< Back to Front Page Text size +

Iraq, back at the forefront

Posted by Scott Helman, Political Reporter June 11, 2008 01:17 PM

John McCain and Barack Obama have locked horns over the economy in the past few days, but today, following McCain's interview this morning on the "Today" show, the presidential campaign returns to a familiar battlefield: Iraq.

Here's the relevant passage:

Matt Lauer, NBC: "If it's working Senator, do you now have a better estimate of when American forces can come home from Iraq?"

McCain: "No, but that's not too important. What's important is the casualties in Iraq. Americans are in South Korea, Americans are in Japan, American troops are in Germany. That's all fine. American casualties and the ability to withdraw; we will be able to withdraw. General Petraeus is going to tell us in July when he thinks we are. But the key to it is we don't want any more Americans in harm's way. And that way, they will be safe, and serve our country, and come home with honor and victory, not in defeat, which is what Senator Obama's proposal would have done."

McCain's "not too important" comment prompted a swift conference call from the Obama campaign, on which Senator John Kerry, Obama's attack dog on national security, called McCain's remarks "unbelievably out of touch and inconsistent with the needs of Americans and particularly the families of troops who are over there."

"To them it's the most important thing in the world when they come home," Kerry said, according to The Politico. "It's a policy for staying in Iraq."

McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds accused Obama's campaign of "embarking on a false attack on John McCain to hide their own candidate’s willingness to disregard facts on the ground in pursuit of withdrawal no matter what the costs."

"John McCain was asked if he had a 'better estimate' for a timeline for withdrawal," Bounds said in a statement. "As John McCain has always said, that is not as important as conditions on the ground and the recommendations of commanders in the field. Any reasonable person who reads the full transcript would see this and reject the Obama campaign’s attempt to manipulate, twist and distort the truth."

UPDATE: The Democratic National Committee also jumped on McCain's remark, quickly launching a web video this afternoon reminding of the Arizona senator's original remarks, at a New Hampshire town hall meeting in January, about US troops staying in Iraq for 50 or 100 years in a peacekeeping role.


"Senator McCain is wrong," DNC chairman Howard Dean said in a statement. "One of the most important questions in this campaign is when and how Senator McCain would bring our troops home from Iraq. Senator McCain stubbornly refuses to acknowledge that the American people do not want our brave troops in Iraq for 100 years under any circumstances. They want a president who will end the war responsibly."

3 comments so far...
  1. Whether we leave tomorrow or stay a hundred years in the end Maliki and Co. will be more allied with Iran than the USA, just as they've always been.

    If you want a government independent of Iran Sadr is your best bet. Even though he hates Americans he has sad he'd be happy to hire our oil field service firms to pump Iraqi oil.

    And what's with the desperation to forces US military bases down Iraqi throats? We already have bases in Afghanistan, Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Oman, Turkey, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, and elsewhere. Why keep pushing for bases in Iraq when it gets our soldiers blown up and gives Bin Laden talking points in his recruiting videos?

    Posted by markg8 June 11, 08 02:53 PM
  1. Old story but no better solution please move forward Brian.

    Posted by skmj June 11, 08 03:12 PM
  1. For McCain, evidently the lives of American troops as well as the lives of innocent civilians in Iraq are not too important to you.

    John, just try to tell their families that the lives of those whom you and your predecessor are sacrificing every day are not important.

    Yes, we know your name, John. We read about you often enough. But you know what, John, your comment shows that you are not very important at all. No, not important indeed.

    So, people should not vote for you.

    Why?

    With that attitude, you are not really important enough to be President of the United States.

    : - (

    Posted by Robert Campbell June 11, 08 06:16 PM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About political intelligence Field reports from Boston Globe reporters and editors covering the 2008 presidential campaign and the national maneuvering of Bay State politicians.

Send your comments to masspolitics@globe.com

archives

browse this blog

by category