< Back to Front Page Text size +

McCain slams Obama on security

Posted by Foon Rhee, deputy national political editor August 26, 2008 03:54 PM

John McCain assailed Democratic rival Barack Obama today as naive about the world and its dangers -- and more confident in himself than his country.

The presumptive Republican nominee, in a speech to the American Legion national convention in Phoenix, says that "in times of trouble, free nations of the world still look to America for leadership, because they know the strength of America remains the greatest force for good on this earth."

"My opponent had the chance to express such confidence in America, when he delivered a much anticipated address in Berlin," McCain says about Obama, according to excerpts released by his campaign. "He was the picture of confidence, in some ways. But confidence in oneself and confidence in one’s country are not the same. And in that speech, Senator Obama left an important point unclear. He suggested that the end of the Cold War proved that there was, quote, 'no challenge too great for a world that stands as one.' Now I missed a few years of the Cold War, as the guest of one of our adversaries, but as I recall the world was deeply divided during the Cold War -- between the side of freedom and the side of tyranny. The Cold War ended not because the world stood 'as one,' but because the great democracies came together, bound together by sustained and decisive American leadership."

"All of this is more than an academic debate," McCain continues. "For the sake of our own security, and the defense of our values in the affairs of the world, American leadership is critical. While we have our share of critics around the world, when people in the oppressed nations of the world need support, and solidarity, and hope, they look to America. When they talk about our country, it is not with distrust or disdain, but with respect and affection. They do not resent or resist America’s democratic influence in the world – they thank God for it."

The Arizona senator also plans to hit Obama over a remark he made last week about the Russian invasion of Georgia. Obama said, “We’ve got to send a clear message to Russia and unify our allies. They can’t charge into other countries. Of course it helps if we are leading by example on that point.”

"I guess we are left to figure out the rest for ourselves," said McCain, who has been harder-line on responding to Russia. "It’s unlikely he was alluding to Afghanistan, the nation we liberated after 9/11, and continue to help despite Russian complaints about our related deployments in Central Asia. And he probably didn’t have Kosovo in mind either -- although Russia didn’t care much for that military action, either. We and our NATO allies had to end the Serbian slaughter of civilians in Kosovo without UN approval, because the Russians blocked the effort in the Security Council.

"If I catch Senator Obama’s drift, then, our failure to “lead by example” was the liberation of Iraq. And if he really thinks that, by liberating Iraq from a dangerous tyrant, America somehow set a bad example that invited Russia to invade a small, peaceful, and democratic nation, then he should state it outright – because that is a debate I welcome."

UPDATE: Obama spokesman Hari Sevugan responded to McCain's speech, "The 'confusion' here is between John McCain rhetoric that no one's love of country should be questioned and the reality of his campaign's daily, false, personal and detestable attacks on Senator Obama. But it's not a surprising tactic from John McCain who is offering four more years of Karl Rove’s playbook to distract from his plan for four more years of George Bush’s failed policies which have left America far less secure and shredded our alliances in the world. In contrast, Barack Obama has called for strong American leadership and renewing strong alliances to finish the fight against al Qaeda and press Russia to live up to its obligations.”

8 comments so far...
  1. Not long after the 9/11 occurred Barrack Hussein Obama emerged ha ha,to defend Muslim extremists or an offense for the Muslim Religion that was at a close watch worlwide especially in the United States.The timing of his emergence to the forefront of the Democrat Party in my own personal view make for a good and interesting conversation.Why this particular moment while the world and the country reeling from that devastating attacked at the World Trade Centre and the loss of civilian lives is to me almost a 100% a political question.Is it motivated by a ommitment to a specific belief that is dear to his heart is almost certain when I look at the timing and the history of his life in a foreign land.

    Posted by skmj August 26, 08 01:02 PM
  1. skmj......Are you a nut case!!???? What asylum did you escape from? You have got to be the most uneducated, ignorant, bigoted person on the face of the earth if you truly believe what you have writtern about Obama! Go back under the rock that you slithered from or to the asylum from which you escaped! You are enough to make anyone sane human being sick!!

    Posted by 62-year old white working woman August 26, 08 01:35 PM
  1. Hmmm, naive you say?

    Why is it then that Bush, Maliki AND McCain are ALL going along Obama's timeline to leave Iraq?

    He schooled them.

    First learn the difference between Sunni and Shia and then get back to us.

    Oh, I almost forgot, which of the two candidates fell for the WMD thing?, who was "naive" enough to put forth their vote that resulted in the destruction of over 4,000 of our best and brightest?

    Posted by JR August 26, 08 02:39 PM
  1. to skmj

    lol...what? It scares me that people like you get to vote at all.

    Posted by Creamsykle August 26, 08 02:41 PM
  1. skmj,
    I don't know what's more ridiculous: your not-so-subtle implication about Obama or your grammer.

    Go back to emailing some old tired lies about Barack and let actual political conversation take place.

    Posted by SGL August 26, 08 02:43 PM
  1. Obama's first reaction to the Georgia crisis was for BOTH sides to "show restraint". Then when the political winds started blowing he adopted the "tough talk" rhetoric. This guy cannot be trusted to lead our country or the free world. He is so shifty on positions that not a single ally can truly put their faith in anything he says let alone the American people.

    Posted by Dr. Dave August 26, 08 02:47 PM
  1. John McCain will lead our country. There is no question in my mind that he contains all the qualities of strong leadership. His track record shows his commitment to the republican party and his 95% lockstep agreement with the policies of George W. Bush that have promoted the imperialist expansion of the West and heroically and forcefully inserted democracy where it was previously rejected. Our country is weaker, over-stretched militarily, in a recession and leading the charge toward worldwide instability. George W. Bush's policies have failed. John McCain is clearly the solution.

    Posted by C. Walsingham August 26, 08 03:10 PM
  1. Barrack Obama is a Muslim to the heart full stop.He ran to be President of this country for a cause higher than himself no argument on that.He's no christian as he claimed to be.

    Posted by skmj August 27, 08 12:45 AM
add your comment
Required
Required (will not be published)

This blogger might want to review your comment before posting it.

About political intelligence Field reports from Boston Globe reporters and editors covering the 2008 presidential campaign and the national maneuvering of Bay State politicians.

Send your comments to masspolitics@globe.com

archives

browse this blog

by category