on here amaze me. First Bush's comment had nothing to do with Obama. If a terrorist wants to kill you, he will always want to kill you no matter how much you talk to them. Which is why people in Israel have been fighting for hundred of years over a piece of land no bigger than Jersey! Or why north and south Ireland have been going at it for years or why north and south Korea hate each other; why racism is still a cancer in this country, why the Hatfields hate the McCoys and why cat hate dogs! When a certain way of thinking and a certain way of life is instilled into a person, it is very difficult to break them of that. That's a fact. So talking to these people does nothing. Sure Bush is a moron and probably the worst president in history, but he never mentioned Obama at all. Obama loves to play the "woe is me" card and Americans are eating that up! I'm not saying Obama would be a bad or good president, I'm saying we need to pick a leader with a good mix of brains and balls! I'm so sick of this he said she said shit that comes with these stupid political elections. Once the American public realizes they are getting screwed no matter who is president, the quicker we can rectify the problem and hopefully not have to pay $4 a gallon for gas. Lets talk about the REAL issues in this country and not address some high school bullshit like what Obama and McCain are complaining about!

    Posted by John from Ohio May 16, 08 12:20 PM
  1. What is there to talk about? All of you Dems got it figured out. John Kerry said it best. "I will have bilateral and unilateral talks." where's the integrity in that. You are all so self absorbed in your own intelligence that you see no wisdom in the ideas that precede you. It's almost comical. The arrogance is more than I can take...... We'll talk to them about it because we're more civilized than they are...... Do you remember when Pelosi sent her possie to Turkey and then pushed a vote in congress to declare Turkey guilty of Genocide. At that time, we were negotiating transfer of arms through Turkey to Iraq to supply our troops. Please, Bush has been tripped up the whole way by power mongering Democratic elitist who think they are smarter than anybody who comes around them.

    Posted by todd johnson May 16, 08 12:22 PM
  1. is'nt obama mulisum he was born to muslium parents right we do not need some one in our white house like that we need only americans not a muslium if obama was born to musilum parents

    Posted by mary
    ---------------------
    Mary, I suggest you take English lessons to help your spelling, punctuation, and capitalizaton. Look at the many ways you have spelled Muslim and never got it correct. Secondly, base your comments and opinions on FACTS and not on something you know nothing about. Senator Obama's father was from Kenya and was a NONE-PRACTICING Muslim and was NOT a radical Muslim; his mother was A WHITE WOMAN originally from Kansas, whose family moved to Hawii where she met her husband. She was NOT a Muslim. Furthermore, it is not the "Muslim Faith" that is our enemy, it is the RADICAL Muslims, who have a different agenda, that are our enemies. So, please take the time to EDUCATE AND INFORM yourself before you spread LIES. Have a good day and try to use your computer to inform yourself.

    Posted by NinaK May 16, 08 12:22 PM
  1. To All those who are fooling yourselves and believe that there will be peace EVER in the Middle East. The terrorists do not and never will want peace even if they are given their own state and even if Israel is wiped off the map they will still fight,

    THE FACT is that there is more violence in Arab countries than anywhere else in the world between muslims themselves. Israel is just a great excuse for the Muslims to blame all their internal failures and violence.

    An Obama presidency will surely embolden terrorists, the mere fact that a Muslim is in the white house can only make those terrorists feel better. You cannot argue that for a moment. Whether Bush has been success ful or not at least he has been fighting terror and keeping terrorists on their toes at all times THEY ARE AFRAID OF A REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT.

    Posted by The voice of reason and truth May 16, 08 12:22 PM
  1. I find it extraordinary that our government finds it easier to fight than communicate.
    Facing your opponent and "hearing" their issues, not placating them, has proven effective in the past. President Bush hides behind his faith, lies about the facts and has caused America to become a target of hate. I don't know who should become President at this point, but I know it should not be someone who will not face down their opponents and listen with a humane ear to compromise and resolutions without weapons.

    Posted by Robin Harvey May 16, 08 12:23 PM
  1. Obama cares about what Bush is saying because this is how the Neocons start, he's right to jump all over this irrespective of whether or not it was directed at him - it's Rove 101 and if left unchecked, it escalates and before you know it..we're back to Swiftboat. Go hard Obama - remember your DNC speech - "I am truly my Brothers keeper".

    Posted by Local128 May 16, 08 12:24 PM
  1. i allwayes think the power lies to the people.you all americans do not fall for this
    dirty politics.the bush adm.is the worriest in our time.bush does not even know
    what kind of world he lives.he is accting like a cow boy.this is not a movie world.we are belong in one planet,we have to find commen ground to live in pease.is that to much to ask? so ther is no problem even to talk to your enemy.we
    must not afraid anybody.beside obama never said i will set with hamas.he said we have to try to find a way to talk to leaders of other nation.

    Posted by jose May 16, 08 12:26 PM
  1. Much of the Democrat party seeks our defeat in Iraq. As a result, they are traitors.

    Why would traitors be upset about the truth being told about little 'ol appeasement?

    By the way, I happen to think a "third Bush term" is a helluva lot better than a "second term for Jimmy Carter!"

    Posted by John Sorg May 16, 08 12:26 PM
  1. Sun Tzu, quoted by an earlier commentator.
    Sun Tzu's philosophy of war (and equally useful in many other situations) is more than 2000 years old. It is closely studied in all of the military academies and by military officers planning wars.
    Keep your friend close, and your enemies closer.

    Posted by Phil Douglas May 16, 08 12:29 PM
  1. Inexperienced Senator Obama is dangerously hoping for solutions through diplomacy. How naive? Doesn't he know that, only through war can we achieve peace. The only true way to achieve true peace in the eyes of the Rapture crowd, is to blow up Hamas, blow up Iran, blow up Europe, blow up the U.N., blow up Democrats that speak up, and blow up the Republicans that disagree with them on abortion, or gay marriage, or government spending.

    Appeasement is a long word. Somebody should look it up before using it. I know Bush struggles with difficult vocabulary words like sovereign and appeasement.

    Posted by Kevin May 16, 08 12:32 PM
  1. I blame Pelosi for not supporting the impeachment of Cheney and Bush after the 2006 elections. Impeachment for High Crimes and Misdemeanors; then conviction in the Senate for multiple violations of the Constitution. Then - here goes - send them in handcuffs to the International Criminal Court in the Hague to stand trial for crimes against humanity. Let them try to explain the complete destruction of Iraq and the deaths of one million people.

    Posted by John Hauptman May 16, 08 12:32 PM
  1. (Stepping up to soapbox, testing microphone.)

    Ahem!

    "White House aides privately acknowledged the remarks were aimed at the presidential candidate and others in his party." — White House Correspondent Ed Henry

    "[A] senior administration official...specifically mentioned Obama and former President Jimmy Carter's suggestion that the U.S. talk to Hamas" — NBC's John Yang


    And yet, here many of you are, like good little Amurrikins, slurping up the "offical" story all day long like hogs at the trough.


    "Fool me once, shame on............shame on you.... Fool me — you can't get fooled again" — George W. Bush.


    Please grow up, USA. Your naivete is not cute anymore.

    Posted by perspicio May 16, 08 12:32 PM
  1. Bush never said anything about Obama, and yet he and the democrats are throwing a fit. Obama could simply agree and move on but instead he and the party take the occasion to pull another one of their phony indignation tactics. YAWN..

    Posted by Eddie Haskell May 16, 08 12:53 PM
  1. "President Bush hides behind his faith, lies about the facts and has caused America to become a target of hate."

    Please supply some evidence. How did George Bush cause America to be a target of hate? When did he lie about facts? how does he hide behind his faith? How does this make President Bush a bad president? If this makes for a bad president then one could probobly prove no president was ever a good president.

    Posted by Greg May 16, 08 12:58 PM
  1. Every false knock is a boost because we the majority of American people say so and weill make it so. Obama is exactly what America and the world needs now before the wormongers from Bush Jr. down to the last neocon zionist get the entire earth in a fire of hell. As ror israel I am an American NOT an israeli or any other nation on earth. NO ONE can honestly be loyal to more than one nation.
    Israel security can only come if and when israel joins the HUMAN RACE and acts like it. I think it will be no other than the TRUE JEWISH people world wide that will bring zionist down and out of israel once and for ever. True Jews live up to Gods Laws as well as international laws. They know that they ofe one flock of GOD out of many flocks. GOD bless all of the peacemakers in the world and GOD bless Obama and add ten more like him in our US government and we the people will give you 10000 more. As for Bush Jr. he is a nothing idiot and so there is nothing worth saying about the worst pResident in American history.

    Posted by Dan Ciaramella May 16, 08 01:01 PM
  1. Ladies&Gentlemen,sometimes it is better not to return fire to fire. Allow the sleeping dog to sleep. Thanks

    Posted by Jerry n. Eneogwe May 16, 08 01:05 PM
  1. First, let me say that regardless of which candidate you support, you have to agree it's nice to see the American public finally paying attention! I'm ashamed that in previous election years, American Idol was dissected and studied more than any candidate for Presidency. But it looks like the nation is *slowly* coming around, which is encouraging.
    On the topic of President Bush's comments:
    Although they were not directed specifically at Obama, the implication was there. McCain jumping on board to direct negative attention to Obama is really disappointing! Please, don't think it was coincidental.
    I don't promote any of the candidates-they all have their flaws. But I would think establishing communication with a terrorist-state such as Hamas would be a priority. Know thy enemy. Is it truely naive to think that opening a line of communication could be detrimental? Shouldn't that be the first step? This country has been operating out of fear for 8 years, and I believe we were entitled to be fearful after 9/11. But we missed the mark. There comes a time when you have find the courage to dismiss your fear. Stop reacting and ACT.
    Whether you have a religion to guage yourself, or your own moral standard, I believe that we all agree that violence is not the first reaction. So why does our government(and not just ours) feel it's the only course of action?
    Communication is a key componant of an advanced society, which I'm sure we can catagorize ourselves as. Let's get off the playground and remember that by protecting our egos and protecting our dominant role, these misguided decisions effect HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF LIVES. People- men, women,children- die.
    The current administration seems to have forgotten that.

    Posted by Heather M. May 16, 08 01:05 PM
  1. Everyone here saying that, "Bush did not use Obama's name," are you truly that incompetent? Is your intellect really on the same level of the person who made these statements in the first place? Have some respect for yourself.
    If you all are going to sit there, and actually use that statement as reinforcement, my God you are truly lost.

    Posted by Jon May 16, 08 01:15 PM
  1. Obama has become very predictable. His lack of experience is showing;
    his specific proposals for change are not.

    Posted by Paul Hightower May 16, 08 01:15 PM
  1. When Barry Hussein OBomba's magic pixie dust has settled on Nov.8. The exit polling will reveal this. The American people will not or ever trust the security of this country to a Left Wing Marxist . With his close friends and allies Rev .Wright and the unrepentant Weathermen Terrorist William Ayers closely connected to the Messiah . Poor Barry Hussien's chances will be flushed down the crapper.

    Posted by jimbeaux May 16, 08 01:16 PM
  1. What this all boils down to is this;

    Obama wins, your retirement gets taxed...period.

    He didnt even know the difference between Hamas and Humus until December so if thats the fresh face you all want leading us, good luck.

    here's my 3 prediction if Obama wins;

    Gas prices $6.00 gallon

    8% reduction in jobs over $50K/annually
    20% increase in jobs less than $50K annually
    that way he can say he has increased jobs

    % of welfare and SS dependents increases 10%

    Posted by mheal May 16, 08 01:17 PM
  1. Leave it to moonbat Obama, I wish he would just go away.

    Posted by Troy May 16, 08 01:17 PM
  1. George better hurry up and attack Cuba before Casto dies.

    Posted by concerned May 16, 08 01:20 PM
  1. Obama can really use this to distinguish his message of unity and change from McCain and Bush's divisiveness. What I have picked up is that there has been a policy over 60 years old of "leaving partisanship at the water's edge." In other words, in foreign countries, American politicians are not supposed to swipe at each other and show a united front abroad.

    Bush took a divisive step that hasn't been seriously breached in decades and then McCain supported the tactic. This was petty and Obama not only should call it out the way he did, but frame this event as an example of what needs to be changed in Washington and the extent that divisiveness is spreading in our country.

    Posted by Charlie S May 16, 08 01:21 PM
  1. So most of you are saying we should appease the oppressors, those who killed thousands, those who still torture their own, those who hide behind the innocent, those who wish for the complete destruction of Israel, and those who are so cowardly they strap bombs to their young. Talking to these people only gives them more power and emboldens them to do more. Stop buying their oil, however, and they have no leverage on which to stand. As Clinton found out the hard way, talking is NOT the answer--Sanctioning these countries is.

    Posted by Adam May 16, 08 01:21 PM
  1. Bush was also sneering at Jimmy Carter but when it comes to a debate with Barack Obama it would be the genius versus the pinhead who has parroted all the kinds of nonsense that warmonger minds always have ... make you afraid and take your money and go out and make war ... even though W was tutored extensively by C. Rice in geography and world power balances, he's never had his own vision. After all, God told him to go to war, remember? Maybe God will tell him to debate with Obama. Bush would need Dr. Phil's ear cam to tell him what to say. Or else he could just keep saying the same old things we've heard for how many years?

    Posted by Gaias Child May 16, 08 01:21 PM
  1. So seriously, I don't understand what's so horrible about meeting with leaders of "rogue nations". If you look back, and I don't care what John McCain thinks he heard, (or more probably knows he didn't hear but thinks he can pass off on the general public) Barack Obama has never once said he would unconditionally meet, much less negotiate with known terrorists or hostile leaders.

    He simply understands what George W. Bush and John McCain don't seem to. You can't make someone go away by ignoring them.

    Posted by Clay May 16, 08 01:22 PM
  1. Everything is a distraction and an attack to this marxist empty suit. Can you imagine the US of A handing over the keys to this community organizer (whatever that is) during a time of war? Wake up sheeple.

    Posted by Kev May 16, 08 01:26 PM
  1. don't wast your time. it will never get posted unless it agrees with the bloger.
    kinda like israel who don't talk with any one unless they agree with israel.. That is why israel never learns anything because people never learn anything form any one that agrees with them.
    PS ... some of us are not well educated, can't spell well, poor gramma BUT we don't complain about the short comeings of the great educted people that always THINK they know best. Just ignore them Mary and kee on writing cause you migh just have more wisdom than most of us. Some of our greatest people were not well educated I.E. Edison, Ford etc. and they gave the world wonderful things while some like einstine gave us nukes to set the world on ire with. Boy I for one am glad that i am a dummy...

    Posted by Dan Ciaramella May 16, 08 01:26 PM
  1. Kind of funny Obama knew exactly who it was directed at! I'd hate to see Obama in the white house. Raise the taxes, expand government! Give me a break the guy is a joke

    Posted by jim burke May 16, 08 01:26 PM
  1. I have an observation I would like to point out. Since the beginning of this campaign Obama has said that he does not wear a pin of the american flag on his lapel because he doesnt need to show his patriotism in this way, and he was adament about this. Now this week, it suddenly appears on his lapel. So all of a sudden, when he thinks he needs to bolster his image as a true american, the pin appears. How convenient. His wife hates america too, so WHY DO YOU WANT THIS GUY AS PRESIDENT?? You people are like sheep to the slaughter, whatever the biased media spews, dumb-ass liberals believe...and follow with blinders, and make no mistake, you are following a racist candidate with 0 experience, in the mosy dangerous times of all recorded time.

    This guy is a joke....just look at Coupe Deval Patrick, you Dems voted him in on the "change" platform, and he has done zero, nada, zip...NOTHING!!!!!! Wake up, Barak Osama Bin Ladin will be 1,000 times worse, and we WILL be attacked again if he gets in, thats for sure. He is soft on terrorism, and is clueless on how to handle this, that is evident.

    Posted by Joey Zazza May 16, 08 01:26 PM
  1. Oh dear, the Dems phony indignation.......let's take a moment to reflect on just how well Bush has done.

    536,000,000,000: the number of dollars the Pentagon is requesting for the 2009 military budget. This represents an increase of almost 70% over the Pentagon's 2001 budget (Do you feel safer yet?)
    1,390,000: the number of subprime foreclosures over the next two years, as estimated by Credit Suisse analysts
    1,000,000: the number of "missions" or "sorties" the U.S. Air Force proudly claims to have flown in the Global War on Terror since 9/11 (Why is gas so high?)
    509,000: the number of names found in 2007 on a "terrorist watch list" compiled by the FBI (are you one?)
    300,000: the number of American troops who now suffer from major depression or post-traumatic stress (and growing)
    51,000: the number of post-surge Iraqi prisoners held in American and Iraqi jails at the end of 2007 (most without charges - ah, Bush democracy!)
    5,700: the number of trailers in New Orleans - issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency as temporary housing after Hurricane Katrina - still occupied by people who lost their homes in the storm almost three years ago (Heckuva job!)
    658: the number of suicide bombings worldwide last year, including 542 in Afghanistan and Iraq, (more than double the number in any of the past 25 years)
    511: the number of applicants convicted of felony crimes, including burglary, grand larceny, and aggravated assault, who were accepted into the U.S. Army in 2007
    126: the number of dollars it took to buy a barrel of crude oil on the international market this week. Meanwhile, the average price of a gallon of regular gas at the pump in the U.S. hit $3.72
    82: the percentage of Americans who think "things in this country… have gotten pretty seriously off on the wrong track
    40: the percentage loss ("on a trade-weighted basis") in the value of the dollar since 2001
    37: the number of countries that have experienced food protests or riots in recent months due to soaring food prices

    Thank you Mr. President, GOP enablers, and all of your experienced advisors!

    Posted by Mark McVay May 16, 08 01:31 PM
  1. RE NinaK & comment 118: Of course you're right to criticize ignorant English usage. But, the term is "nonpracticing", not "NONE-PRACTICING".

    Posted by Brian May 16, 08 01:31 PM
  1. Those who say Obama is not mature enough. F8*K you!
    By your standands the prizident must be a killer - bush qualifies 4000 times and McCain does too as he raped and killed babies.

    Posted by matt May 16, 08 01:31 PM
  1. to jack ryan...

    in which of obama's two books, and on what page did he declare that he "stands by his Muslim Brother Hood"?

    Posted by les May 16, 08 01:32 PM
  1. In "Losing Hearts and Minds?: Public Diplomacy and Strategic Influence in the Age of Terror” Carnes Lord a professor of military and naval strategy at the US Naval War College and former John M. Olin (Really right wing) Visiting Professorship in Statecraft and Civilization at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, "drawing on his high-level public policy experience, outlines what he considers to be an appropriate strategy to develop the organizational mechanisms within the U.S. government needed to carry out an effective public-diplomacy campaign to defeat the 'center of gravity' of Islamic terrorism, which 'lies not in its organizational structure but in its ideological inspiration the real source of the fresh recruits who continue to flock to the terrorist banner' ...Mr. Lord's discussion of the role of public diplomacy and strategic influence as vital instruments of American national power is especially pertinent today as the administration and Congress goes about the business of confronting religious extremism and terrorism." -- The Washington Times

    Posted by Kerry May 16, 08 01:34 PM
  1. Um, White House press releases state clearly that Bush was talking about Obama.

    Ronald Reagan negotiated with Iran. I suppose he was also an appeaser.

    Negotiation is talking with others. Appeasement is giving in to their demands. There is really something wrong with your vocabulary skills if you cannot distinguish.

    Posted by Fran Taylor May 16, 08 01:34 PM
  1. Violence is always the solution to those with no imagination.

    Posted by Jimbo Hightops May 16, 08 01:34 PM

  1. Obama is fully functional and has reacted with conviction which I think is appropriate,,,The Saudis had sent billions of dollars to support Hamas and also there are many terrorist living in Saudi Arabia...Bush is presently rubbing faces and necks with these covert terrorists and discussing how to fill the pockets of the conglomerates..Such an idiot, his usage of WORDS are so POOR....So at least, he is meeting with terrorist, and they are affluent MUSLIMS who OPPRESS poor people. Bush is an IDIOT....

    Posted by rajah kahn May 16, 08 01:37 PM
  1. Oh would you please stop embarrassing the Obama campaign with your loony rantings. It is bad enough we have detractors from the opposition; we do not need the help of our own supporters blasting off and damning people to hell. I just wish Barrack would have just agreed with what the President said and left it at that. His advisors are making him sound like he is defending himself when he has nothing to defend himself against.
    Relax people. Stay on point. Our man will make it.

    Posted by Maintain May 16, 08 01:37 PM
  1. The President of the US should not be airing Politics on the Foreign Stage period! Even if you grant him the right to actually DO that, do you think the rest of the World does not know HE HAS ZERO CRED?

    Posted by Hawk May 16, 08 01:38 PM
  1. First of all comment #7, JFK was by far the worst President in the history of the USA. He was a lier, adulterer, mob flunky, and an outright loser as is his entire family. Chapaquidick. As far as Barrack Bin Ladin Obama is concerned if we elect him we should just invite Al-queda over for tea since they will be running the country. Maybe Rev Wright can have the government invent a disease to erardicate whites like he believe the white gov invented AIDS to kill blacks.

    Posted by Jim T May 16, 08 01:38 PM
  1. "Bush did not say Obama's name nor did he imply Obama. Most educated thinking people automatically assumed he was speaking about JIMMY CARTER and his talks with Hamas."

    That is the most ridiculous statement I have ever heard. Note how I am not using your name. But am I referring to you? You bet I am. And Bush was clearly referring to Senator Obama.

    Posted by JimR May 16, 08 01:39 PM
  1. AH yes, Diplomacy has worked so wonderfully in that region of the planet over the last 2000 years.

    Posted by Jim May 16, 08 01:39 PM
  1. No, we should not appease those oppressors. We should wage preemptive wars against all those countries, occupy their countries and bring the wrath of our god until they are submissive to our ideology. Even if it takes 100 years and countless number of our very own people lives.

    Posted by Nobody May 16, 08 01:44 PM
  1. If Bush believes that talking with Iran is akin to appeasement, one wonders what Bush would have to say about the great conservative hero Reagan - who sold arms to Iran immediately following the US hostage crisis.

    Posted by Athena May 16, 08 01:44 PM
  1. the whole democrat party would sit down with terrorists. ex: Jimmy Carter.
    the face of their party are all failed presidential wanna-bees (edwards, kerry, gore, dashel) add Obama to the list.

    drill for oil.

    Posted by Ryan Snyder May 16, 08 01:47 PM
  1. Why is it that everything is about political backtracking and not common sense, which the American people could use a dose of for a change. How do you define a terrorist? Someone who has a "belief" that is totally contrary to the real belief of a religion or a people to the point that they try to use force to shove it down others throat? If that is the case is Obama also willing to negotiate with the KKK , White Supremists and Arian Brothers who also have a belief so perverted that they would be willing to destroy the country to have their way. He is either unable to think before he speaks or he does not have the ability he tries to convince everyone he does.

    Posted by Roy May 16, 08 01:48 PM
  1. What diplomacy? I thought there were mostly all wars all those years. Why abondon that strategy now, it has not worked for the last 2000 years?

    Posted by Unjim May 16, 08 01:49 PM
  1. The problem here is that the "negotiate" crowd thinks that the problems are solvable by understanding the underlying grievances and seeking rational ways to resolve them peacefully. We aren't talking about a fighting married couple needing a marriage counselor. We aren't even talking about a country that we have some fundamental misunderstanding with due to differences of culture. We are talking about evil proto nazi states like Iran and and terrorist groups like hamas and alqueda that want to kill anyone who isn't like them. Thats the way they think. They are "right" we are "wrong". They are "good" we the western world are "the great satan". They don't want to negotiate, they want the western world to die and Isreal to die. When somebody wants you dead, you shoot them first to survive.

    Posted by Common Sense May 16, 08 01:51 PM
  1. They say, "HE (current president) DIDN'T MENTION ANY NAMES!" ......DUH-H-U-AH! Dummy is, Dummy Does! Names in such a precise context need not be mentioned, DUMMY! Anyone with an I.Q above 50 understands what was being
    implied! SPELL IT OUT? OK . How 'bout a direct calculated cowardly attack on the Senator from Illinois competency on foreign affair policies....oh,cowardly...oh, [He] waited to get on foreign soil to engage [his] laim attacks on Dem Pres. Nom..WHO!

    Posted by Lil 'George May 16, 08 01:54 PM
  1. We talk to Israel, which practices routine (state) terrorism against the Palestinians, making the Israelis "terrorists", so why shouldn't Obama or anyone else talk to Hamas, which uses terror as a tactical military response to Israel's state terrorism. Hamas was legitimately elected by the Palestinians to boot (a fact usually ignored in the West), so there is absolutely no reason to refuse to talk to them. This refusal has everything to do with U.S. and Israeli public relations requirements, which demand such refusal in order to avoid legitimizing Hamas in the eyes of Americans. To do so would undermine the whole premise of the "War on Terror" and U.S. public support for it.

    Posted by Winston Warfield May 16, 08 01:54 PM
  1. Maybe diplomacy hasn't worked, but neither has war.

    Posted by mike May 16, 08 01:55 PM
  1. Obama is making very sure he will not get "swift boated" by replying.
    Why paint yourself into a corner by stating you'll never talk with someone?

    Even Winston Churchill, no Hitler appeaser, said "Jaw Jaw is beter than War War. " You can always talk with an adversary; you don't have to agree with them. Just don't maintain false hopes they they will magically come to agreement with you. .

    Posted by Steve May 16, 08 01:56 PM
  1. "Why of course the people don't want war. Why should some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally the common people don't want war: neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country." --Hermann Goering, Hitler's #2

    Posted by Courtney May 16, 08 01:56 PM
  1. The "terror threat" is a lie. Bush and his cronies should be sent to jail for murder and treason. 9-11 was an inside job, wake up people, don't believe everything your mainstream media (owned by the bankers and world elite) throw at you. Do some investigating.

    Posted by Dan May 16, 08 01:58 PM
  1. Bush's comments about Obama were dead on!

    Of course Obama supports appeasment. Why would we think anything else. Whenever he was asked to vote on anything related to foreign policy, he voted "present." It was safer than actually taking a stand.

    It will be fun to have a Muslim as our President. Soon all of our women will have to wear towels on their head.

    Posted by Dumb Black May 16, 08 02:00 PM
  1. Barack Obama is a principled and strong leader. He understands that a wider and more pragmatic meaning of the term diplomacy will be more effective and keep America more safe. The President on the other hand has a narrow view of the world around him. He has severely diminished America's credibilty and stature around the world. His foreign policy has been misguided and full of lost opportunities. Barack needed to respond to Bush's and McCain's comments. It shows the American people that he's a candidate that can lead our country, not only in the domestic arena but also in this trecherous world. Good for Barack for showing some backbone. More to come!

    Posted by GreggfromDorchester May 16, 08 02:01 PM
  1. MCain floats in the wind. He has flipped flopped more times than a cricket in a frying pan. I like him as a person, but sorry -- this is not a man who should be in charge of our government or foreign affairs.

    Posted by Rose
    ------------------------
    I think your analogy of Senator McCain is priceless. Indeed, MCain floats in the wind. He has flipped flopped more times than a cricket in a frying pan. First he is for something, then he's against it; he is against it and then is for it! That man seems to live in a world of confusion and does not seem to remember what he said and did. Altzheimers setting in???

    Posted by NinaK May 16, 08 02:01 PM
  1. MCain floats in the wind. He has flipped flopped more times than a cricket in a frying pan. I like him as a person, but sorry -- this is not a man who should be in charge of our government or foreign affairs.

    Posted by Rose
    ------------------------
    I think your analogy of Senator McCain is priceless. Indeed, MCain floats in the wind. He has flipped flopped more times than a cricket in a frying pan. First he is for something, then he's against it; he is against it and then is for it! That man seems to live in a world of confusion and does not seem to remember what he said and did. Altzheimers setting in???

    Posted by NinaK May 16, 08 02:02 PM
  1. McCain Crime Family... His family has served with honor for several generations including his own son. He spent 6 years as a POW in Vietnam when he could have left, he chose to stay with his men...

    Bush is a moron I agree. But do not equate McCain with Bush. McCain is the anti Bush in the Republican Party

    McCain will win the Independents in Novemeber, Barrack Hussein Obama can't even win white/catholic/middle class/blue collar workers... News Flash thats the Bulk of the Democratic Party.

    You are an abomination John Q....
    You pathetic little man.

    Posted by Matt May 16, 08 02:05 PM

  1. American Empire - The Imperial Psychosis
    Wednesday, 14 May 2008
    A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford
    Global aggression is a family affair at the Bush White House. The President cynically assigns his wife to threaten the ruling military junta in Myanmar, while simultaneously requesting that the generals open their borders to U.S. hurricane relief aid. The two First Hypocrites, George and Laura, could not be so stupid as to believe that insulting the junta - amid calls for regime change in Myanmar - would smooth the process of disaster relief. The Bush White House put on a phony show of concern for the storm-battered people Myanmar, knowing full well that U.S. saber-rattling would only cause the junta to guard more zealously against foreign intrusion. The Bushes are more concerned with making the generals look bad, than with saving lives in Myanmar.

    Laura and George: Hypocritical Ghouls of Disaster
    A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford
    "Threatening to overthrow foreign governments has apparently become so routine at the Bush White House, the president lets Laura do it."

    The Mad Invader, George Bush, finds nothing shameful in drafting his wife into the international outlaw business. No doubt Bush beamed with pride from the shadows as Laura Bush last week exploited the deaths of tens of thousands to issue veiled threats against the military rulers of Myanmar, formerly known as Burma. The First Lady proved as alien to diplomacy as her husband - and just as much the bully - by insulting the Myanmar junta in the same breath that she asked free passage through Myanmar's borders to aid hurricane victims. One does not curse a man while seeking permission to help his household - unless, of course, one's real mission is insult and aggression, not philanthropy. Mrs. Bush charged the ruling generals with failing to give their people adequate warning of the storm's approach - as if her verbal assault on their character and competence, whether true or not, would cause the junta to eagerly cooperate with American disaster relief efforts. As should have been expected, the junta, their faces publicly slapped, did not welcome foreigners with open arms - especially not the Americans, much of whose assistance was to be delivered by U.S. Navy ships and aircraft.

    The Myanmar junta is corrupt and cruel, but not stupid enough to throw open their borders to a military whose commander-in-chief is named George Bush, the Regime Changer. So busily bellicose is President Bush, he finds it necessary to delegate Myanmar-related threat-making to his wife, Laura, who last October demanded that the country's generals "step aside," forthwith. Threatening to overthrow foreign governments has apparently become so routine at the Bush White House, if the president's schedule is too crowded, he lets Laura do it.

    "Bush doesn't give a damn about the people of Myanmar, and neither does his wife."

    Traditionally, American First Lady's are expected to be concerned with humanitarian affairs, but not to soil themselves with the dirty business of armed aggression. However, the Bush regime has succeeded in popularizing what they consider Humanitarian Wars - aggressions that are for the other guy's own good. Shock and Awe with a heart of gold. The benevolent, armed embrace of weaker countries. Tough love among nations.

    The Bush's invasion compulsion must be contagious, because much of the ruling circles of America have caught it. Time magazine asked if it was time to invade Burma which, it is assumed, will go back to its old name once the generals are removed. The influential (among warmongers) publication Aerospace & Defense Network, for obvious reasons, argues that it's past time to fly the American flag over Myanmar which, incidentally, has substantial oil and natural gas reserves. According to the magazine, the U.S. considered invading Myanmar on several previous occasions, in order to remove that country from its number two place in the global heroin trade. It appears the Americans thought they could do a better anti-drug job in Myanmar than they've done with the U.S. puppet states of Afghanistan and Colombia, currently ranked number one worldwide in heroin and cocaine, respectively.

    As Kanye West informed us in the wake of a U.S. disaster, George Bush doesn't care about Black people - to which wisdom we add: Bush doesn't give a damn about the people of Myanmar, either, and neither does his wife. They are both ghouls, drawn to sites of death and horror, eager to feast - and ever anxious to invade.


    Posted by The Truth May 16, 08 02:15 PM
  1. Im just hoping Obama's best words will be: "Would you like fries widdat"

    Posted by T.W.P. May 16, 08 02:16 PM
  1. To All those who are fooling yourselves and believe that there will be peace EVER in the Middle East. The terrorists do not and never will want peace even if they are given their own state and even if Israel is wiped off the map they will still fight,

    THE FACT is that there is more violence in Arab countries than anywhere else in the world between muslims themselves. Israel is just a great excuse for the Muslims to blame all their internal failures and violence.

    An Obama presidency will surely embolden terrorists, the mere fact that a Muslim is in the white house can only make those terrorists feel better. You cannot argue that for a moment. Whether Bush has been success ful or not at least he has been fighting terror and keeping terrorists on their toes at all times THEY ARE AFRAID OF A REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT.

    Posted by The voice of reason and truth
    -----------------------------------------------------

    You really should change your "name" to "The Voice of deceit and untruth". Senator Obama is NOT a Muslim; he is a Christian. Please do your research and get yourself informed on the TRUTH. It is ignorant people like you who spread rumors and lies.

    Posted by NinazK May 16, 08 02:16 PM
  1. Speak to your enemies? Speak to Iran? Speak to North Korea? Of course.

    "Always keep your friends close. But keep your enemies closer."

    Niccolò Machiavelli said those words. I seem to recall that he was pretty much a political genius. Of course, if you don't like Machiavelli, how about Don Corleone, who said the same thing in Godfather I. Unfortunately, neither Bush nor McCain understand the art of manipulating your enemy.. They believe only in threats and intimidation - that if you ignore someone, he'll go away. Really dumb.

    Posted by Splinter09 May 16, 08 02:24 PM
  1. We should all be happy that there are 8 months left of this of horrible administration they and the Republicans have done enough damage to this great country of ours, I'll take my chances With Obama or Clinton.

    Posted by Vincent May 16, 08 02:26 PM
  1. I think bushie is right talking to those vermin is useless unless your an America hating politician like obama. Your going to tell Me He didn't take some of the anti American shite aka rev. wright was spewing to heart . He sat there for 20 years listening to this vermin talk about how bad America is how bad the rich are then he gets in his bentley and drives away to his mansion in the hated white suburbs. Poor America the once great nation is on its knee's because a two party system with vermin on both sides facist repuclicans and communist democrats. I love America you vermin politicians , to bad General Washington or Jefferson weren't around all these scum pols would be swinging from a tree.

    Posted by red May 16, 08 02:26 PM
  1. Its amazing how brainwashed people are. We are all part of a failed system. The not so mighty dollar is what rules our lives. It is a prison that we will not get out of regardless of what party is in power. But at least the democratic party would attemp to bring us together Instead of dividing us and the rest of world further. All we need is another warmongering gay basher in the office. I'm pretty sure a few of are anceisters left england because of the goverment there. Look what we have become.

    Posted by Aggrevated May 16, 08 02:30 PM
  1. RE NinaK & comment 118: Of course you're right to criticize ignorant English usage. But, the term is "nonpracticing", not "NONE-PRACTICING".

    Posted by Brian (#148)
    ---------------------------------
    In this instance, none-practicing is correct as an adverb describing Muslims. No such word as nonpracticing. At least, not according to The American Heritage Dictionary".

    PS, thanks for the kudo, though! :)

    Posted by NinazK May 16, 08 02:34 PM
  1. I am a registered Democrat but I am going to switch to Republican to vote for the candidate that would best bring this country through this difficult time. John McCain. Obama IS an arrogant dreamer and he is a fool if he thinks he can reason with a man who feels that Isreal should not even exist....He will make this nation look like it is cowarding to Bin Laden, the Terrorists organizations, and other American hating nations..I, for one, think this is wrong no matter how you spell it out. McCain will bring back this country's glory, strength,and reputation............
    Let Obama dream all he wants......
    Let him keep dreaming about becoming this Nations President !!
    GOD BLESS AMERICA NOT DAMN IT !!!!

    PEACE TO ALL !!

    Posted by Jamie Dipietrio May 16, 08 02:34 PM
  1. Seriously...
    All I see are Adults behaving like children. What is scary is that unlike children, Adults don't have anyone to put them in their places when they've done wrong.

    I like America and I am very proud to be an American. But it's sad to see how Americans take ALOT for granted. Americans have become so spoiled that we bully just about any country to get what we want. It's no wonder Americans are so unpopular. We make little to no sacrafices.

    I am a free spirit and I will vote for the best person to represent me & my family. So far I'm not too impressed. All I've seen is name calling, dirt throwing, and childish behavior. If I want this kind of entertainment I can go to my kids' playground.

    I want MY government to GROW UP, be like our great forefathers. Leave a legacy of positive achievements, not this terriable reputation of being American that we have all created for ourselves.

    In God I Trust, may he lead this nation in the right direction and prevent further distruction.

    Posted by Ghost May 16, 08 02:37 PM
  1. How much can each of us read what the opposing side has to say, and find something to agree with? A place to start talking? Reaching common ground? We're all responsible for our country. We can't succeed without each other. Embrace what's good.

    Posted by Brook Wiers May 16, 08 02:48 PM
  1. In this Democrat state you would be hard pressed to find an objective view. However, the facts remain the same. When asked the question directly, Obama did not equivocate - he said, "I would." He uses some sort of logic to equate Reagan talking with the USSR as the same as our next president with Iran and other belligerent nations. The USSR was at the time a super-power and those talks came after prior presidents negotiated arms treaties with the Soviets (SALT I and SALT II.) By treating them in the same manner elevates their status, while they are current major sponsors of terror.

    These policies, if that is what is meant by "Hope and Change" by Obama are merely regurgitate failed policies of Carter and Zbigniew Brzezinski - which by the way began our involvement in Afghanistan and armed the radical Islamics. It is also a fact that Carter's lack of support for the Shah resulted in the takeover of Iran by the Mullahs. To date there was no worse president than Carter on foreign policy - which he continues bubbling through in retirement. Obama has the potential to beat his record of incompetence..

    Posted by FRS May 16, 08 02:49 PM
  1. Kind of funny Obama knew exactly who it was directed at! I'd hate to see Obama in the white house. Raise the taxes, expand government! Give me a break the guy is a joke

    Posted by jim burke
    ---------------------------
    Jim, what Senator Obama said today is: Bush directed his outrageous comments at "me and other democrats". Did you listen AND HEAR what he said?? President Bush was totally out of line with his comments, most especially in trying to connect the dems with Hitler and the Halocaust. This kind of talk is extremely divisive, damaging to our democrac, and to the United States of America, and to how the world sees us.

    Posted by NinazK May 16, 08 02:50 PM
  1. Obama continues to prove his is ahead of the curve with his thinking and judgement of international affairs. Whevever he says somethng about the middle ease, he is roundly critisized by the more "experienced" politicians. Af ew weeks or months later, people begin to see th wisdom of his words. He is going to be a great president!

    Posted by Scott in NM May 16, 08 03:01 PM
  1. Let me start by stating the obvious; Political Intelligence is an oxymoron.

    That being said Foon Rhee ought to read, in its entirety, Bush's comments. No where does Obama's name appear in those comments. So this is all nonsense. Why should Obama feel the need to refute Bush when he wasn't even named. Perhaps the truth hit too close to home.

    Maybe he's a bit sensitive to one of his ex-staffers who resigned last weekend over his contacts with Hamas. Does the name Rob Malley ring a bell with anyone. Didn't think so, as this was barely reported upon by any of the press.

    Posted by Paul Revere May 16, 08 03:06 PM
  1. I agree 100% with the President. al Qaeda may have reason, according to their faith to oppose Christian soldiers being on the Arabian Peninsula even if they are there to save Kuwait from Iraq. However in regards to conflicts stemming from faith, we have the lesson of Japan which deified their leader and its troops were dedicated to their cause so much as to become Kamikazes. In truth al Qaeda and Iran will both be molded to our wishes or be broken with unconditional surrender if we employ the same tactics that were used by Democrat President Harry S Truman. This Democrat party President used Nuclear Weapons to bring peace in the fervently religious and suicide warrior Japan. The Parallels are incredibly striking! Why, you might ask, does Senator Obama not see them? The reason is simple! It is because.....Whoops! My lunch break is over! Gotta Go!!

    Posted by Aristotle Smith May 16, 08 03:06 PM
  1. Another election year and everyone is still brainwashed to think that the left or right will change the direction of this country. The only direction we are going is not the correct one.
    The elite class rule, period, it is as simple as that. The worst the economy gets (there is a purpose to why the economy is so bad) the more people look to the government for help. They already sent everyone there 600 dollar checks , that is step one. As they slowly keep providing for you, they slowly wrap there tentacles around you and before you know it we live in a socialist society because Most Americans are too lazy to provide for themselves. Welcome to the dumbing down of America and the Eventual Collapse. Right + Left = Same thing.


    Posted by TampaRich May 16, 08 03:11 PM
  1. I'm a democrat who is voting republican this time around because I decided not to drink the Obama Kool Aid, plus his wife is hag.

    Posted by KP May 16, 08 03:11 PM
  1. fact: a patriot is just a nicer word for a terriorist.

    Posted by sigh May 16, 08 03:12 PM
  1. I am sure many in the NE area hate conservative Radio Talk show host Mike Savage but he has a pretty good platform if he were to run. It's funny how easy it would be to fix things....

    The Savage Manifesto

    Domestic

    A. Cut Federal Income Taxes by 2 percent per year over four years, for a minimum total of 8 percent over four years.

    B. Reduce Federal Government Departments in size by 4 percent each year, for a total reduction of size by 16 percent over four years.

    C. Eliminate all public assistance for able-bodied recipients. Cut off all public assistance for immigrants for five years. Repatriate those who are not working, after two years.

    D. Immediately impose tariffs on cars and trucks owned by foreign entities, even if they’re manufactured in America.

    E. Cause illegal aliens to build a wall between the United States and Mexico, and then, repatriate them. Pay them a one-time worker fee.

    F. Increase pay for active duty combat troops by 10 percent. Number Two. Fire any unmarried military person becoming pregnant while on active duty.”

    G. Make abortions illegal, except when the physical survival of the mother is threatened, to be determined by three medical doctors. Require Norplant for all women on welfare of childbearing age.

    H. Close all houses of sex and massage.

    I. Expand the DEA, while decriminalizing most drugs.

    J. Regarding the media; one, eliminate all foreign ownership of any American media entity. Two, break up overly large conglomerates, like News Corporation.

    K. Encourage child bearing among tax paying citizens. Create a marriage incentive, through lower taxes for married heterosexual couples. And a government subsidy for each child conceived and carried to birth. Increase the subsidies for each year the couple remains married.

    L. Repatriate all illegal immigrants now incarcerated. Encourage all other illegals to self-repatriate through double taxation on wages and fines on employers.”

    International

    A. Iraq. Send in Iraqi troops to mop up pockets of resistance. Make Iraq pay with their oil for the cost of the war. Cordon off Sadr City, force all residents to leave, then go in and mop up all resistance fighters. Divide Iraq into three to four sectors; Sunni, Shiite, Kurd, and International. Next, remove all U.S. troops after above achieved.

    B. Iran. One, sanctions embargoes and mine their harbors. Nothing goes in, nothing comes out.

    C. North Korea. Destroy their launching platforms, impose a Naval blockade on all goods coming in or out, except food.

    D. Israel Arab Entities. Give Israel four years to become self-sufficient. Cut off all foreign aid to all nations.

    E. China. 20 percent tariffs on all China made goods immediately; rising by 5 percent each year for each year China refuses to revalue their currency.

    F. United Nations. Withdraw immediately. Remove all Diplomats and staff. Convert the United Nations building into housing for the working poor.

    G. Mexico. Force Mexico to pay one barrel of oil for every illegal alien in the United States of America per month.

    Posted by TampaRich May 16, 08 03:14 PM
  1. He obama said those very words "I would sit and talk"...or cant he remember...and now he wants to complain "they arent playing fair". IF the shoe fits wear it and dont complain or say the president shouldnt have said it while over seas... truth hurts. the dems are afraid what this may do to obamas chances. And thats why they complain. Obama is like a fish flip flopping on a deck. Sounds like he is the liar...or should I say, with a brain fart that he cant remember what he said.. We are in deep trouble if he wins...

    Posted by Francesca May 16, 08 03:17 PM
  1. Its not appeasement to get in a room with a terrorist leader and smack him upside the head. Bush only represents the moron class.

    Posted by Evan Falchuck May 16, 08 03:17 PM
  1. Obama is not going to withstand real threats from Russia and other major enemies when the moments of truth abouth the global efforts of Terrorists Organization to thrust the United States untill it is crushed to trash is arrived.Talking carbage about a sitting President is a very cheap thing to do but in comparison Barrack Hussein Obama hasn't done anything to protect this nation or its citizens.

    Posted by skmj May 16, 08 03:20 PM
  1. From the July Democratic debate, transcript in the New York Times:

    QUESTION: In 1982, Anwar Sadat traveled to Israel, a trip that resulted in a peace agreement that has lasted ever since.

    In the spirit of that type of bold leadership, would you be willing to meet separately, without precondition, during the first year of your administration, in Washington or anywhere else, with the leaders of Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba and North Korea, in order to bridge the gap that divides our countries?

    COOPER: I should also point out that Stephen is in the crowd tonight.

    Senator Obama?

    OBAMA: I would. And the reason is this, that the notion that somehow not talking to countries is punishment to them -- which has been the guiding diplomatic principle of this administration -- is ridiculous.

    Posted by Abu Al-Poopypants May 16, 08 03:23 PM
  1. If you don't negotiate with your enemies who do you negotiate with? You certainly don't negotiate with your friends. Even McCain realizes that.

    Posted by Bill May 16, 08 03:24 PM
  1. What is your definition of terrorism and aggression? Why Germans and Russians in 1939 invaded Poland?

    Every nation in Europe was annexed without shooting even one bullet (i.e. France, Belgium, Holland, Czech, Slovakia, Lithuania, Belarus) or joined the hostile forces (i.e. Italy, Spain, Ukraine, Austria, Estonia, Hungary) with the exception of Poland and Great Britain. Only two countries in Europe, Asia and Africa were defending their sovereignty and they did not impose a threat to any nation. However, they did not want to listen to bully Germans and barbaric Russian communists.

    During this time U.S. was enjoying prosperity and did not act upon expansion of communism and imperialism until Japan made “weak-up call” in Perl Harbor. After the war was over President of the winning nation sat at a table with Russian invader and agreed to continuous occupation of Poland and other annexed countries by Russians. After that Americans were treating Poles as communists and Poland as communist country – the ideological enemy. America needed “smarter then fifth grader” President like Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan to correct mistakes made by previous Presidents and help to bring Poland and other given-up countries back to independent Europe.

    Why America and other countries including Poland invaded and occupying Iraq? Is this worth misery of young lives? Nations have great sense of self-preservation and even under occupation will maintain their own identity. This thesis is confirmed by history of occupation of Poland, France, Vietnam, Palestine, Iraq or Afghanistan.

    Worldwide media has confirmed that Pakistan is the main source of international terrorists and Al-Qaeda’s headquarter. Pakistan is a country where assassinations are dictating “democracy” though U.S. is financially supporting the country and granting access to technologies of mass destruction including atomic warheads. Why then Iran is the very first enemy? They stopped enrichment of atomic resources five years ago, they maintain their own political system and they have right to have their own opinion about relations between Israel and Palestine.

    Hard power is a theory that describes using military and economic means to influence the behavior or interests of other political bodies. It is used in contrast to soft power, which refers to power that comes from diplomacy, culture and history.
    Diplomacy is the art and practice of conducting negotiations between representatives of groups or states.

    What is better for Americans to use military and economic means to influence other countries or be a leader based on culture, history and diplomacy?

    Posted by Canadian May 16, 08 03:26 PM
  1. Bush has been appeasing the dictatorship of Saudi Arabia for years. To get an inkling of how little respect the Saudis have for Bush, see the recent stories about their refusal to increase oil production. The Reagan administration appeased Saddam Hussein in his war against Iran, even when it was learned that Hussein was using chemical weapons. The United States has assisted various dictatorships in South America and Asia throughout the past fifty years, some of which have committed atrocities against segments of their own population that were comparable in scope to Hussein's crimes. We supposedly went into Iraq to assist the oppressed Kurds, among other victimized groups, but has anyone noticed that the Turks have been bombing the Kurds lately, with nary a word of protest from Bush or the American media? Bush and Cheney should be shackled and sent to Guantanamo Bay to rot in prison after they finish out their terms.

    Posted by Dan Farnkoff May 16, 08 03:26 PM
  1. Appeasement:
    The policy of accepting the imposed conditions of an aggressor in lieu of armed resistance, usually at the sacrifice of principles.

    Let's see: 15 of the 19 hijackers came form Saudi Arabia. Osama Bin Laden came from Saudi Arabia. Today George W. Bush is in Saudi Arabia having tea and cavorting around in traditional Arab clothes.

    Just who is guilty of appeasement?

    Posted by Yukon Baleaumi May 16, 08 03:27 PM
  1. America is a sad sad place..... we have the worst president in history and now people are thinking Barack Hussien Obama (can you read Al Qaeda) is the savoir??? I cannot remember a worst political situation. Do you realize the Euro, Canadian dollar,even the freaking Brazilian dollar is stronger than the American dollar... I am moving to Canada or some far away Pacific island to get away from this place.

    Posted by Jeff DeSocio May 16, 08 03:34 PM
  1. Bush constantly appeases Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. Chamberlain appeased Hitler by conceding the Sudentenland. Reagan and Rumsfeld conceded alot to Saddam in the 80's. Obama TALKING to leaders is TALK not appeasing.

    Posted by Truth of History May 16, 08 03:35 PM
  1. It is easy to kill with these things, like McCain did in VIetnam, drop some napalms from the air and fly back to the air craft carrier, In 10 years it left 50,000 americals dead and 3 million vietnamese dead!

    For the record, Kennedy, a democrat, sent the first U.S. troops to Vietnam and Johnson, also a democrat, was responsible for the ramp up. The troops were withdrawn under Nixon, a republican. McCain was a soldier and prisoner of war, not a policy maker.

    Posted by TGL May 16, 08 03:37 PM
  1. this could have been about Pelousi, Reid, Carter, (worst president), Skerry or anyone. Nice to know that the person seeking the presidency is so vain.
    "he problem thinks these words are about him, don't you, don't you? "

    Obama's new slogan :
    If you elect me as your president I will give you hope and
    I will give you change. you will give me dollars and I will
    give you hope that you get some change back from those
    dollars. That will be your only hope for change....

    Posted by Ikem May 16, 08 03:40 PM

  1. To the posters who said that Obama has been making "whiny", "immature" or "silly" comments about Traitor Bushes little talk. Obama has been doing what the republican war machine has been doing for the last dozen years or so. Every time someone make a comment that can be twisted to seem like an attack on you, attack them back. If you use the weapons of politics expect them used back on you.

    Posted by James E Stevenson May 16, 08 03:41 PM
  1. The war on our health is being appeased by any politician who does not stand up and fight against mandatory enforced vaccinations (neither safe nor effective) and the planned restrictions on natural nutritional food supplements by a world trade regulation called Codex Alimentarius (Food Rules).

    Posted by Culture of Life May 16, 08 03:44 PM
  1. Obama is certainly an appeaser. What is the argument about?

    Posted by Three! May 16, 08 03:51 PM
  1. Judging by Obama's reaction and the amount of comments by Obamabots in here, President Bush hit a nerve! Good for him!

    Posted by Three! May 16, 08 03:53 PM
  1. Umm...while you are all arguing about the number of Angels dancing on the head of the Appeasement pin, could someone go over and turn-up The Fat Lady's microphone? Hillary can't seen to hear it.

    Posted by 5Strings May 16, 08 03:55 PM
  1. All you need to do to evaluate a comment is to see if they throw a label in, like "liberal" and if they make it into a personal attack on someone....instead of evaluating the merits of the debate....Anyone who submits that type of response is not worth reading.....probably an angry malcontent venting

    Posted by Edboy May 16, 08 03:58 PM
  1. Hey Jeff DeSocio... don't let the door of freedom hit you in the ass on your way out.!! Good rddance and stay away!!! Thecountry is better off when people like you leave.

    Posted by Wingnut May 16, 08 04:00 PM
  1. Everyone/liberals that agree with Obama believe this man can do no wrong. Obama has been caught in many lies over the past few months, but he gets a pass by the main stream media. There is a double standard with the media in America. The Republicans are hatemongers, biggots and uncaring, while the Democrats are sensible caring people. It's all a lie. Republican's care about people, the environment and this country. We can see that handouts are not helping the poor, but creating dependency. We want to make America energy independent but are stopped by the Democrats who say they want energy independence. We have clean coal and trillions of barrel's worth of oil within our boundaries, which would substancially lower our energy costs for the poor and all Americans. The Democrats don't want to even discuss this option even though it would help the economy and every citizen. The Dems believe that granting amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants will be good for this country even though we are in an economic slump and unemployment is very high. They dismiss the cost of illegal immigration-$346 billion dollars in 08. They seem to brush aside the middle class while they live in their gated communities and criticize the wealthy.
    If everyone actually paid attention to what is happening in Washington and not just what the Globe reports they might think differently about Republicans. I switched years ago because I saw that the Democrats were actually more corrupt than the Republicans but their mishaps are always overlooked by the media.

    Posted by David May 16, 08 04:04 PM
  1. From my George W Bush Out Of Office Countdown calendar (249 days left) today's quote: "After all, a week ago, there were - Yasser Arafat was boarded up in his building in Ramallah, a building full of, evidently, German peace protesters and all kinds of people. They're out now. He's now free to show leadership, to lead the world." Washington DC, May 2002.

    Why is anyone listening to what this man has to say or taking anything he says, seriously? He is an embarrassment to America, if not his own family.

    Posted by A Dingo Ate My Baby May 16, 08 04:10 PM
  1. I believe Obama when he says he's not a Muslim. However, I have a hard time following how he is this great Pius Christian, when he converted at age 28 at the feet of Rev. Wright. Trinty church preaches hate and distrust. How white men are evil, How any self respecting black man must put Africa first in his heart. His black brothers second, ect ect with the love for the USA far, far down the list. He went to the Church for 20 years so don't give me the "he wasn't paying attention" defense. Wright is a very powerful political figure in Chicago, just like that terrorist Ayers. Are we really dumb enough to believe that Obama is such a poor judge of character that he can't figure out who stands for hate and extremism? That he can think Ayers is just "some guy in my town". when this guy brags about how he made bombs to everyone he meets? Obama makes it clear in "Dreams from my Father" that he sought out radicals and extremists. Now he says that he opposes extremism in his soul. A lot about this guy just doesn't add up to me.

    Posted by Joe May 16, 08 04:17 PM
  1. Obama spent 20 years in Wrights church and didn't hear anything...

    But he heard a 20 second sound bite and KNOWS Bush is talking about him?

    Obama is a racist, a liar, and his election means the end of the American ideal.

    Posted by Shad May 16, 08 04:20 PM
  1. Who cares about Bush-Obama-Clinton-McCain...they're about as American as soccer. I'm a patriotic American who actually believes in freedom and democracy, hence why I'm voting for a 3rd party.

    The Demopublicans and Republocrats are terrorists just the same as "axis of evil", if not more so.

    Posted by Adam Pieniazek May 16, 08 04:25 PM
  1. Bush has put himself in a new box after Iraq box!

    Posted by C. Powell May 16, 08 04:27 PM
  1. There's nothing the leaders of hate like more than a well meaning but naive leader that is willing to sit down with them. President Reagan sat down with the enemy, but he carried a big stick with him at all times and they knew it.

    Posted by Philip Zito May 16, 08 04:28 PM
  1. Bush is appeasing the Saudi Royal family. Unlike Obama or McCain the royal family are enemies of Israel and we can surmise have financed terror groups. They consider Bush to be an infidel. They are dictators.

    They are the only oil producer Bush will talk to. He's shunning all the rest in some fashion.

    Posted by Charles Rapp May 16, 08 04:35 PM
  1. Whatever....Someone hit a nerve?...Obama needs to stop acting like a toddler. I don't believe his name was mentioned. If he thinks talking to the President of Iran who took our American's hostage and won't admit it...more power to him thinking it will work. I'm waiting.....his getting elected isn't in the bag...it's only May!.. needs to get over himself...anything can happen. He's not Kennedy and his wife is faaaaar from the next Jackie O.

    Thanks TG for your comment:
    For the record, Kennedy, a democrat, sent the first U.S. troops to Vietnam and Johnson, also a democrat, was responsible for the ramp up. The troops were withdrawn under Nixon, a republican. McCain was a soldier and prisoner of war, not a policy maker

    Posted by CR May 16, 08 04:36 PM
  1. I read some of the responses here and it's no wonder our country is in such sorry shape. People are easily lead around by the nose by the likes of Rush Limbaugh and other right wing propagandists to the extent that they will vote AGAINST their own best interest.

    If you like the price of gas, a faltering economy, our young soldiers being blown up in the desert, government corruption, rising food prices and all the other problems we face as a nation go ahead and vote republican. If you want to restore our country to its former glory, vote for democrats.

    Posted by Bill May 16, 08 04:36 PM
  1. In your face, Mr. President:
    Saudi Arabia's leaders made clear Friday they see no reason to increase oil production until customers demand it, apparently rebuffing President Bush amid soaring U.S. gasoline prices.

    more stories like thisIt was Bush's second personal appeal this year to King Abdullah, head of the monarchy that rules this desert kingdom that is a longtime prime U.S. ally and home to the world's largest oil reserves.

    Posted by Wasted Lobsters Receptions In Maine May 16, 08 04:38 PM
  1. In the spirit of Mark Twain,"Our rich and powerful people are a precious resource, without them there would be no poor people!

    Posted by Dave Welch May 16, 08 04:43 PM
  1. In just few years Bush degrade himself from Global Bully to oil begger!
    So sad, my fellow country men.

    Posted by Retired Exxon employee May 16, 08 04:48 PM
  1. There is something terribly wrong in our great nation; USA: How come G. Bush
    such a imcompent, such lazy, such unqualified thug get elected in Texas governor twice and twice US president ?? What wrong with vast majority of our voters,
    what's wrong with our system of government? And fundamentally what's
    wrong with our demorcracy? Are our political and economic systems fatally
    flawed??

    Posted by Danvers thinker May 16, 08 04:57 PM
  1. You know what, Democrats? Your pathetic party has stood idly by and watched this president destroy the country. You're complicit in his atrocities. Bush will say whatever he wants about your fluff candidates and there isn't a d*** you can do about it!

    Posted by Fiercely independent May 16, 08 05:00 PM
  1. You know what, Democrats? Your pathetic party has stood idly by and watched this president destroy the country. You're complicit in his atrocities. Bush will say whatever he wants about your fluff candidates and there isn't a d*** you can do about it!

    Posted by Fiercely independent May 16, 08 05:01 PM
  1. To all of those who voted Bush once or twice: What made you think Bush is
    not a Thug, a fool?

    Posted by Puzzled senior from Marblehead May 16, 08 05:06 PM
  1. Everything everyone says about Obama's Pastor is just as true of McCain's Pastor. They are both kooks. Why don't we just ignore them and look at the candidates?

    McCain has said repeatedly that he wants to negotiate with Hamas. He has said it over and over again. Just google and you will find lots of instances of this.

    So now he going after Obama for saying the same thing? How is this not hypocrisy of the first order?

    And where does our president get off, taking our internal arguments and putting them up on the world stage? And can you believe he talked about Nazis in front of the Knesset? Unbelieveble!

    Posted by Fran Taylor May 16, 08 05:16 PM
  1. The President and Vice President should be Impeached and Indicted for War Crimes. Let's discuss that instead.

    Posted by Jim B May 16, 08 05:33 PM
  1. Our cowboy President talks big, didn't have sac enough to go to the fight himself, now talks with all the bravery of being out of range. Failed businessman, failed President and sorry human being that hides behind his questionable principles.
    Accuses others of appeasement when he has spent 8 years appeasing the oil whores (saudi royal family) and driving the country into recession and muddying the good name of the USA all over the world and will now leave the mess to somebody else to clean up. Time for this guy to just shut up and take his 10 gallon hat and go home a clear brush.
    Hopefully the country will recover from this clown.

    Posted by johnson May 16, 08 05:36 PM
  1. McCane is the only awesome dood out there. At first Bush was awesome and now Im all like "Woot!" I love old peeps! Becuz Osama is like a terrorist and stuff, and shouldn't be Presidents nohow. Cuz when McAin is all up in the White House, I'll be able to gas up my El Camino - O YA RLY! Cuz he'll all be like "Give us some gas or we'll blast you!" and they'll all be like "Argh" and stuff. Word.

    Posted by Informed Voter May 16, 08 05:56 PM
  1. Bush's comments on foreign soil in front of a foreign politcal assembly is tantamount to treason. Oh wait.... never mind, I forgot about his "executive privilege" which enables him to redefine executive privilege..

    Put him in a cell in ABu Grahib with dogs attacking his balls at breakfast & Dinner! And when Congress arrests Rove, send him there as well. "W" will need his "Brain to provide medical care for his sore ball bag. Then we can fly over the Afghan-Pakistan Border & drop Cheney & Rumsfeld out the back of a C130, with Bulls-eyes stuck on the back of their heads.
    You murdering Traitors.

    Posted by Dave May 16, 08 06:29 PM
  1. 10 years from now we will all learn that Muslims will continue terrorism in their attempt to take over and control the world. Look around the world and you'll see terrorism growing in every country. We will know that Bush was the first to confront terrorism and wish he had done more!

    Posted by Independent P J May 16, 08 06:43 PM
  1. Ohbummer you quick to react to President Bush fending off enemies but when you were with Reverent Wrights for 20 years shouting and screaming hate and dammed to America comments you just sit there and nod your head in agreement with a mocking smile on your face.I guess it's your Islamist connection you don't want to be touch.

    Posted by skmj May 16, 08 06:55 PM
  1. President Bush has become such a pathetic figure. He will be remembered as the worst President ever, and his comments about Obama will only reinforce that view.

    Posted by AlleyCatBruin May 16, 08 07:07 PM
  1. The big oil companies are appeased.

    Posted by Steve May 16, 08 07:34 PM
  1. Kumbiya my lord, Kumbiya Kumbiya my lord, Kumbiya Kumbiya my lord, Kumbiya Kumbiya my lord, Kumbiya.....care for a s'mores Hussein?....not thanks Hussein....
    Wow, so its Barack hah, that oughtta go over good in the White House......
    ......Yah, wait till its too late and they find out I am really a racist "moozlum" ..please pass the the desert oysters.

    Posted by Typical Whitey... May 16, 08 07:57 PM
  1. Bush has damaged Foreign Policy in such that it will take 40-50 years to correct the mistakes he's made and regain our reputation in the world.

    He will go down in history as one of the worst presidents ever.

    Posted by Jimmy May 16, 08 08:10 PM
  1. The President is 100% correct. When he spoke, he was just not speaking folly, but reiterating how deadly this threat is. What we have to go on is what we know of these regimes and their ideology. It is has reared it's ugly head all over the world and on our shores. There is a track record of deadly actions and threats that largely have been carried out. What more do we need?

    Why are the liberals so defensive? They are weak on Crime, weak on defense, weak on national security, and weak on terrorism. We may be talking about the economy, education and global warming now, but without aggressive national sercurity and defense policy, none of those things matter.

    Posted by Corey Bassett-Tirrell May 16, 08 08:28 PM
  1. You know what, Democrats? Your pathetic party has stood idly by and watched this president destroy the country. You're complicit in his atrocities. Bush will say whatever he wants about your fluff candidates and there isn't a d*** you can do about it!

    That's right you didn't stop us, so it is your fault. Is the US just a big elementary schoolyard full of recess bullies?

    You said it,"there isn't a damn thing you can do(could've done) about it!."

    Posted by Dave Welch May 16, 08 08:41 PM
  1. Speaking on appeasement of Nazis, were any of Hitler's troops carrying any products that GW's grandpa may have sold to Germany during WWII.

    And what party was the big supporter of Hiltler and Naziism before we got involved in WWII?

    The GOP expexts americans to be ignorant and tries to recruit people who have no real knowledge of their party's history.

    Would GW turn a blind eye to this kind of profiteering?

    Posted by Dave Welch May 16, 08 08:54 PM
  1. Please, Barak,

    Keep your commitment to speaking with those who differ from us; not sending bombs or ugly comments as Bush has. This is definitely the only way to make enemies our friends. Ignore those who criticize your policies; stick to your values. We need you to be that kind of a president. Thanks.

    Posted by Sister Mary Jude Jun, OSU May 16, 08 09:05 PM
  1. Bush and his foreign policy mentor Sec. Condi Rice have appeased North Korea for at least 5 years and further send North Korea hundreds shipments of
    FREE fuel and more than half million tons of food.
    W Bush. you are not qualified to talk about appeasement, your foreign
    policy is appeasement plus bribery.

    Posted by Chris H. May 17, 08 12:07 AM
  1. Its sad that most Americans have forgot history and seem to want to bury their heads in the sand. Islam has been hijacked by religous facists that are convinced that it is their sacred duty to destroy "all infidels" and establish sharia law as the world's standard. They are not being challenged enough by the more rational Islamic faithfull, as it is a possible cultural, spiritual, and even physical death sentence for them to do so. The United States is the only real entity that has the practical ability to carry on this most necessary defense of democracy. You who cherish freedom of religion, freedom of ideas, freedom to live your lives as you generally see fit, should be proud of our efforts to stand up to this enemy, and be very afraid of their fury, should they prevail. I fear it will take another 9-11-2001 to drive home the actual threat and wake Americans up to the fact we are at the beginning of a long struggle.

    Posted by Mike May 17, 08 12:40 AM
  1. Any one who thinks Hamas is going to change is a fool. Liberal or conservative.

    Posted by Exposing Islam May 24, 08 02:07 AM
  1. There is NO winning the hearts and minds of the Islamic world. That is just wishful thinking and the FACTS prove otherwise. It is time to end Muslim immigration.

    Wednesday, May 14, 2008
    It's Only a Few.....That's What They Keep Telling us
    Those that follow the worldwide problem of Islam, continually hear the popular "it's only a few" excuse by the Islamic apologists. Well, I beg to differ. Lets finally put that excuse to rest.

    If it were only a "few", then how can these FACTS be explained?

    http://islaminaction08.blogspot.com/2008/05/its-only-fewthats-what-they-keep.html


    Sister Mary Jude,
    You need to face the facts the Christians are persecuted in EVERY Islamic country and if not confronted Islam will destroy Christianity.


    Posted by Exposing Islam May 24, 08 02:25 AM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About political intelligence Field reports from Boston Globe reporters and editors covering the 2008 presidential campaign and the national maneuvering of Bay State politicians.

Send your comments to masspolitics@globe.com

archives

browse this blog

by category