< Back to Front Page Text size +

Clinton's name will be placed in nomination

Posted by Foon Rhee, deputy national political editor August 14, 2008 12:07 PM

Hillary Clinton's name will symbolically be placed into nomination at the Democratic National Convention, but then she will quickly turn her delegates over to Barack Obama and cast her superdelegate vote for him.

The latest move to unify Democrats behind Obama and mollify Clinton's supporters was negotiated between the two camps.

Clinton and Obama just issued a joint statement: "Since June, Senators Obama and Clinton have been working together to ensure a Democratic victory this November. They are both committed to winning back the White House and to to ensuring that the voices of all 35 million people who participated in this historic primary election are respected and heard in Denver. To honor and celebrate these voices and votes, both Senator Obama's and Senator Clinton's names will be placed in nomination."

“I am convinced that honoring Senator Clinton's historic campaign in this way will help us celebrate this defining moment in our history and bring the party together in a strong united fashion,” Obama said in the statement.

“With every voice heard and the Party strongly united, we will elect Senator Obama President of the United States and put our nation on the path to peace and prosperity once again,” Clinton said in the statement.
The role of Clinton and her supporters at the convention has been one of the most closely-watched aspects.

Clinton's hardcore supporters are already planning marches in Denver, and she is scheduled to speak on the convention's second night. The roll-call is scheduled for the third night, Wed., Aug. 27.

  • CommentComment
  • Email Email

Email this article

Invalid email address
Invalid email address

Sending your article

Your article has been sent.

.

why is she turning them over? after what people know now, she would probably get the nomination.

Posted by NO BO August 14, 08 12:50 PM
.

Shame on the amoral, unprincipled, self absorbed and megalomaniacal Clintons for taking over the convention to spite and humiliate Obama and feed their own massive arrogant egos and shame on Barack Obama for being so spineless and weak to allow this to happen out of fear of Hillary's dead ender angry old white women gender crusaders. This is a dark day of shame and disillusionment for those of us who'd hoped for something better.

Posted by Rand Elison August 14, 08 12:56 PM
.

It is so sad that Hillary has been given such condescending treatment by her own party. She deserves the nomination. If Hillary is not the nominee, I am crossing party lines to vote for McCain.

PUMA

Posted by Jay August 14, 08 01:00 PM
.

Hillary always wanted to be treated as "one of the boys." I don't see any of the boys whinning, and having hissy fits because they lost to either Obama or McCain. Grow up Hillary. You lost . Get over it and move on. If women want to run for the presidency, they have to expect there's a possibility they might NOT win. Your run was no more "HISTORIC" than Obama's. He planned better, organized better, while you took it for granted that you had the nomination sewed up. Be gracious in your defeat. It's not about you or Bill at the convention. Decline having your name put in nomination, and get on with having the real nominee win the election

Posted by Mary August 14, 08 01:04 PM
.

THis deal worked out between Clinton And Obama make a sham of our election process.Clinton should be the democratic candidate. Obama can not be trusted and does not have the ability to lead this nation in its current economic and military condition . This deal reflects a serious problem and should shame the democratic party.

Posted by Leroy H. Maccormack August 14, 08 01:10 PM
.

They despise each other!! This is a crock and will not go over well - do they really believe we are all that stupid? Because of crap like this, I'm going to vote for John M. At least he is honest, even if you don't like him.

Posted by Glen Gary August 14, 08 01:22 PM
.

I'm BAAAACK!!!!!

Posted by JonB August 14, 08 01:56 PM
.

I'll be watching now before the convention for the Clinton's to pull out a dirty trick on Obama to make him look un-electable!! I don't trust the Clinton's and I DO think they have some evil plot behind this latest scheme of placing her name on the ballot. Watch your BACK, Barack!!!!

Posted by tvfl August 14, 08 02:01 PM
.

Hilary should graciously ask her hard core supporters, who bent on protest in order to claim her as the next president, to cease now and unite the party by supporting Obama. The Democratic party is going to lose if the protestors continue. There is too much at stake now that Bush and McCain are all out to got to Georgia for more war. I question the timing and the speed of these Republicans to go fight another war. We are very fragile. Divided, we fail.
Please make the smart choice

Posted by kathryn Creegan August 14, 08 02:01 PM
.

Glen Gary,
John Mccain is honest? Really? Why is McSame running false ads about Obama every day if he is sooo honest? Obama, at any time, can tell clinton to go to h*ll after the way she has treated him. But he is not like that and he is trying to be NICE. We shall see if Nice guys finish last. But John Mccain is not honest, and he has proven that. KEATING FIVE anyone? Also, this latest tiff with Goergia is scary and John McSame and his foreign policy guru is a foreign agent for Georgia.
Nuff said. That is really American of John McSame, to have a foreign agent in your forieng policy team?

Posted by mike August 14, 08 02:03 PM
.

This represents the finest kind of reconciliation: recognition of Senator Clinton's historic run for the nomination and the promise that a unified party will ensure that Barack Obama will be our next president.

Kudos to everyone involved!

Posted by Dennis Berry August 14, 08 02:04 PM
.

This is just another Democrat party scam to win... Obama is not fit to be in the White House. This is a sad day for America.

Posted by Joe Vet August 14, 08 02:24 PM
.

Hillary supporters need to get over it!!!I realize this is a "symbolic" gesture and if this is going to happen, why do her fans need to be having marches etc. Hillary, if she is a true leader would strongly urge these folks to really get behind OBAMA and discourage such potentially destructive actions. I am really disappointed in Hillary.

Posted by LYNDA L. STRECKER August 14, 08 02:30 PM
.

THis deal worked out between Clinton And Obama make a sham of our election process.Clinton should be the democratic candidate. Obama can not be trusted and does not have the ability to lead this nation in its current economic and military condition . This deal reflects a serious problem and should shame the democratic party.

Posted by Leroy H. Maccormack August 14, 08 02:32 PM
.

I see puppets and sheep.

Posted by kindbud August 14, 08 02:39 PM
.

It's sad that the unprincipled, amoral, megalomaniacal self-absorbed and vastly overrated Clintons have been allowed to take over the convention and will now have Hillary's name placed in nomination just to spite and humiliate Obama and probably ensure his defeat. Shame on Obama for being so weak and spineless asto allow this to happen. Hillary's dead ender angry old white women gender crusaders apparently scared him into ceding everything and anything. Maybe he is too weak to lead. I can't stand McCain but this is just too much.

Posted by Rand Elison August 14, 08 02:46 PM
.

Get a grip, PUMA! You're starting to lose touch with reality.

Posted by Dan August 14, 08 02:49 PM
.

Mr. Elison -- why is it that you seem to think that prejudice against white people, the elderly and women is less heinous than prejudice against people of color? It's the hateful supporters of Senator Obama that are turning away Senator Clinton's supporters, not Obama himself. Self-rightous and ignorant bigots like you make me sick!

Posted by Linda August 14, 08 02:59 PM
.

PUMA: Crossing party lines to vote for a man who called his own wife a bitch in public makes a lot of sense for a woman. I certainly hope that it is your son who is the first one sent to Georgia instead of mine.

Posted by Lucy August 14, 08 04:01 PM
.

Obama's camp is a sleaze bag. They still robbed the election with their manipulation of the caucuses and the race baiting. I would like to know the vote from all those caucus states. There were too many stories coming out of the caucuses how the system was overrun by highschoolers or people who were unable to get in or being shut out. He still won't get my vote.

Posted by Angry voter August 14, 08 04:06 PM
.

Someone should get that big hook and pull these two off stage. Their time is far past over and they smell rotten.

Hillary Clinton's behavior SINCE she lost the 2008 nomination has insured that I would never, ever consider supporting her or even voting for her in 2012. She has no principles for upholding the common good, no view beyond her own ego, no understanding that this election isn't about politics but about America's survival and future, and, thus, no business being President of the United States. Feminist? What feminist about riding your husband's coattails?

Bill Clinton's behavior in office had left his legacy tatted and soiled. His behavior in this election leaves it in total shambles. Post-primary colors, anyone?

Posted by Connie August 14, 08 04:08 PM
.

This move creates additional possibilities on the chess board. In 1968 the convention was rocking and the outcomes were uncertain. The Clinton's are keenly familiar with and idealize that period, perhaps using it as some kind of precedent? It is my sense that Hillary and Bill are motivated to get back into the White House, and I wonder if that motivation is stronger than the goal of getting Obama elected. If so, then this is all set up and prelude to an interesting ride this fall and in four years from now. This is, in nearly every way, the most interesting election of my life time. Thanks for all the theater, my friends and countrymen!

Posted by hidden identity person August 14, 08 04:18 PM
.

Obama and Clinton both have class! I think they will make a great team.

Posted by Karen August 14, 08 04:24 PM
.

I still just do not understand how people who really support Clinton and her positions could even think of voting for McCain. It's just petulance. And unbecoming of responsible voters.

Posted by Boston2008 August 14, 08 04:26 PM
.

Hey, Mr Elison -- why is it that your ignorant prejudice against white people, elderly people, and women in particular is no more heinous than prejudice against people of color? It's because of Obama's hateful supporters -- not Obama himself -- that Senator Clintons supporters are having trouble supporting Senator Obama. Self-rightous bigots like you make me sick!

Posted by Linda August 14, 08 04:32 PM
.

To joe vet and glen gary...
Number one, overwhelming evidence suggests that the troops support Obama.
Number two, let's go over this for a second. John McCain was a POW for five years. He was tortured by the Vietnamese. And now he supports the Bush-sanctioned torture at Gitmo? Torture works? You don't think this is one of the many glaring pieces of evidence that a vote for John McCain is a vote for four more years of George Bush?
Number three, read the man's education policy. 'Nuff. Said.

Um, also, Leroy? Get a grip, man. There is way more to be ashamed of as a voter in this country than the way the democrats handled the election. I wasn't old enough to vote for Bush the first time and I didn't vote for him the second time, and yet still he held office for eight years and seriously screwed us all. And I have you to thank for that, I'm sure. So thanks.

Posted by jess August 14, 08 04:45 PM
.

Anyone willing to vote for John McCain when they initially supported Hillary is a juvenile delinquent.

How can this country survive 4 more years of Bush/Cheney style leadership?

Posted by No McCain August 14, 08 04:48 PM
.

Watch your back now,Obama! Here comes all the dirty tricks by the Clintons!!!

Posted by tvfl August 14, 08 04:57 PM
.

Hey Mike that's pretty cleaver "John McSame"! Must have taken you all day to come up with that one.
If by the same do you mean a qualified and experienced job applicant that actually has a plan?
Or by the "same" do you mean someone who didn't learn foreign policy by traveling to Europe, trampling on the graves of the greatest generation, while taking foreign policy for dummies night classes?
And Linda, just go ahead and vote for BO and all will be forgiven.

Posted by PA August 14, 08 04:59 PM
.

Linda, you're painting all Obama voters with the same brush. both sides have their zealots and the majority of both want the Dems to win... If we allow the extremes to rule, then Mccain takes the office and then next 4 years we'll be continued in turmoil... I wouldn't have been very happy if Hillary had won, but I do know I'd recognize that all of my candidate's believes would be followed thru on by Hillary and I would have definitelty voted for her...

Posted by Beau August 14, 08 05:00 PM
.

For those saying that HRC should be the nominee, perhaps I'm mistaken but didn't Obama get more delegates than she did? Of course if we use the math from the previous two elections where the candidate with less votes became president then I guess HRC should get the nomination.

Posted by Dave August 14, 08 05:05 PM
.

Voters that would rather vote for John McCain than Obama are either not true members of the Democratic party, are rich beyond belief, are uneducated or they really don't care about the issues and think this is all a popularity contest like American Idol. The differences between Clinton, who was my candidate, and Obama are slight. On the other end of the spectrum completely is McCain. He will make W. look like Ghandi. And for the mothers and fathers out there: McCain has the LOWEST rating for Children's issues in Congress and a 0% rating by the League of Conservation voters. Instead of voting McCain, stay home! For our children's sake!

Posted by Meeche August 14, 08 05:18 PM
.

Hillary for President.

Posted by eleanor kelley August 14, 08 05:47 PM
.

This is bad news. Poster NO BO is right: if she submits her name at the convention, she may very well win. I have voted democratic for over 20 years, but if Obama is foolishly awarded the nomination, then I will vote for John McCain; and I'll encourage fellow democrats to do the same.

Posted by LouiseT August 14, 08 06:04 PM
.

Mr. Elison -- why is it that you seem to think that prejudice against white people, the elderly and women is less heinous than prejudice against people of color? It's the hateful supporters of Senator Obama that are turning away Senator Clinton's supporters, not Obama himself. Self-rightous and ignorant bigots like you make me sick!

Posted by Linda August 14, 08 06:11 PM
.

To everyone who claims that Hillary would have won the Iowa caucuses if Edwards had not been there and thus had more momentum going into the rest of the contests consider this: The claim that Hillary would have won was not backed by any concrete facts about the actual Edwards voters it was speculation by one of her advisers. The entrance polls actually showed that Obama had more than a 20 point edge over Clinton for the second choice of Edwards voters.

Posted by Chris August 14, 08 07:27 PM
.

This is a perfectly normal process to help create a unified party. It has happened many times in the past, and it makes a great deal of sense. Much of the convention will be for shoring up the party to get it ready for the fall campaign, and this is just one part of it. Let's get ready to put our shoulders to the wheel and make this thing happen. The world waits.

Posted by Tomas August 14, 08 07:31 PM
.

Novel idea: instead of saying something hateful about candidates you don't support, why don't you say something positive about the one you do?

Being negative towards other candidates only makes the supporters of those candidates more bitter and defensive. Simple logic, people.

Posted by Sarah August 14, 08 09:05 PM
.

I have been a life long Democrat but upon being called an angry old white woman has put in the McCain camp along with lots of others.

Posted by Anne August 14, 08 09:24 PM
.

but I do know I'd recognize that all of my candidate's believes would be followed thru on by Hillary and I would have definitelty voted for her...

Sure, sure, sure....

Posted by TGL August 14, 08 10:08 PM
.

For those saying that HRC should be the nominee, perhaps I'm mistaken but didn't Obama get more delegates than she did? Of course if we use the math from the previous two elections where the candidate with less votes became president then I guess HRC should get the nomination.

Oh, please. The delegates voted like wounded sheep. Obama won one TENTH of ONE percent of the popular vote (not counting a single contested states; had those votes been counted, Clinton would have won)--hardly a mandate for THE ONE, by any stretch of the imagination. Face it: the delegates voted for the sake of expediency, so as not to be left behind in this absurd Kennedy-esque election. Oh how too very cool for words....

Posted by TGL August 14, 08 10:27 PM
.

Did you notice that Obama now welcomes the FL and MI delegates with open arms? He thought they were cheating scum a number of weeks ago and blocked them from exercising their democratic right to vote at the convention.

Great job Dems! You are about to nominate THE MOST disingenuous slimy politician in American political history!!

Hahahahahahahha!!!! LOL!!!!

Posted by HusseinObama'sMuslim August 15, 08 12:10 AM
.

Can you trust ANYTHING that comes out of BILLARY Clinton's mouth?

The answer is a BIG FAT NO!

And ANYTHING they do is for their SOLE benefit!! OsiSpeaks.com

Posted by KYJurisDoctor August 15, 08 12:53 AM
.

I don't understand why Hillary has to turn over her delegates. If Obama won, he already has enough delegates. Why would it matter whether Hillary keeps hers? If he didn't win, then he's not the nominee. Why is the DNC making up all kind of silly rules. Democracy is democracy. People should be allowed to vote their conscience. Why is the DNC messing around with people's votes? I am so sick and tired of the DNC! There is no way I vote Democrat this time. Not even to congressional candidates! I detest all of them.

Posted by mk August 15, 08 01:30 AM
.

Hillary LOST. Why anyone thinks that it is fair that she be placed on the nomination is beyond me. Obama won more delegates. Get the heck over it. This is reality.

Posted by x August 15, 08 01:56 AM
.

Hillary Clinton is the "People's Choice". She is the Most Qualified and Electable Democratic Candidate for President. BHO, the Chicago Mob, and the DNC keep trying to RIG this nomination by pushing Hillary to the side. STAND UP and TAKE ACTION America...Stop this Obamanation...it's CORRUPT POLITICS at its WORST EVER!!!

Posted by Justice August 15, 08 11:17 AM
.

Hillary Clinton is the "People's Choice". She is the Most Qualified and Electable Democratic Candidate for President. BHO, the Chicago Mob, and the DNC keep trying to RIG this nomination by pushing Hillary to the side. STAND UP and TAKE ACTION America...Stop this Obamanation...it's CORRUPT POLITICS at its WORST EVER!!!

Posted by Justice August 15, 08 12:56 PM
add your comment *(If you put a URL in your comment, it must be relevant )
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About Political Intelligence

Reports from Boston Globe reporters and editors about the Obama administration, the Massachusetts congressional delegation, and other national political happenings.

News from the Washington Bureau

Afghanistan wary of US plan to send more advisers

Afghan officials have begun to push back from the Obama administration's plans to send hundreds of advisers to the country, complaining the Americans are often overpaid, underqualified, and unfamiliar with the culture of the country. (Globe Staff, 2:15 a.m.)

Mass. keeps an eye on US bill’s funding ban

Massachusetts officials are closely monitoring an abortion funding ban in the sweeping health care legislation before Congress to make sure that it does not restrict women’s access to abortion coverage in the state. (Globe Staff, 11/11/09)

Survey raises new doubts on military’s ‘don’t ask’ policy

WASHINGTON - The Obama administration received more research yesterday to help make its case for allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly in the armed forces. (Globe Staff, 11/10/09)

Lieberman’s threat of filibuster looms large

When a recent conversation among Senate centrists turned to insurance company antitrust concerns, Joe Lieberman boasted of his bona fides: As Connecticut attorney general in the 1980s, he sued the industry. (Globe Correspondent, 11/9/09)

Health care headache for House Democrats

WASHINGTON - Democratic House leaders scrambled to round up enough support yesterday for their sweeping health care overhaul, getting last-minute help from White House advisers on the eve of a historic vote scheduled for today. (Globe Staff, 11/7/09)

Patrick wraps up two-day visit to Washington

WASHINGTON - Governor Deval Patrick swept through Washington yesterday, wrapping up a two-day tour to advance the state’s interests in health care, economic development, and transportation - a trip that also let him showcase his access to the city’s most powerful Democrats, including President Obama. (Globe Staff, 11/5/09)

Health care opponents intensify late attack

WASHINGTON - The sweeping health care overhaul package before Congress is under an 11th-hour attack over a pair of emotional issues, abortion and immigration, that are complicating Democrats’ efforts to piece together the coalition they need to pass the bill. (Globe Staff, 11/6/09)

Public’s opinions of health care overhaul efforts have familiar ring

Americans’ opinion of the health care proposals now before Congress is eerily similar to public sentiment about the Clinton health reform initiatives in 1994, according to an analysis published online yesterday in The New England Journal of Medicine - and that may not bode well for Democrats. (Globe Staff, 11/5/09)

Frank reconsiders legislation after worry raised on loopholes

House Financial Services Committee chairman Barney Frank, under fire from some fellow Democrats and consumer groups for carving out what they call loopholes in legislation designed to prevent another economic meltdown, said in a letter released last night that “there may be a problem here’’ and that he wants to reconsider. (Globe Staff, 11/5/09)

Moderate Democrats fear shift to GOP

Democratic moderates who will determine the fate of much of President Obama’s domestic agenda heard an early warning from this week’s off-year elections: Congress had better do something about the economy, or sitting lawmakers will lose their jobs in 2010. (Globe Staff, 11/5/09)
archives