< Back to Front Page Text size +

Opinion: Last night, reality caught up with Hillary Clinton

Posted by Jason Tuohey May 7, 2008 01:55 PM

By Scot Lehigh, Globe Columnist


Last night, reality caught up with Hillary Clinton.

The question now is how long it will take for that reality to sink in.

Barack Obama's big win in North Carolina, combined with the late night/early morning drama that turned Indiana into only the narrowest of wins for Clinton, did three important things: It ended any sense of momentum she had generated with her sizable victory in Pennsylvania.

It demonstrated that, at least as far as the relevant Democratic primary voters were concerned, Obama has survived the controversy over the Rev. Jeremiah Wright's incendiary remarks.

And in doing both those things, it obliterated the arguments Clinton hoped to use to sway the superdelegates.

Earlier in the evening, when it looked as though she would win by 4 or 5 percentage points in Indiana, some in the Clinton camp tried to pitch this as a basic split, a night when she had offset Obama's strong victory in North Carolina with an impressive win of her own.

But when the votes finally dribbled in from dilatory, dawdling, inefficient, laggardly, lollygagging, national-bedtime-delaying, CNN-and-MSNBC-annoying, slower-than-molasses-in-January-and-with-no-good-explanation Lake County, it was clear no such case could plausibly be made.

With the final results, Obama increased his lead in both the popular vote and in pledged delegates, effectively destroying the arguments that the Clinton camp has been making. That is, that she is closing the gap on both those fronts, even as his candidacy is fading.

That's all the more remarkable coming after several rocky weeks for him – and several supposedly strong ones for her.

But despite the obsessive media focus on his former pastor's rhetorical pyrotechnics, Obama turned in a much stronger overall showing than she did.

That demonstrated that the Wright controversy has neither crippled his candidacy nor even raised enough doubts among Democrats about the fall effects of that controversy for them to indulge in serious buyers' remorse.

That doesn't, of course, resolve the question of who would be the strongest general election candidate. At different points in this race, each candidate has had periods when he or she could claim that status.

But it resolves what is currently a more crucial issue: Will the results in the last leg of the primary season mark such a change from what has previously occurred that they will force superdelegates to do something they would otherwise be very reluctant to do? That is, contravene both the popular vote and pledged delegate totals by handing the nomination to Clinton.

Last night's answer was a resounding no. Nor will arguments that Clinton does better with working class voters, or that she has done better in the battleground states, change that.

Now that Obama has demonstrated that the wheels haven't come off his campaign, now that he has shown some real resilience of his own, superdelegates will make their decision based on what has happened in the primary season, and not on what might happen in the general election.

And that's very good news for Obama – and very bad news for Clinton.

Scot Lehigh can be reached at lehigh@globe.com.

4 comments so far...
  1. Excellent piece ... Say goodbye, Clin-toons

    Posted by Chuckamok May 7, 08 02:29 PM
  1. The Democratic nomination process is being subverted and sabotaged by the media.

    The black racism in the North Carolina win cannot triumph over the nomination process. The Indiana win of a mere 9 counties by Obama out of more than 100 counties cannot triumph over the nomination process. Florida and Michigan must be counted; the remaining states must vote; and the superdelegates must use their independent judgment to select the best qualified candidate for the presidency and that is Hillary Clinton. The fight for the future of America continues full speed ahead. Rational Democrats need to step up to the plate and make frequent contributions to the Hillary Clinton campaign at hillaryclinton.com

    Posted by crat3 May 7, 08 02:40 PM
  1. crat9 you're an idiot. You have no idea what proportional representation means, do you? Based on your idiotic claims a county with 1 person should count the same as a county with 10,000. Dumbass.

    Posted by LM May 7, 08 04:50 PM
  1. I surprises me that anyone could say the word "racism" in this election primary.
    I amazes me that the media at large seems to ignore a major ingredient in this campaign for the Democratic Presidential nominee.
    Barack Obama is where he is due to an overwhelming block of white votes.
    The now infamously inaccurate polls love to divulge how many of the black votes, in certain areas, that Obama received. Ignoring completely the most obvious and wonderful. Obama is winning in "non-black" areas, many of them, also.
    This election is showing that the United States is not so racist as so many would like to have us believe.

    Posted by Duane Kuehn May 8, 08 08:59 AM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About political intelligence Field reports from Boston Globe reporters and editors covering the 2008 presidential campaign and the national maneuvering of Bay State politicians.

Send your comments to masspolitics@globe.com

archives

browse this blog

by category